Drake WICKEDLY LIED TO DJ AKADEMIKS To RUIN His Hip-Hop Credibility

Summary

In this video, the narrative unfolds around a leaked DM conversation between Drake and Chris Blake Griffith, which reveals tension between the two. The messages touch on topics ranging from Drake's legal battle with Universal and Kendrick Lamar, to a personal issue involving Stephon Diggs. The drama escalates when Drake denies supporting Griffith in a lawsuit, citing a 'code of silence,' despite the severity of Griffith's situation. The involvement of media personality Academics adds another layer of complexity, as he questions the authenticity of the DM, only for Griffith to later expose proof of Drake's deception, leading to public distrust.

Takeaways

• 😀 Drake allegedly tried to use his credibility with academics to manipulate a story.
• 😀 A DM surfaced where Drake discussed his legal situation with Universal Music Group and used an analogy involving LeBron James.
• 😀 The DM showed Drake claiming that his situation was not about street stuff and that he wanted to make the industry safer for artists.
• 😀 The initial DM was thought to be fake, but it was later revealed that the person who received it, Chris Blake, had a history with Drake.
• 😀 Chris Blake had previously worked with Drake on merchandise designs, and he was involved in an incident with Stefan Diggs that led to a legal battle.
• 😀 Chris reached out to Drake for help spreading awareness about his situation, but Drake refused, citing the 'code' of not ratting in street situations.
• 😀 Chris responded, explaining that he was defending himself against an attack and had spoken out due to being targeted.
• 😀 When the story went viral, DJ Akademiks dismissed the authenticity of the DM, claiming it was fake and fabricated by Chris.
• 😀 Akademiks then claimed that Drake told him the DM was fake, making it seem like Chris was lying.
• 😀 Chris later posted a video showing the real DM conversation, disproving the claims that he had lied.
• 😀 The situation led to questions about the relationship between Akademiks and Drake, especially regarding Drake’s potential manipulation of Akademiks' credibility.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the transcript?

The main issue involves a controversial DM exchange between Drake and Chris Blake Griffith, where Drake reportedly defends his 'code' against Chris asking for help in his legal battle, sparking a conversation about loyalty, reputation, and Drake's relationship with both Chris and Akademiks.

What was the nature of the DM exchange between Drake and Chris Blake Griffith?

Chris Blake Griffith reached out to Drake asking for help in spreading awareness about his legal case, after being attacked by Stefan Diggs' associates. Drake rejected his request, citing his 'code' against getting involved in ratting or street business, despite the serious nature of Chris's situation.

How did Akademiks respond to the controversy surrounding the Drake and Chris Blake DM?

Akademiks initially dismissed the DM as fake and claimed that Chris Blake Griffith fabricated the messages. He later clarified that his source for calling the DM fake was Drake himself, casting doubt on Chris's claims.

What was Chris Blake's reaction to Akademiks calling the DM fake?

Chris Blake responded by posting a video recording of his message exchange with Drake to prove that the DM was real. He also expressed frustration about being called a liar and warned Akademiks not to let Drake manipulate him.

What was the significance of Chris Blake's relationship with Drake?

Chris Blake had previously worked with Drake on designing merchandise, including shorts for a boxing event. This history was important because it demonstrated that Chris was not just a random person reaching out to Drake, but someone with an established professional relationship.

What is the 'code' that Drake refers to in the DM?

The 'code' that Drake refers to seems to be his personal code of loyalty and silence, particularly in situations involving 'street' matters. He implies that he doesn’t get involved in situations where individuals might be 'ratting' or revealing secrets, even if the situation is serious.

How did the public react to the leaked DM between Drake and Chris Blake?

The public had mixed reactions. Some believed Chris, especially after he posted the video recording of their conversation, while others sided with Akademiks, who argued that the DM was fabricated. The situation raised questions about Drake's authenticity and his relationship with people in the industry.

Why does Chris Blake refer to the situation as political in the transcript?

Chris refers to the situation as political because in the entertainment industry, there is often a power dynamic between individuals with big platforms and those with smaller ones. He suggests that individuals like him, with less influence, are often at the mercy of bigger names and that relationships with idols can be risky.

What does the exchange between Chris Blake and Drake reveal about their relationship?

The exchange reveals a complex and somewhat one-sided relationship, where Drake, despite benefiting from Chris's previous work, refuses to help when Chris is in a difficult situation. This highlights Drake’s apparent prioritization of his image and loyalty code over personal connections.

What message does Chris Blake try to convey to young people in the industry?

Chris Blake warns young people in the industry to be cautious when developing relationships with their idols, as they may find out the hard way that their idols don't always have their back. He emphasizes that the industry is full of manipulative dynamics, where bigger platforms often control the narrative.