Lies about Project 2025

Ryan McBeth
16 Aug 202424:08

Summary

TLDRThe video script discusses 'Project 2025,' a vision document by the Heritage Foundation, which outlines a conservative roadmap for a new president's first 180 days. The speaker, Ryan McBeth, a software engineer specializing in AI to combat disinformation, critiques an infographic spreading misinformation about Project 2025. He analyzes the document's claims, revealing several lies and partial truths, and suggests the infographic might be an 'active measure' to outrage people. McBeth also promotes his subscription to Ground News for unbiased news summaries and his book 'Warlock' on Amazon Kindle.

Takeaways

  • 📜 **Project 2025 Overview**: Project 2025 is a vision document by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, outlining a roadmap for the first 180 days of a new conservative president.
  • 🤔 **Public Perception**: Many people are scared of Project 2025 due to its potential impact on various social and political aspects of American life.
  • 📊 **Infographic Analysis**: An infographic related to Project 2025 has been criticized for spreading misinformation, disinformation, and in some cases, outright lies.
  • 👤 **Ryan McBeth Introduction**: Ryan McBeth, a software engineer specializing in AI to combat disinformation, is the narrator of the script.
  • 🌐 **Ground News**: Ryan recommends Ground News as a source to combat misinformation by providing news summaries and identifying biases of different news sources.
  • 📈 **Active Measures**: The term 'active measures' is used to describe the Russian tactic of creating and leaking fake documents to influence public opinion.
  • 📅 **Document Timeline**: The infographic in question seems to have first appeared online around July 4th, 2024, and is suspected to be a form of 'active measure'.
  • 📝 **Document Examination**: Ryan meticulously examines the claims made in the infographic and compares them with the actual content of the Project 2025 document.
  • 🚫 **Misrepresentations**: Many of the claims in the infographic are found to be lies or misrepresentations of the Project 2025 document.
  • 📉 **Truth Score**: The infographic has a 'truth score' of only 17.7%, indicating a high level of inaccuracy in its claims.
  • ✅ **Call to Action**: The script concludes with a call for viewers to support Ryan's work in fighting misinformation and to reconsider the use of disinformation tactics in political discourse.

Q & A

  • What is Project 2025?

    -Project 2025 is a vision document created by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research institution. It serves as a playbook or wish list to map out a roadmap for the first 180 days of a new conservative president's term in office.

  • Why are people scared of Project 2025?

    -People are scared of Project 2025 because it outlines a conservative agenda that some individuals may find controversial or alarming, especially if they do not align with conservative ideologies.

  • Who is Ryan McBeth and what is his profession?

    -Ryan McBeth is a software engineer who specializes in artificial intelligence, specifically in the area of rooting out disinformation online.

  • What is Ground News and how does it help combat misinformation?

    -Ground News is a platform that aggregates news, providing summaries of events and information about the biases of each news source, as well as ownership data of each publication. It helps combat misinformation by providing a balanced view and promoting transparency in news sources.

  • What is an active measure in the context of the script?

    -An active measure, as mentioned in the script, is a tactic used to create and disseminate false information, often to influence public opinion or create discord. It is a common tactic historically used by Russia.

  • What is the significance of the infographic mentioned in the script?

    -The infographic is significant because it appears to be a misleading or false document that was created to spread misinformation about Project 2025. It contains numerous factual errors and misrepresentations of the actual document's content.

  • What are some of the claims made in the infographic that are identified as lies in the script?

    -Some of the claims identified as lies in the infographic include ending no-fault divorce, banning contraceptives, raising the retirement age, cutting Social Security, ending the Affordable Care Act, banning books and curriculum about slavery, and promoting capital punishment.

  • What is the truth score of the infographic according to the script?

    -The truth score of the infographic is 17.7%, with five true statements, ten partial truths, and fourteen outright lies.

  • What does the term '1%' refer to in the context of the script?

    -In the context of the script, '1%' refers to the top 1% of earners in the US, which would be individuals making approximately $600,000 a year.

  • What is the role of the Heritage Foundation in Project 2025?

    -The Heritage Foundation is the creator of Project 2025, a document that outlines a conservative policy agenda for the initial period of a new conservative presidency.

  • What is the purpose of the video script?

    -The purpose of the video script is to analyze and debunk misinformation spread through an infographic related to Project 2025, providing a detailed critique of its claims and comparing them to the actual content of the Project 2025 document.

Outlines

00:00

📜 Introduction to Project 2025 and Misinformation

The speaker, Ryan McBeth, introduces Project 2025, a vision document by the Heritage Foundation, which outlines a conservative roadmap for the first 180 days of a new presidency. The document covers a wide range of topics from White House operations to military strategy. McBeth, a software engineer specializing in AI to combat disinformation, plans to analyze the military and intelligence aspects of Project 2025. He also discusses his personal motivation for creating content to counter misinformation, sharing an anecdote about his mother's reliance on CNN and her resulting misinformed views. He promotes Ground News as a balanced news source and offers a discount for his audience.

05:01

🔍 Analyzing the Project 2025 Infographic

McBeth scrutinizes an infographic related to Project 2025, suspecting it to be a piece of misinformation, potentially a Russian active measure. He notes the document's lack of attribution and its timing around July 4th, 2024. He points out numerous factual inaccuracies in the infographic, suggesting it was hastily compiled with the intent to spread fear and provoke sharing among those with a superficial understanding of Project 2025. He challenges the authenticity of the document, questioning its origins and its potential political motivations.

10:02

📚 Fact-Checking Claims in the Infographic

In this section, McBeth begins a detailed fact-check of the infographic's claims against the actual Project 2025 document. He discusses topics such as divorce policies, abortion, contraceptives, taxes, worker protections, retirement age, Social Security, the Affordable Care Act, prescription drug prices, the Department of Education, religious schools funding, teaching Christian beliefs in public schools, free lunch programs, civil rights, and climate protections. He finds most claims to be false or misleading, with only a few having partial truth or requiring context to understand accurately.

15:05

🚫 Debunking More Infographic Claims

Continuing his fact-checking, McBeth addresses claims about banning African-American and gender studies, books on slavery, climate protections, regulations on big business and the oil industry, capital punishment, marriage equality, support for single mothers, FBI and Homeland Security funding, military use in domestic protests, immigrant policies, Birthright citizenship, Muslim entry bans, federal agency elimination, and court packing. He concludes that many claims are outright lies, while others are partially true or require more nuanced understanding.

20:05

📊 Summary of Infographic's Truth Score

McBeth summarizes his findings, stating that out of all the claims in the infographic, only five were true, ten were partially true, and fourteen were outright lies, giving the infographic a 'truth score' of 17.7%. He criticizes the use of misinformation as a tactic, regardless of political affiliation, and compares it to Russian active measures. He concludes by promoting his work on Substack and mentions his book, 'Warlock,' encouraging viewers to support his efforts in combating misinformation.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Project 2025

Project 2025 is a comprehensive policy document created by the conservative Heritage Foundation. It outlines a vision for the first 180 days of a new conservative president in office, covering a wide range of topics from military and intelligence to social policies. The document has sparked controversy and fear due to its sweeping proposals, which some interpret as an attempt to consolidate power and reshape American institutions to a more conservative mold. It is seen by many as a roadmap for potential policies if a conservative president were to take office, with some people scared of its implications on democracy and individual liberties [^1^] [^4^] [^6^] [^10^] [^11^] [^12^].

💡Heritage Foundation

The Heritage Foundation is a conservative research institution based in the United States. It is known for its influential policy recommendations that often align with conservative political agendas. In the context of the video, the Heritage Foundation is responsible for drafting Project 2025, aiming to provide a playbook for a conservative administration. It has a history of influencing U.S. policy, particularly during the Reagan era, and continues to be a significant voice in conservative circles [^1^] [^6^] [^12^].

💡Disinformation

Disinformation refers to the deliberate creation and sharing of false or misleading information with the intent to deceive and influence public opinion or obscure the truth. In the video, the creator discusses the role of disinformation in politics and society, particularly in the context of the Project 2025 document and how it may be used to mislead or scare people. The video aims to debunk disinformation and provide a fact-checked analysis of the document's contents [^2^] [^7^] [^14^].

💡Misinformation

Misinformation is a term used to describe the unintentional spread of false or inaccurate information, often caused by a misunderstanding or a lack of knowledge. In the video, misinformation is contrasted with disinformation, as the creator seeks to clarify the authenticity and accuracy of claims made within the Project 2025 document. The goal is to root out misinformation and provide accurate information to the public [^2^] [^7^] [^14^].

💡Active Measures

Active measures are tactics used to influence or manipulate public opinion, often involving the use of propaganda, disinformation, and other deceptive techniques. The video discusses the possibility that the infographic related to Project 2025 might be a form of active measure, designed to provoke a reaction from the public. This term is often associated with Russian information warfare tactics but is applied broadly to any strategic efforts to spread disinformation [^2^] [^7^].

💡Ryan McBeth

Ryan McBeth is introduced in the video as a software engineer specializing in artificial intelligence, with a focus on combating disinformation online. He is portrayed as a fact-checker and an expert in analyzing the真伪of various claims, particularly those related to Project 2025. His role in the video is to provide a detailed analysis and debunking of the misinformation surrounding the document [^1^].

💡Ground News

Ground News is mentioned as a news aggregation service that aims to provide balanced news summaries and to reveal the biases of different news sources. The video creator, Ryan McBeth, recommends Ground News as a tool for staying informed and getting a broader perspective on news events. It is positioned as a resource for combating misinformation by understanding the context and biases of news publications [^1^].

💡Infographic

An infographic is a visual representation of information, data, or knowledge intended to present complex information quickly and clearly. In the video, an infographic related to Project 2025 is critiqued for containing numerous factual errors and being potentially designed as misinformation or disinformation. The term is used to describe the visual content that is under scrutiny for its accuracy and intent [^1^].

💡Political Propaganda

Political propaganda refers to the deliberate dissemination of information, often biased or misleading, to promote a particular political cause or agenda. The video discusses the possibility that the Project 2025 document and related infographics might be forms of political propaganda, intended to sway public opinion in favor of conservative policies. Propaganda is a key concept in understanding the video's theme of misinformation and its potential political uses [^1^].

💡Factual Mistakes

Factual mistakes are errors or inaccuracies in information that can mislead or misinform. The video highlights numerous factual mistakes in the infographic related to Project 2025, which the creator alleges are either deliberate (as part of disinformation campaigns) or the result of carelessness. Identifying and correcting factual mistakes is a central theme of the video, as the creator seeks to provide a more accurate understanding of the document's contents [^1^].

Highlights

Project 2025 is a vision document by the Heritage Foundation

Document serves as a roadmap for a new conservative president's first 180 days

Ryan McBeth, a software engineer specializing in AI for disinformation detection, introduces himself

Ground News aggregates news with bias and ownership information

The infographic related to Project 2025 may be a Russian-style 'active measure'

Infographic seems to be designed to outrage people with surface knowledge of Project 2025

Document likely created to be shared and cause fear without providing sources for verification

No fault divorce claim is an outright lie according to Project 2025

Proposal to end federal funding for abortion, not a general ban, is found in the document

Claim of banning contraceptives is a complete fabrication

Proposals to simplify tax code with two tax rates and lower corporate tax rates are present

No plans to raise taxes for the working class, despite claims to the contrary

Elimination of unions and worker protections is a false claim

No mention of raising the retirement age in Project 2025

Proposal to cut Social Security and Medicare are not found in the document

End of Affordable Care Act is not proposed in Project 2025

Proposal to end government price controls on drugs might increase prices

Plan to eliminate the Department of Education is truthfully represented

Proposal to use public funds for private religious schools is partially true

Teaching Christian religious beliefs in public schools is a false claim

End of free and discounted lunch programs is partially true, focused on need

No plans to end civil rights or Dei protections in government

No proposal to ban African-American or gender studies in education

No proposal to ban books or curriculum about slavery

Plan to end climate protections is mixed, focuses on EPA role and compliance

Proposal to increase Arctic drilling is present in the document

Regulating big business and the oil industry is partially true, focuses on reducing unnecessary regulations

Plan to expedite capital punishment is true, with context on federal death row

End of marriage equality is a false claim

Promoting traditional families over single mothers is a mixed truth

No plans to use the military to break up domestic protests

Proposals for mass deportation of immigrants and increasing detention bed space are true

End of Birthright citizenship is a false claim

No proposal to ban Muslims from entering the country

Plan to eliminate certain federal agencies like NOAA is partially true

No proposal to pack the Supreme Court with right-wing judges

The infographic contains 5 truths, 10 partial truths, and 14 outright lies

Call to action to support work fighting misinformation through Ryan McBeth's substack

Promotion of the book 'Warlock' by Ryan McBeth, a bestseller on Amazon Kindle

Bunker Branding merchandise advertised as cool and relevant

Transcripts

play00:00

what is Project 2025 why are so many

play00:03

people scared of it and what does this

play00:05

infographic have to do with spreading

play00:07

misinformation disinformation and some

play00:10

cases outright lies project 2025 is a

play00:13

vision document that was created by

play00:15

conservative research institution the

play00:17

Heritage Foundation this document is a

play00:19

Playbook or maybe more like a wish list

play00:22

to create a road map for the first 180

play00:24

days in the event of a new conservative

play00:26

president in office the document is

play00:29

about 9 pages long and contains item as

play00:31

mundane as how the white house chief of

play00:34

staff works and how many ships should be

play00:36

in the US Navy and I plan to do a

play00:38

companion video where I talk about the

play00:40

military and intelligence components in

play00:42

that project 2025 document and what it

play00:45

could mean for America now this video is

play00:48

probably going to get shared a lot so

play00:49

allow me to introduce myself my name is

play00:51

Ryan McBeth I'm a software engineer that

play00:53

specializes in artificial intelligence

play00:56

uh specifically to root out

play00:58

disinformation online and you know who

play01:00

else helps me fight thisinformation

play01:01

ground news so I'm sitting at the

play01:04

airport waiting for a flight and my mom

play01:07

texts me about that Algerian female

play01:09

boxer and my mom is basically retired

play01:12

and all she does is what CNN all day and

play01:14

this has turned her into one of the most

play01:16

misinformed people in my life so uh I'm

play01:19

going to send her an article I found on

play01:20

ground news from the BBC which is

play01:23

considered Centrist and of high

play01:25

factuality so go to ground. news/ ran

play01:28

mcbath and subscribe through my link to

play01:30

get 40% off the Vantage plan that's the

play01:32

same one that I purchased uh yeah I

play01:34

actually bought ground news they do not

play01:36

give it to me for free uh ground news

play01:39

Aggregates the news uh so they'll give

play01:41

you a summary of a news event but

play01:43

they'll also give you the biases of each

play01:45

Source uh Left Right Center whatever and

play01:48

they also give you the ownership data of

play01:50

each publication so you know who is

play01:52

telling you what to think and also this

play01:55

blind spot report is pretty cool it's a

play01:57

page dedicated to finding stories that

play02:00

you may have missed due to your own

play02:01

personal biases it also comes in a

play02:04

newsletter that gets right to your email

play02:06

inbox so go to ground. news/ ran McBeth

play02:10

to stay fully informed and subscribe

play02:12

through my link for 40% off the Vantage

play02:14

plan which is the same one that I

play02:16

purchased now let's get back talking

play02:18

about active measures and project

play02:21

2025 when it comes to this stuff I am a

play02:24

political I'll go after right-wing

play02:26

trolls like end wokeness and DC Dro for

play02:29

posting Russian propaganda the same way

play02:32

I'm going to go after the person who

play02:34

created this infographic now this

play02:37

infographic seems to have popped up

play02:38

online on or about July 4th 2024 the

play02:42

document appears to be a primer of sorts

play02:45

for the project 2025 objectives if you

play02:47

look at the colors of the infographic

play02:50

and The prominent uh position of

play02:52

presidential candidate Donald Trump it

play02:54

appears that this document was

play02:55

constructed as sort of a phony document

play02:58

that may have been leaked by the conser

play02:59

cons atives precisely so that people on

play03:01

the left would be outraged by it

play03:03

creating fake documents which are

play03:05

designed to be leaked is a common

play03:07

Russian tactic it's called an active

play03:09

measure uh the anti-semitic Protocols of

play03:12

the Elders of Zion was a Russian active

play03:14

measure uh so was the rumor that aids

play03:16

was a bioweapon that was created at Fort

play03:18

Dietrich Maryland and so was the

play03:20

allegations of American bioweapons Labs

play03:23

in Ukraine now this infographic is

play03:26

freaking Amateur hour uh there's

play03:28

numerous factual mist mes which I will

play03:30

go over um and you know it's almost like

play03:33

some guy just just read uh the project

play03:37

2025 document or maybe skimmed it and

play03:39

just threw a bunch of handmaid's tail

play03:41

talking points on a graphic hoping that

play03:43

most of them would be correct or that

play03:45

nobody would check well hi I'm the guy

play03:49

who checks now looking at the

play03:51

infographic itself it seems like this

play03:54

document was created by a person who

play03:55

does have a command of English uh

play03:57

everything is spelled correctly there's

play03:59

really no obvious grammar or punctuation

play04:01

mistakes although Birthright is spelled

play04:04

Birthright uh but the biggest indicator

play04:06

that this is an active measure type

play04:08

document is the lack of attribution

play04:11

authentic documents put out by the

play04:13

Heritage Foundation would have a link

play04:15

back to their creator or a URL where you

play04:17

can go to learn more about project 2025

play04:20

so it's almost like the person writing

play04:22

this document did not want you to go out

play04:23

and get more information they want you

play04:25

to read this document be terrified and

play04:27

share it the document is designed

play04:29

designed as outrage bait for people who

play04:31

only have surface level knowledge of

play04:33

project 2025 and the issues involved so

play04:36

did Russia have a hand in making this

play04:38

document I can't prove it and I don't

play04:41

think so but I think it may be more

play04:42

likely that this was constructed by

play04:44

someone on the left as an active measure

play04:46

they may not even understand that what

play04:48

they're doing is wrong now it seems like

play04:50

the first instance of this document

play04:52

appeared on imager by a user named

play04:55

Dinger Lori

play04:57

64 uh based on that account's post

play04:59

history it appears this account is

play05:01

primarily interested in leftist politics

play05:03

and that's kind of Where the Trail Ends

play05:05

the document was then made Popular by

play05:07

left-wing political pun in Christopher

play05:09

Han who received 4.9 million views uh as

play05:13

of me writing this note that uh I

play05:15

actually reached out to Christopher Han

play05:17

I asked him if he was aware this

play05:19

document was likely an active measure Mr

play05:21

Han did not respond sometimes silence

play05:23

speaks volumes um if you don't care that

play05:26

a document that you are promoting is a

play05:28

lie because it serves your agenda you're

play05:31

probably not one of the good

play05:33

guys so let's go over each of the

play05:36

documents claims and see if there's any

play05:37

truth behind it now uh note the

play05:40

infographic and the page references as

play05:42

well as the complete 900 sum project

play05:45

2025 Playbook is available at ry.

play05:48

substack do.com for free in order to

play05:51

evaluate the truth of this infographic

play05:53

we actually have to take a look at the

play05:54

project 2025 document and I read it all

play05:57

900 some pages and also note that the

play06:01

just because a Heritage Foundation wants

play06:03

to do something doesn't mean it's

play06:05

actually going to be able to get it done

play06:07

implementing some of these items would

play06:08

require all of Congress to get on board

play06:10

and the Supreme Court to agree that the

play06:11

laws are constitutional so let's start

play06:13

with the first claim no fault divorce uh

play06:17

the text divorce only appears on page 51

play06:20

and it is in the context of funding uh

play06:23

as in divorcing policies and the funding

play06:25

needed to implement them um so no fault

play06:29

divorce is is not found in the document

play06:30

much less ending no fault divorce if

play06:33

your infographic is starting out with an

play06:35

obvious lie that probably doesn't bod

play06:37

wall for the rest of your

play06:39

document the second item is complete ban

play06:42

on abortions without exception and this

play06:44

is partially true but not once does the

play06:47

document Advocate Banning abortion in

play06:49

the general sense instead the document

play06:52

says on page six alternative options to

play06:54

abortion especially adoption should

play06:56

receive federal and state support uh

play06:58

note that on page 104 there's text that

play07:02

says the use of public monies for

play07:04

transgender surgeries or to facilitate

play07:07

abortion for service members should be

play07:08

ended so that's kind of the closest

play07:11

thing you get to a ban ough this really

play07:14

only refers to service members people

play07:16

who serve in the

play07:17

military uh there are sections about

play07:19

defunding Planned Parenthood from

play07:20

Medicaid dollars and prohibiting federal

play07:22

funds for being used for abortion travel

play07:25

and that means uh federal funds being

play07:28

used to uh trans transport someone from

play07:30

a state with a very restrictive abortion

play07:33

laws to a state with fewer abortion laws

play07:36

that way they can obtain an abortion the

play07:39

next claim is uh ban contraceptives and

play07:42

this isn't just a lie this is a pants on

play07:44

fire lie there is text in the document

play07:47

which advocates for uh supporting and

play07:50

restoring religious and moral exemptions

play07:53

to the contraceptive mandate under the

play07:54

Affordable Care Act you can find that on

play07:57

page

play07:58

484 uh in a nutshell there are some

play08:00

organizations who do not believe in

play08:02

birth control and they were essentially

play08:03

forced to offer birth control on their

play08:05

Health Plans by the federal government

play08:07

changing this would allow certain

play08:09

companies who do not believe in

play08:10

contraception to offer health care plans

play08:12

without such a contraceptive

play08:14

prescription

play08:15

coverage next is additional tax breaks

play08:18

for corporations on the 1% this is

play08:21

partially true now this is kind of the

play08:24

first clue that this is an active

play08:25

measure because the term 1% isn't used

play08:27

by the 1% and by the way when I say 1%

play08:30

that refers to the top 1% of earners in

play08:33

the US so in order to be part of the 1%

play08:36

you need to bring in an annual salary of

play08:39

$600,000 a year roughly now there is a

play08:43

section that says treasury should work

play08:44

with Congress to simplify the tax code

play08:46

by enacting a simple two- rate

play08:48

individual tax system of 15% and 30%

play08:51

that eliminates most deductions credits

play08:53

and exclusions and then later it goes on

play08:55

to suggest lowering the corporate tax

play08:57

rate to 18% this would likely benefit

play09:00

the rich but it would also benefit small

play09:04

businesses next is higher taxes for the

play09:07

working class and this is actually

play09:09

partially true there's nothing in the

play09:11

document that specifically Advocates

play09:14

higher taxes for the working class

play09:16

however the two lowest tax brackets are

play09:18

10% and 12% and that is for people

play09:21

making 11,000 K year and 45k a year

play09:26

respectively those people would see

play09:28

their taxes raised raed to 15% but again

play09:31

this is designed to simplify the tax

play09:33

code so that everybody regardless of how

play09:36

much you make either pays 15% or

play09:39

30% next is elimination of unions and

play09:41

worker protections This Is A Lie this

play09:44

actually doesn't appear in the document

play09:46

although there is a section on page 81

play09:48

that talks about how hard it is to fire

play09:50

government workers who are

play09:51

underperforming and it makes suggestions

play09:53

to expedite the process of terminating

play09:55

underperforming government workers but

play09:57

it's obvious that the statement in the

play09:59

infographic implies eliminating all

play10:02

private sector unions not making it

play10:04

easier to fire underperforming

play10:06

government

play10:07

employees next is raising the retirement

play10:10

age and this is a pants onf fire lie the

play10:13

document does not contain anything about

play10:15

raising the retirement age the document

play10:18

does mention that on page 77 there may

play10:20

be opportunities to save money by moving

play10:23

towards things like Thrift Savings plans

play10:25

uh instead of traditional pensions for

play10:27

government workers but nothing about

play10:29

raising the retirement age next is cut

play10:32

Social Security this is a pants on fire

play10:34

lie there isn't a single mention in the

play10:36

document of cutting Social Security cut

play10:38

Medicare this is pretty much again a

play10:41

pants on fire lie as well next is end

play10:44

the Affordable Care Act this is a lie I

play10:46

couldn't find anything in the document

play10:48

of of ending the Affordable Care Act

play10:51

there was text on page 469 about

play10:54

separating the subsidized ACA Market

play10:57

from the unsubsidized Market to promote

play10:58

insurance competition there's also a

play11:01

section on removing restrictions for

play11:03

physician owned hospitals I didn't know

play11:05

about this but apparently there are some

play11:07

physician-owned hospitals that

play11:08

specialize in certain procedures like

play11:10

Cardiology or Orthopedics and it appears

play11:13

that under the ACA Medicare won't

play11:15

reimburse these hospitals for procedures

play11:18

so I guess this was done to prevent

play11:20

these small physician-owned hospitals

play11:22

from performing procedures that weren't

play11:23

really needed and then just billing

play11:25

Medicaid like a factory or maybe this

play11:28

was a gift to large Hospital

play11:30

corporations to decrease competition but

play11:33

it doesn't seem like project 2025

play11:36

intends to repeal the

play11:38

ACA next is raise prescription drug

play11:41

prices there is no explicit language

play11:44

that calls for raising prescription drug

play11:46

prices but this might be partially true

play11:49

because of a technicality or an effect

play11:51

of a law they want to implement but the

play11:54

closest thing I can see is Page 465

play11:57

which talks about ending government

play11:59

price controls on drugs that are

play12:01

available for Medicare which I suppose

play12:04

would increase prices If you eliminate

play12:06

the price control but it sounds like

play12:08

what the government wants to do is

play12:09

negotiate with the pharmaceutical

play12:11

companies instead of just having a fixed

play12:13

price uh but I found a section on page

play12:16

456 which also talks about generic drugs

play12:20

which indicate that the document wants

play12:22

the FDA to go after companies that's

play12:24

kind of slow walk the entrance of

play12:27

generic drugs into the marketplace so

play12:29

that right there could probably lower

play12:30

costs so this might be a wash next is

play12:34

eliminate the Department of Education we

play12:37

finally have a truthful statement it's

play12:38

on page 319 uh I think the basic idea

play12:42

here is that the Department of Education

play12:44

is supposed to drive federal education

play12:46

policy but most education is driven by

play12:49

the states so the Department of

play12:51

Education has turned into this bloated

play12:53

bureaucracy that doesn't actually

play12:54

perform their core Mission at least

play12:56

that's what this document claims and so

play12:58

the idea is to just eliminate the

play12:59

department and do things like move

play13:01

scholarship grants into the Department

play13:02

of Labor uh but this is the first

play13:05

genuinely true item I've seen so far

play13:08

next is use public taxpayer money for

play13:11

private religious schools so this is

play13:13

somewhat true and it kind of goes back

play13:14

to school valur the idea here is that if

play13:17

your child is in a public school that is

play13:18

not performing well you can take the

play13:20

money that would be normally allocated

play13:22

toward that public school and you can

play13:24

send your child to private school with

play13:26

that money instead often times these

play13:28

private school schools are religious

play13:30

institutions like Catholic schools and

play13:32

you often hear this in the terms of

play13:34

school

play13:35

choice next is teach Christian religious

play13:37

beliefs in public schools uh the word

play13:40

Christian only appears in the document

play13:42

six times none of which talking about

play13:44

Christian religious beliefs being taught

play13:46

in schools this is an outright lie next

play13:50

is endf free and discounted lunch

play13:52

programs and this is partially true page

play13:55

302 talks about how school lunch

play13:57

programs are originally designed to Prov

play13:59

Pro food to children from low-income

play14:00

families well at school but these

play14:03

programs are now servicing middle class

play14:06

and upper class families I think the

play14:08

main issue here is something called the

play14:10

community eligibility provision which

play14:13

means that if 40% of students in a

play14:15

school or School District are eligible

play14:17

for federal meals all students in that

play14:20

school or School District can receive

play14:22

free meals and in some cases this makes

play14:24

sense I once dated a teacher who taught

play14:26

in Prince George's County Maryland where

play14:29

significant number of parents were from

play14:31

Central America and they could not read

play14:32

in English or Spanish so asking them to

play14:35

fill out a free meal form that that just

play14:37

ain't going to happen their kids just

play14:39

going to go hungry and sometimes school

play14:42

lunches make a lot of sense in a case

play14:44

like that but it sounds like what the

play14:46

Department of Agriculture has done is

play14:48

interpret the law so that if 40% of

play14:50

students in a district meet the criteria

play14:52

the entire District gets free lunches no

play14:55

matter their income level so whether

play14:57

this is right or wrong the orig original

play14:59

text of endf free and discounted lunch

play15:02

programs is a lie it's not ending it's

play15:04

just being focused on children who

play15:06

actually need the services next is end

play15:09

civil rights and Dei Protections in

play15:11

government so this is a mixed truth and

play15:13

I think a lot of it has to deal with

play15:15

that you have two separate issues on the

play15:17

same line civil rights and Dei or

play15:20

diversity equity and inclusion now there

play15:23

is nothing in this document about ending

play15:25

civil rights Protections in government

play15:27

but I will tell you this Dei has

play15:29

mentioned 39 times mostly with the issue

play15:32

of preventing politicalized or social

play15:34

agendas by agencies that have no reason

play15:37

to promote those agendas and I can tell

play15:39

you that the Heritage Foundation is

play15:41

deathly afraid of Dei efforts uh there's

play15:44

a section on page 358 which calls for a

play15:47

general accounting of federal programs

play15:49

that spread Dei or CRT critical race

play15:52

Theory and gender ideology so this is of

play15:55

mixed

play15:56

factuality next is Ban African-American

play15:59

and gender studies in all levels of

play16:01

Education This Is A Lie now there is a

play16:04

section on page 343 that talks about

play16:06

preventing students and teachers from

play16:08

being required to believe that they are

play16:10

guilty or responsible for the actions of

play16:12

others based on race or ethnicity uh but

play16:15

there is no blanket ban on

play16:17

African-American or gender studies next

play16:20

is Ban books and curriculum about

play16:22

slavery This Is A Lie the word slavery

play16:25

only appears once in the document and

play16:27

the text appears on page 4 14 which says

play16:30

left our own devices the American people

play16:32

rejected European monarchy and

play16:33

colonialism just as we rejected slavery

play16:36

uh but there is no ban on books or

play16:39

curriculum about slavery next is ending

play16:42

climate protections this is of mixed

play16:45

factuality on page uh 419 through 426

play16:49

the role of the Environmental Protection

play16:51

Agency or EPA is laid out and the basic

play16:54

idea is to move away from environmental

play16:56

advocacy and moving towards ensuring

play16:58

compliance and enforcement of existing

play17:01

laws next is increased Arctic Drilling

play17:04

and this is somewhat true as well page

play17:06

390 talks about the Arctic energy office

play17:09

and a strategic plan for the responsible

play17:11

development of Alaska's energy assets so

play17:14

yes this probably equates to more

play17:16

drilling for oil in Alaska next is to

play17:19

regulate big business and the oil

play17:21

industry this is partially true but it

play17:24

needs context page 884 talks about

play17:28

positive plan for freeing the private

play17:29

sector from overblown government

play17:31

interference and regulation could we

play17:33

believe result in an explosion of

play17:35

entrepreneurial activity and Page 855

play17:38

talks about eliminating unnecessary

play17:40

regulations and one of the fears of this

play17:43

document are that Federal bureaucracies

play17:45

have grown so big they just kind of make

play17:47

up their own rules in order to justify

play17:49

their existence so the document does

play17:52

advocate for relaxing regulations in

play17:54

general especially where regulations

play17:56

don't make any sense or they're put in

play17:59

place in order to satisfy a political

play18:01

ideology or

play18:02

bureaucracy next is promote and expedite

play18:05

capital punishment this is true it's on

play18:07

page 554 and it says the next

play18:10

conservative Administration should

play18:11

therefore do everything possible to

play18:13

obtain finality for the 44 prisoners

play18:15

currently on federal death row now this

play18:18

is with the idea that providing this

play18:20

punishment without ever enforcing it

play18:22

provides neither Justice for the victims

play18:24

nor the defendant now the document also

play18:27

admits that Congress needs to visit

play18:29

whether the death penalty is appropriate

play18:30

at all but until then the prisoners who

play18:33

are on death row should have their

play18:34

sentences carried out next is end

play18:36

marriage equality this is a lie there

play18:39

isn't a single line that talks about

play18:41

ending marriage

play18:43

equality then we have condemn single

play18:45

mothers while promoting traditional

play18:47

families uh this is of mixed factuality

play18:50

there isn't anything about condemning

play18:51

single mothers but the document does

play18:53

talk about promoting traditional

play18:54

marriage as the best solution for family

play18:57

stability to fund FBI and Homeland

play19:00

Security so this is true although it's

play19:03

more histrionics than truth and it needs

play19:05

context the infographic makes it sound

play19:08

like the Heritage Foundation wants to

play19:09

eliminate the FBI and Homeland Security

play19:12

in reality what they want to do is

play19:14

streamline non-law enforcement functions

play19:16

of the FBI and eliminate redundancies

play19:18

you can find that on page 551 where they

play19:21

say badges over bureaucracy the

play19:23

Department of Homeland Security is

play19:25

another animal and the paper talks about

play19:27

how the idea to create that department

play19:29

20 years ago was supposed to create this

play19:31

cohesive department where they could

play19:32

bring everything Under One Roof but it

play19:34

never quite worked you can find that on

play19:36

page 133 it also wants to combine all of

play19:40

America's separate immigration agencies

play19:42

into one agency to remove redundancies

play19:45

they suggest moving the Coast Guard into

play19:47

either the Department of Justice or the

play19:48

Department of Defense and they also want

play19:50

to divide the Secret Service into a

play19:52

protective branch and a financial Branch

play19:56

uh and also uh privatize the TSA all of

play19:59

that can be found on page

play20:01

134 next is use the military to break up

play20:04

domestic protests this is a lie there

play20:06

isn't a single line about this anywhere

play20:08

in the project 2025 document next is

play20:12

mass deportation of immigrants and

play20:14

incarceration in camps so some of this

play20:16

is true although it literally focuses on

play20:19

immigrants uh that enter the country

play20:21

illegally specifically on page 135 it

play20:24

talks about prioritizing border security

play20:27

and immigration enforcement including

play20:29

detention and deportation and on page

play20:31

143 the document talks about increasing

play20:34

bed space for detainees to 100,000 beds

play20:37

finally page 142 talks about uh civil

play20:40

arrest detention and removal of

play20:42

immigrant violators anywhere within the

play20:45

us next is end Birthright citizenship

play20:48

this is a lie I looked over this entire

play20:50

document and the word Birthright only

play20:52

appears once and that's on page 803

play20:55

which talks about it in the context of

play20:57

optimism home and confidence there is a

play21:00

section on preventing human trafficking

play21:02

by repealing section 235 of the William

play21:05

wlur Force trafficking victims

play21:06

protection reauthorization act of 2008

play21:09

uh but that's more about the procedures

play21:11

of safely repatriating children next is

play21:15

Ban Muslims from entering the country

play21:17

this is a lie there is nothing in the

play21:19

document that references this next is

play21:22

eliminating federal agencies like the

play21:24

FDA EPA or Noah uh and this is partially

play21:28

true the document does not recommend

play21:30

eliminating the FDA or EPA however it

play21:33

does recommend eliminating Noah or the

play21:35

national oceanographic Atmospheric

play21:38

Administration and uh placing its

play21:40

functions within other

play21:42

agencies finally we have continue to

play21:45

pack the Supreme Court and lower courts

play21:46

with right-wing judges This Is A Lie

play21:49

project 2025 does not contain any plan

play21:51

for packing the Supreme Court with

play21:53

right-wing judges now I can tell you

play21:55

this conservative presidents tend to

play21:57

appoint conser of justices liberal

play22:00

presidents tend to appoint liberal

play22:01

justices and that's just kind of how the

play22:03

American system works but sometimes

play22:05

judges don't don't work out as expected

play22:08

uh Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy

play22:11

uh he was appointed by Ronald Reagan as

play22:14

a conservative Justice and he was often

play22:16

the Swing Vote on the court so just

play22:18

because you appoint a Justice doesn't

play22:20

mean that they'll always have a

play22:21

conservative opinion on all issues

play22:24

doesn't mean they'll vote the way you

play22:25

want them to vote every single time so

play22:27

if we look at the totals there are five

play22:30

true statements in this infographic 10

play22:32

partial truths and 14 outright lies this

play22:36

leads to a truth score of 177% and this

play22:38

is pretty bad if you have to make up 83%

play22:41

of your allegations against an opposing

play22:43

political party you might want to

play22:44

revisit what you stand for using the

play22:47

same active measure tactics as Russia

play22:49

isn't right no matter whether you're

play22:51

liberal or conservative or somewhere in

play22:55

between so hey if you want to support my

play22:57

work fighting this information from all

play22:59

sides head on over to rhyme. substack

play23:02

do.com where you can get access to a lot

play23:04

of extra materials for only five bucks a

play23:05

month and you know I wrote a story

play23:07

called warlock it's actually kind of the

play23:09

best seller on Amazon Kindle which is

play23:11

kind of weird the story is about an

play23:12

Irish traveler who's hired by the FBI to

play23:14

cat the world's most wanted criminal in

play23:17

Afghanistan you can get it for only

play23:19

9 thank you guys so much for watching oh

play23:23

wow daddy cigarettes if I smoke these

play23:26

I'll be cool hey kid what are you doing

play23:28

Think Tank you know kidss smoking isn't

play23:31

cool but t-shirts stickers and hoodies

play23:33

from bunker branding Shore are wow

play23:36

alcoholics moving cargo awesome Intel

play23:40

light aerosol live laugh launch for

play23:43

Destroyer Trident High Mars and Patriot

play23:46

think outside the bomb drone site drone

play23:48

Department of the boat people landmines

play23:50

and even the tow missile it would

play23:52

behoove you to grab one today I better

play23:54

take these don't worry I'll destroy them

play23:57

by burning and remember bunker branding

play23:59

is cool now I know and knowing is half

play24:02

the battle bunker branding

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Project 2025MisinformationActive MeasuresHeritage FoundationPolitical AnalysisRyan McBethDisinformationConservative AgendaFact-CheckingPolitical Tactics