Manuel ruthlessly fact-checks VP Duterte's book

Manila Bulletin Online
27 Aug 202404:22

Summary

TLDRIn a discussion about the 2025 budget, the focus shifts to a children's book project. The vice president defends the budget proposal and addresses concerns about the book's content, which includes errors and misinformation. The book is criticized for being unchild-friendly, with poor illustrations and a lack of coherence between text and visuals. The vice president humorously suggests increasing the budget for more books, even proposing a special edition about her life, highlighting the need for higher standards in children's literature.

Takeaways

  • 📚 The discussion revolves around a children's book project with a budget of PHP million.
  • 🙅‍♀️ There is a refusal to disclose the name of the editor of the children's book due to concerns about the book's quality.
  • 🤔 The book is criticized for containing errors, such as incorrect references to the Banahaw mountain range.
  • 🐦 The book is said to incorrectly place the habitat of the 'kagwang' (possibly a bird), suggesting it nests on tree branches or underground.
  • 🎨 The illustrations in the book are deemed not cohesive and of low value, with the illustrators' names being smaller compared to the author's.
  • 👶 The book is criticized for not being child-friendly, with both text and visuals being important in children's literature.
  • 🖋️ The roles of the illustrator and author are emphasized as equally important in a children's book.
  • 📢 There is a mention of disinformation regarding the book's content and its representation.
  • 😅 A light-hearted suggestion is made to increase the budget for more books, possibly with a special edition about the Vice President's life story.
  • 😅 The name of the editor, 'Raul Manuel', is revealed as a joke, indicating the seriousness of the issues raised with the book.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of discussion in the script?

    -The main topic of discussion is the 2025 budget proposal and the quality of a children's book that is part of a project overseen by the Office of the Vice President.

  • Why is the children's book being discussed in the context of the budget?

    -The children's book is being discussed as part of the budget because it is a project funded by the Office of the Vice President, and there are concerns about its quality and the allocation of funds.

  • What specific errors are mentioned in the children's book?

    -The errors mentioned include incorrect information about the Banahaw mountain, such as the absence of a leaf of Banahaw and the incorrect location of a frog's habitat.

  • What is the issue with the illustrations in the children's book?

    -The illustrations are not cohesive with the text, have low value, and the illustrators' names are smaller compared to the author's, which is not child-friendly according to the experts.

  • Why is the role of the illustrator considered important in a children's book?

    -The role of the illustrator is considered important because they contribute significantly to the visual appeal and understanding of the story, which is crucial for children's engagement and learning.

  • What is the implication of the book not being child-friendly?

    -If a book is not child-friendly, it may not effectively engage or educate children, potentially wasting resources and not serving its intended educational purpose.

  • What is the suggestion made regarding the budget for books if the quality is not up to standard?

    -The suggestion made is to increase the budget for books, possibly to produce more high-quality books, even suggesting a special edition about the Vice President's life story.

  • Who is identified as the editor of the children's book, and is there a specific reason for this revelation?

    -The editor of the book is identified as Raul Manuel, which is revealed as a joke, indicating that the name might not be genuine or could be used humorously to address the situation.

  • What is the purpose of the question and answer format in this discussion?

    -The purpose of the question and answer format is to allow for a detailed examination of the budget proposal and the quality of the children's book, providing an opportunity to address specific concerns and clarify information.

  • What is the significance of the mention of disinformation in the context of the book?

    -The mention of disinformation suggests that there may be inaccuracies or misleading content in the book, which is a serious concern, especially in educational materials for children.

  • How does the script reflect the importance of accuracy and quality in educational materials for children?

    -The script reflects the importance of accuracy and quality by highlighting the errors and lack of child-friendliness in the book, emphasizing the need for educational materials to be both accurate and engaging for young readers.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Scrutiny of Children's Book in 2025 Budget Discussion

In the opening statement, the Vice President addresses the 2025 budget proposal, focusing on a controversial children's book project. The Vice President defends the budget allocation despite the Resource person's refusal to engage in a Q&A session. The discussion highlights issues with the book, such as factual inaccuracies, unsuitability for children, and poor quality illustrations. The Vice President suggests that if the book met standards, they would even recommend increasing the budget. The editor's name, Raul Manuel, is revealed as a joke, indicating the absurdity of the situation.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Budget

A budget is a financial plan that outlines income and expenses over a specific period. In the script, the discussion revolves around the 2025 budget proposal for the Office of the Vice President, indicating the allocation of funds for various projects and initiatives. The budget is a central theme as it reflects the priorities and financial planning of the office.

💡Children's Book

A children's book is a book designed for young readers, often with illustrations and simple language. The script mentions a specific children's book, which is a point of contention due to errors and inaccuracies. The book's quality and content are critiqued, highlighting the importance of accurate and child-friendly educational materials.

💡Editor

An editor is a person who reviews and prepares written material for publication, ensuring it meets quality standards. The script discusses the identity of the editor of the children's book, suggesting that the editor's role is crucial in maintaining the book's quality. The mention of the editor's name being a joke implies a lack of seriousness in the book's production.

💡Errors

Errors refer to mistakes or inaccuracies in content. The script points out that the children's book contains many errors, which could mislead young readers. This highlights the importance of accuracy in educational materials and the responsibility of those involved in producing them.

💡Illustrations

Illustrations are visual representations that accompany text, often used in books to enhance understanding or appeal. The script criticizes the illustrations in the children's book for being incohesive and of low value, suggesting that they do not effectively support the text or engage the reader.

💡Resource Person

A resource person is an individual who provides information or expertise on a specific topic. In the script, the resource person is asked to provide information about the children's book, indicating their role in the discussion and the importance of their input in clarifying details about the book.

💡Disinformation

Disinformation is false information that is deliberately created and spread to deceive or mislead. The script mentions disinformation regarding the book's representation, which could have serious implications for the credibility of the material and the trustworthiness of the source.

💡Influence

Influence refers to the capacity to have an effect on someone or something. The script discusses the book's lack of positive influence, suggesting that it does not provide the intended educational or inspirational impact on children.

💡Standards

Standards are established levels of quality or attainment. The script implies that the book does not meet the expected standards for writing and production, which is a concern for those evaluating the material's suitability for children.

💡Hearing

A hearing is a formal inquiry or investigation, often conducted by a committee or panel. The script refers to a hearing where the Vice President's budget and the children's book are being discussed, indicating a formal process of evaluation and scrutiny.

💡Special Edition

A special edition is a version of a publication that differs from the standard version, often containing additional or unique content. The script humorously suggests a special edition of the book, which could imply a more carefully curated or improved version, contrasting with the criticized original.

Highlights

Discussion on the 2025 budget proposal for the Office of the Vice President.

Mention of a PH million project for a children's book.

Request for the editor's name of the children's book is denied.

The book contains many errors according to the experts.

Misrepresentation of the Banahaw mountain range in the book.

Errors in the depiction of the habitat of the 'kagwang'.

The book is not child-friendly as per writers' standards.

Illustrations in the book are not cohesive and have low value.

The illustrators' names are smaller compared to the author's, which is unusual for a children's book.

Content influences are not appropriate as per the Vice President.

Suggestions to increase the budget for better-quality books.

Proposal for a special edition book about the Vice President's life story.

Concerns about the book not meeting writing standards.

The hearing did not successfully address the issues raised.

Revelation of the editor's name, Raul Manuel, as a joke.

Transcripts

play00:00

topic Madam Cher since ang gusto ng ah

play00:03

ovp a 2025 budget mapag-usapan din natin

play00:07

siya maliban doon sa past budgets Madam

play00:09

Cher I'd like to discuss Iyung PH

play00:12

million project na children's book Madam

play00:15

chair ah Dahil ayaw din po ng Resource

play00:19

person ng question and answer then ang

play00:21

paraan ko na lang po ay hindi pa tanong

play00:24

ah tell the committee Sino po ang editor

play00:27

ng children's book na ito

play00:31

Madam Vice

play00:34

President Madam

play00:36

ch all the answers

play00:38

are wala doon sa opening statement I

play00:42

forg the opportunity to defend the

play00:44

office of the vice president 2025 budget

play00:47

proposal by question and answer and the

play00:50

house

play00:53

ofes name of the auditor of the

play00:55

children's

play00:58

book ang kapag hindi ask a question I

play01:03

ask the Resource person to tell the name

play01:06

Pero ah baka hindi pa nisu Ano yung

play01:08

tanong ano yung Hindi pero since ayaw

play01:11

pong ibigay yung name ng editor ng

play01:12

children's book Ito kasi yung point

play01:14

natin Madam chair ah the book contains

play01:17

many errors Sige po pakita po natin

play01:20

kasama po diyan dahon ng Banahaw Wala

play01:23

naman pong dahon ng Banahaw baka Anahaw

play01:25

po yung tinutukoy yung word na sila

play01:28

Dapat po sina tapos yung walang awa

play01:31

Dapat nga may high fen po iyan tapos

play01:33

Madam Cher nakalagay din yung pugad daw

play01:36

ng kwago ay nakapatong sa sanga Madam

play01:40

Cher sabi ng mga eksperto ang ess hindi

play01:43

po a nakapatong sa sanga nasa either

play01:46

butas po yan ng mga puno or nasa ilalim

play01:48

ng lupa next Madam chair This book is

play01:52

not child friendly as per writers kasi

play01:55

pag children's book Madam Cher hindi

play01:57

lang yung text yung mahalaga pati yung V

play02:00

ws Madam chair So yung illustrations are

play02:02

not cohesive para yyung elements

play02:04

pinatong lang sa background tapos low

play02:07

value ito for illustrations kasi Madam

play02:10

Sher Kahit nga yung pangalan ng

play02:11

illustrators ay maliit compared doon sa

play02:14

pangalan ng author Well in fact for a

play02:15

children's book magkasim bigat po ang

play02:18

papel ng Illustrator tsaka ng author

play02:21

also Madam Cher sa content

play02:28

nagi-impluwensiya hindi siya

play02:30

nag-impluwensya

play02:59

Madam Cher ah ah before i end sa second

play03:03

round kasi kanina meron din pong ad

play03:06

homin name sa atin meron pang

play03:07

disinformation about this representation

play03:10

Madam Cher kung okay lang naman yyung

play03:12

mga libro at halimba kung totoo pa

play03:13

ngayong sinasabi about me I would even

play03:15

suggest ovp dagdagan yung budget baka

play03:17

makalimang libro pa ang ah bice

play03:20

presidente pwede pa nga may special

play03:23

edition tungkol sa kwento ng buhay ko

play03:25

pero given Madam Sher na hindi din

play03:28

talaga pumapa sa standards ang

play03:29

pagsusulat ng libro and I also think

play03:32

Madam Cher na throughout this hearing

play03:34

hindi successfully

play03:50

na-depress Madam Vice President Yes

play03:52

ma'am the name of the editor of the book

play03:55

is Raul Manuel

play04:00

It's a joke Maam you wk it out of the

play04:02

record if you want

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
Children's BookVP BudgetContent CritiqueEducational MaterialLiterary AnalysisFunding DebateEditorial OversightIllustration QualityLiterary StandardsHearing Discussion
Вам нужно краткое изложение на английском?