ARTTI R2 - Smooth Lover!!

Summary

В этом обзоре рассматривается последний продукт компании - однодинамический наушник RT2 с 10-миллиметровым брилиумовым динамическим дaphragm. Обзор включает в себя технические характеристики, внешний вид, акустические характеристики и сравнение с другими моделями в своем ценовом диапазоне. Автор делится своими впечатлениями о звучании RT2, его легкой и непринуждённой настройке, а также о том, как он сравнивается с другими наушниками, такими как XLS X1 Mark II, EPZ G10, Cadenza и другие. Также обсуждается влияние различных материалов диафрагм и магнитных систем на звучание. В заключение автор даёт своё мнение о том, какие факторы могут определить выбор между этими моделями.

Takeaways

• 🎧 R2 - это последний однодинамичный наушник от компании RT2, имеющий 10-мм бриллиумовый покрытый динамик.
• 🔍 Название R2 может быть заблуждающим, поскольку предыдущий R1 на самом деле имел три динамических драйвера.
• 📏 У R2 есть характеристики: 32 омма импеданс и 106 дБ чувствительности.
• 📦 Коробка R2 простая и классная, без лишних украшений, соответствующая стилю компании L.
• 👂 Наушники R2 легкие и компактные, с хорошим внешним видом и легко вставляются в ухо.
• 💰 Цена R2 составляет около 39 долларов, что делает их доступными на рынке.
• 🔌 Поставляемый кабель R2 неплохой, хотя не имеет 4.4-мм разъема, и доступны более дорогие альтернативы.
• 🎶 Звуковая характеристика R2 - спокойная и расслабленная, с хорошей тональностью и ненавязчивым басом.
• 📊 В сравнении с другими наушниками, R2 выделяются своей теплостью, отличаясь от более ярких моделей, таких как EW200.
• 👍 R2 считаются хорошим выбором в своей ценовой категории, сбалансированными характеристиками и привлекательным дизайном.
• 📈 Графики частоты R2 показывают, что наушники имеют хорошую работу в низких и средних частотах, с незначительным уходом в верхних частотах.

Q & A

Что означает аббревиатура 'R2' в контексте обзора?

R2 обозначает модель наушников с одним динамическим драйвером, выпущенную компанией RT2. Несмотря на название, которое может быть заблуждающим, поскольку предыдущая модель R1 имела три динамических драйвера.

Какой тип драйвера используется в наушниках RT2 R2?

В наушниках RT2 R2 используется один 10-миллиметровый брилиумовый покрытый динамический драйвер.

Какова импедансия и чувствительность наушников RT2 R2?

Импедансность наушников RT2 R2 составляет 32 ом, а чувствительность - 106 дБ.

Какой тип кабеля поставляется с наушниками RT2 R2?

С наушниками RT2 R2 поставляется стандартный кабель, который, как утверждается, неплохо подходит для их цены, около 39 долларов.

Какие цвета доступны для наушников RT2 R2?

Для наушников RT2 R2 доступны два цвета: зелёно-азурный и оранжево-золотой.

Какие аксессуары включены в комплектацию наушников RT2 R2?

В комплектацию наушников RT2 R2 входит переноска с документами, кабель и разные размеры наушниковых наконечников.

Какие наушники использовались для сравнения с RT2 R2 в обзоре?

Для сравнения с RT2 R2 в обзоре использовались наушники XLS X1 Mark II, EPZ G10, Cadenza Qs, Cadenza, PI01, EPZ Q5 и EW 100.

Какие особенности звука отличают RT2 R2 от других наушников в сравнении?

RT2 R2 отличается более мягким и легкослышающим тембром, менее напряжённой средней и верхней средней частоты и более чистым басом по сравнению с другими моделями.

Какие два трека использовались для определения характеристик звука наушников в обзоре?

Для определения характеристик звука в обзоре использовались треки 'Feel So Good' от Diane Reeves и 'It's On' от George Duke.

Какие факторы могут влиять на выбор между RT2 R2 и другими наушниками в одном ценовом диапазоне?

Выбор между RT2 R2 и другими наушниками может зависеть от предпочтений в плане звукового характера (холодно-бриллиантный или теплый-органический), а также от качества сборки и аксессуаров.

Каковы цены на RT2 R2 и другие наушники, с которыми они сравнивались?

Цены на RT2 R2 и другие сравниваемые модели находятся в ценовом диапазоне от 39 до 50 долларов.

Какие наушники по мнению автора обзора удивили его своим качеством?

По мнению автора обзора, наушники G10 и PI01 удивили его своим качеством и превзошли его ожидания.

Чем отличается динамический драйвер в RT2 R2 от других динамических драйверов с покрытием брилиумом?

В отличие от типичного брилиумового динамического драйвера, драйвер в RT2 R2 имеет более мягкий и умеренный звук, который автор обзора ассоциирует с типичным для драйверов с покрытием LCP.

Outlines

00:00

🎧 Обзор R2: Единый динамический драйвер с неожиданным именем

В первой части обзора представлены основные характеристики R2 - наушников с одним динамическим драйвером 10 мм, имеющих 32 ом аимпеданс и чувствительность 106 дБ. Обсуждается потенциально заблуждающее название модели, сравниваемое с предыдущей моделью R1, имевшей три динамических драйвера. Упаковка R2 описывается как простая и классная, включающая в себя коробку для носки, кабель и разные насадки. Также упоминается наличие двух цветовых вариантов облицовки и сравнение оригинального кабеля с более качественным заменой A1.

05:01

🎶 Звуковая характеристика R2 и сравнение с другими моделями

Второй параграф посвящён анализу звучания R2 и его сравнению с другими наушниками, такими как XLS X1 Mark II, EPZ G10, Cadenza Qs, Pi01 и EW 100. Рассматриваются восприятие тепла и яркости звука, а также детализированная работа в мид и верхних мид. Используются две композиции для демонстрации различий в звучании и детализации. R2 описывается как самый тёплый и нежный, но не менее детализированный по сравнению с другими моделями.

10:03

🔍 Подробный анализ звучания R2 и его особенностей

Третий параграф продолжает исследование звучания R2, сосредоточившись на его легкой и ненавязчивой насыщенности и тембре. Обсуждается отсутствие усталости при прослушивании и сравнение с E200, имеющим более интенсивную насыщенность. Также затрагивается влияние материала диaphragms на звучание и то, как различные системы магнитных полей могут изменять ощущение звука, несмотря на использование одинаковых материалов.

15:04

💰 Рассмотрение стоимости и соответствующих моделей R2

В четвёртом параграфе обсуждается цена R2 и сравниваются с другими наушниками в своей ценовой категории, такими как XLS X1, G10, Cadenza, Q5 и EW 200. Подчёркивается, что все они находятся в диапазоне от $39 до $50, что делает сегмент конкурентоспособным. Также упоминается, что выбор между моделями будет зависеть от предпочтений пользователя, включая предпочтение теплого или яркого звучания и качество сборки.

20:05

📊 Графическое сравнение характеристик R2 с другими наушниками

В заключительном параграфе представлены графики частотных характеристик R2 и других моделей, подчёркивая сходства и различия в басовом диапазоне, мидс и верхних мидс. Обсуждается влияние выбора насадок на восприятие звука, а также технические характеристики, такие как детализированная ретроспективная способность и пространственное восприятие. Автор заключает, что R2 является прочный и хороший выбор для прослушивания музыки.

Keywords

💡RT2

RT2 является моделью наушников, о которой рассматривается обзор в видео. Это последняя модель с одним динамическим драйвером от компании, и обсуждается в контексте ее характеристик и звучания.

💡динамический драйвер (Dynamic driver)

Динамическое драйвер - это тип акустической системы, используемой в наушниках для воспроизведения звука. В контексте видео, RT2 оснащён одним динамическим драйвером, что влияет на его звучание и характеристики, такие как чувствительность и импеданс.

💡импеданс (Impedance)

Импеданс - это электротехнический параметр, измеряемый в омах, который определяет, как легко текущая проходит через устройство. В видео упоминают импеданс RT2, равный 32 омах, что говорит о его совместимости с различными источниками звука.

💡чувствительность (Sensitivity)

Чувствительность наушников измеряется в децибелах (dB) и определяет, насколько громко звучит наушник при определенном уровне подачи сигнала. В видео упоминается, что RT2 имеет чувствительность 106 дБ, что указывает на хорошую эффективность.

💡Burum

Burum - это тип покрытия, используемое для драйверов в наушниках, которое влияет на их звучание. В видео утверждается, что RT2 имеет 10-мм динамический драйвер с burum покрытием, что может придать ему определенные акустические характеристики.

💡наушники в Touchie (IEM - In-Ear Monitor)

IEM - это сокращение для In-Ear Monitor, что означает наушники, вставляемые в ухо. Обзор в видео посвящён модели RT2, которая является одним из таких устройств, и обсуждается их звучание, дизайн и другие характеристики.

💡звучание (Sound signature)

Звучание - это характеристика наушников, определяющая их тональный баланс и восприятие различных диапазонов частот. В видео описывается звучание RT2 как 'расслабленное' и 'не напрягающее', с упором на его легкость и приятность для прослушивания.

💡подшипник (Cable)

Подшипник - это кабель, используемый для подключения наушников к источнику звука. В видео обсуждается, что RT2 поставляется с хорошим стандартным кабелем, а также с усовершенствованной версией A1 для улучшенного звучания.

💡объективные наушники (Reference IEMs)

Объективные наушники - это те, которые предоставляют более нейтральное и точное звучание без искажений, что делает их популярными среди аудиофилов. В видео используются такие наушники для сравнения с RT2.

💡ценовая категория (Price range)

Ценовая категория - это диапазон стоимости товаров. В видео упоминается, что RT2 стоит примерно от $39 до $50, что помогает потенциальным покупателям определить, подходит ли эта модель для их бюджета.

💡звуковая сцена (Soundstage)

Звуковая сцена - это восприятие пространственности звука при использовании наушников. В видео утверждается, что у RT2 средняя звуковая сцена, что может влиять на ощущение глубины и пространства при прослушивании музыки.

Highlights

The RT2 is a single Dynamic driver IEM with a 10 mm beryllium coated driver, differing from the R1 which has three dynamic drivers.

The RT2 has a misleading name compared to its actual specifications, which can cause confusion.

Specifications include 32 ohms impedance and 106 dB of sensitivity, suggesting a high performance-to-price ratio.

The packaging and design of the RT2 are simple and classy, with a focus on functionality over frills.

The RT2 comes with a carrying case that includes the cable, tips, and other accessories.

Two color options are available for the RT2: aqua green and an orange-gold faceplate.

The stock cable is of decent quality for the price point, and an upgraded A1 cable is also tested for comparison.

The sound signature of the RT2 is described as warm and relaxed, with an easygoing tonality.

The RT2's bass is clean with good texture but slightly slower compared to some competitors.

The RT2's soundstage and imaging are good for the price, with a slightly smaller soundstage but decent detail retrieval.

The RT2's performance is compared to other IEMs in its price range, showing its competitive position.

The RT2's build quality is discussed, with a plastic shell that may not be as durable as metal alternatives.

The reviewer finds the RT2 to be a solid IEM with no major faults, but suggests personal preference will guide the choice.

The RT2's sound signature is likened to LCP drivers rather than the expected Brillium driver tonality.

The importance of the magnetic system in IEMs is highlighted, showing its impact on sound quality beyond just diaphragm material.

The RT2 is positioned as a relaxed, easy-to-listen-to IEM that won't fatigue the listener, with a smooth presentation.

The RT2's price point is competitive, sitting between $39 and $50, making it an attractive option in its segment.

The reviewer concludes that all the IEMs compared are good, and the choice depends on the listener's sound preference.

Transcripts

hi guys and welcome to my review of the

rt2 this is the company's latest imem a

single DD this time around uh just a

quick mention is that the naming is a

little bit or can be a little bit

misleading uh since the R1 which came

out earlier is actually a three Dynamic

driver I am and nevertheless they call

it R1 and this one is a single Dynamic

uh driver I am they call it the R2 so it

can be a little bit confusing anyway

this is the R2 a uh single DD as I

mentioned uh it's got a a 10 mm burum

coated driver uh in the back of the the

box he has some specs 32 ohms impedance

106 DB of sensitivity the whole box

again is very much leure kind of vibe so

I'm I'm assuming that once again maybe

this is probably made by L sure the

graph uh that is shown in the back of

the box is basically what I got when I

measured it but I'll show it to you in a

second um and that's it I mean the box

is very simple like I said very classy

straight to the point no no FRS you open

it up up and inside the IM came over

there and then straight away underneath

there there's a carrying case with some

paperwork and and the whole carrying

case actually you know has then inside

of it the the rest of the stuff the

cable and uh and the tips and so on so

let me just get this out of the way here

okay

so um I've actually got two units here

both colors okay uh a green aqua green

kind of face plate and this one which

has got like a orange gold kind of face

plate this is the stock cable as you can

see okay not a 4.4 termination not a bad

cable actually not not bad considering

this is

roughly uh going for about $39 uh

depending on on where you get it U yet

it is again all wound up but this one

here the second set is actually using an

upgraded A1 cable okay so much much

nicer which confers a whole it just it's

it's a nicer cable it's just in terms of

performance

questionable if there is going to be

really any difference or any significant

difference I actually measured both of

them this one measures a little bit

better than the stock one but there

isn't a whole lot of difference and

soundwise again there isn't um a big

difference I mean almost negligible

let's put it that way anyway stock cable

this is the stock cable the case simple

inside as I mentioned it brings the

cable brought the cable and the tips

which are again all these leure kind of

tips that you've seen and it brings

these also black more generic type ones

kind of a medium B size all right I am

using the lead sh the white ones on this

particular um unit and on that one I'm

actually using the the the black ones on

that one there all right anyway what

what what can we say about

the the IM let me just grab it properly

very small shell 10 mm brilliant coated

driver as I mentioned very small shell

fits really nice inside of my ear very

light I mean this is as light as can

possibly be I believe that this driver

might have some relation with the driver

used in the kadenza that I've also got

here okay and also in the t1s from t 105

all right all these three units actually

use a buril coated driver also there's a

the ivp IQ 100 also uses the same driver

so I believe that they probably are the

same driver okay uh I actually haven't

gone to the trouble of opening it up but

just by the way that they graph and they

sound it kind of it seems like it's the

same driver now uh a small correction in

terms of the sound is that or although

they are using this buril type of um

coated driver in the um R2 uh the the

the typical burum tber or tonality or or

you know has been stained slightly okay

so it's when you listen to it you

actually get get more perception that

maybe you're listening to an LCP driver

uh and and you know

once you have a lot of experience and

you've listened to a lot of IM IMS it's

not something which is fail proof uh you

you can make mistakes I've made mistakes

but usually you can kind of pick out

what sort of driver perhaps or driver

material is being used DLC LCP CNT

whatever okay anyway like I was say um

fits nicely with the tips that I'm using

the medium siiz you know beautiful just

sits beautifully in my ears doesn't bug

me it really like it sits it goes

totally inside of my ear you know my the

whole con everything just very nice very

very nice um what have I got then here

to compare the um R2 with uh

well I could have brought out a lot more

IMS but I thought I would stick with

these ones for for the reasons that I

will uh give XLS X1 Mark

II um the epz

G10 uh Cadenza Qs Cadenza the p

pi01 epz Q5 and the ew 100 they are

lined up uh in well this is how I

perceive them but they all lined up from

the the warmest sounding one to the

brightest sounding one okay that's how

I've lined them up uh now being warmer

doesn't necessarily mean it's bad being

brighter doesn't necessarily mean it's

bad this is just how I perceive them the

ew 100 uh sorry the ew2 200 comes across

to me as being the one that's got the

most

detail uh but clean detail because the

epz has got about the same detail just

that

it is a little bit less polished on

occasions okay uh and again on the

opposite under the Spectrum the the R2

for example comes across as the one

that's the the warmest sounding one but

that doesn't mean that it necessarily

has lost detail or or it sounds wrong or

anything of the sort I used two songs

especially to very much dis distinguish

between them I used feel so good from

Diane Reeves and I used its on from

George Duke um feels so good uh the way

the song is the symbols the the the the

the you know the whole song has got

specific parts that enabled you to

distinguish very well in terms of the

mids and upper mids which uh of them is

doing it with more energy or less energy

and it's so it's on from George Duke the

the the the drum the Baseline that's

present uh enables you again to see

which one has got the tight the tightest

base the the marriage between that bass

drum and the symbols how they have

matched so it's it's I thought those two

songs I listen to a lot more songs but

those two specifically were very easy

for me to kind of position these IMS all

right

okay what is the sound here of the R2

the R2 has got

um could call it a a very um not going

to call it Harmon 100% um I'm going to

call it a a a relaxed Harmon okay if you

want to put it that way

um the thing that jumps to you straight

away when you listen to it is it's got a

very easygoing tonality a very easy to

listen to tamber uh and especially for

example it feels so good uh where you

have this this this um this symbol crash

constantly happening

um you how can I explain this you

straight away see that it's very mellow

in the way that it does it um as opposed

to for example something like the E200

which has got a little bit more

intensity behind it uh and that some

might even think that it's too much I

personally don't feel that it's too much

I feel that it actually gives the song U

and the whole presentation of the IM am

in in the whole the the necessary energy

that it needs okay but either either one

of them do it in a very agreeable manner

it's just in a question of what you

prefer you prefer a sound which is

slightly more open in the mids uper mid

and trible or you prefer you prefer

you're not a trible head let's put it

that way and you prefer a warmer more

cozy type of sound then you will go for

something more towards this end of the

spectrum

okay um that's the first thing that you

notice and other thing that you notice

very easily with these two songs between

all these IMS is how these three

especially the well say the Cadenza as

well but these three especially the

Cadenza the epz and the Q5 and the ew2

200 have got a lot more twinkies and

sparkly a lot more detail up top okay a

lot

more you know just like I said details

and the twinkly and sparkly as opposed

to these ones which also have a lot of

detail you know there's also a lot of

ample twinkly and sparkly just that they

are more relaxed more more more more

toned down and ultimately less fatiguing

if you want to put it that way

anyway uh base it's clean it's got a

nice nice nice tonality nice tber got a

good texture um it is slightly slower

than the base on for example uh the XL

xx1 slightly slower than the base on the

ew20 and slightly slower than the base

on the pull of the PA 01 uh these three

are probably the ones that have the most

incisive the cleanest base and I think

that's down to the fact that they've

probably got the best magnetic system in

in these these three drivers it's it's

that's how I perceive it it's I get the

feeling that these three drivers

magnetically have got the strongest

magnet system and it just tightens up

the base um you don't initially notice

it too much on the X1 uh but you notice

at the moment you push the volume a

little bit more you notice how it just

tightens up you know and it just slams

is really hard like clean and hard again

this this XLS X1 it uses the same driver

as the MIM Dark Magician if you guys

recall and this Mark III version is

definitely the best of the three

versions that they've um offered up to

now it's the one that's got the most

balance in the tune between the base and

the mids and the Trel um the highs it's

it's the one that's the the the R2 is

the one that's the most relaxed

unquestionably actually these two have

got the most relaxed highs um is is

there any lack of of detail acheval by

that I wouldn't really call lack of

detail acheval but there are instances

where you you feel that you lose a

little bit of that space that for

example something like the ew2 200 will

give you now you could argue oh but the

ew20 maybe is doing it in a in a way to

pushed manner so it comes across as

maybe being false or or or or colored

okay I can I can accept that argument uh

I don't I don't personally agree with

that I I think it's just the the way it

is anyway um an interesting an

interesting fact definitely with regards

to the to the R2 is although that it

uses that brillium c driver like I was

mentioning is you notice that it has a

sound which is more like uh for example

the the the the the the the the sound

that you find from from usually LCP

drivers like the sound that you find

from for example something like the um

the G10 which uses an LCP driver um and

it's actually quite interesting how uh

the diaphragm material yes will to a

certain extent dictate the type of sound

but it's also you know that's not the

only um the only case here where you

have that disparity between what you

probably would expect by the material

used by the diaphragm and what then you

actually hear for example the XLS X1 it

uses a DLC driver usually known for

having uh you know very good mid and up

you know up and mid and triple

presentation and in this particular case

the way that it's been done and tuned it

sounds a little bit darker uh another

one which also uses an LCP driver and it

doesn't sound like the more usual LCP

driver is let's say the the the the pa01

um usually LCP drivers are you know

better in the lower in the base in the

low mids and so on but they lose a

little bit of clean in the sub toop and

the pi01 doesn't do that and I think

it's down to the fact that it does have

a very strong magnetic flux in the in

its magnet system 1.6 Tas if I'm not

mistaken so you know um the diaphragm

material

I believe will definitely be a an

influence in what you can get in terms

of final sound but it's not only the

diaphragm material it's also the

magnetic system because you can have a

very

good you know material being used but if

the magnet system isn't strong enough to

then control and and let the diaphragm

move and stop as quick as it needs to be

or it needs to be done then you lose its

it loses its its

um it loses its significance let's put

it that way that's why sometimes you

hear some some things like um some you

he some P drivers well the majority of

them all basically pet in the base then

they all overlay with that that material

CNT LCP whatever it's very sent to find

a pure LCP driver or pure ber ber

drivers are very rare or CNT it's always

got a a p base but then they cover it

with those materials to improve the

tonality the tber and so but you hear a

more simple P driver like the ones that

KZ uses but because they actually are

using a good magnetic system system they

they sound pretty decent those Dynamic

drivers that's the reality you know

let's let's be frank here they might

just be using a standard P excuse me

diaphragm but they've taken care of the

magnetic system made sure that it's it's

ample and it's strong enough and the

driver sounds amazing anyway that's

that's a little bit of a of a side note

there that I wanted to just give um one

thing I I didn't mention and I'll just

quickly mention now is in terms of the

price there are two you can pick it up

for about

$39 just over $39 um the

XLS the X1 is about $49 so it's slightly

more expensive the G10 about $39 $40 as

well the Caden are about the same thing

$39 the um puller uh about um $50 give

or take the the the Q5 about the same

thing $49 $50 and the ew 200 about $39

to $45 depending on where you pick it up

so they all between the 39 and and $50

price bracket uh which is it's it's a

competitive segment okay uh I was going

to compare in uh well the R2 I was going

to kind of give you a comparison with

lower priced ones and higher priced ones

but I thought no I'm just going to

compareed with the ones at its price

range and if you guys then do want me to

make that comparison I'll I'll do it

I'll compare it with the more expensive

units and slightly cheaper

units um so yeah that's it overall the

sound of the the art two it's a a

relaxed sound that's that's the main

thing it's got a very easygoing very

easy to listen smooth presentation um

it's not it's you know it's not

fatiguing uh it's not going to offend

anybody um tber and tonality I think or

probably it's it's it's better uh um

technical capability uh and then in

terms of Sound Stage Imaging detail

retrieval resolution I would say they

are good for the price Sound Stage a

little bit on the smaller side iming

pretty decent it actually is able to

distinguish between things quite nicely

and no no real you know problems there

uh I would say I would say probably the

detailed retrieval is the one that I

would have liked a little bit more much

like in the case of the XLS X1 a little

bit more detailed retrieval a little bit

more to increas in sparkly but I mean

that's just

me uh overall it's it's a nice I am and

you know the truth is I can't really

fault it uh I conly say oh no it's it's

not good enough now which ones would I

Choose You Know if I have to be totally

Frank and totally honest any one of

these IM IM is more than capable more

than capable it's going to be down to

what you prefer ultimately do you want a

brighter cleaner more clinical

presentation then perhaps go for

something like the Q5 or the ew2 200 do

you want a warmer more organic more old

school type of sound and perhaps go here

for you know the R2 or the XL X1 do you

want something which is kind of the in

between I would say then okay the G10

the Cadenza and the the Pula allo in

between but it's all very um relative as

well because it depends how on your ear

anatomy how it will fit you uh you know

you

might take the ew2 200 for example put

it in your ears and it and it comes

across as a darkest sounding I am and

and some and that's an extreme case

obviously and the same thing can happen

here with R2 and you listen to it and it

sounds bright or something so it's it's

always a a very delicate issue for me to

stand here and say oh this one is the

one to go for they are all good end of

story these IMR are all good uh so I

think it's going to be down to things

like overall build quality if I take the

the R2 and I consider it's it's a

plastic raisin shell and I take the ew2

and it's a metal shell I mean this one

in terms of built is much more solid uh

but basically they're the same price

this is the B I am this uses and has a

very good driver inside it's a it's an S

what they called an SCP drive it's

basically the mix between a DLC and an

LCP type um materials uh so very good

driver built is buil uh quality is is

superior it's a metal shell it's going

to be more sturdy it's going to probably

last longer time you know longer longer

than the than this plastic shell on the

on the R2 um accessories wise um very

comparable I mean this has got a better

stock cable but in terms of tips they're

about the same thing so it's these

things that will ultimately be the the

the determining factors between them

okay

um because soundwise it's it's very easy

you want warmer you want brighter period

it's it's it's as simple as that um out

of all of them then if I have to um say

which are the the surprise IMS which are

the IMs that surprise me the most when I

listen to them uh well the G10

definitely was one of those uh I wasn't

expecting the G1 to be as good as it is

and I also wasn't expecting the pi1 to

be as good as it is I I I have to admit

that

the rest kind of um you know um they

kind

of filled my expectations let's put it

that way even the R2 I kind of uh when I

listen to it the you know taking taking

away just the fact that I thought it was

going to be a little bit more brighter

it kind of was um was more or less the

same thing um just one last thing for

example if you have a cadenza do I think

the r the R2 is a is a viable

alternative is a bit IM

honestly not really uh it's it's they

they both use Brum drivers they both use

probably the same drivers I mentioned um

but that's got a slightly more detailed

up top presentation this has got a

slightly warmer presentation so at most

they are side grades it's not one is

better than the other

um and I guess that's that's basically

it I mean guys there's there's really

not much more than I can say I'll show

you another the graphs and uh that's it

I'll wrap it up hi guys and come not to

the graph section yeah for the RTR R2

this is the graph of the RT R2 using the

Leer style tips so subbase Focus it's

almost flat by 200 HZ 250 HZ is

basically flat very slow Progressive pin

game picks at around four and then drops

off uh it's it's it's very smooth

everything sits within a window of more

less 8bs give Tech so it's it's fine the

one that I'm showing you now is the R2

as well but with the wideboard tip and

the wideboard tip does Cony the im a

little bit more sensation of space of

sound statue okay but anyway I'm going

to compare it with the OG tip which is

this one here first one I'm going to be

comparing it with it is the XSL X1 the

Mark III version Bas is very much as Sim

there's a little bit of a difference

there in the sub base but honestly I

didn't perceive it and then what you do

notice is that there is a slight more

bit of energy in the upper mids on the

XSL X1 which is

welcomed uh but again it's not as

differentiate as different as what you

see it's not it's not the the the

noticeable difference is not as

significant as this why because then in

this area here of 4 to six 7even the XSL

S1 loses so it it it loses energy in

that section while the RTR R2 has energy

so they kind of balance each other out

and that's why both of them sound very

similar the the XSL X1 does come alive

though is when you give it some power

you give it some power and that thing

comes alive big time um next one is

is the

sorry next one I'm showing you is the

epz the G10 I mean Bas is basically the

same as you can see however when you

listen to the G10 and you compare it

with the

um uh R2 you you you definitely notice

that the the the G10 has got a little

bit more detail retrieval there's a

little bit more of twinkly and sparkly

uh and it's it's sufficiently noticeable

okay let's put it that way it's not h

huge day and night but it's noticeable

enough for you to perhaps be more uh

engaged

by the the G10 the next

one

uh this one but let me change you

the color okay this is the Q years

Cadenza uh again Bas basically the same

uh a little bit more sensation of Sound

Stage yes if I'm comparing it with the

leral tips if I'm comp comparing it with

the other version us the Whiteboard tips

no you don't get that fly uh what you do

notice on the Cadenza is that the

Cadenza um although graphically you

wouldn't think so but it it sounds way

more forward way more you know way more

detailed than the um R2 does and I think

it's basically down to this difference

that we find up in mids okay so that's

that one out next

one is oops sorry next one is

the Pula pa01 again the Pula is very

similar across the whole frequency

spectrum but it sounds more energetic

More Alive more incisive more detail

more everything and technically it's

also superior but there you go um the

next

one is the my watches is the epz the Q5

again base similar

similar uh it's the difference that is

uh that that we find here is that upper

mid and treble is way more detailed on

the on the EPC there's more we twinkles

and sparkl there's more of everything

that just makes it

a I'm not going to say a better IM but

makes it a more lively IM okay um and

then finally compared with the SIM got

the

ew 200 once more we have a a great

degree of similarity in terms of the

base and and as well the mids and the

dips and everything it's just the aw200

sounds um more detailed in that 2 to 4K

area and there's way more Brilliance

there's way more detailed

retrieval more more twinkly at the top

end but if you look carefully at the

graph the graph doesn't look that

disimilar all right anyway guys I hope

um I was able to shed some light here on

the R2 nice I am I mean it's it's really

really a a leg back I am to listen to uh

everything sits within a window of

roughly 89 DBS uh so there isn't I would

at least I don't consider there to be a

whole lot of coloring or anything of the

sort no if anything it sounds darker

than what it graphs let's put that way

but um it's it's it's it's a solid I am

that's the truth the the R2 is a a solid

I in you just need to obviously now if

you can listen to it and and then make

make a a more informed decision um and

that's it okay guys anyway don't forget

like And subscribe any questions you

might have please feel free to ask me

take care now bye-bye