Real Doctor Explains The Link Between 5G & Coronavirus

Summary

This video debunks myths linking 5G technology to health issues and the spread of coronavirus. It clarifies that Wuhan was not the first city with 5G and that COVID-19 cases have occurred in countries without 5G. The video refutes claims of a geographical or dose-response relationship between 5G and COVID-19, explains that viruses are not spread by radio waves, and counters the idea that 5G radiation causes symptoms similar to COVID-19. It concludes by stating that 5G, like visible light, is non-ionizing and does not penetrate deeply into the skin, and that there is no evidence linking 5G to harmful health effects.

Takeaways

• 💡 5G technology and coronavirus have no direct connection or causation.
• 🌍 South Korea, not Wuhan, was the first country to launch 5G, and COVID-19 cases did not appear immediately after.
• 🌐 COVID-19 affects countries with and without 5G networks, showing no geographical correlation between 5G and the virus.
• 📊 There is no dose-response relationship between the number of 5G towers and COVID-19 cases, as evidenced by South Korea's controlled outbreak despite widespread 5G.
• 🔬 Viruses spread by infecting cells, not via radio waves from 5G towers, disproving the myth that 5G causes COVID symptoms.
• 📡 5G frequencies in use do not reach the 60 GHz range that affects oxygen molecules, debunking claims of 5G impairing oxygen binding.
• ❌ The idea that 5G causes similar symptoms to COVID-19, such as headaches and shortness of breath, is scientifically unsupported.
• 🧬 There is no evidence that 5G or radiofrequency electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure harms human health.
• ☀️ Humans are exposed to far more intense radiation from visible light and sunlight than from 5G, which is relatively weak and limited to the skin surface.
• ✨ Cosmic microwave background radiation naturally exposes us to radio frequencies, without harmful effects, further challenging the belief that 5G is dangerous.

Q & A

What is the first myth about 5G and coronavirus mentioned in the transcript?

The first myth is that Wuhan, being the first place to get 5G, was also the first place hit with the coronavirus. However, South Korea was the first to launch 5G in April 2019, and the virus's spread can be tracked independently of 5G deployment.

Which country was actually the first to launch 5G, according to the transcript?

South Korea was the first country to launch 5G in April of 2019.

How does the transcript refute the claim that 5G causes coronavirus?

The transcript refutes this by showing that the spread of the virus does not follow the order of 5G introduction, and there is no time association between 5G and COVID-19 cases.

What is the geographical association myth regarding 5G and COVID-19 discussed in the transcript?

The myth is that COVID-19 only affects countries with 5G networks. The transcript counters this by stating that Iran, a country without 5G, has many COVID-19 cases, indicating no geographical association.

How does the transcript address the myth that countries with more 5G towers have more COVID-19 cases?

The transcript points out that South Korea, with the highest number of 5G cities, has a well-controlled outbreak, while the USA, with fewer 5G cities, has a larger outbreak, indicating no dose-response relationship.

What is the myth about 5G towers spreading viruses via radio waves?

The myth is that 5G towers spread viruses via radio waves causing COVID-19 symptoms. The transcript debunks this by explaining that viruses are infectious particles that invade cells, and 5G is just a computer networking system with no link to viruses.

How does the transcript explain the claim that 5G radiation causes symptoms similar to COVID-19?

The transcript explains that 5G does not use 60 gigahertz frequency, which is the frequency claimed to cause such symptoms. Even if it did, the effect on oxygen molecules would be negligible and not cause COVID-19 symptoms.

What is the myth about 5G technology being harmful to health mentioned in the transcript?

The myth is that 5G or radiofrequency EMF exposure is harmful to health. The transcript counters this by stating there is no evidence supporting this claim and compares 5G frequencies to visible light frequencies, which are much higher and not harmful.

How does the transcript compare the energy of 5G photons to that of visible light?

The transcript states that 5G technology uses frequencies up to 95 gigahertz, while visible light frequencies are 10,000 times higher, in the 400 to 800 terahertz range, and thus have correspondingly higher energy per photon.

What is the conclusion of the transcript regarding the penetration of 5G wavelengths into the human body?

The transcript concludes that high-frequency 5G wavelengths penetrate less than a millimeter of the skin, which is less than the thickness of the dermis, meaning these photons do not penetrate past our skin.