Pemkot Medan Respons Aksi Demo Seniman Tuntut Kembalikan Fungsi Taman Budaya

Summary

Artists in Medan staged a protest demanding the restoration of the cultural function of Taman Budaya Medan, which has recently restricted their activities or charged fees for use. During the protest on July 24, officials intervened and halted the performances. The local government, represented by Topan Obaja Putra Ginting, clarified that no official regulations require fees for artistic activities and condemned any unauthorized charges as illegal. The government promised clearer guidelines to prevent future conflicts between artists and management, and to ensure that the renovated spaces in Taman Budaya are available for artists' use without obstacles.

Takeaways

• 🎭 The artists of Medan city demanded the restoration of the cultural park's function.
• 🗣️ The government of Medan city responded quickly to the artists' demands.
• 🚫 The cultural park had been closed to performances due to a typhoon.
• 💵 Artists were previously prohibited from using the cultural park without charge and were asked to pay for activities.
• 📉 The fees for using the park varied from 100,000 to 500,000, depending on the space used.
• 🚫 The artists were frustrated as they were not allowed to use the park even after renovations.
• 🏛️ The park consists of 12 rooms including galleries, theaters, and libraries meant for various art forms.
• 🛠️ Some rooms in the cultural park were under renovation and were expected to be used for art activities.
• 🏢 The Secretary of Medan, Topan Obaja Putra Ginting, assured that no fees would be imposed on artists for their activities.
• 📜 There is no regulation (Perda) that mandates the fees mentioned by the park's management, indicating the fees were unauthorized.

Q & A

What was the main demand of the artists' action in Medan?

The artists demanded the restoration of the original function of Medan Cultural Park, as they were previously prohibited from using it for their activities.

How did the government of Medan respond to the artists' action?

The government responded immediately, with the Secretary of the Region, Topan Obaj Putra Ginting, visiting the site and stating that there should be no fees imposed on artists for cultural activities at the park.

What was the reason behind the artists' dissatisfaction with the management of Medan Cultural Park?

The artists were dissatisfied because they were not allowed to use the park for free and were instead asked to pay fees ranging from 100,000 to 500,000 for using the facilities.

What were the fees imposed on the artists for using Medan Cultural Park?

The fees ranged from 100,000 to 500,000, depending on the space or room they intended to use for their activities.

What was the status of the rooms in Medan Cultural Park after renovation?

After renovation, only a few rooms were available for use by the artists, specifically A6, while the rest were not accessible despite being renovated.

What was the initial purpose of Medan Cultural Park according to the script?

The park was initially designed to house various cultural activities including theater, dance, visual arts, cinema, music, and had facilities like galleries, exhibition halls, a library, a prayer room, and a canteen.

How did the Secretary of the Region, Topan Obaj Putra Ginting, address the issue of fees at Medan Cultural Park?

He clarified that there were no regulations (Perda) that stipulated the fees mentioned by the artists, implying that the fees were unauthorized and that future use of the park would be regulated to avoid such misunderstandings.

What was the condition of Medan Cultural Park before the artists' action?

Before the action, the park was under the management of the city government's Department of Education and Culture, and artists were restricted from using it without paying fees.

What was the outcome of the meeting between the Secretary of the Region and the artists?

The meeting led to a commitment to resolve the issue and ensure that the park would be available for artists to use without any unauthorized fees, and that the park's facilities would be properly managed for cultural activities.

What was the role of the media, specifically Tribun Medan, in this situation?

Tribun Medan played a role in reporting the artists' action and the government's response, providing a platform for the artists to voice their concerns and for the government to communicate its stance.