Kenapa THAILAND SERING KUDETA? Terbanyak Di Dunia! Jadi Identitas & Budaya? | Learning By Googling

Summary

The video explores the recurring phenomenon of military coups in Thailand, which have become a significant part of the country's political culture since the first coup in 1932. Despite numerous attempts to create a stable democratic system, coups remain frequent due to factors such as the military's influence, a semi-authoritarian political system, and the entrenchment of military power through constitutional changes. The video delves into the causes, effects, and historical context of Thailand’s political instability, highlighting the role of military involvement in shaping the nation’s governance and its implications for future political developments.

Takeaways

• 😀 Thailand has experienced 13 successful coups and 9 unsuccessful coups since 1932, making it the country with the most coups in the world.
• 😀 The first coup in 1932 led to the shift from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy in Thailand, which deeply impacted the country's political landscape.
• 😀 Military intervention in Thai politics has been a longstanding tradition, with the military frequently assuming power and shaping the country's governance.
• 😀 The military's influence in Thai politics has been strengthened by the 2017 constitution, which entrenches their power for at least two decades.
• 😀 Despite attempts to strengthen democracy, the military's power remains deeply embedded in the political system, preventing significant political change.
• 😀 The 2017 constitution is viewed as a 'permanent coup' by many pro-democracy factions, as it ensures military dominance and limits opposition.
• 😀 Thailand's political culture has normalized coups, with many citizens perceiving them as a regular part of political life, rather than as a crisis.
• 😀 The military often justifies coups with accusations of corruption, a claim that is used to rationalize their actions regardless of whether corruption exists.
• 😀 External factors, such as the legitimacy of the military and monarchy, contribute to international indifference towards Thailand’s frequent coups.
• 😀 Thailand's semi-authoritarian government structure, combining elements of democracy and dictatorship, creates an environment where coups are more likely.
• 😀 The military’s repeated involvement in coups has significantly altered Thailand’s political landscape, making it difficult for anti-military groups to rise to power.

Q & A

Why have military coups become a regular part of Thailand's political culture?

Military coups have become a regular part of Thailand's political culture due to the country's history of instability, with frequent coups dating back to 1932. Over time, coups have been normalized, and the population has become somewhat accustomed to them. The military's strong influence in the government has also made coups an accepted method for resolving political conflict.

How many successful coups has Thailand experienced since 1945?

Thailand has experienced 13 successful coups from 1945 to 2021, making it the country with the most successful coups in the world.

What was the significance of the 1932 coup in Thailand's history?

The 1932 coup was significant because it marked the shift from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy in Thailand. It was a bloodless coup that ended centuries of absolute royal power and introduced a more democratic government structure, even though the military still played a strong role in governance.

What factors contribute to the high frequency of coups in Thailand?

Several factors contribute to the high frequency of coups in Thailand, including a history of prior coups, the political system's mixed democratic and authoritarian nature, the military's entrenched power, and the legitimacy of royal and military authorities that deter international intervention.

How has the 2017 constitution influenced the occurrence of coups in Thailand?

The 2017 constitution has strengthened the military's grip on power, making it easier for the military to stage coups if the government is deemed incompatible with military interests. It has created a political system where the military can exercise significant influence, making it difficult for anti-military groups to rise to power.

Why is the 1932 coup considered the most impactful despite being bloodless?

The 1932 coup is considered the most impactful because it fundamentally changed Thailand's government structure, transitioning from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy. This marked a significant shift in the nation's political system, even though it occurred without violence.

How did the military's role in the 1932 coup affect Thai politics in subsequent years?

The military's involvement in the 1932 coup solidified its influence in Thai politics, setting a precedent for military interventions in government. This early involvement led to a long history of military-led coups, with the military playing a central role in shaping Thailand's political landscape.

What role did the Shinawatra family play in the recent history of coups in Thailand?

The Shinawatra family, particularly through figures like Taksin and Yinglak, was central to the coups in 2006 and 2014. Both Taksin and his sister Yinglak were overthrown by military coups, despite their electoral victories, highlighting the ongoing power struggle between civilian and military factions in Thailand.

How does Article 112 contribute to political instability in Thailand?

Article 112, which deals with lèse-majesté laws, is often used to suppress political opposition, particularly those perceived as criticizing the monarchy or military. It provides a tool for the military and royalist factions to justify the persecution of opponents, further complicating Thailand's political landscape and fueling instability.

Why do many Thai people appear indifferent to the frequent occurrence of coups?

Many Thai people are indifferent to the frequent occurrence of coups because they have become normalized over time. The Thai public has grown accustomed to political upheaval and tends to view it as an inevitable part of the political system, leading to a more relaxed response to government overthrows.