Audiência de Instrução - Processo 0815231-94.2018

Summary

This transcript captures a courtroom hearing in a vehicle accident case involving the plaintiff, Evandro, and the defendant, Rota do Oeste. The witness, Paulo Francisco, testified about his knowledge of the accident and how he assisted the plaintiff during the period he was without a car. The session was part of the Audiências Online project, aimed at educational purposes. Despite technical issues with connecting the witness, the court proceeded with the hearing, focusing on damages and the responsibility of the defendant. The case is awaiting a final judgment.

The video is abnormal, and we are working hard to fix it.
Please replace the link and try again.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the courtroom hearing?

The main issue discussed in the hearing involves a traffic accident where Evandro's vehicle collided with an animal on the road, resulting in damage to the vehicle. The case examines both material damages (to the vehicle) and potential moral damages (emotional harm).

Who is the witness in the case, and what role did he play?

The witness is Paulo Francisco Gomes Pacheco, who knew Evandro and offered him assistance after the accident. He provided Evandro with rides during the period his vehicle was inoperable.

What kind of support did the witness provide to Evandro after the accident?

Paulo provided Evandro with logistical support, including giving him rides because Evandro’s vehicle was damaged and out of service for about 60 days following the accident.

What was the condition of Evandro's vehicle after the accident?

Evandro’s vehicle suffered damage from colliding with an animal, leading to what was described as 'small monta' (minor damage). The vehicle was inoperable for about two months due to the damage and the lack of immediate funds for repairs.

What was the impact on the vehicle’s resale value due to the accident?

The accident caused the vehicle to have a 'small monta,' which impacted its resale value. This made it harder for Evandro to sell the vehicle, as its value was lower than the market price, reflecting the fact it had been involved in an accident.

How long did Evandro remain without a functioning vehicle?

Evandro was without his vehicle for approximately 60 days while it was being repaired after the accident.

What was the emotional and financial impact on Evandro after the accident?

Evandro faced significant emotional distress and financial hardship due to the accident. He was unable to use his vehicle for work, which affected his livelihood. Additionally, the repair costs and the lowered resale value of the vehicle further impacted him financially.

Did the witness provide any details about the location of the accident?

Paulo mentioned that the accident occurred near Cuiabá, close to Rondonópolis in the state of Mato Grosso, although he didn’t know the exact spot. He heard about the accident from colleagues a couple of days after it happened.

What is the relevance of the question about whether the animal was on the road or appeared suddenly?

The question about whether the animal was on the road or appeared suddenly was important to determine if the accident was caused by the negligence of a third party, such as road maintenance or vehicle management. However, the witness did not directly witness the accident and could not confirm these details.

Why was the online broadcasting of this hearing made available?

The online broadcasting of this hearing was part of an educational project aimed at providing academic professionals and new lawyers with insights into real-world legal proceedings. This is designed to help them learn about courtroom procedures and legal practices.