What are speech acts?

Summary

This video delves into J.L. Austin's Speech Act Theory, which challenges traditional views of language as merely describing facts or expressing truth. Austin argues that many utterances are not declarative but perform actions, such as promising, commanding, or warning. The theory is crucial to understanding how language performs social functions, often relying on pragmatic knowledge and societal conventions. The concept of 'performative utterances' and 'Felicity conditions'—rules for speech acts to be valid—are key elements discussed, illustrating the complex interaction between language, meaning, and communication.

Takeaways

• 📚 The speech act theory, introduced by J.L. Austin, is a significant concept in linguistics that explores how language is used to perform actions beyond just conveying information.
• 🌐 Traditional views of language were based on the assumption that its primary function was to make declarative statements, but Austin's theory challenges this by highlighting the performative nature of language.
• 🗣️ Not all sentences are statements; many are questions, exclamations, commands, and expressions that do not describe states of affairs but instead perform actions.
• 🚫 Austin disagreed with the traditional assumptions about language, arguing that language is more than just making declarative statements or utterances judged by truth value.
• 🌟 The concept of performative utterances is central to speech act theory, where the act of saying something is performing an action, such as promising, betting, or warning.
• 🔑 Performative verbs are crucial in indicating the type of speech act being performed, such as promising, betting, or expressing feelings, which are not statements of fact but expressions of intention.
• 🎯 For a speech act to be successful, it must meet certain conditions known as felicity conditions, which are essential for the intended social function of the utterance to be fulfilled.
• 🤝 Pragmatics plays a significant role in speech acts, as understanding the social context and conventions is necessary to interpret the intended meaning behind utterances.
• 🏛️ The success of performative utterances often depends on the speaker's position and the societal context, as certain speech acts are deeply institutionalized within a culture.
• 🌱 The script emphasizes the importance of combining linguistic knowledge with an understanding of the outside world to fully comprehend the communicative functions of language.

Q & A

What is the speech act theory?

The speech act theory is a philosophical theory of language, developed by J.L. Austin, which posits that utterances perform actions and are not just statements of fact that can be judged as true or false.

Why is speech act theory important in linguistics?

Speech act theory is important in linguistics because it explains aspects of communication that go beyond truth-value semantics, such as how language is used to perform actions like promising, commanding, and declaring.

What were the traditional assumptions about language that Austin reacted against?

The traditional assumptions that Austin reacted against included the ideas that the basic sentence type is declarative, the principal use of language is to describe states of affairs, and the meaning of utterances can be described in terms of their truth or falsity.

What are performative utterances?

Performative utterances are those that are not statements of fact but are actions performed through language, such as promising, warning, or declaring.

What are the different types of speech acts mentioned in the script?

The script mentions several types of speech acts including locutionary acts, directives, commissives, and expressives.

What is a locutionary act?

A locutionary act is the act of uttering words, which is the basic level of communication where the speaker uses language to convey a message.

What are Felicity conditions in the context of speech acts?

Felicity conditions are the necessary conditions that must be met for a speech act to be successful and to achieve its intended effect in a social context.

How does the script relate speech act theory to pragmatics?

The script relates speech act theory to pragmatics by highlighting that understanding speech acts requires knowledge of social conventions and the ability to coordinate linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge to interpret intended meanings.

What is the role of performative verbs in speech acts?

Performative verbs indicate the type of speech act being performed, such as promising, warning, or apologizing, and they express the speaker's intention in relation to different social functions.

Why are not all sentences considered statements according to the speech act theory?

According to the speech act theory, not all sentences are considered statements because many utterances serve to perform actions rather than describe states of affairs or facts.

Can you provide an example of a performative utterance from the script?

An example of a performative utterance from the script is 'I hereby name this ship the Flying Dutchman,' where the act of naming is performed through the utterance.

Outlines

00:00

🗣️ Speech Act Theory Introduction

The paragraph introduces the concept of speech act theory, developed by Oxford philosopher J.L. Austin. It discusses how language is not merely for making declarative statements or asserting facts, but also for performing actions. The traditional view of language, which is based on the assumption that language is primarily used to describe states of affairs through statements, is challenged. Austin's observations highlight that many sentences serve purposes beyond stating facts, such as questions, exclamations, commands, and expressions of wishes. He introduces the idea of performative utterances, which are actions performed through language, and sets the stage for explaining these actions through his speech act theory.

05:00

🎭 Types of Speech Acts and Felicity Conditions

This paragraph delves into the different types of speech acts and their relation to the speaker's behavior in communication. It explains the locutionary act, which is the act of conveying an intended meaning through language. The paragraph categorizes speech acts into directives, commissives, and expressives, each serving a different social function. It introduces performative verbs that indicate the type of speech act being performed. The concept of felicity conditions is discussed, which are the necessary conditions for a speech act to be successful and valid. The speaker emphasizes the importance of pragmatics in language, which involves the coordination of linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge to interpret intended meanings. The paragraph concludes with an example of how felicity conditions are deeply institutionalized in society, affecting the success of performative utterances.

Keywords

💡Speech Act Theory

Speech Act Theory, developed by J.L. Austin, is a philosophical and linguistic concept that explores how language is used to perform actions beyond merely conveying information. In the video, this theory is central to understanding how utterances can be more than just statements of fact; they can be performative, such as making a promise or issuing a warning. The script discusses Austin's challenge to traditional views of language that focused on truth-value, emphasizing instead the performative nature of language.

💡Pragmatics

Pragmatics is a branch of linguistics that deals with the way context influences the meaning of language. It is integral to the video's theme as it helps explain how speech acts are understood within social contexts. The script mentions that pragmatics involves coordinating linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge to interpret intended meanings, such as the social conventions required for a speech act to be successful.

💡Locutionary Act

A locutionary act refers to the act of uttering words, which is the most basic level of a speech act. It is the physical production of sounds or inscriptions that convey meaning. The video script uses this term to describe the initial step in communication, which is the act of speaking itself, before considering the intended action or social function of the utterance.

💡Performative Utterances

Performative utterances are statements that perform an action when they are spoken. The video explains that these utterances are not just descriptions of facts but are actions in themselves. Examples from the script include 'I promise,' 'I bet,' and 'I declare this meeting open,' where the utterance is not about stating a fact but is actually performing a commitment, a wager, or an opening, respectively.

💡Felicity Conditions

Felicity conditions are the necessary conditions that must be met for a speech act to be successful and achieve its intended effect. The video script discusses these conditions to illustrate that not just any utterance can perform an action; there are social and contextual prerequisites. For instance, the script mentions that saying 'I declare you man and wife' requires the speaker to be in a position of authority, like a priest or a judge, for the act to be felicitous.

💡Truth-Conditional Semantics

Truth-conditional semantics is a theory of meaning that suggests the meaning of a sentence is determined by the conditions under which it would be true or false. The video critiques this traditional view by arguing, through Speech Act Theory, that not all language use is about truth-telling or can be judged by truth-value, as seen in performative utterances that are not statements of fact.

💡Declarative Sentences

Declarative sentences are typically used to make statements and are often associated with truth-value. However, the video script challenges this by showing that even declarative sentences can be performative, such as 'I promise to take a taxi home,' which is a commitment rather than a statement of fact.

💡Speech Act

A speech act is an act performed by speaking, which can include any number of communicative actions like promising, warning, or asserting. The video script uses this term to emphasize that language is not just about conveying information but is also a tool for performing actions in social contexts.

💡Performative Verbs

Performative verbs are verbs that indicate the performance of a speech act, such as 'promise,' 'bet,' 'declare,' 'warn,' and 'apologize.' The video script explains that these verbs are crucial for understanding the performative aspect of language, as they express the speaker's intention to perform an action through their utterance.

💡Social Conventions

Social conventions are the unwritten rules and practices that govern behavior in society. The video script highlights that the effectiveness of speech acts often relies on these conventions, which dictate how and when certain actions can be performed through language. For example, the act of 'naming a ship' is a performative utterance that is successful only within the context of specific social and ceremonial practices.

Highlights

Introduction to speech act theory by J.L. Austin.

The importance of understanding language beyond declarative statements.

Challenge to traditional assumptions about language and meaning.

Observation that not all sentences are statements.

Conversations often consist of questions, exclamations, commands, and expressions of wishes.

Examples of sentences that are not descriptions but performative utterances.

Explanation of performative utterances and their non-truth-conditional nature.

The concept of performative verbs indicating different speech acts.

The role of the speaker's intention in performing a speech act.

Categorization of speech acts into directives, commissives, and expressives.

The necessity of Felicity conditions for a speech act to be successful.

The significance of social conventions in the interpretation of speech acts.

The importance of pragmatics in understanding the intended meaning of utterances.

The coordination of linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge in communication.

The institutionalization of Felicity conditions in society.

Practical examples illustrating the application of speech act theory.

The conclusion emphasizing the broader implications of speech act theory in linguistics and communication.

Transcripts

[Music]

foreign

[Music]

speech act which has been theorized by

the Oxford philosopher J.L Austin into

what is known as the speech act Theory

and that is what I'm going to talk about

today

but then why are we talking about

philosopher this is a linguistic Channel

as I mentioned while we use language

based on linguistic knowledge there is

also a lot of communication that is

based on knowledge of the outside world

and also there is a fact that the speech

act theory has received a lot of

attention by linguists because there are

certain aspects of linguistic

communication that can be very well

explained by the speech act Theory

traditionally the attitude towards

language was based on three assumptions

that the basic sentence type is

declarative it's a statement of

assertion

that the principal use of language is to

describe states of Affairs by using

statements

that the meaning of utterances can be

described in terms of their truth or

falsity

Austin developed his speech act theory

in a way in reaction to these

assumptions about language which he

didn't agree with because Austin's idea

was that language is far more than

making declarative statements or making

utterances that can be judged based on

their truth or falsity

he made two important observations the

first is that not all sentences are

statements and then that much of

conversation is made up of questions

exclamations commands and expressions of

wishes

to explain this idea let's look at the

few sentences

excuse me

although it sounds like a question it's

more like maybe an objection

are you serving

hello

six pints of stout and a packet of

peanuts please so obviously this is just

a noun phrase right

right give me the dry roasted ones

how much are you serious

oh more rays but it's a phrase from

Cicero o times o Customs now the

question is are these sentences

descriptions are they declarative

sentences or statements about facts can

they even be judged with to be either

true or false obviously not

even sentences that are in the

declarative form in English there's a

there are a lot of times that they're

not making statements actually

I promise to take a taxi home you might

think it you're making a like a

statement like you're making a statement

of fact but it's not a statement to fact

you see a promise when you make a

promise you are making a commitment

about doing something in the future so

no fact has taken place yet

I bet you five pounds that he gets

breathalyzed again I bet you how is that

like it means I'm willing to bet you

that amount of money on this particular

thing and that's not again as fact

I declare this meeting open again you

are performing a function

I warn you that legal action will ensue

again when you warn someone in a way are

you making a statement or are you

telling something about potential legal

force that you're capable of using

against that person or other people are

capable of using that legal Force

so in a way in each of these sentences

instead of making a statement of fact

you're doing you're performing some sort

of action they are not the statements of

facts there are actually some sort of

action which we perform using language

the point is whatever the means of

expressing the language is what we are

doing is performing a kind of action

that's why these are called performative

utterances

for example you can say I hereby name

this ship the Flying Dutchman if you add

the word hereby and you see that the

sentence still makes sense you can

clarify that it's a performative sample

when you think about the performative

aspect of language you need a theory to

explain it and that's what Austin did he

proposed the speech act Theory to

explain this aspect of language so you

see the way this fits with pragmatics is

kind of exciting so he coined the term a

speech act which have to do with the

behavior of the speaker here in

communication it's not an active speech

it's a communicative activity it's a

locutionary Act

then in the next step he categorized

these statements

directives you can direct your listener

to do something command them

commissive you commit to do something

like I promise I bet Express you express

your feelings so when you're expressing

your feeling you can't say somebody's

feeling is true or false or or it's a

statement it's not a statement of fact

it's about your feelings or when you

apologize or when you sympathize or

welcome

foreign

verbs that we use to indicate these

different kinds of speech act which are

called performative verbs

in other words when you perform a speech

act you're expressing your intention in

relation to different social functions

and in order for your speech act to come

true it has to meet certain conditions

which are called Felicity conditions

we're saying that part of the meaning of

an utterance is intended social function

Communication in language is more than

acquiring the pronunciation of grammar

you see it's talking about pragmatics

asking questions making suggestions

obviously every language has more themes

intonations sentence patterns with which

you can make questions mark questions

wishes orders and the light but

communicating these functions may rely

on knowledge of social conventions which

is again pragmatic knowledge outside

language and the local content of utter

or the uterus

it's the area where you coordinate your

linguistic and non-linguistic knowledge

you put them in sync you coordinate them

to interpret intended meaning

going back to the Felicity conditions

just to clarify that what what do we

mean actually when we say that

there are certain things that you can

say in language but in order for them to

come true you have to fulfill certain

Felicity conditions that have been

deeply and highly institutionalized in

society for example I declare your man

and wife I can say that to any two

random people but are they going to

become husband and wife it depends who I

am it depends on my position in society

and our relationship

[Music]

thank you

[Music]