The Real Story of Malaysia Flight MH370? Ashton Forbes Investigates

Summary

In this interview, Ashton Forbes discusses the mysterious disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, suggesting it may be the biggest conspiracy ever. He presents an alternative theory to the official narrative, involving a fire event caused by 500 pounds of lithium-ion batteries and the use of advanced technology to track and potentially divert the plane. Ashton also addresses debunking attempts, asserting the authenticity of leaked videos and the involvement of a U.S. Navy officer, Edward C. Lynn, who may have disclosed classified information about the incident.

Takeaways

• 🔥 The script discusses the mysterious disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, suggesting it may be part of a large conspiracy.
• 🛫 The plane's route indicated a possible emergency landing in Penang, along with witness accounts of a plane on fire, consistent with a fire emergency scenario.
• 🔋 There were 500 pounds of lithium-ion batteries onboard, which raised suspicions about their role in the incident.
• 👁️‍🗨️ Eyewitness Catherine T reported seeing a glowing orange plane with smoke, which aligns with the theory of a fire event caused by the batteries.
• 🗣️ Ashton Forbes is highlighted as a prominent figure advocating a particular narrative about MH370, suggesting his claims are quite shocking.
• 🔎 The conversation dives into the analysis of flight simulator data, suggesting the pilot was not practicing a suspicious route before the flight.
• 🌐 The script mentions Ashton's theory of the plane's possible diversion to Diego Garcia, contradicting the official story of it crashing in the South Indian Ocean.
• 🛰️ The discussion includes the role of US surveillance capabilities, suggesting that the US government might know more about the incident than it has revealed.
• 🧭 The script points out anomalies in the satellite pings allegedly from the plane, suggesting they might have been falsified or misinterpreted.
• 🔮 The narrative proposes the use of advanced technology, possibly related to hypersonic weapons and plasma physics, by the US, which could be linked to the passengers onboard.

Q & A

What is the main theory proposed by Ashton Forbes regarding the disappearance of MH370?

Ashton Forbes proposes that the disappearance of MH370 was due to a fire event caused by 500 pounds of lithium ion batteries on board, leading to a series of events that were covered up, possibly involving espionage and advanced military technology.

Why does Ashton believe that lithium ion batteries were a significant factor in the MH370 case?

Ashton points out that the lithium ion batteries were extremely dangerous and had been known to cause fires on other flights. He suggests these batteries may have been intentionally used to cause a fire on MH370, leading to the plane going dark and changing its course.

What role does Ashton think the United States government might have played in the MH370 incident?

Ashton suggests that the U.S. government might have been involved in a counter-espionage operation, potentially using advanced technology to track and possibly intercept MH370, and then covered up the true events surrounding the plane's disappearance.

What evidence does Ashton present to support the theory of a fire event on MH370?

Ashton cites 19 witnesses who reported seeing the plane on fire, loud noises, or the plane descending, consistent with a fire scenario. Additionally, he references a Mayday call reported only in Chinese media suggesting the plane was disintegrating and attempting an emergency landing.

How does Ashton explain the sparse data from the satellite pings after the plane's disappearance?

Ashton questions the authenticity of the satellite pings, suggesting that the data might have been falsified or misinterpreted, as no debris was found in the South Indian Ocean where the pings supposedly indicated the plane had crashed.

What is Ashton's theory about the role of the passengers from Freescale Semiconductors on board MH370?

Ashton theorizes that the presence of 20 employees from Freescale Semiconductors, who were experts in semiconductors and plasma physics, might be linked to the plane's disappearance due to a potential espionage or counter-espionage operation involving their intellectual property.

Why does Ashton believe that the videos leaked online are real and not faked?

Ashton argues that the videos show details that are consistent with known military technology and operations, and he has identified a likely leaker with access to such information, Lieutenant Commander Edward C. Lynn. He also counters claims that the videos are faked by pointing out the lack of evidence for manipulation in the alleged source materials.

What is the significance of the 'regicide anon' YouTube channel in relation to the MH370 videos?

The 'regicide anon' YouTube channel is significant because it was the first to publish the MH370 videos. Ashton suggests that the channel's publication of the videos, along with the description indicating the source was protected and received shortly after the disappearance, implies a leak from someone with insider knowledge.

How does Ashton respond to the claims that the MH370 videos are faked using stock footage?

Ashton refutes these claims by arguing that the alleged stock footage does not match the events in the MH370 videos. He also points out that the same stock footage has been used in various other productions without manipulation, and challenges the credibility of those making the claims.

What is Ashton's stance on the debunkers and their arguments against his theory?

Ashton criticizes the debunkers for lacking a coherent alternative explanation for the disappearance of MH370 and for what he perceives as their dishonesty in presenting evidence. He challenges them to provide a plausible explanation for the creation of the videos and the lack of debris in the South Indian Ocean.

Outlines

00:00

🔥 MH370 Mystery and Conspiracy Theories

The paragraph delves into the mysterious disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, discussing the lack of a distress call and the absence of clear reasons for the vanishing act. It introduces Ashton Forbes, who shares his theory that the plane's disappearance might be the biggest conspiracy ever. Ashton suggests that the plane was carrying a significant amount of lithium-ion batteries, which could have caused a fire, and points to witness accounts consistent with this scenario. The conversation also touches on the various conspiracy theories surrounding the event, including hijacking, terrorism, and even black holes.

05:03

👀 Investigating MH370: The Role of Ashton Forbes

Ashton Forbes is presented as a key figure in investigating the MH370 case. His interest in mysterious plane crashes and his dissatisfaction with the official narrative led him to conduct extensive research. Ashton's approach includes active engagement on social media and live streaming to share his findings. He emphasizes his authenticity and transparency, inviting scrutiny to counter accusations of dishonesty. The paragraph also discusses Ashton's background, his methods, and his motivations for pursuing the truth behind MH370.

10:07

🔍 The Evidence and Analysis of MH370's Final Moments

This section focuses on the analysis of evidence related to MH370's final moments. It discusses the plane's cargo, including the suspicious presence of 500 pounds of lithium-ion batteries, which were not declared and were found to be poorly packaged. The paragraph also explores the possibility of a fire event caused by these batteries and how it could have led to the plane's disappearance. Ashton suggests that the batteries might have been used for espionage purposes and that the plane might have been diverted towards a rendezvous point seen in the MH370 videos.

15:08

🛰️ Satellite and Drone Footage: Clues to MH370's Fate

The paragraph examines the significance of satellite and drone footage in understanding what happened to MH370. It discusses the details found within the footage, such as the plane's low altitude and the smoke coming from it, which is indicative of a lithium-ion battery fire. The conversation also addresses the capabilities of the United States' surveillance systems, suggesting that the U.S. government might have knowledge about the plane's true fate. The paragraph raises questions about the authenticity of the footage and the implications of its content.

20:10

🌐 Geopolitical Implications and Theories on MH370

This section explores the geopolitical implications of the MH370 disappearance, focusing on the passenger manifest and the presence of employees from Freescale Semiconductors. It discusses the potential for espionage or counter-espionage involving these individuals and intellectual property theft. The paragraph also delves into the possible use of hypersonic weapons and the role of the United States Navy in the incident. The conversation suggests a complex scenario involving international relations, technology, and secrecy.

25:13

🚁 The Drone's Role and the Leaked Videos' Source

The paragraph discusses the role of a drone that was close to MH370 and the implications of its presence. It suggests that the drone was not there by chance but was part of a planned operation, either for rescue or espionage. The conversation also focuses on the source of the leaked videos that captured the plane's final moments, hinting at a potential whistleblower within the U.S. military. The paragraph raises questions about the credibility of the videos and the motives behind their release.

30:14

🗣️ Public Debate and the Quest for Transparency

This section touches on the public debate surrounding MH370, the credibility of the evidence, and the quest for transparency from authorities. It highlights the challenges faced by those seeking the truth, such as Ashton Forbes, who is advocating for an official statement on the videos and the events surrounding MH370. The paragraph also addresses the reluctance of certain individuals to engage in debate and the importance of maintaining a high standard of evidence in such investigations.

35:15

🔬 The Science Behind the MH370 Theories

The final paragraph delves into the scientific aspects of the MH370 theories, discussing the potential for gravity and space-time manipulation. It mentions the work of Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Bearden and scalar physics, suggesting that the science behind the videos and the events is not only plausible but also aligns with existing research. The conversation emphasizes the importance of an open mind and the potential for groundbreaking discoveries in the field of physics.

Keywords

💡MH370

MH370 refers to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, a Boeing 777 aircraft that disappeared on March 8, 2014, while flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. The plane, carrying 239 people, vanished from radar and has remained a mystery ever since. In the video, MH370 is central to the discussion of a potential conspiracy and the analysis of leaked videos that claim to show the plane's fate.

💡Conspiracy

A conspiracy, in this context, suggests a secret plan or agreement between people to perform an unlawful or harmful act. The video discusses the possibility of the biggest conspiracy ever, hinting at a coordinated effort to hide the true events surrounding MH370's disappearance, as suggested by the alternative theories presented by the interviewee.

💡Lithium ion batteries

Lithium ion batteries are a type of rechargeable battery widely used in electronic devices due to their high energy density. In the transcript, the mention of 500 pounds of lithium ion batteries on the plane suggests a potential cause for a fire event, which is a significant part of the alternative narrative being discussed regarding the plane's disappearance.

💡Fire event

A fire event, as used in the video, refers to a scenario where the plane is suggested to have experienced a fire, possibly caused by the lithium ion batteries. This theory is explored as a potential explanation for the plane's deviation from its flight path and the subsequent lack of debris found in the official search area.

💡Citrix session

Citrix session refers to a remote computing session facilitated by Citrix technology, which allows users to access applications and desktops from a central server. In the context of the video, the mention of a Citrix session is part of the analysis of the leaked videos, suggesting that the videos may have been captured from a secure, remote terminal session.

💡Black holes

Black holes are regions of spacetime where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from it. In the video, the mention of black holes is part of a list of far-fetched theories that have been proposed to explain the disappearance of MH370, though it's used more to illustrate the range of speculative ideas rather than as a serious theory being discussed.

💡ACARS system

ACARS stands for Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, a digital datalink system for transmission of short messages between aircraft and ground stations. In the video, the ACARS system is discussed in relation to the plane's final communications and the timeline of events as the plane went missing.

💡SIBRS system

SIBRS refers to the Space-Based Infrared System, a U.S. military satellite system designed for early warning of missile launches. The video mentions SIBRS in the context of the surveillance capabilities that could have tracked MH370, suggesting that the U.S. government might have more information about the plane's fate than has been disclosed.

💡Diego Garcia

Diego Garcia is a British Indian Ocean Territory and hosts a U.S. military base of the same name. In the video, Diego Garcia is mentioned as a potential location where MH370 may have been diverted or where debris from the plane could have originated, based on alternative theories discussed.

💡Freescale Semiconductor

Freescale Semiconductor was a semiconductor company known for its microcontrollers, sensors, and other technologies. In the video, the company is mentioned because 20 of its employees were on board MH370, leading to speculation about the significance of their presence and potential connections to the plane's disappearance.

Highlights

Discussion on the potential cover-up of the real events surrounding the disappearance of flight MH370.

Analysis of eyewitness accounts and their consistency with a fire event scenario on MH370.

Ashton Forbes introduces his theory on MH370, suggesting it's potentially the biggest conspiracy ever.

Interviewee's confession of being out of depth on the subject but eager to learn more.

Explanation of the significance of lithium-ion batteries onboard MH370 and their potential role in the event.

Discussion on the unusual flight path of MH370 and its deviation from the planned route.

Ashton's journey from a casual observer to an activist seeking the truth about MH370.

Critique of the official narrative of MH370 and the plausibility of the pilot's involvement.

Analysis of the satellite data and the inconsistencies that raise questions about the official story.

The role of the United States' surveillance capabilities in tracking MH370 and the implications of their findings.

Ashton's identification of the individual he believes leaked the MH370 videos and the evidence supporting this claim.

Discussion on the significance of the passengers onboard MH370, including employees from Freescale Semiconductors.

The potential military applications of the technology suggested by the MH370 event.

Ashton's views on the dangers of lithium-ion batteries in aircraft and their role in aviation incidents.

The interviewee's reflections on the implications of the MH370 case for aviation safety and security.

Ashton's call for transparency from the United States government regarding their knowledge of MH370.

Final thoughts on the importance of continuing to question and seek the truth about MH370.

Transcripts

This is why I say that this is potentially the biggest conspiracy ever, because

you look at this and the real story of the plane is one of a fire event,

the flight path going to Penang, 500 pounds of lithium ion batteries, 19

witnesses that either see the plane on fire, hear loud noises, see the

plane descending, uh, consistent with what you would do in a fire scenario.

Or Catherine T, who's in the Nicobar Islands and sees the plane

glowing orange, flying low with smoke coming out of the back of it.

All right.

We are joined today by Ashton Forbes for what may be my most difficult interview.

Ever for multiple reasons, not that Ashton is a difficult

person or anything like that.

He's just a very bright person.

And just from the exposure I have seen, I already know that I am going to be way

out of my depth of knowledge, et cetera.

And what I have seen is Ashton's claims Are literally mind blowing.

So there's a lot going on here.

How are you doing today?

Ashton?

Hey, Eric, it's a pleasure to meet you.

I'm doing great and looking forward to this conversation.

On this particular topic, I am definitely ill informed, so at times I may say,

please talk to me like I'm six years old.

I apologize ahead, but let's go into it.

This is about the infamous flight MH370.

The

Boeing 777 plane carrying 239 people left Kuala Lumpur on March 8, 2014.

But disappeared from the radar shortly after and never made it

to his destination in Beijing.

There was no distress call, no indications of bad weather or

technical faults before it vanished.

I think even Don Lamon, I mean, Don Lemon has been mocked for

statements that he's made about it.

What if it was hijacking or terrorism or mechanical failure or pilot error,

but what if it was something fully that we don't really understand?

A lot of people have been asking about that, about, Black holes and on and on and

on and all of these conspiracy theories.

Let's look at this.

Uh, Noah says, what else can you think about?

Black hole, Bermuda triangle.

You

came on my radar from an individual who studies a lot of body language, statement

analysis and things of that sort.

And the fact that he was endorsing you and as somebody who literally

studies liars makes me go, Hmm, I should talk to this guy.

So what got you on the track?

Of this flight.

Yeah.

The first thing I want to say is whether or not I'm right or

wrong, I'm definitely not a liar.

Uh, and I think that I, I go out of my way to show that by being very active

on social media, engaging every single podcast requests that I can accommodate,

uh, live streaming, a lot of my initial research, uh, as well as almost every

night so that people can see that I'm an authentic person because when people

are liars, like they get caught in a web of lies and that to be careful about.

What lie they say here or there.

Um, for me, I was, I've always been interested in, uh, mysterious

plane crashes and trying to figure out how they crash.

I like Malcolm Ben or, um, Malcolm Gladwell.

Uh, when he talks about, uh, like tipping point and things that like the types of

stuff it takes for accidents to happen.

Um, and I remember I followed MH370 10 years ago.

And I was never very comfortable with what was going on.

It was all this obfuscation around, like every day there was something

new we were finding, Oh, we're searching the South China sea.

Now we're searching over in the Malacca straits and the Andaman sea.

And then now it's all of a sudden the South Indian ocean.

Um, and even before I got really involved in this last year.

I knew the United States government must know more about

what happened to this plane.

I knew our surveillance capabilities.

I didn't know exactly what they were back then, but they must be pretty advanced.

So, um, when I saw the MH370 videos re emerge on the social media site

Reddit, uh, last year, I was very intrigued because I had remembered

seeing the drone video back in 2014 when I was just a casual observer

of the disappearance of the plane.

And like many people even now, I had dismissed it.

I thought that has to be fake.

I don't know how it could be fake, but I just thought it has to be fake.

And the thing that changed my mind right away when I saw the second video, I

didn't realize there was a second video that was in perfect synchronization with

the first, that there's no discrepancies on a single frame in either video.

And that's the part where something this incredible deserves to be investigated.

Um, especially because of the implications of it.

Uh, and the part where I started to get really, uh, let's say activist

about it is when we realized that I had been looking at the videos

independently while, uh, the, uh, Reddit community and social media community

on Twitter and 4chan even actually were looking into all the details.

And I had noticed that it wasn't somebody who had filmed, uh, the drone or the,

uh, satellite video with a camera.

It wasn't someone who's sitting there with a camera filming that you didn't

see the computer screen, like you often see on some of these leaks.

It was actually somebody who had cropped the screen and we could tell because

you could see this mouse come in from the top, right, and go off the screen on

the bottom left, which indicates we're looking at a cropped field of view.

And I thought, wow, that's a weird detail to add if this is a hoax video.

And at the same time, The people on social media had figured out that

the mouse itself was at 24 frames per second, and the background is only six

frames per second, which is indicative of a remote terminal citric session.

Somebody actually logged in to a real database.

So if people don't know what that means is that.

When you work for a big company, what you normally do is you log in

using Citrix to their environment to access their databases.

And this is exactly how we imagine we're able to deduce that

the SPI satellite system works.

It's a ground based computer system that pulls satellite data all the time and

is building a rendered 3D environment.

That people can then use to track missiles, planes, boats, anything

the military wants to track.

Um, and when I saw that, I went, wow, we, I was like, this is like, that

to me was already like hard evidence.

So what we're looking at here is real.

I don't know how anyone could even imagine faking that.

A couple of things.

Um, real quick.

Um, Citrix essentially is.

Acting as a dump terminal to a mainframe and in the case of satellite footage

or whatever, there would be a server farm or something of that sort,

probably collecting the data and nobody would be directly logged into it.

They would all be going in through windowing or citric sessions, I

believe is what you're describing now.

Really quickly, before we get too deep into the videos and things

like that, let's just step back.

Can we talk about what is the narrative of the flight?

Well, there's the official story is that we don't know what happened to the plane.

If you go look it up right now, that's the official story is they just don't know.

Uh, which is pretty damn odd, uh, planes don't just disappears, not

in 2014 with all the surveillance capabilities that we have out there.

Um, but the narrative that most people are familiar with is this idea that

the pilot took control of the plane and flew it into the South Indian

Ocean, which is easily disproved.

Um, it's not even necessarily something that a pilot can actually do, which

is make a plane go entirely dark.

Uh, the officials have actually ruled out the pilot, saying that they're not

under the impression that it's something that could be pulled off by them.

Uh, the pilot's mental health screen was clean.

The family has supported him.

Uh, the coworkers said he's a great guy.

So yeah, the, the situation as well with the flight path is that

if you're going to crash a plane or a plane, you just crash it.

If you look up other incidents where it happened, like the German

wings incident in 2015, uh, the guy locked out the co pilot and

crashes the plane under 10 minutes.

When you look at the flight path, you see that this flight turned around.

And it went directly to Penang, which is the closest airport that

you would go to to land a Boeing 777.

In addition to that, uh, the flight simulator data, people think, oh,

well, he practiced this route.

The FBI and Malaysian government ruled out the simulator data.

Uh, even more so, we can prove that it's not true because we've

looked at the simulator data.

And there's analysis out there.

If you just Google MH one five zero, it turns out that it was literally

MH one five zero from Kuala Lumpur to Jeddah that he was practicing

on February 2nd and February 3rd.

He was scheduled to fly that route February 4th.

Um, and so what some of these, uh, I.

I use the term journalist very loosely here.

Some of these investigators into the case originally falsely compared

that, uh, that flight path, because it goes Northwest to part of the flight

path of what the plane actually took.

And they say, Oh, this proves that he was practicing that, but that's, that's a lie.

So, um, this goes to show that there is some major mystery around this

and only a few countries have the capability to obfuscate to this level.

Um, this is.

This is why I say that this is potentially the biggest conspiracy ever, because

you look at this and the real story of the plane is one of a fire event, the

flight path going to Penang, 500 pounds of lithium ion batteries, 19 witnesses

that either see the plane on fire, hear loud noises, see the plane descending,

uh, consistent with what you would do in a fire scenario, or Catherine T who's

in the Nicobar Islands and sees the plane glowing orange, flying low with

smoke coming out of the back of it.

All these witnesses had to be discredited in order to come up with this cover story

of it going to the South Indian ocean.

Okay.

Can you define the fire event?

Yeah.

So right away, one of the things that sticks out is that you find

out that the Malaysian CEO lied, uh, on March 13th saying there was no

dangerous cargo on board the airplane.

And then it wasn't until March 20th, 2014, where they admitted that there

was, um, at least 500 pounds of lithium ion batteries in the cargo bay.

These have been outlawed since then in the passenger.

Why were they there?

Uh, well, that's a good question.

Presumably they're being shipped to, to Beijing, but that's the big question

is that if you, uh, are a believer of the narrative and story that I've put

forth, this was some type of espionage event and these batteries have a very

specific purpose, which is to ignite at that certain point and divert the

plane back to the other direction, uh, potentially towards the rendezvous point.

That we see in the MH370 videos, it's very suspicious that you have these

very extremely dangerous batteries that managed to miss two security

screenings on board this plane.

We found out the two pallets of them were also in the forward cargo bay.

Right next to the MEC, the main equipment center, also known as the electronics bay.

So you imagine if those batteries exploded and ignited, they could

have easily damaged the electronics bay causing this plane to go dark.

Um, I was always suspicious of those batteries and it wasn't until I found

out about Catherine T that I, we were able to piece it together because

Catherine T sees a glowing orange plane.

Well, the Halon 1301 fire extinguishing devices have bromine in them.

Which is a halogen gas.

If you go look at a halogen lamp and compare it to Catherine T's sightings

from her old blog posts, you'll see it's a perfect match of halogen lamp.

Um, so the idea here is that the how on fire extinguishing devices,

which can last for up to 3 hours.

We're battling this cargo bay fire.

And there was a chemical reaction that's releasing bromine for an hour

enough so that Catherine T sees this glowing orange halo around the plane.

To me, the fire scenario is indisputable and the only reason why the experts have

all dismissed it is because they've all, uh, believed that these satellite pings

that say that the plane went into the South Indian Ocean must be accurate.

But we looked all up and down the seventh arc where these experts used a novel

analysis to determine where the plane must have gone and we didn't find anything.

We didn't find one piece of the plane down there.

We didn't find any black boxes.

We found absolutely nothing.

Uh, I looked at the satellite pings myself and you can see right at 1840 UTC when

this plane is in this, in the Nicobar Islands, the data after that is only 10

rows of data for the next five hours.

Before that it's hundreds Why is that

significant that there's few rows and versus many rows?

Yeah, so,

The, the experts would say that the ACARS system was turned off

at 1707, which is about 10 minutes before the plane goes dark.

What is the ACARS system?

Uh, ACARS is the, the tracking system that they use on the computers in order to, uh,

the flight management system, I believe.

Oh, actually the FML is a, is a different one, but the ACARS is basically

the computer system that's pinging nonstop and, and sending this data.

Um, but the data from 1707 to 1840, where the plane is then over the Nicobar

Islands, Is full hundreds of rows of data out there that you can, you can watch

you scroll down through it, but then once you get to 1840, the next ping is 1941.

It's just 2 rows of data.

Then 2041 2 rows of data.

20, uh, 2141 until 2315.

And there's also a pattern in that data.

It seems to change.

Like if anyone's familiar with databases or, uh, Excel spreadsheets,

you can look at that right away.

You go, this seems odd.

All of a sudden the data becomes very sparse.

And I've confronted the experts and said, why is this change right here?

And they say, well, the, the ACAR system was turned off and I go,

well, but the ACAR system was turned off at 1707, not at 1840.

So why is the data full up until that point?

If, okay, um, because I'm lost on that, if it was off, there

should be no rows, right?

Well that's the thing that's also unclear, like I can't get a straight answer

from the supposed experts about what we would expect if it's off or if it's on.

What I can say is that if the argument is that it was turned off at 1707,

then I expect consistency in the data between 1707 and the time after that.

And that there's not the inconsistency happens in 1840.

So if there was some explanation for why this should have changed at 1840,

I would expect the ACAR system and turned off at 1840 or some other event

to have happened at 1840, the point being, when you look at the flight

path and you see this plane flying up to Beijing, cut back across Malaysia,

go to Penang, and then it goes up the Malacca Straits, uh, and Nicobar islands.

And then all of a sudden it takes a sharp turndown.

The point where you see this deviation in the data is the

exact point where this plane turns down in the South Indian Ocean.

The argument that I'm presenting is that it just never turned

into the South Indian Ocean.

You ignore those 10 rows of data where we never found the plane in the South

Indian Ocean, and now the obvious scenario is an emergency fire event where this

plane ends in the Nicobar Islands.

And the reason why that has to be obfuscated is because if that

happened, where'd the plane go?

Why is there not a plane in the Nicobar Islands?

Well, we have two videos showing it disappearing, uh, in the

same location where Catherine T.

sees it on the ground.

And we have a Mayday call only reported in China Times.

You guys can find it.

It's only in Chinese, not reported in Western media.

They claim that China had intercepted a communication from the Thai embassy.

From Malaysian Airlines MH370, saying that the plane was disintegrating

and attempting an emergency landing, which is consistent with two

videos that we have, as well as the eyewitness testimony from Catherine T.

in the same location.

Okay, so just so I'm clear on all this, um, your contention is that

the, Sparse data that actually is there was potentially added after the

fact to give a breadcrumbs for the plane to be somewhere else, uh, by

manipulating the record or, or doing something inserting this extra data.

That's number one.

And then number two, I guess is who actually controls that tracking system and

who has the capability of turning it on.

And turning it off and what are the procedures as to why

it would be turned on or off?

I would think you would have tracking on all the time.

Yeah, and I'm not an expert on those systems.

So, um, we'll have to ask the experts if you want to talk to them about how it

can be turned off or on or what have you.

All I know is that they've argued that it was turned off.

Um, the, uh, New York Times actually asked the Malaysian minister of

transport, I think it was the next day.

Can, is it even possible for an airplane to go dark?

Is that even a thing?

thing that you can do is just turn off all the electronic signals, they

wouldn't even answer the question.

Is it possible for a 777 to turn off all of its diagnostic information

that it regularly sends out?

I mean, is that, is that actually technically possible that it would A,

disappear from the radar, but also all of this diagnostic information that's

routinely sent out to the public?

Would, would just cease.

Is there a button that you can press to do that?

I think

that's, that is something that, uh, we are all like to know the answers as well.

And we are, we are investigating on that, on that, on that matter.

And we are, we are talking to the experts from the airline.

And also, uh, we will get assistance from Boeing, in fact, on this matter.

That will be part of the investigation.

Wouldn't it be a basic question?

Just a basic question, can an aircraft disappear into thin air?

I

just, I just cannot speculate something that we are not sure.

No, it's better that we get, uh, from the, from the right resources,

from the, from what is, what is the technicalities of the aircraft.

I think to be, you have to be fair to us.

We have to look at every angle.

We just cannot do something very fragmentally or piece,

piecemeal, uh, investigation.

You can't just simply turn everything off like that.

Rolls Royce engine data should have been transmitting non stop.

Rolls Royce has never made their information public.

In fact, they had come out, uh, a Wall Street Journal article.

Had supposedly talked to Rolls Royce and they were making the claim that

this plane had, uh, still had some engine data that was transmitting.

And then all of a sudden that had to be retracted, um, to me, it's very obvious

that either those pings are falsified, uh, they're either, or misinterpreted.

I don't know the exact nature of what happened.

All I know is that we never found a plane in the South Indian ocean

where those pings supposedly should be able to pinpoint.

The location of that plane, based on this analysis, um, so, you know, to me, that's

the part where I think that if you look at the flight path and you take away those,

those pings out there, that shows that, you know, we have a completely different

event on our hands at that point.

Um, and just to, uh.

Add to it.

We found the surveillance capabilities of the United States government.

So we have something called SIBRS system, which is what I was talking

about before regarding the ground based computer systems that have

satellites all over the world, scanning the entire world all the time.

SIBRS is the nation's next generation of space based infrared surveillance.

The program has already proven its value with successful HEO payloads on orbit.

With deployment of the GEO spacecraft, SIBRS will be an unprecedented resource

as the nation's global, taskable, and persistent infrared monitoring sentinel.

We found USA 229, which is a NOS, Naval Ocean Surveillance Spy Satellite, in

the Malacca Straits, uh, at the exact time when Malaysia and Airlines Flight

370 was in the Nicobar Islands there, staring down right at the plane.

So the United States government knows, no doubt whatsoever, whether

or not this plane turned into the South Indian Ocean or not.

Uh, an issue of a question we found out about the Sosa system,

the sound surveillance system that uses acoustic detectors.

That was the one that heard the Titan sub.

Uh, they have acoustic systems within Diego Garcia, as

well as Western Australia.

Absolutely would have heard the plane crash.

Um, and then we also found out about the over the horizon radar, which can see

thousands of miles, which means that at least Pine Gap military base and Diego

Garcia would have had the capability to track the plane start to finish also

the joran system generally operational radar network, which is in Australia

is supposedly also an over the horizon system, uh, over the horizon radar

system that would have seen the plane if it had gone in the South Indian Ocean.

So we know for sure that we would attract it.

So why did we not find anything down there?

People would say, well, there was some debris, debris washed up in Africa.

Yeah, it washed up in Africa, not, not Australia, two to 3000 miles away.

It's actually impossible for most of that debris to have drifted

from the supposed crash site in South Indian ocean to Africa.

And even the flapper on wasn't even connected with a unique serial number.

The media doesn't tell you that, but even if it, even if that is MH370, um,

that's the scenario I've put forth.

It's not inconsistent at all.

In fact, the flapper on they did, uh, this modeling, but the problem

was the flapper on, on the model was sticking out of the water like this.

And they're like, oh, that's great.

Cause we can blow it and it will explain how it got to the reunion islands.

The problem is there's barnacles on the parts that they claim was out

of the water, which is impossible.

Piece of wing on reunion island.

It's very hard to trace back to exactly where it crashed.

If you mean exactly within, you know, 10 miles, even 100 miles, you're right.

But to say it generally came from the eastern Indian

Ocean is definitely possible.

Marine biologists will take a hard look at the sea life from the age and type of

barnacles and microorganisms for clues.

And furthermore, they looked at the barnacles, and the barnacles only

had four months of growth on them.

But they claim that the flapper on was in the water for 16 months.

So if it was four months, there's no way it could have drifted 2, 000

miles to get to reunion islands.

But I have a better location for where that debris could come from.

It's called Diego Garcia military base, which is halfway from the

supposed crash site to Africa.

Um, so that's just some additional evidence that.

I think conclusively shows this plane couldn't have crashed

in the South Indian Ocean.

The United States government knows exactly what happened to it and that the more

likely, uh, location for this plane, uh, if it did crash, I would say somewhere

much further west near the Maldives.

Um, but I personally believe this plane got to Diego Garcia and

potentially was ripped apart.

Now, you said something earlier that, you know, sticks in my mind

and I don't know the details on how plane crashes work, but you said

that they said it was disintegrating.

Is it possible that it could have disintegrated to an extremely high

degree and there just was nothing to crash or very, very little debris left?

Depressive.

Yeah, I think the debris that was found is actually consistent with

the disintegration of the fire event.

Um, a B 777 fire suppression device washed up in the Maldives

has a visible serial number on it.

Uh, the officials just didn't even address it.

They just said, we're not going to look at that.

It's not part of MH370.

Uh, it was actually reported on as a bomb.

Even though it's obviously a B777 fire suppression device, uh, 20 islanders

in the Maldives reported seeing MH370 on a tiny island, only 3, 000

people in the early morning hours flying south towards Diego Garcia.

Um, so I think that the, the debris that was out there is only consistent

with the story that I've put forth.

None of the other stories are consistent with where the debris showed up.

Some of the debris even has visible scorch marks on it.

I've showed this as well.

It's obviously scorch marks.

Like if you put fire to something and you see this scorch mark appear on the debris,

um, so the thing with the fire people say is, well, it would burn up too quickly,

but actually that's, I think people say that because they haven't looked into

how the fire suppression systems work.

Uh, the fire suppression systems automatically deploy right away

and they'll put out the fire and lithium ion battery fires.

The issue is that you can put them out, but they just come back up again.

It's called thermal runaway.

Now during a thermal runaway, you start off with a battery failure, a

single battery cell, and that cell you have no chance of extinguishing.

Um, so you have this idea where the automatic suppression system

is going to put out the fire It's going to come back up again.

And then they have these low rate, um, ones where they then aren't

for can last for up to three hours.

So you can imagine a scenario where the automatic ones do high flow rate.

They put out the fire, uh, crew is freaking out.

They're going to go down.

They're going to start pouring water on it, which is what you're supposed

to do for lithium ion battery fires.

Uh, you're gonna have this chemical reaction happening, and then they're

trying to keep that fire at bay as best as they can, so the plane doesn't literally

fall apart or get holes burnt into it and, you know, become destabilized.

The

only thing you can do is stop the propagation.

In a cascading thermal runaway, you have one cell that fails, it

heats up, it thermally damages all the cells around them.

They fail.

You keep having cells that are in contact with each other fail.

And then they're going to also depressurize the plane because the halon

fire extinguishing devices absorb oxygen.

It takes oxygen out of the environment.

Um, and in fact, it was just recently shown that the turn back when the

plane goes dark and turns back around, they did an emergency descent as well.

Um, some of the experts reanalyzed the rate that radar pins and found

that they took an emergency descent, which is exactly what you would do in

the fire scenario if you're a pilot.

Um, so then that's where I think there was also eight fishermen on a

boat, 10 minutes after the plane goes dark, that see the plane flying low,

which corroborates that again, with eyewitness testimony, um, So to me,

it's just undeniable that it was a fire.

Uh, and then, you know, the only thing you have to, for the story that I

put forth, the only thing you have to throw out is those satellite pings,

where we see this anomalous 10 rows of data, whether or not the United

States government's, uh, fabricated those misinterpreted spoofed them.

There's a lot of different theories out there.

I don't personally care what they did with it.

But what I strongly believe is that the United States government, uh,

came up with, took them about five days to come up with a cover story.

And on March 13th, the United States unnamed intelligence sources went

to the media and said, this plane went into the South Indian ocean.

The reason why they did that is they needed to send people on a wild

goose chase where they knew they would never find anything down there.

And then it wasn't until May 9th or May 28th, 2014.

Roughly almost 90 days later, 80, 90 days later that they finally Emersat

finally released the first 47 page report with the raw telemetry data.

The problem is the MH370 satellite video that has coordinates in the bottom

left that indicate the real location of the plane in Nicobar Islands, where

it turned to the South Indian Ocean.

That was published on May 19th.

Nine days before that data.

So unless the person that made these videos has the ability of precognition,

there's no way they could have known where to put that plane there just as easily

would have put that plane in the South China sea or the South Indian ocean.

But why did they put it directly there in the Nicobar islands?

Because that's where the plane ended up.

Okay.

Some, uh, other questions like, okay.

So one of the big, um, mysteries of this scenario is the massive

amount of lithium ion that was on the plane, which doesn't belong.

And I think you did say offhandedly and I interrupted you, but, um, was it that

long after this flight that lithium ion, you know, got limited to only a

hundred watts or whatever it is for, um, And it had to be on the plane and not

in the luggage compartment on planes?

Yeah, they're literally not allowed in the cargo bay of passenger planes at all.

Um, and if you go, next time you get on a flight, they will ask you when

you check your bag, if you have lithium ion batteries in your checked bag.

So, even a tiny lithium ion battery like this, they're afraid of.

And we're talking about 500 pounds of these things stacked up on one another

unsafely stacked, I would add, because we've looked, if you go look at the

official ATSB report, you'll see, these are not safely packaged at all.

Um, just loaded up in cardboard boxes on top of each other, on

a, on a pallet out there, um, they were put together that day.

As well, if you even mail a letter at the post office, they'll ask you, even if it's

just a little piece of paper and a letter, just like, you know, like something I've

got like this, they'll say, Is there any lithium ion batteries in there?

You're like,

they've got stickers on the side of the boxes whenever you

order from Amazon or wherever.

And some of these planes

burnt up a bunch of planes burnt up between 2010 and 2014 as well.

People even now don't realize how extremely dangerous lithium ion batteries

are in the cargo bay of, of, uh, Any plane, but let alone passenger ones.

Um, so I don't think, I don't know.

We had found evidence that they had outlawed them in 2015, but

there's a bunch of different reports out there between like the.

2015, 2017, where they got much more visibility.

If you look up the FAA's website, you'll actually find that even after

they've outlawed them in the last two years, I think it's like 74 incidents

in domestic flights in the United States alone, where there's still been fires.

Now we're talking about like.

People's cell phones in the passenger area up above that are like starting on fire

and they have these special bags that they put them in and then they just pour water

on them and that's how they put them out.

So it's happening even now, more than one per week.

So these things are extremely dangerous and anybody who's telling

you differently, um, you know, is potentially just kind of not really aware

of all the dangers that are out there.

Okay.

So that's, That's the cargo.

So the next question would be, and I have handily heard you talk about it.

What about the passenger manifest as in who was on this

flight of any significance?

Were there anybody?

Yeah.

And there is, and this is all this really surprised me because I was

just a guy that came into this thinking we're going to find evidence.

These videos are fake.

Nothing's going to line up that, you know, These videos must've been shot or made

to be shot in the South Indian ocean.

I thought that the pings were accurate when I first dug into this.

Uh, then we find out about those batteries.

We find out that the pings look like extremely sketchy at a minimum.

Uh, and then we look at the passenger manifest and we find out that there's

20 employees from a company called Freescale Semiconductors, which is

an American company and eight of the people on board are Chinese nationals

and 12 are Malaysian nationals.

And when it comes to intellectual property theft.

The number one target are Chinese nationals that work for American

companies, 600 billion that costs United States companies every single year.

Semiconductors, semiconductors and plasma physics are the secret to

the technology we see in the videos.

In the MH370 videos, we're seeing floating orbs, I call them

super conductive harmonic orbs.

Um, but really it's a plasma field around a smaller object.

And if you look up hypersonic weapons, you will find that hypersonic

weapons use a plasma sheath.

In front of them in order to be able to achieve these hypersonic speeds that

they do Um, and I think that what we're looking at these videos is united states

hypersonic weapons And I don't think it's any coincidence that there's 20

people from this free scale semiconductor company that were all supposedly very

important people According to news reports about them way too many people

From one company to be on the same plane.

Were they scientists specifically?

Yeah, they were engineers and

supposedly they were going to China to upgrade the plants in China as well.

At least that's the cover story.

There's a FSB, which is Russia's like FBI, um, report out there that people

just thought was disinformation, but it actually literally says that the United

States Navy took this plane and that Russia doesn't know why and that China

was actually going to divert the plane.

Due to the people on board, and it even speculates that the United States put

cargo on the plane for a specific reason that came from the Alabama Mursk, which

is famous for, uh, the Captain Phelps, uh, movie with Tom Hanks in it, um, and

actually two Navy SEALs mysteriously overdosed, uh, a couple months earlier.

That we're guarding cargo on that boat, uh, that we're working for

a company called Trident and their story is extremely suspicious.

The families related to those seals say that they never do drugs and somehow

they both overdose simultaneously.

So there's a lot of really, really weird stuff going on here.

But one thing I'm sure about is the free scale.

Semiconductor scientists are connected to this.

Um, I, the story that I put forth is one of espionage or count counter

espionage, uh, which is definitely hard to believe, but you could imagine

Especially this is my own government.

I'm talking about here, and I don't want to think that we are this

potentially evil and nefarious, but, um.

The evidence, the story that fits the best is one where we set these batteries

on this plane, uh, potentially even ignited them at a specific point in time

when the plane was at its weak point between radars to have the longest time

for people to react and then diverted that plane intentionally, maybe even

took over the plane, uh, after it got to Penang because it doesn't land there

for whatever reason and sent it to the rendezvous point where we had our

hypersonic weapons ready to, um, You know, there's not an easy way to put

this, warp drive the plane somewhere else.

People call it teleportation, but really it's a manipulation of space time itself.

Um, and then we warp this plane somewhere to the west, consistent

with the right hand rule.

When we see these orbs spin around the plane, and when we look at the right

hand rule, the direction, the vector direction of the travel is backwards.

We see the plane traveling east.

That means this plane is going to go to the west.

And what's west of the Nicobar Islands?

The Maldives are exactly the place with a B triple seven fire suppression device

washed ashore where the 20 Islanders saw the plane flying towards Diego Garcia.

Diego Garcia is the location where basically every conspiracy

theory out there about this plane says this plane ended up.

Um, so I can't prove that that's where the plane ended up, but it's consistent

with where the debris washed ashore.

And if I was a betting person, if I'm in Vegas or whatever, I'm putting

it all on Diego Garcia and I'm just saying, okay, we're Flip over your hand.

Let me see what you got.

All right.

We got a head because I definitely wanted to dig into that theory.

We've let it slip ahead of time, but let's back up another step.

Um, the videos that were leaked online, what was the source or who

was the source for these videos?

So we went back to the Wayback Machine because the YouTube channel

has been deleted since, uh, this has all been uncovered in 2023.

Uh, the, the account name was regicide and non for the

earliest one that we could find.

We looked back to find if there were earlier versions.

There might be, if so, all traces of them have been wiped out.

Um, but Regicide Anon first uploaded the videos published May 19th, 2014.

The satellite video was in the description of that video.

It says received March 12th, 2014, which is four days after the plane disappeared.

And it says source protected.

We looked at their other videos from their, their, uh, YouTube channel.

None of them have information like this in terms of like, some of them say source

email submission and things like that.

This seems to just be a random UFO account.

Not necessarily the person who leaked these videos.

They just found them somewhere.

In fact, there was a higher quality version of the satellite video.

The regicide and non version is 3d stereoscopic, which means there's

two videos with slightly different angles, which is what USA 229, the

spy satellite we found has capability of doing with a sister satellite

right next to it that could do that.

But then there's one higher quality video that has just one

video without the side by side.

That was published, I believe, in, uh, June, somewhere between June and August.

I'd have to find the exact date.

Um, but since it's higher quality and you can't make a higher quality

video from a lower quality video, this would indicate that neither

of these is the original source.

Um, people have speculated that this, the videos got published to

a forum or the dark web somewhere.

And these people picked it up and they uploaded it.

The, the drone video.

So we have two videos, perfect synchronization.

One of them are from two completely different angles.

One is from one side of the plane angled down like low earth orbit satellite

would look, uh, and then the other one's from the drone, an MQ one C gray eagle

looking horizontally at the plane from the other perspective on the other side.

What was the drone doing there?

Sorry, what?

What was the drone doing there?

Yeah, so this is where, to me, it has to be espionage, has to be an operation.

And if you look at the drone video, you can clearly tell

this is an operation because the drone is very close to the plane.

This isn't a situation where the drone's seeing the plane in the distance.

This drone is, goes underneath the wake of the plane.

So, To me, there's only two scenarios that make sense.

One is that the fire was accidental and that the United States government

was reacting to the fire because this plane is doomed and it's going

to try to land in the ocean and rip apart and everybody's going to drown.

And that's what I thought for the longest time.

Uh, but it just, it didn't fit with all the evidence as well

as the story of espionage.

The story of espionage would say this event was planned for

months, that they knew these people were going to be on this plane.

They knew exactly when they were going to be there.

They knew they were defecting to China.

Uh, that China was trying to steal this intellectual property from free

scale semiconductors, potentially the exact technology used on the

plane and that they had set the assets in the, in the location.

Now there's also was the Cobra gold and Cope tiger exercises

that were going on in that area.

So these are yearly exercises that the United States does military exercises.

Uh, the theme of the Cope tiger exercises, which were slated to begin March 10th.

Uh, just two days after this plane disappears was actually

search and rescue that year.

I have FOIA'd the Navy for a list of the assets that were in the area

because I want to figure out if they have MQ 1C Grey Eagles that were around

there that could have been filming it.

Okay.

So the, the drones weren't happenstance.

Either way you look at it, you're saying that either, Oh my God,

we're losing track of this plane.

Let's fire a drone up there very quickly to see if we can catch what's going on.

Or, The drone was there the whole time surveilling the plane for whatever

reason it was surveilling the drone can't

catch the plane and it doesn't have as high an altitude capability as the plane.

So this, it's not a situation where the drone was just randomly

there and catching the plane.

It was definitely a planned operation one way or another.

Either a rescue operation or a counter espionage operation,

however you want to think of it.

Um, that's really the only stories that make sense regarding the drone

video being there and checking it out.

Uh, we also can tell it's low altitude.

Some people say, well, the drone can't fly that high.

Can't be real, but we can tell because we see cumulus clouds in both

videos, that this is a low altitude.

This is under 10, 000 feet that we're looking at in these videos, which

also tells us that we are not seeing contrails come out of the back of the

planes, literally impossible for those to be contrails coming out of the back

of the plane in both these videos.

That's smoke coming out of the plane, um, from the lithium ion battery fire.

And some people say, well, you can't see the smoke in infrared cameras, but we're

dealing with multi spectral military grade cameras here that, uh, definitely

have the capability to see smoke.

Um, it's not like off the shelf commercial grade equipment.

We actually even found this West cam MX 25, where there's

a example of it from 2015.

That shows, uh, basically identical video capabilities to

what we see in our drone as well.

Um, so I think we've essentially identified every asset, identified the

cameras, we've even identified how the satellite capabilities work with the cyber

system and the ground based computers.

It actually integrates with real Google earth, uh, as well as something

called quick terrain modeler.

That was brought to my attention.

We looked it up and the military DOD and intelligence communities

use this quick train modeler and integrate it with Google earth.

And this is how they track objects.

Um, so it, you know, we deduce the capabilities and then found out

that's actually how they really work.

Okay.

So, um, I'm going to circle back again, though, um, do you have a name of a person

or are people who could have actually.

Leaked because I would imagine this is not publicly available information,

you know, for a FOIA or anything else this you said there was a screenshot

of a Citrix session showing a mouse.

It was deliberately cropped.

That implies a an individual had done this and had put this out there.

Do you have any theories or anything

Not only do I have theories, not only do we have a list, I have the

actual guy who leaked these videos.

Uh, I couldn't believe we found it.

So there's people out there that think these videos are fake, that

somebody CGI'd them, that these random YouTubers have found assets that match.

And somehow that means these videos are fake, but nobody has produced a

hoaxer with any evidence, any credible evidence that they made these videos.

Meanwhile, I was able to find and identify with an extremely

high degree of certainty, the guy that leaked these videos.

Uh, it took a couple of weeks, dug around, had to dig through Google,

change all the date ranges around, look for people that had been charged with,

you know, espionage and retention of classified information, dissemination.

And then I find, I hit the Patriot, Lieutenant Commander Edward C.

Lynn.

Somebody that nobody really knows about.

All the news stories about him are really odd and obfuscated.

They won't say exactly what it was that he leaked.

They throw random like prostitution charges on a guy that is, uh, facing

espionage and life in prison to just try to like discredit him that's out there.

I FOIA'd the FBI and NCIS.

FBI rejected my FOIA for, you know, personal information reasons.

The NCIS rejected it in total under an Obama era exemption to

be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy.

When you look at the videos, you can tell this is a U.

S.

military personnel is the person that leaked them.

There had to probably be an operator because they knew enough about the

systems to remove the HUD data.

They were trying to protect U.

S.

intelligence by cropping the satellite video to take out the

drone and potentially other assets.

They may not even have wanted to leak the drone video, but only leaked the

drone video because people didn't take the satellite video seriously enough.

They probably had an emotional reaction to what they were looking at based

on Regicide Anon saying that they received the footage four days later.

You can imagine somebody looks at a plane disappearing and they go,

Oh my God, what just happened?

I've got to tell the world about this.

Otherwise, they're never going to figure it out.

Um, They probably had to convince Regicide Anon that the videos were

authentic because Regicide Anon supposedly received this footage on March 12th, but

they didn't publish it until May 19th.

So you can imagine if you receive this, you're like, no, this can't be real.

And then the person's telling you like, it's real.

Like I'm the guy that leaked this.

I use these assets.

Uh, so we start looking into the background of

Lieutenant Commander Edward C.

Lynn turns out he's on the special projects patrol squadron called the

VPU 2 wizards that flies in the most sensitive spy planes on the planet.

Somebody actually just recently told me too that the VP squadrons actually have

deployments in Diego Garcia as well, which if true is pretty damning Um, he

would have flown on P 8 Poseidon as well as the Lockheed Martin EP 3 Ares II That

particular plane has real time tactical SIGINT, which is signals intelligence and

full motion video intelligence And the bat and the crew fuses collected intelligence

along with off board data for battlefield situational awareness, like the role

of what his job was, was literally to be tracking planes just like this.

The case against him got a code name rogue archer, which I just think is interesting.

The signals intelligence is how all these assets communicate wirelessly,

like a military internet network, uh, the drone, the satellite spy plane.

This is how all this stuff comes together.

The dates are extremely damning.

He was deployed to the VPU two squadron, February of 2014.

We got a, uh, quote from his lawyer and one of the articles that said

the case against them began, the investigation began April 2nd.

2014, which remember if he was logged into that Citrix session,

they're going to have logs for it.

And I was looking for somebody who would have got caught pretty quickly.

Cause the moment they see this on the internet, they're going to be looking

for who's the guy that potentially leaked this or had unauthorized access

to the data, his Lieutenant commander, Edward C Lin's actual role was to relay

information to upper command as well.

So he would have been a guy in the right position of access to all this footage.

He would have been knowledgeable enough to know how to download it

and potentially disseminate it.

And

enough rank to maybe get it outside.

Yes, exactly.

And then in May of 2014, he accidentally left flight, two flight manifests in his

flight suit that included deployments from Search and Rescue, with Search

and Rescue code names in them, which is, the only Search and Rescue in that

time period would have been MH370.

There's even an article on the internet about his case, where at

the top, it has a picture of a P 8 Poseidon literally searching for MH370.

It says in the caption, And I'm like, why, why is that on an article about this guy?

Um, because people even just tangently were putting the

two, two and two together.

Uh, but the real kicker is that the defense argued that the classified

information in question is available on the internet that he leaked.

Um, He ended up taking a plea deal, only pleading to the charges

that he was actually guilty of.

Like him, he, his family came out with this big campaign

about how he's being vilified.

The lawyers argued that the prostitution charge and the other

stuff that they're putting out there to the media was just obfuscation.

The military was actually afraid that if the case went to court, They would

have to make the information that he leaked publicly available, um, that

they would have to say what it is.

Um, and if you look up similar cases for espionage, they have no problem

talking about what people leak.

There's one recently where they're talking about exactly how much money trying to

pay the guy to leak information out there.

But for this guy, they won't say anything about it.

And it's pretty obvious because if these videos are what this guy leaked,

uh, and they were to admit to it, You have a lot of tough questions

to answer about why we got crazy hypersonic orbs that can, uh, warp a

plane from one location to the other.

Um, his charge sheet is heavily redacted.

It was the first major incident of espionage and an active duty member

of the Navy since the end of the cold war, they were trying to get him in

prison for life, but they ended up having to admit that there was no

evidence whatsoever that he exchanged any information with anyone from China.

But if you're the United States and you've had this counter espionage mission, And

then you see these videos get leaked.

You're going to think that the person that leaked them is spying for China.

Because you're giving away all the secrets about the operation that we just did.

But then you go and you talk to him and you find out, no, like, he didn't even

know possibly what he was looking at.

And he was just trying to tell the world, like, this is what happened to MH370.

Maybe he thought just some random orbs, you know, wiped it out,

zapped it, or something like that.

And that's why he potentially came out and then took the plea deal and admitted

that what he did was wrong and that he wanted to be an example for anyone

else who would, who would do that.

Because this was a guy that was, by all accounts, a patriot.

And we trusted him with like nuclear weapons.

Um, so yeah, the United States had to admit that it wasn't even really a spy

case in the end, which begs the question, if it wasn't really a spy case, why

is this information being, uh, held up from the FOIA request due to national

security reasons and foreign policy?

I hate to go here, but you know, I'm being realistic and my mind goes dark.

Currently, we have, um, issues with another Or with an airplane manufacturer,

Boeing, and, uh, people who have been whistleblowing are no longer with us.

So, I don't know if anybody's ever asked you, but why is he

still with us and why are you?

No, those are, those are good questions.

Um, and part of the reason why I'm saying his name is to protect him.

Because if all of a sudden there's an obituary about Edward C.

Lynn, it's going to look extremely suspicious.

Edward C.

Lynn has not reached out to me to tell me to stop saying his name, despite

the fact that I bring this up on many, many, many podcasts, uh, if these videos

are real, um, he is potentially in danger and I'm potentially in danger.

In fact, I've heard through back channels, people that are connected,

that they are worried about me and the information that I'm disseminating.

And this is part of the reason why I'm being so high profile about

it is that, uh, a, I don't care.

Even if it was, I'm not afraid.

Um, if I need to be a martyr for this information for extremely hyper

advanced technology, potentially free energy for the world, I can't

think of any more noble cause.

Uh, if I'm wrong about all this, then I have nothing to worry about.

Uh, and if I'm right, then it was all worth it in the end.

Um, it's not as simple as just killing people these days.

Uh, I was listening to, uh, former general Flynn.

Talk about this a little bit.

And one of the things he was saying is that we have so much forensic nowadays

and anyone else you include in something like this to silence someone or whatever

is another loose end that you have to tie up and you have to explain what happened

to the person and why, if I were to disappear, all of a sudden it would be

extremely, extremely suspicious, given what I've been disclosing out there.

Uh, but to your point, these Boeing whistleblowers are, you know, having

heart attacks and other stuff happened to them and very opportune time.

And it can be coincidence.

Yeah.

Correlation doesn't mean causation.

Yeah.

Yeah.

And I'm not, I'm not accusing

them directly.

I do think it's really weird that Boeing planes are literally falling apart every

single day now and their whistleblowers are, um, you know, falling apart as well.

Um, and, and I don't want that to happen to me as well.

I've been very upfront with the government as well as these are real.

I would like for them to talk to me because, uh, I do not enjoy

Revealing are, these are probably the most top secret weapons.

The United States arsenal magnitudes, more secret than nuclear weapons

are magnitudes, more powerful than the nuclear weapons are.

I can understand why they want to keep them secret.

I can't even understand why we would want to keep free energy secret.

Because, uh, if you look at it from the perspective of people hiding

it, they would think that we are going to destroy the entire planet.

And I'm not talking about like shooting nukes at one another.

I'm talking like press a button and the planet explodes type technology.

That's how advanced this is.

So it is the type of thing where you have to be very careful and measured about what

your response is and how you reveal it.

But to date, they have not attempted to reach out to me or, you know, Um,

you know, convinced me that I shouldn't be disclosing this information.

So until then, uh, I'm gonna keep pushing forward with it.

I have given this information to the A A RO, which is the all

domain Anomaly resolution office.

I think they're the appropriate party because they're the ones that look

into this UFO stuff that's out there.

And while I don't think this is aliens or anything related to that, I do think

this proves and shows that we have, uh, gravitational manipulation capabilities

as well as space time manipulation.

It's hard, as hard as that is to believe.

Um, and they would be the ones that could look into the defense contractors.

Um, and from my first interaction with them, I talked to somebody, uh, a

Lieutenant Colonel, I'm not going to say their name cause they asked me not to.

But in January, I talked to them for the first time.

And I gave them the verifiable information.

I said, you can find Edward Seeland, and they said, well, I wasn't sure if they

would be able to get the information.

They said, well, we can get the classifications required to find

out what it was that he leaked.

So it's really just a simple yes or no.

Like, if he leaked these videos, boom, they're real.

There's your proof.

If for some reason these aren't what he leaked, well, then what did he

leak that's available on the internet that we, uh, even after a plea

deal, gave him a nine year sentence.

After a plea deal.

For like, what could be so serious that we would come down on him so

hard even after we had to admit that it wasn't, he wasn't even a spy.

Um, to me, these videos are the only thing that match up.

We even looked at his, uh, appeals.

His appeals, he argued that he was way over sentenced and he's right.

Even other people that were, uh, Convicted of espionage like

the one I was for in February.

I think it was he only got like two years that's convicted of actual espionage

as opposed to edward c lin where he just pled guilty to like I think two

counts of dissemination of classified materials, um And we even looked at the

penal codes the penal codes of what he was convicted of are consistent with

potentially being video evidence so I think that the AARO, they've pretty

much been ghosting me for the most part.

There is one email that I would like to read because I think it is quite telling.

Um, they did respond back to me and I've been sending them emails

probably once every couple weeks.

They were supposed to send me a memorandum of record.

They never did.

They keep sending me like excuses about how they're busy or something like that.

And they keep saying how they'll get back to me next week and they never do.

Uh, but then one day on April, uh, 11th, they replied back to me,

which was almost a month ago now.

And This was a very ominous email.

Mr.

Forbes, my apologies for the slow responses.

AARO is researching several topics at the moment.

Some of AARO's initial research into MH370 has revealed the US

government's search efforts after the airliner disappeared from radar.

I believe the genesis and authenticity of the videos may be helpful.

Can you confirm the date the videos were published to the

Regicide Anon YouTube channel?

And yes, a quick follow up call may be helpful.

And I spent, the reason why I read that was because I was expecting

them to come back and say, No, this is all fake, blah, blah, blah.

We didn't have surveillance footage of the event.

But if they did initial research already, and I had given them the

videos, given them at Edward C.

Lynn, And they must've found something that they're interested in there.

And this is the part where if these videos are real, like

what can they even possibly say?

The amount of evidence that I put forth in the story I put forth in my mind is.

It's almost undeniable how much evidence.

So there's not even a story that they can plausibly come up with that

can cover this up at this point.

I think their only response is to not respond at all because anything they say,

even if they were to lie, I just compare it against my 17 pages of evidence to

figure out, does this fit the story?

Um, and, and the only story in my mind that fits is that these videos

are what happened to the plane.

Okay.

Now that was my question about safety, and then my next question,

which I'm sure you see coming a mile the ways, I looked it up, and

So this video is just a quick summary of the ways in which

we know the videos are fake.

First, this portal effect was found by redditor IcySlide7698 to be made using

modified stock footage from the 1990s.

It's impossible for all these curves along the edges to match by accident,

and in comparisons between other frames, we see the internal details match.

We know the stock footage is that old because it was used in a 1995 game

called Killing Time for a portal effect.

The stock footage is also used in the fake satellite video, as found by Redditor

HappyGrammy, where an overexposed version of this frame matches the portal effect.

That should be enough.

But then we also have the stabilisation issue, where if we stabilise the

plane, then the contrails jump around.

I've looked at thousands of videos of contrails, and they just don't do this.

This must be a tracking and compositing error, and also

shows that the video is fake.

There are a bunch of other issues, like the supposed stereo version

being the same image left and right, just with a manual distortion.

There are issues with the frame rate.

The drone footage seems to be using a 3D model, the satellite footage is static

when we'd expect motion from parallax with the clouds, and several other things.

But really, the fact that both videos use stock footage should be all you need

to demonstrate that these videos are what they appear to be, silly fakes.

A distraction upon which I shall waste no more time.

There's an, this video was put together by an individual named Mick

West, along with an article who wrote about this in The Skeptical Enquirer.

And from what I've seen, and uh, some of this is extremely recent.

That, um, Mick West, you've been back and forth with for a while, but then

you also are debating publicly, I guess, if you will, with, um, kim.

com.

Um, what are the claims, uh, of these folks?

And.

What are your counters?

Yeah, and I have no problem if people want to believe these videos are

real, they're not, or I mean fake.

If people want to believe the videos are fake, they absolutely can.

These videos are real.

Um, Mick West actually accounts for at least three of the four

prominent debunks related to MH370.

I think it's very odd.

That all debunks go back to 1 guy who is a unemployed serial

debunker for the last 15 years.

Uh, that seems to have a vested interest in proving things to be fake.

Um, it actually goes all the way back to the Philip would exit data

picture that shows that he would potentially ended up in Diego Garcia.

Mick West is the guy that tried to debunk that picture as well.

Um, he's been caught falsifying multiple debunks.

Uh, the jittery contrails was the most recent one that we proven beyond any doubt

that Mick West falsified a fake debunk.

They use stabilization software, uh, that inaccurately shifted the smoke trails

behind the plane to make it look like they were not connected to the plane.

We were able to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that's because of

the stabilization software, seeing the smoke as part of the background.

And somebody proved that by shifting the video to black and white and

then restabilizing it using the stabilizing software and the, uh,

disconnection goes away entirely.

Um, so Mick West doesn't have any credibility whatsoever when it comes

to debunking or the MH370 videos.

Uh, so that's two debunks.

And then the third one is this Pyromania VFX debunk that showed

up on Reddit on August 19th by a one day old Reddit account.

There's not a lot of people that would need to use a burner

email account to push a debunk.

Uh, Mick West is one of the only ones who would have to do that because his

reputation is so bad that if people realized it was coming from him,

it wouldn't have any credibility.

So a one day old account pushes it on Reddit and the same day, and I have

all the receipts by the way, for this, um, the same day, Mick West claims

on his MetaBunk website that he's the one who found it, he's the only real

person who claims to have found it.

Um, And he says he founded an obscure 3DO killing time video game from the 90s,

which if Mick West does actually choose to debate me, he's dodged four debates.

Um, the first, one of the first questions I'm going to ask him is, was he messing

around with his old 3DO video games?

How exactly did he find, This killing time, uh, effect.

So the thing about this pyromania VFX as well as it objectively doesn't match.

Uh, Mick West has admitted this as well, and I don't know why people feel

the need to lie and claim that it does.

It doesn't match.

It's not even the same kind of event.

Uh, the videos is, is a endothermic black event, and this is an explosion event.

When you overlay it.

Directly over the video, you can see that there is one frame

that looks pretty similar.

I can understand, uh, the middle is not even at all the same, but the

rest of the frames aren't even close.

So the claim that's being made by the debunkers is that somebody

manipulated this VFX to somehow like change all the frames around,

move the pixels around, whatever.

They can't actually provide a list of steps to recreate it, to

make it a pixel perfect match.

And my counter argument is that has never been done on this.

Uh, VFX before we actually found four examples of this VFX being

used, the stock effect, and never once has anybody manipulated it.

The killing time video game, there was an attack on Titan, which is

this very popular anime that had an advertisement that included it.

Uh, it was used in the movie Starship Troopers, which is a

cult classic from the nineties.

And it was used in the TV show on HBO eastbound and down.

None of them manipulated in any way, shape or form like this.

Um, so the assertion that this was somehow manipulated as one that

needs to be proven, uh, not one that you can just make a bare assertion

and argue that this somehow proves that this was used in the videos.

Um, the, uh, endothermic event is consistent with a wormhole as shown in

three different defense intelligence agency papers, um, and negative

energy, uh, that is required in order to produce that type of effect.

Uh, and then the last debunk, the kim.

com situation, which I wouldn't really call it, uh, a debate,

um, is the cloud picture.

And I just recently, uh, posted on Twitter just earlier today,

because a lot of people, this cloud image shows up in, uh, December.

And it came from a six day old Reddit account is always these anonymous

six day old Reddit accounts.

One day old Reddit accounts seem to find these, uh, which right away there's,

there's no credibility to it at all, because the person just immediately

lied off the bat and claimed that they found this cloud image, uh, in

20 minutes of searching out of the thousands and millions of cloud images

that are out there, especially because the cloud image they found in order to

get to match has to be stretched out.

Reoriented and stitched together in order to get it to match.

But that someone was just what, looking at a thousands of cloud images and went, Oh,

that's the one that I saw in this video.

After doing that, the story makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

I actually tried to reach out to this, uh, Reddit account and, uh, figure out what

the real story was about how they found this and they wouldn't tell me the truth.

Um, Then they went ahead and started these same Redditors, um, have actually

committed felony fraud against me.

Just to show you like how dishonest these people were.

They fabricated a fake RAR file, uh, with fake metadata in it to try

to perpetuate a scam against me.

And then they use that to try to humiliate me back in December as well.

Uh, so I just want people to realize like these people are.

Mentally unwell, and they're willing to fabricate fake evidence against

the case and against me because they want this to go away that badly.

It's actually a little bit scary to be honest with you, but just going back

to the cloud image itself, um, because we've done a lot of forensic analysis

on this, the cloud image only goes back on the way back machines to 2016.

Doesn't does not predate the videos.

Uh, the website in general, where it came from had an update date on December

4th, 2023 coinciding with the recreation of the six day old Reddit account.

Uh, the website owner, uh, tried to show the background database, uh, data on this.

And it only goes back even from their records to October of 2014, which is

actually after the videos as well.

Uh, the cloud image doesn't reverse image search back to the website.

But the other images in the set do, which is extremely suspicious.

The person who supposedly took the picture who I've talked to firsthand,

uh, told us that we should look in the torrents because potentially

somebody got it from a pirated torrent.

And that's how they maybe got the cloud image.

We looked in the torrents.

This image does not exist in any torrents that are out there.

So if this image was used in the videos, it would have had

to have come from the website.

And there's only a 70 day window between the plane disappearing

and the video Being published.

So that means that probably less than a handful of people would

have downloaded that image.

And yet the per the website owner, none of these people are trying to find who

downloaded this image, uh, which should be suspicious for anyone who's interested.

Um, and then people on X have shown that you can take a lower quality cloud image.

Uh, the argument here is that somebody simply took the video

and made a cloud image out of it.

And they've been able to show that you can use AI to create a

higher quality image from a lower quality image in under one minute.

I've got a video of that as well.

Um, and then some users as well.

There's a lot of technical analysis that shows inconsistencies in the photo.

But the, the biggest death blow is that somebody found the exact picture of

Mount Fuji, uh, from Flickr that has the exact same angle and shadows on Mount

Fuji, Fuji that was seemingly added into this cloud picture that people found.

And the reason why that's important is because the person who took the picture

claimed to have taken it from an airplane.

At a very specific time in the day.

So for there to be an exact same angle and shadows on this Mount Fuji,

uh, from another picture, uh, is seemingly, uh, completely impossible.

So that's, I think the strongest evidence against the cloud picture, the VFX

debunk, the jittery contrails debunk, and everything else else that's out there

at the end of the day, whether or not you believe the videos are real or fake,

nobody should be against the United States government issuing a statement on this.

We've got a plane that disappeared.

Where the official story is.

No one knows what happened to it.

We search in the location where everybody claims they know where it's at.

And we find nothing whatsoever.

The debris we find contraindicates the story that's being told to us.

And these videos and the evidence that goes along with them represent

more evidence than I would say, 99.

9 percent of murder cases that have been out there that convict somebody.

We've got two videos, 19 witnesses.

We've got a full story that explains the entire series of events.

And the debunkers don't have any story that makes any sense.

Like who's the hoaxer.

How did they make this?

How'd they know how the science worked?

How'd they know how to get the engineering and the plane correct?

How'd they know about classified military systems that nobody

would have known about in 2014?

Um, why did they not come forward to accept 150, 000 bounty that

we had out there for the hoaxer to come forward with proof?

Uh, it just, it defies, uh, belief in terms of how somebody

could have created these.

Okay.

Well, then to close out, um, one last question, you mentioned that

You've tried to debate with, um, Mick West, um, multiple times or

there have been scheduled debates.

If by some miracle, um, he was to agree to come on this channel and

debate you, would you be up for it?

Well, here's the thing.

He, four different people have tried to do that and he's

backed out every single time.

Um, so at this point, I, I'm kind debunkers and what have you.

Like I want to debate scientists on.

The idea that there may be an ether and this is how we can get the

negative energy requirements that we need for warp drive and a wormhole.

Um, but if it came down to it, like, he's the only guy that.

Really is, has enough pedigree to even debate against at this point.

Um, but the truth is like, I don't think he would last five minutes.

Um, the questions I would ask him, you know, in terms of how he found this

random VFX, uh, how to manipulate it.

I would simply, I would even tell him what my questions are ahead of time.

I mean, I would tell him what is the full story for who made this

and why I would ask him what he thinks happened to the plane.

And what evidence there is because when you ask these debunkers,

what do you think happened to it?

Like they are happy to try to poke holes in your arguments and say that

things must be fake, but then you tell them, Hey, what do you think happened?

Their answer is always, Oh, I don't know.

And so this goes to show that they don't, they're not out

there trying to solve the case.

What they're trying to do is they're trying to make it go away.

Um, so it's possible.

I can't say for sure, but, um, it was something we'd, we'd have to work it out.

Okay.

And, um, this will be really the last question.

What I like to ask people, what is the one question I should have

asked you, but I neglected to?

Oh, that's a really good one.

Um, Probably, you know, I think the thing we just we didn't get into too much

is the science aspect like how can you be sure these videos are real and what

I would say is it's not just the body of evidence that goes along with it.

This obfuscation that happened, all the witnesses and stuff, but the science

checks out too, and is consistent with Science is not mainstream.

Uh, Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Bearden talked about, uh, something called

scalar physics, which is this idea that Maxwell's equations were correct.

And that when we reduce those equations, when Oliver Heaviside

reduced them down from 20 to four, we lost the scalar potential.

And if you, uh, were to take a two sides of a force like this rubber band,

And you were to stretch it in both directions, physics would say, well, the

sum is zero, but is the sum really zero?

If I stretch it a little bit or a little bit more or a little bit more,

physics would say it's still zero.

But if I stretch this more and more and more, eventually this

rubber band is going to snap.

And what that is, is the stress in the medium of this, the stress in

the medium of space times gravity.

So what we've lost when we reduce those equations, we lost the

ability to manipulate gravity.

And this is where, uh, Thomas Bearden's science comes into play

where this has been out there.

This is not, I'm not rediscovering any science to make these videos be real.

It's already been out there and I just had to go and uncover it and say, Oh.

We've been talking about this for a while.

This proves that that's real.

And so these are the reasons why, in addition to the fact that I've talked

to Navy engineer Salvatore Paez, uh, my friend DoD contractor Dave Rossi, who

work on, if not the same, very similar technologies to this, and they more or

less have said that this stuff is real.

So, um, this is the reason why I'm so confident.

That these videos are accurate and that this science will change the world.

All right.

Now people can follow you on X and I believe it's Ashton X for just X Ashton.

Oh, just X Ashton.

Sorry.

Um, my mind is, uh, thoroughly blown.

I hope, uh, hope to learn more and I will definitely put out the word

to see if I can, you know, get, get any kind of conversation going.

I'm Personally, I just don't know.

It is so far beyond my comprehension.

It's almost overwhelming, but Ashton, thank you so much.

No problem.

And I don't blame you.

I think that anybody out there is skeptical.

You have the right approach.

Uh, this is so far beyond the paradigm that people should be skeptical of it

and have a very high bar of evidence.

And I just want people to know that, uh, I strongly believe this

will be proven true in the future.

Stay up to date with the most cutting edge science, and you will find

out that we can, uh, manipulate gravity and manipulate space time.

It's a great time to be alive.

Thanks, Eric.