Argentina's Javier Milei DESTROYS the U.N. in SCATHING speech

Summary

Javier Milei, Argentina's President, delivered a powerful speech at the United Nations, criticizing the 2030 Agenda as a socialist, collectivist policy undermining national sovereignty and individual freedoms. He emphasized Argentina's new stance, embracing freedom, property rights, and limited government, distancing from historical neutrality. Milei condemned global governance, economic restrictions, and the UN's failures in addressing major issues, such as dictatorships and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. He urged a return to the principles of freedom and encouraged other nations to join Argentina in creating a new agenda for the UN.

Takeaways

• 🗣️ The speaker identifies himself as an economist and a libertarian, not a politician, who was unexpectedly elected President of Argentina.
• ⚠️ He warns the United Nations and the world about the dangers of continuing with collectivist policies, particularly the 2030 Agenda.
• 🌍 The speaker criticizes the 2030 Agenda, calling it a socialist program that infringes on national sovereignty and individual rights, and argues it worsens poverty and inequality.
• 💡 He emphasizes that limiting government power, protecting property rights, and ensuring equality before the law are the only ways to achieve prosperity.
• 💥 He condemns the United Nations for allowing dictatorships and regimes that violate human rights to sit on important councils, criticizing hypocrisy within the organization.
• 🛑 He expresses dissent over the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic, describing global quarantines as crimes against humanity.
• 📉 The speaker opposes zero-emission policies and other environmental regulations, claiming they harm poor countries while being hypocritically promoted by wealthier nations.
• 🌱 Argentina will abandon its historic neutrality and take a stand for individual freedoms, liberty, property rights, and free markets on the global stage.
• 👊 He calls on other nations to join Argentina in rejecting collectivist policies and building a new global agenda based on freedom and limited government.
• 🏛️ The speaker ends by quoting Thomas Paine, stressing that those who want the blessings of freedom must endure the struggle to defend it, signaling his commitment to the fight for liberty.

Q & A

Who is delivering the speech at the United Nations in the provided transcript?

The speaker is Javier Milei, the President of Argentina, addressing the United Nations General Assembly.

What is the main critique Javier Milei has about the United Nations?

Milei criticizes the United Nations for promoting collectivist policies, particularly through the 2030 agenda, which he describes as a socialist, supernatural government program that violates national sovereignty and individual rights.

What specific agenda does Milei criticize during his speech?

Milei criticizes the United Nations' 2030 agenda, arguing that it imposes collectivist policies that he believes worsen poverty, inequality, and discrimination.

According to Milei, what are the key values of the 'new Argentina'?

The 'new Argentina' defends individual freedoms, the right to life, liberty, property, freedom of speech, freedom of worship, and free markets, as well as limited government intervention.

How does Milei describe the United Nations' involvement in human rights issues?

Milei criticizes the United Nations for allowing dictatorships like Cuba and Venezuela to join the Human Rights Council and for failing to defend human rights adequately in various global contexts.

What historical figures and documents does Milei reference in his speech?

Milei references U.S. founding figures, particularly Thomas Paine, and the Declaration of Independence to emphasize his belief in individual freedoms and limited government.

What does Milei say about the role of the United Nations in international conflicts?

Milei argues that the United Nations has failed to address global conflicts like the Russian invasion of Ukraine, while instead focusing on promoting collectivist policies that limit freedom.

What economic policies does Milei reject during his speech?

Milei rejects collectivist economic policies that violate property rights and hinder economic growth, particularly those that prevent underprivileged countries from using their resources freely.

What is Milei's stance on the United Nations' environmental policies?

Milei criticizes policies like zero-emission targets as harmful, especially to poor countries, arguing that they are unrealistic and hinder development.

How does Milei suggest Argentina's international role will change going forward?

Milei states that Argentina will no longer remain neutral but will actively defend freedom, opposing any international policies that restrict individual freedoms or violate natural rights.

Outlines

00:00

🌍 Addressing the UN: A New Perspective

The speaker, identified as an economist and libertarian rather than a politician, delivers his first speech at the United Nations General Assembly. He critiques the UN for promoting collectivist policies, specifically those under the 2030 Agenda, which he believes undermine national sovereignty and individual rights. The speaker emphasizes the principles of liberty, limited government, and free markets, warning that the current path of collectivism will lead to failure.

05:02

💡 Critique of Global Governance and Economic Policies

The speaker continues to denounce the UN's collectivist policies, arguing that they hinder economic growth, violate property rights, and perpetuate inequality in underprivileged nations. He criticizes the role of international lending agencies and the global elite in exploiting poorer countries and highlights the failure of the United Nations to address territorial sovereignty issues and real global conflicts, like the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

10:04

🚨 A Call for a New Global Agenda

The speaker warns that the UN's collectivist agenda has reached a dead end, and a shift toward freedom and individual rights is necessary. He argues that collectivist policies fail because they impose an unrealistic model of human behavior, which ultimately leads to repression and poverty. Citing Argentina's embrace of freedom, he calls for a new global agenda focused on liberty, limited government, and individual rights, rejecting the UN's 2030 Agenda.

15:06

🛡️ Defending Freedom at All Costs

In the final section, the speaker emphasizes the need for nations to unite in defense of freedom, whether in response to political oppression, economic enslavement, or religious fanaticism. He aligns Argentina's new doctrine with the original values of the United Nations, stating that Argentina will no longer remain neutral but will lead the global fight for liberty. He concludes with a powerful quote from Thomas Paine, urging the world to endure the hardships necessary to defend freedom.

Keywords

💡United Nations

The United Nations (UN) is an international organization founded in 1945 aimed at promoting peace, security, and cooperation among countries. In the script, it is criticized for failing to fulfill its original mission and for promoting collectivist policies through the 2030 Agenda, which the speaker argues violate national sovereignty and individual freedoms.

💡2030 Agenda

The 2030 Agenda is a global framework adopted by the UN in 2015, focusing on sustainable development and addressing issues like poverty, inequality, and climate change. In the speech, it is referred to as a 'supernatural government program' that enforces socialist policies, which the speaker claims worsen problems rather than solve them.

💡Collectivism

Collectivism refers to the practice or principle of prioritizing the group over individual interests. In the script, collectivism is portrayed negatively as a failed ideology that undermines freedom and prosperity. The speaker warns that continued reliance on collectivist policies, especially by the UN, will deepen global problems.

💡Libertarianism

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual liberty, limited government, and free markets. The speaker identifies as a 'liberal libertarian economist' and advocates for Argentina's embrace of libertarian principles, such as the protection of individual rights to life, liberty, and property.

💡Freedom

Freedom in the context of this speech refers to the individual's right to live without unnecessary interference from governments or organizations. The speaker positions freedom as the core value of Argentina's new direction and criticizes international bodies, like the UN, for supporting policies that restrict individual freedoms.

💡Property Rights

Property rights refer to the legal ownership of resources and the ability to use them without interference. The speaker highlights the importance of defending property rights as part of Argentina's shift toward libertarian values. He argues that violations of property rights, particularly through collectivist policies, prevent economic growth.

💡Neutrality

Neutrality is the policy of not taking sides in international conflicts or political struggles. Historically, Argentina has maintained a neutral stance in global affairs. However, the speaker announces a shift away from neutrality, signaling that Argentina will now actively defend freedom and oppose policies that restrict individual rights.

💡Global Governance

Global governance refers to the cooperation of various international institutions to manage global issues. The speaker criticizes global governance policies, particularly those promoted by the UN and international lending agencies, as they force underdeveloped nations into perpetual debt and limit their economic freedom.

💡Poverty

Poverty is a condition in which people lack sufficient financial resources to meet basic living needs. The speaker criticizes the 2030 Agenda's approach to addressing poverty, arguing that the policies it promotes will only deepen economic inequality and hinder prosperity in developing nations.

💡Sovereignty

Sovereignty is the authority of a state to govern itself without external interference. The speaker expresses concern that the UN's 2030 Agenda and global governance policies violate national sovereignty by imposing regulations that undermine a country's ability to make decisions independently.

Highlights

The speaker, an economist and Libertarian, presents his first speech at the United Nations, emphasizing his background outside of politics.

He criticizes collectivist policies and warns of the United Nations' failure to fulfill its original mission.

The 2030 agenda is described as a 'socialist' program that violates national sovereignty and individual rights.

The speaker asserts that freedom, equality before the law, and the defense of life, liberty, and property are the only ways to guarantee prosperity.

He accuses the United Nations of allowing dictatorships like Cuba and Venezuela into the Human Rights Council, despite their violations.

The speaker condemns the organization's failure to defend women's rights, citing countries that punish women for showing skin.

He criticizes the United Nations for systematically voting against Israel while failing to address global terrorism.

The speaker highlights the promotion of harmful economic policies that hinder the growth of underprivileged countries.

The United Nations is accused of promoting toxic global governance policies, trapping countries in debt to advance elitist agendas.

The speaker calls for a rejection of zero-emission policies, claiming they disproportionately harm poor countries.

He argues that the organization has lost credibility due to its contradictions and misguided policies.

The speech advocates for a shift from historical neutrality, positioning Argentina at the forefront of defending freedom worldwide.

He issues a warning that the 'woke agenda' and collectivism have collided with reality and failed to provide real solutions.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of enduring the fatigue of defending freedom, quoting Thomas Paine.

The Argentine Republic is presented as embracing the principles of life, liberty, and property, committing to defend these values globally.

Transcripts

so jaier uh Malay got up yesterday to

the United Nations and this is worth

reading almost verbatim listen to this

to the authorities of the United Nations

to the representatives of the various

countries that make up the United

Nations and to all the citizens of the

world who are watching us good afternoon

for those who do not know I'm not a

politician I'm an economist a

Libertarian liberal Economist who has

never had the ambition to be a

politician I'm an economist a liberal

libertarian ecist who's never had that

but I was honored to be in the honored

with the position of President of the

argentinan Republic in the face of

resounding failure of More Than A

Century of collective

policies this is my first speech in

front of the United Nations General

Assembly and I'd like to take this

opportunity with humility to alert the

various nations of the world to the path

that they have been treading for decades

and the danger of this organization's

failure to fulfill its original Mission

I do not come here to tell the world

what to do I come here to tell the world

on the one hand what will happen if the

United Nations continues to promote

collectivist policies which they have

been promoting under the Mandate of the

2030 agenda and on the other hand what

are the values of the new Argentina that

we

defend I do want to begin giving credit

where credit is due the United United

Nations and he goes into 70 years of

blah blah blah blah

blah then he

says the successful model of the United

Nations whose Origins can be traced back

to the ideas of President Wilson Oh goes

on Wilson let me again I want to be

clear on the position of the Argentine

agenda the 2030 agenda although

well-intentioned in its goals is nothing

more than a supernatural government

program socialist in nature which sees

which seeks to solve the problems of

modernity with solutions that violate

the sovereignty of nation states and

violates people's right to life liberty

and property it is an agenda that

pretends to solve poverty inequality and

discrimination with legislation that

will only deepen those problems because

world history shows us the only way to

guarantee Prosperity is by limiting the

power of the Arch guaranteeing equality

before the law and defending the right

to life liberty and the property of

individuals does this sound like a

Founding Father Eden Pure is back with

their famous thunderstorm air purifier

it's their top seller air purifier that

quickly destroys viruses odors mold and

so much more with thousands of five-star

reviews you know it works any smell will

vanish after just a few seconds of the

thunderstorm being plugged in odors

litter boxes trash can cigarette smokes

dirty diapers wow I don't want to visit

that house the powerful thunderstorm

sends out 03 molecules that seek out and

Destroy odors I have these in my house

they're great the molecules go uh behind

and under Furniture nothing can hide

from the thunderstorm best of all no

filters to buy over and over again

saving you money start enjoying your

home again and get several thunderstorms

right now you can save $200 on an Eden

Pure thunderstorm thre pack for the

whole home protection you get three

units for under $200 put one in your

basement bedroom family room kitchen

wherever you need the air to be clean go

to EdenPURE deals.com EdenPURE deals.com

use the promo code back and save it has

been precisely the adoption of this

agenda which obeys privileged interests

the abandonment of the principles

outlined in the Universal DEC

Declaration of Human Rights in the

United Nations that has distorted this

role of this institution and put it on

the wrong path thus we have seen how an

organization born to defend the rights

of man has been one of the main

proponents of the systematic violation

of Freedom as for example with the

global quarantines during the year

2020 which should be considered a crime

against

humanity in this same house that claims

to defend human rights they have allowed

bloody dictatorships such as Cuba and

Venezuela to join the Human Rights

Council without the slightest reproach

in this same house that claims to defend

women's rights they allow countries that

punish their women for showing their

skin to join the committee on the

elimination of discrimination against

women in this same house systematically

they have voted against the state of

Israel which is the only country in the

Middle East that defends liberal

democracy while simultaneously

demonstrating it total inability to

respond to the scourge of terrorism in

the economic sphere collectivist

policies have been promoted that

threaten economic growth violate

property rights hinder the natural

economic process preventing the most

underprivileged countries in the world

from freely enjoying their own resources

in order to move

forward regulations and prohibitions

promoted precisely by the countries that

developed thanks to doing the same thing

they condemn today moreover a toxic

relationship has been promoted between

Global governments Go Global governance

policies and international lending

agencies requiring the most neglected

countries to commit resources they do

not

have to programs they do not need

turning them into Perpetual debtors to

promote the agenda of the global

Elites nor has the tutelage of the world

economic Forum helped where the

ridiculous policies are promoted with

malthusian blinders on such as zero

emission policies which harm poor

countries in particular to policies

linked to sexual and Reproductive Rights

when the birth rate in Western countries

is plummeting heralding a bleak future

for all nor has the organization

satisfactorily fulfilled its mission of

defending the territorial sovereignty of

its members as we argentines know

firsthand in a relation with the

maldivian Islands we now have even

reached a situation in which the

security Council which is the most

important organ of this house has become

distorted because of the veto of its

permanent members has begun to be used

in defense of particular interests of

some thus we are today with an

organization that is powerless to

provide solutions to the real Global

conflicts such as the uh Russian

invasion of Ukraine which has already

cost the lives of more than 300,000

people leaving a trail of more than 1

million wounded in the

process an organization that instead of

confronting these conflicts invests time

and effort intoo imposing on poor

countries what and how they should

produce with whom they should associate

and what they should eat what they

should believe in as the present pact

for the future intends to dictate this

long long list of errors and

contradictions has not been gratuitous

but has resulted in the loss of

credibility of the United Nations in the

eyes of the citizens of the Free World

in the denaturalization of its

functions I therefore would like to

issue a

warning listen to this we are at the end

of a cycle collectivism and moral

posturing of the woke agenda have

collided with reality

and no longer have credible solutions to

offer to the world's real problems in

fact they never had them if the 2030

agenda failed as its own promoters

acknowledge the answer should be to ask

ourselves if it was not an ill-conceived

program to begin with accept that

reality and change course we cannot

pretend to persist in the mistake by

redoubling on a bet on an agenda that is

failed the same thing always happens

with ideas coming from the left they

design a model according to what human

beings should be according to them and

when individuals freely act otherwise

they have no better solution than to

restrict repress and restrict their

freedom we in Argentina have already

seen with our own eyes what lies at the

end of this road of envy and sad

passions poverty brutalization Anarchy

and a fatal absence of fre Freedom we

still have time to turn away from this

course I want to be clear about

something so there are no

misinterpretations Argentina which is

undergoing a profound process of change

has decided to embrace the ideas of

Freedom those ideas that say all

citizens are born free and equal before

the law that we have inalienable rights

granted by the Creator among them are

the right to life liberty and property

those principles which guide the process

of change that we are carrying out in

Argentina are the principles that will

guide our International conduct from now

on we believe in the defense of life for

all we believe in the defense of

property for all we believe in freedom

of speech for all we believe in the

freedom of worship for all we believe in

the freedom of Commerce for all and we

believe in limited governments all of

them and because in these times what

happens in one country quickly impacts

the others we believe all peoples should

live free from tyranny and oppression

whether it takes the form of political

oppression economic slavery or religious

fanaticism that fundamental idea must

not remain mere words it must be

supported in Deeds diplomatically

economically material uh through the

combined strength of all countries which

stand for Freedom this doctrine of the

new Argentina is no more and no less

than the true essence of the United

Nations organization that is the

cooperation of the United Nations in

defense of Freedom if the United Nations

decides to retake the principles that

gave it life and adapt it again to the

role for which it was conceived you can

count on the unwavering support of

Argentina in the struggle for Freedom

you should also know that Argentina will

not support any policy that implies the

Restriction of individual freedoms of

trade the violation of natural rights of

individuals no matter who promotes it or

how much consensus that institution has

for this reason we wish to express

officially our descent on The Pact of

the future signed on Sunday and we

invite all of the nations of the Free

World to join us not only in dissenting

from this pack but also in the creation

of a new agenda for this Noble

institution the agenda of freedom from

from this day on know that the Argentine

Republic will abandon the position of

historical neutrality that characterized

us and will be at the Forefront of the

strug struggle in the defense of freedom

because as Thomas Payne said those who

wish to reap the blessings of Freedom

must as men endure the fatigue of

Defending it may God bless the

argentines and the citizens of the world

and the forces of Heaven may they be

with us

Long Live Freedom damn

it how great is

that I mean this guy is quoting our

Declaration of Independence and throwing

it in our

face the Declaration of Independence and

Thomas Payne all of our founding

principles and he is saying and look at

Argentina it is turning

around and he's saying this has to be

done because this agenda 2030 this new

uh pact for the future which the United

States uh passed signed excited about he

said it is it is going to the

entire world and he's

right you want second citizenship maybe

Argentina is the place to get second

citizenship so how the question is just

how long he's going to be there that

would be my only concern because he

seems to be promoting all of the right

things and abandoning a historical

precedent of uh yeah neutrality

historical neutrality that's a big a big

change does he have enough people to

support him and not only that but

also can he grow that and teach that to

so many others I mean we had you know we

had all of our Founders in a row and and

we started from

scratch uh and it took about 20 years to

really screw it up part of the reason

why I think it's possible is because

he's loud yeah right like I I think part

maybe one of the problems we've faced

over the past you know 100 years or so

is like Hey we're obviously the most

successful country everything's working

really well we all know it's because of

capitalism and freedom everyone else

should know it too and over time you

know with with exceptions right like you

know certainly you'd say Reagan was an

exception to this of someone who really

loudly spoke for the benefits of of

these Donald Trump Donald Trump is is

loud defender of property and freedom

and individual and yeah he's just more

he's still active so I'm thinking more

of a historical context um but like I

think as with Malay if he becomes if

this if he's able to set this country on

on this path and make it obvious what is

why it's succeeding yes throughout and

definitely another addition to this and

still up Up For Debate but if it

succeeds which so far it really is but

you know it's short term we don't we

don't know for sure if it succeeds long

term I think there could be a really

major change in the world yeah there

could be all you all you need is one

spark you know the one thing that stuck

out to me in his um in his speech was

one of the last paragraphs as Thomas

Payne said those who wish to reap the

blessings of Freedom must as men endure

the fatigue of Defending it how many

people do we know say I'm just tired I'm

just worn out I just don't want to look

at it anymore remember that line those

who wish to reap the blessings of

Freedom must as men endure the fatigue

of Defending it