Cybersecurity Skills: Quantitative Risk Management
Summary
TLDRThis video script delves into the intricacies of risk management calculations in tort law, using the hand-balancing test as a starting point. It introduces a basic quantitative formula to calculate annual loss expectancy by multiplying the single loss expectancy with the annual rate of occurrence. The script explains how to determine the value of assets at risk, the exposure factor, and the annual rate of occurrence, providing examples to illustrate the process. It emphasizes the importance of this approach in allocating resources for risk mitigation, while acknowledging the limitations and complexities involved in assigning monetary values to certain risks and assets.
Takeaways
- 📊 The annual loss expectancy (ALE) is calculated by multiplying the single loss expectancy (SLE) by the annual rate of occurrence (ARO).
- 💡 Single loss expectancy is determined by the asset value at risk and the exposure factor, which is the percentage of asset value that would be lost if the risk is realized.
- 🏢 Asset value can be challenging to quantify, especially for intangible assets like customer data.
- 🔥 Exposure factor ranges from 0% (no impact) to 100% (complete destruction), and it helps to calculate the potential loss for a given risk scenario.
- ⏱ The annual rate of occurrence is a multiplier that estimates how often a particular risk is likely to occur within a year.
- 💹 The formula for ALE is a basic quantitative method for risk management, but it's not always precise and often requires estimation.
- 🛡 The ALE can guide how much an organization should invest in risk mitigation measures, such as fire suppression technology.
- 🏗️ An example provided in the script illustrates calculating ALE for a building valued at $100,000 with a 25% exposure factor and a risk occurrence every ten years.
- 💼 The script emphasizes that while these calculations are quantitative, they are often based on estimates and may not account for all potential impacts, such as employee injury or downtime.
- 📈 There are more sophisticated methods and tools, including big data, that risk managers use for more granular risk assessments, but the script focuses on introducing general principles.
Q & A
What is the hand balancing test mentioned in the script?
-The hand balancing test is a method used by lawyers to think about tort law, which involves a rough risk management calculation, balancing the potential harm against the potential benefits or costs.
How do professional risk managers calculate risk management?
-Professional risk managers use a variety of sophisticated methods, but the script introduces a basic quantitative formula that involves calculating the annual loss expectancy (ALE) based on single loss expectancy and the annual rate of occurrence.
What is the formula for calculating annual loss expectancy (ALE)?
-The formula for calculating ALE is ALE = Single Loss Expectancy (SLE) * Annual Rate of Occurrence (ARO). SLE is the expected loss for any single event, and ARO is how often this loss is expected to occur in a year.
How is Single Loss Expectancy (SLE) determined?
-SLE is determined by multiplying the value of the asset at risk by the exposure factor. The exposure factor is the percentage of the asset value that will be lost if the risk is realized.
What is the exposure factor in risk management?
-The exposure factor is the percentage of the asset value that would be lost if the risk materializes, ranging from 0% (no impact) to 100% (complete destruction of the asset).
How is the Annual Rate of Occurrence (ARO) calculated?
-ARO is calculated based on the frequency of the risk event. For example, if a risk is likely to occur once a year, the ARO is 1. If it's likely to occur twice a year, the ARO is 2, and so on.
What is the significance of calculating ALE in risk management?
-ALE helps determine how much a company should spend on risk mitigation measures. It provides a quantitative measure of potential annual losses, which can guide investment in risk management strategies.
Why might asset values be difficult to calculate?
-Asset values can be difficult to calculate because they may include intangible assets like customer data, which have value based on their competitive advantage but are not easily quantified in monetary terms.
What is an example of how to use the formula for ALE?
-An example given in the script is a building valued at $100,000 with a 25% exposure factor for damage. If a damaging event is likely to occur once every ten years, the SLE would be $25,000, and the ARO would be 0.1. Thus, the ALE would be $2,500.
What are the limitations of the quantitative risk management calculations presented in the script?
-The calculations are not always precise and can be unrealistic. Factors like non-financial losses, different parts of an asset having varying values, opportunity costs, and downtime are not easily quantified and may require more granular analysis.
How can the ALE calculation help in deciding on risk management expenditures?
-The ALE calculation can guide a company on how much to invest in risk mitigation technologies or insurance. If the ALE is $2,500, for example, it might suggest that spending around $2,500 per year on fire suppression technology could help manage the risk effectively.
Outlines
📊 Risk Management Calculations
The paragraph introduces a fundamental quantitative approach to risk management, using the formula for annual loss expectancy (ALE). ALE is calculated by multiplying the single loss expectancy by the annual rate of occurrence. Single loss expectancy refers to the expected loss for any single event, while the annual rate of occurrence is the frequency of such events within a year. The speaker emphasizes the importance of estimating asset value at risk and the exposure factor, which is the percentage of asset value that could be lost if a risk materializes. The example of barrels of oil and potential fire damage is used to illustrate how these calculations can be applied.
🏢 Asset Value and Risk Quantification
This paragraph delves deeper into how to quantify single loss expectancy (SLE), explaining that it involves understanding the value of the asset at risk. The speaker discusses the challenges of calculating asset values, especially for intangible assets like customer data. The concept of exposure factor (EF) is further elaborated, which is the proportion of asset value that could be affected by a risk event. An example is given where a building valued at $100,000 has a 25% exposure factor due to potential fire damage, and the risk of such a fire is estimated to occur once every ten years. The calculation results in an ALE of $2,500, suggesting that investing this amount in fire suppression technology could mitigate the risk over a decade.
🔍 Granular Risk Analysis and Practical Application
The final paragraph discusses the limitations and practical applications of the risk management calculations introduced. It acknowledges that while these calculations are quantitative, they may not always be precise due to the complexity of valuing assets and estimating risk occurrence. The speaker suggests that for roles like general counsel or outside counsel, understanding these principles is more important than performing highly granular risk analysis. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing the need for a general sense of risk quantification to inform decisions about cybersecurity and risk management.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Tort Law
💡Risk Management
💡Annual Loss Expectancy (ALE)
💡Single Loss Expectancy (SLE)
💡Exposure Factor
💡Asset Value
💡Annual Rate of Occurrence (ARO)
💡Quantitative Calculations
💡Mitigation
💡Actuarial
💡Opportunity Costs
Highlights
Introduction to risk management calculations in tort law using the hand balancing test.
Explanation of the basic formula for quantitative risk management calculations.
Definition of annual loss expectancy and its calculation.
The importance of understanding single loss expectancy in risk management.
How to quantify the value of an asset at risk.
The concept of exposure factor in risk calculations.
Calculating the exposure factor based on the percentage of asset value lost.
Understanding the annual rate of occurrence and its role in risk calculations.
The significance of the annual rate of occurrence in determining risk.
An example of calculating single loss expectancy using asset value and exposure factor.
How to use the annual rate of occurrence to calculate annual loss expectancy.
The practical application of risk management calculations in determining insurance costs.
The limitations of quantitative risk management calculations and the need for estimates.
The impact of asset value on risk management decisions.
The role of opportunity costs and downtime in risk management calculations.
The importance of considering the value of different parts of an asset in risk calculations.
The use of big data in advanced risk management calculations.
The goal of risk management calculations in guiding mitigation and risk management spending.
Transcripts
[Music]
okay so that's that's kind of how
lawyers thinking about tort law after if
you're using something like the hand
balancing test would think about doing
some kind of really back of the envelope
very rough risk management calculation
how do professional risk managers do it
well they doing a whole variety of ways
most of which are going to be more
sophisticated than what I'm going to
show you right now but I'm going to show
you right now is kind of a recognized
basic way of doing risk management
calculations quantitative calculations
that go a bit beyond the learn at hand
formula so here is the formula that I'm
putting up on the screen for you and
here's what it means a le is annual loss
expectancy the annual loss expectancy in
other words what how much are you
expecting the loss to be in any given
year will be equal to the single loss
expectancy what do you expect a loss to
be for any single event times arrow the
annual rate of occurrence how often do
you expect this loss to occur in a given
year
so you know these are some nice kind of
cool management teas sounding formula
again if you look at it it kind of
breaks down it makes it really makes
sense right
what's gonna cost you for a whole year
don't get caught up right now and
whether it's a calendar year or a fiscal
year it doesn't really matter for this
purpose right what's gonna cause for a
whole year well what is he what does any
one incident cost and maybe I'll be able
to quantify that and how many times do I
expect the incident to occur in a year
maybe I'll be able to quantify that
[Music]
okay
so how do we figure out how do we
quantify what the single loss expectancy
is well we really have to know what the
value is of the asset that's at risk now
that you know should be relatively
self-explanatory I mean if we've got you
know some customer data that provides
information that enables us to compete
in the marketplace and price our product
to our customer that's going to be an
asset and then as it's going to have a
certain value and that value might be
you know what's the kind of marginal
benefit having that customer information
gives us over our competitors in you
know our pricing in the marketplace even
more straightforward you might say all
right we've got you know we're selling a
commodity we've got barrels of oil right
those barrels of oil today are worth X
dollars on the commodity market I mean
that's a much more straightforward but
even as my example of the customer data
suggests it can be really hard to
calculate this so I mean even though
this sounds kind of highly quantitative
you know asset values can be hard to
calculate and figure out especially when
we're talking about data so even when
you're doing this on a quantitative
basis you're going to sort of often have
to sort of do your best estimates and
there are best practices and you know
people that do this for a living will
know kind of the best accounting
practices and so on for doing that all
right the EF in this calculation is
what's called exposure factor the
exposure factor is the percentage of the
asset value that will be lost if the
risk is realized and that of course is
going to range from zero to a hundred
percent so I mean it could be that the
risk happens and it really doesn't have
any impact on the asset at all asset
value at all and then it's zero right it
could be that the risk happens and the
asset is completely destroyed right so
let's think about our barrels of oil the
risk is that there's a
major fire and explosion at the plant
where the at the facility where the oil
is being stored if there's a major fire
the all the oil will be burned up and
destroyed exposure factors 100% now more
likely more likely what we're thinking
about you know a risk we're thinking
about is not a major fire that destroys
the whole facility but a fire that
eventually gets contained and that let's
say destroys 50% of the facility and 50%
of our barrels of oil right so then our
exposure factor would be 50% we'd
multiply the value of the oil let's say
the boils worth a million dollars our
exposure factors the risk we're facing
is a fire that would destroy half of our
barrels of oil so then you know our SLE
is going to be $500,000
all right the other piece in this
calculation is the annual rate of
occurrence what is the annual rate of
occurrence it's going to be some kind of
multiplier so example if it's going to
likely happen one the risk is likely to
be realized once a year our multiplier
is one if our risk is likely to be
realized twice a year it's two and so on
right if the risk is likely to be
realized every other year well then it's
one half each each given year so it's
point five right if it's likely to be
realized once every 25 years 0.04 right
you can see how this math works out and
you really if you're trying to do this
kind of thing in a basic risk management
setting it doesn't have to get very much
more granular than this again you're
it's quantitative but it's pretty rare
that you're gonna have the kind of
granular level data that are gonna allow
you to predict this is gonna happen you
know 13 times this year it's just that's
highly unlikely you're probably gonna
have to round off you know 1 5 10 to
every other year every five years every
10 years
and and that'll give you kind of rounder
numbers okay so let's work through a a
specific example with these figures so
this is a you know very unrealistic
example but it's kind of straightforward
so it shows you how you would work this
out so let's say we have a building
that's valued at $100,000 let's say a
fire would damage the building to be
damaged twenty-five percent of the
building and let's say that we have some
insurance data underwriting data that
suggests a fire of this sort is likely
to occur once every ten years so what we
have here we'd have our single loss
expectancy our asset value is a hundred
thousand our exposure factor is twenty
five percent that would damage twenty
five percent of the building and so our
SLE is twenty five thousand dollars then
we factor our a le right we have our
sles twenty five thousand dollars our
aro annual rate of occurrence is going
to be point one because it's 1/10 once
every ten years and so therefore we're
going to have a le of two thousand five
hundred dollars okay so what does that
mean if we have an a le of two thousand
five hundred dollars I mean you could
say all right that means I should spend
about two thousand five hundred dollars
on fire suppression technology that's to
$2,500 is the a le that means in any
given year that's my sort of it's
possible exposure and so if I'm spending
twenty five hundred dollars a year on
that technology then you know over the
course of ten years
I'll have spent the total amount of the
potential loss and I'll have evened out
my risk so you could say that and that
is you know what this kind of
quantitative calculation in a sense is
designed to do
it's designed to tell you how much you
should spend on mitigation on risk
management but you do have to realize
that this whole thing is not
usually going to be precise it's usually
going to be unrealistic so think for
example about the asset value we're at
our asset value of the building hundred
thousand dollars if I sold this building
tomorrow I could sell it for a hundred
thousand dollars okay but if there's a
fire you know I may loot there may be
employees who are injured or killed how
am I going to value that you know if you
have to put money value on that you you
sort of can I mean there are actuarial
ways of doing that and then of course
there's value on that that goes way
beyond money right so we say 25 percent
of the building but you know are
different parts of the building
potentially more valuable than others I
mean are there is there a manufacturing
equipment that's really expensive to
replace as opposed to a warehousing area
with goods that I would lose that are
easier to replace what about opportunity
costs what about downtime I mean if the
production equipment is destroyed if
that portion of the building is
destroyed does that mean that I'm out of
business for you know a period of time
all those things if you really really
wanted to dig into the granular level
you'd have to include in your
spreadsheet now there are people that do
this kind of thing right that really
crunch these kind of numbers and that
try to do this and they're even at
higher levels there are ways of using
big data to try and do this and but
that's not what we're trying to do for
our purpose right now in this course or
to introduce these general principles
and it's not necessarily what you need
to do you know kind of at the level of
being a general counsel or an outside
counsel in a business talking about
cybersecurity and kind of introducing
some of these principles you're trying
to begin to get the general sense so at
least you can put some numbers on things
you
Посмотреть больше похожих видео
Risk Analysis - CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 - 5.2
CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Course - 5.2 Explain Elements of the Risk Management Process - PART A
IIMFC2022016-V006400
ISTQB FOUNDATION 4.0 | Tutorial 50 | Risk Identification | Risk Assessment | CTFL Tutorials
Konsep Mudah belajar Hidrolisis Garam - Asam-Basa- Kimia SMA kelas 11 semester 2
Part 2: Management of Translation Exposure |English| #InternationalFinance| M. Com|MBA
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)