Telegram Creator on Elon Musk, Resisting FBI Attacks, and Getting Mugged in California

Tucker Carlson
16 Apr 202458:48

Summary

TLDRIn an in-depth interview, Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, discusses his journey from creating Russia's VK to establishing the secure messaging app Telegram. He shares his commitment to privacy and free speech, which led to conflicts with governments and tech giants. Durov emphasizes Telegram's organic growth, user-centric features, and his vision for a neutral platform that fosters global communication without compromising on security.

Takeaways

  • 🌐 Telegram is a globally popular messaging app with significant growth, currently nearing 900 million users without spending on marketing.
  • 📖 The founder, Pavel Durov, is a strong advocate for privacy and free speech, having left his home country of Russia and his previous company, VK, due to conflicts with the government over censorship.
  • 🕊️ Durov emphasizes Telegram's commitment to neutrality and its stance against taking sides in political conflicts, treating all users equally regardless of their political views.
  • 🔒 The encryption for Telegram was designed by Durov's brother, who has two PhDs in mathematics and is an expert in cryptography, ensuring the security of the platform.
  • 🏢 The company is headquartered in Dubai, chosen for its business-friendly environment, tax efficiency, and geopolitical neutrality.
  • 🛑 Telegram has faced pressure from governments and tech giants like Apple and Google to comply with certain guidelines, but Durov remains committed to resisting censorship and protecting user privacy.
  • 💡 Durov's personal belief in freedom extends to his business philosophy, as he has not taken on outside investment that could compromise the mission of Telegram.
  • 🏆 Despite the challenges and potential for recognition, Durov has kept a low profile, focusing on the development of Telegram and its features rather than seeking personal fame or accolades.
  • 🔄 The script discusses the dynamic between public and private companies, suggesting that public companies may be less efficient due to external pressures and bureaucracy.
  • 🌟 Durov highlights the importance of innovation in the tech industry, welcoming Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter as a potential catalyst for new ideas and approaches to social media.
  • 🤝 The interview concludes with a nod to the broader importance of free speech, suggesting that the principles Telegram upholds are vital for societal health and progress.

Q & A

  • What is the background of Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram?

    -Pavel Durov was born in 1984 in the Soviet Union and moved to Italy at the age of four. He later moved back to Russia after the Soviet Union collapsed. He has a strong educational background with a focus on math and programming, and he started his first company, VK, at the age of 21.

  • Why did Pavel Durov leave Russia and VK?

    -Durov left Russia and VK due to conflicts with the Russian government over demands to censor political opposition on his social media platform, VK. He chose to sell his stake in the company, resign as CEO, and leave the country to uphold his values of free speech and not comply with government censorship requests.

  • What is the business model of Telegram, and how does it grow its user base?

    -Telegram has an organic growth model; it does not spend any money on marketing or advertising to acquire users. The platform's growth is driven by word-of-mouth and user satisfaction, leading to a user base that has grown to almost 900 million without any marketing spend.

  • How does Telegram ensure the privacy and security of its users?

    -Telegram uses a cryptographic protocol designed by Durov's brother, who has two Ph.D.s in mathematics and is an expert in cryptography. The app emphasizes secure, encrypted communication, and the company has a strong stance against creating backdoors for government surveillance.

  • Why did Telegram choose Dubai as its headquarters?

    -Dubai was chosen for its ease of doing business, tax efficiency, excellent infrastructure, and geopolitical neutrality. The UAE's policies align with Telegram's mission to be a neutral platform that respects user privacy and freedom of speech.

  • What is the significance of Telegram channels, and how do they work?

    -Telegram channels are a one-to-many broadcast tool that allows messages to be disseminated to millions of subscribers. They are used for various purposes, including official communications from heads of state, and have become popular due to their ease of use and integration within the messaging interface.

  • How does Pavel Durov manage to keep Telegram efficient with such a small team?

    -Durov manages the company with a compact team of about 30 engineers, using a decentralized approach that includes hosting programming contests to find the best talent. He is directly involved in the development process, making decisions that influence the platform's features and direction.

  • What is Durov's stance on the use of private equity and venture capital in his business?

    -Durov has avoided private equity and venture capital to maintain independence and align the company's goals with his values. He believes that external funding could introduce goals that may not be consistent with Telegram's mission of privacy and freedom of speech.

  • How does Telegram handle requests from governments that may infringe on user privacy?

    -Telegram evaluates government requests on a case-by-case basis. While they cooperate with legitimate requests related to violence or terrorism, they ignore requests that they believe cross the line into censorship or spying, which they view as violations of user privacy.

  • What challenges does Telegram face from tech giants like Apple and Google?

    -Telegram faces the risk of being removed from app stores if it does not comply with guidelines set by Apple and Google. These companies have the power to censor apps and their content, which could limit access to Telegram for a significant portion of the global population.

  • What is Durov's view on the future of private communication in the context of increasing surveillance and AI technology?

    -Durov is optimistic that privacy can be preserved despite advancements in technology and surveillance. He believes in the development of new secure hardware for communication and that societal attitudes towards privacy may change, leading to a greater appreciation for private communication.

Outlines

00:00

🌐 Introduction to Telegram and its Founder

The paragraph introduces Telegram, a rapidly growing messaging app popular worldwide, with a focus on its enigmatic founder, Pavel Durov. Headquartered in Dubai, the app is run and owned by Durov, who is known for his rare public appearances and interviews. The host expresses amazement at the founder's story and invites Durov to share his background and the company's origins. Durov recounts his birth in 1984 in the Soviet Union, his family's move to Italy, and his experiences comparing the centralized system of the USSR to the capitalist system in Italy. He discusses his education, his brother's prodigious mathematical abilities, and their shared passion for coding, which led to the creation of VK, often referred to as the 'Facebook of Russia.'

05:02

🔐 Telegram's Commitment to Privacy and Freedom

Durov details his journey with VK and the challenges he faced when the Russian government demanded he censor political opposition on the platform. He refused, upholding values of free speech and assembly, which led to conflicts with the government. In 2013, faced with the choice of compromising his values or leaving the company and country, he chose the latter. This decision was influenced by his commitment to freedom and privacy, which he aimed to provide through Telegram. He clarifies misconceptions about Telegram's ties to the Russian government, emphasizing the app's organic growth and lack of marketing spend, contrasting it with competitors who invest heavily in marketing.

10:02

🌱 Telegram's Growth and Durov's Departure from Russia

The conversation continues with Durov explaining his decision to leave Russia and the subsequent creation of Telegram. He discusses the bureaucratic challenges faced in various countries when trying to establish a company with the best programmers from around the world. He also shares his personal experiences of feeling unwelcome or unsafe in countries like the US, where he encountered aggressive attention from security agencies and even a street attack. These experiences, along with the need for a neutral and business-friendly environment, led him to Dubai, where Telegram found a home. He praises Dubai for its ease of doing business, tax efficiency, and neutrality, making it an ideal location for Telegram's global operations.

15:07

🛡️ Defending User Privacy and Freedom of Speech

Durov discusses the pressures Telegram has faced from various governments and the importance of maintaining user privacy and freedom of speech. He recounts instances where Telegram has resisted government demands that would compromise these values, even at the risk of legal repercussions. He also addresses the challenges of operating in a world where large tech platforms like Apple and Google can exert control over app distribution and content. Despite these pressures, Durov remains committed to Telegram's mission, highlighting the platform's neutrality and its role in facilitating the free exchange of ideas.

20:09

🌟 Telegram's Unique Business Model and Durov's Vision

In this segment, Durov explains Telegram's unique business model, emphasizing the app's organic growth and refusal to spend on marketing or advertising. He discusses the company's structure, with a small team of elite engineers and a focus on product quality and user experience. Durov shares his personal philosophy on business ownership, highlighting his desire for independence and efficiency. He also touches on his views on the role of public companies versus private ones, suggesting that public ownership can lead to inefficiencies and a lack of focus on long-term goals.

25:10

🔒 The Future of Privacy and Communication

Durov reflects on the future of privacy in a world increasingly focused on security over privacy. He expresses optimism that new technologies and societal attitudes will eventually favor privacy and personal freedom. He discusses the role of Telegram as a neutral platform and the importance of allowing diverse opinions, even those critical of government measures. Durov also comments on the recent changes in the social media landscape, particularly with Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter, and how it might impact the industry and the future of free speech online.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Telegram

Telegram is a rapidly growing social messaging app popular worldwide, including in the United States. It is known for its focus on speed and security. In the video, the creator of Telegram, Pavel Durov, discusses the app's organic growth and commitment to user privacy, which contrasts with other social media platforms that may compromise on these fronts.

💡Pavel Durov

Pavel Durov is the founder of Telegram and previously VK, often referred to as the 'Facebook of Russia.' He is portrayed in the video as a staunch advocate for free speech and privacy, having left Russia and his first company due to conflicts with the government over these values. His story illustrates the personal sacrifices made in the name of freedom and the principles upon which Telegram is built.

💡Free Speech

Free speech is a central theme in the video, representing the right to express one's thoughts and ideas without censorship or restraint. Durov's refusal to censor political opposition on VK and his subsequent creation of Telegram, a platform committed to free speech, exemplify his dedication to this principle.

💡Privacy

Privacy is highlighted as a key concern for Telegram, with the platform being designed to protect users' data and communications from surveillance and intrusion. The video discusses the importance of privacy in an era where many tech companies and governments are increasingly encroaching upon it.

💡Censorship

Censorship is presented as the antithesis of free speech, with the video detailing instances where Durov resisted government demands to censor content on VK. The term is used to describe the suppression of information, ideas, or opinions, which Telegram aims to prevent.

💡Organic Growth

Organic growth in the context of the video refers to the natural and unsolicited increase in Telegram's user base, attributed to word-of-mouth and user satisfaction rather than marketing or advertising. This stands in contrast to other apps that spend heavily on user acquisition.

💡Encryption

Encryption is the process of encoding messages or information to ensure secure communication and protect it from unauthorized access. Telegram utilizes encryption to safeguard user data, as discussed in the video, which is a fundamental aspect of the app's commitment to privacy.

💡Surveillance

Surveillance is the monitoring of communications or activities, often by governments or other entities, for various purposes, including security or control. The video touches on the widespread surveillance practices and the potential for Telegram to be a target due to its user base and focus on privacy.

💡Neutrality

Neutrality in the video refers to Telegram's stance of not taking sides in political or social disputes, aiming to provide a platform that is fair and balanced for all users. This is in contrast to other platforms that may exhibit bias or take actions that favor certain viewpoints.

💡Innovation

Innovation is highlighted in the context of the social media industry, with the video discussing the lack of innovation among major platforms and praising Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter as a potential catalyst for new ideas and approaches to social media.

💡Regulation

Regulation in the video pertains to the demands and pressures from governments and other entities for social media platforms to comply with certain rules or restrictions. Telegram has faced such pressures but has often chosen to maintain its principles of free speech and privacy.

Highlights

Telegram is one of the fastest-growing social messaging apps globally, with its headquarters in Dubai.

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, is known for his strong belief in free speech and privacy, which led him to leave Russia and his previous company, VK.

Durov's early life experiences in the Soviet Union and Italy shaped his views on centralized systems and capitalism.

Telegram's encryption was designed by Durov's brother, a cryptography expert, ensuring the app's security.

The company operates without any marketing budget, relying on organic growth to reach nearly 900 million users.

Durov emphasizes Telegram's commitment to user privacy, even in the face of government requests for data.

Telegram has faced pressure from both the Russian and Ukrainian governments for its role in enabling political dissent.

Durov's decision to leave VK and Russia was driven by his refusal to comply with government censorship demands.

The UAE has been a supportive environment for Telegram, offering a neutral and business-friendly location.

Telegram's growth strategy focuses on product quality and user satisfaction rather than traditional marketing.

Durov discusses the challenges of running a privacy-focused platform in countries like the US, where surveillance is prevalent.

Telegram's stance on not censoring COVID-19 related skepticism contrasts with other social media platforms.

Durov's personal approach to company ownership and management is unique in the tech industry, with a focus on independence and efficiency.

Telegram's team is selectively chosen through coding competitions, maintaining a small, elite group of engineers.

Durov shares his optimism about the future of privacy and the potential for new secure communication technologies.

The interview concludes with a discussion on the importance of neutrality in social media platforms and the challenges of the current geopolitical climate.

Transcripts

play00:00

telegram is one of the fastest growing

play00:02

and biggest social messaging apps text

play00:06

apps in the world popular all around the

play00:08

world including in the United States but

play00:10

almost nothing or very little seems to

play00:12

be known about the company it's

play00:15

headquartered in Dubai where we are now

play00:17

it is run and owned and the software is

play00:20

designed written by Pavo dorov who began

play00:24

it some years ago who almost never does

play00:26

interviews it turns out he's in a very

play00:28

interesting person extremely interesting

play00:30

person we learned that the other day

play00:32

while talking to him and he has agreed

play00:34

to sit down and tell us about himself

play00:35

and his company and we thought it'd be

play00:37

definitely worth hearing and with that

play00:39

Pao thank you for joining us well thank

play00:40

you for having me so um I confess I used

play00:44

telegram I didn't know anything about

play00:47

you or the company and I was just kind

play00:48

of amazed by your story and if you

play00:50

wouldn't mind just recreating a little

play00:51

bit um for our audience where are you

play00:54

from how did you start this and why uh

play00:57

that will be a long story that's okay uh

play00:59

I was was born in 1984 in the Soviet

play01:02

Union so it was a fun year to be born in

play01:05

and uh back then I could witness you

play01:08

know the deficiencies of the centralized

play01:11

system we had in the Soviet Union when I

play01:13

was four years old my family moved to

play01:15

Italy where I could compare what I saw

play01:17

in tourin Italy with what I experienced

play01:20

in the Soviet Union and I thought the

play01:23

capitalist system the free market system

play01:26

is definitely better at least for me um

play01:29

and uh I went to school in Italy I uh

play01:32

became sort of a part of the um European

play01:37

as a result but then when the Soviet

play01:39

Union collapsed we decided to move back

play01:43

to Russia uh in Italy though we me and

play01:49

my brother we had a lot of fun time uh

play01:53

he was shown live on Italian TV as a

play01:57

young Prodigy kid who could Sol

play02:00

cubic equations in uh real time uh being

play02:04

just you know 10 years old and that was

play02:06

considered to be impossible back then in

play02:09

Italy I don't know what a cubic equation

play02:10

is so yeah it sounds

play02:12

difficult definitely and you know when I

play02:15

first went to school in it I didn't know

play02:17

how to speak Italian I didn't know a

play02:19

single Italian word and a lot of

play02:21

teachers said this guy well this kid

play02:23

will not going to be successful in our

play02:26

school by the end of the first year was

play02:28

second best by the end of the uh next

play02:31

year I was the best student in our class

play02:34

so it also showed me that well you could

play02:38

Excel you could compete I like that in

play02:40

competitive environment and then when we

play02:43

got back to Russia it was a little bit

play02:46

chaotic the only reason we got back is

play02:49

my father got uh an offer to run one of

play02:52

the departments in the St Petersburg

play02:53

State University he's one of the uh

play02:56

famous Scholars and writers uh uh

play02:59

dealing with ancient Roman literature

play03:02

and uh that experience was very

play03:04

different and uh I still enjoyed it

play03:07

because in Russia in the '90s you had

play03:10

this experimental schools where uh you

play03:14

were taught everything like we had six

play03:17

foreign languages we had math like very

play03:20

specialized six foreign languages at

play03:22

once six foreign languages in parallel

play03:25

you would have math similar that you

play03:27

would have in specialist math schools

play03:29

and like chemistry at the same level you

play03:32

would have schools specialized in

play03:34

chemistry and biology so that was really

play03:37

intense uh my brother he became world

play03:41

champion in maths in international

play03:44

olympiads in maths and programming many

play03:47

times in a row uh absolute best myself I

play03:51

was just the best student at my school

play03:53

also did uh some victories in local

play03:58

competitions in several areas but we

play04:01

both were very passionate about coding

play04:04

and uh designing stuff and uh we because

play04:08

we brought this

play04:10

IBM uh PC XT computer from Italy back in

play04:14

the early 90s we were one of the few

play04:16

families in Russia who could actually uh

play04:20

teach ourselves how to

play04:22

program and uh we started to do that I

play04:26

was uh in the University I was building

play04:29

website for my fellow

play04:31

students and uh as a result you know

play04:34

I started a company that became what

play04:39

they call the Facebook of Russia we

play04:41

don't like to name it that way because

play04:45

uh we actually managed to do a lot of

play04:47

things before Facebook and that defined

play04:51

how the social

play04:53

media uh industry developed in the years

play04:56

to come the company's name was VK I

play04:59

started it with I was 21 years old I

play05:02

just graduated University and uh it

play05:05

eventually became the largest social

play05:08

network the most popular social network

play05:11

in Russia Ukraine B Russia Kazakhstan

play05:13

and a bunch of other post Soviet

play05:15

countries uh that was an significant

play05:18

effort on my side because I at a certain

play05:22

point was the sole employee of the

play05:25

company I would write the code myself I

play05:28

would do the design myself myself I

play05:30

would uh manage the servers myself it

play05:33

was quite intense I even responded to

play05:36

customer support requests uh barely

play05:39

slapped but that was a fun time when I

play05:42

was 21 22 years old um and then the

play05:45

company grew like I said to somewhere

play05:47

about 100 million active users which was

play05:51

a lot back then it's uh was I think

play05:55

201 uh 12 or 2011 when we fa this the

play06:01

our first issues in Russia because you

play06:05

see I was still a big believer in this

play06:08

values of free market freedoms freedom

play06:11

of speech freedom of assembly so when

play06:14

the Russian opposition started to use VK

play06:17

to organize large protests in Russia

play06:20

where like almost half a million people

play06:22

will would go and protest on the main

play06:25

square or some of the main squares of

play06:27

the city uh we were requ requested to

play06:30

ban these communities on BK by the

play06:34

government and uh I refused so the

play06:37

government asked you to shut down

play06:39

Communications between

play06:41

their opponents well BK is a social

play06:44

networking platform so they have this

play06:46

large public communities that anybody

play06:49

can join anybody can read what people

play06:53

are discussing or what the

play06:55

administrators are posting they can

play06:57

comment they can share so it was a tool

play07:00

for these protesters to organize

play07:02

themselves back then it wasn't about us

play07:04

you know siding with with one side with

play07:07

one part of the uh political uh fight or

play07:10

the other it was us defending the

play07:13

freedom of speech and the freedom of

play07:15

assembly which we believed was the right

play07:17

thing but that didn't go too well with

play07:21

with the government and uh they were not

play07:24

too happy about that I would say and uh

play07:27

in a few years from then in 20 13 we had

play07:31

a similar situation where uh you know

play07:34

you had this protests in Ukraine where

play07:38

people again would use VK to organize

play07:40

themselves and go to the main square of

play07:43

the city and uh show their disagreement

play07:47

with the government yes and we received

play07:51

a request SL demand from the Russian

play07:54

side saying you have to give us the

play07:57

private data of the organiz

play08:00

of this protest and our response was

play08:03

wait wait a minute this is a different

play08:05

country we won't betray our Ukrainian

play08:09

users because you asked us to do that we

play08:12

decided to refuse and uh that didn't go

play08:16

too well with the Russian government as

play08:17

well so at the end of that year I had to

play08:20

make

play08:21

a difficult decision because I was

play08:24

offered basically a a choice between two

play08:28

suboptimal options

play08:30

uh one of which was uh I would start

play08:33

complying to whatever know the leaders

play08:37

of the country told me to do it the

play08:38

other one was I

play08:40

could um sell my stake in the company

play08:44

retire resign as the CEO and leave the

play08:49

country um I chose the

play08:53

letter uh that's a it's a if I can just

play08:55

ask you to pause it it's a little

play08:56

strange because I have heard people say

play08:59

that telegram is a part of the Russian

play09:02

government and you're describing the

play09:04

opposite you're saying you had to leave

play09:05

the country because you wouldn't bow to

play09:07

their demands well that exactly like

play09:10

you're saying people who have very

play09:12

limited knowledge of where telegram came

play09:16

from they would make these

play09:18

claims they could be encouraged by our

play09:21

competitors who see it is an easy way to

play09:24

discredit us because you know telegram

play09:26

is spreading like forest fire two and a

play09:29

half ion users sign up every day and

play09:31

we're sort of a threat so I'm not

play09:33

surprised there's this perception

play09:36

because our competitors they spend tens

play09:38

of billions on marketing and they're

play09:41

known for using PR firms to also engage

play09:46

in campaigns like that so how do you how

play09:49

much do you spend on marketing zero zero

play09:52

dollars in dollars zero dollars we've

play09:55

never spent anything on acquiring users

play09:59

for marketing purposes we never promoted

play10:02

telegram uh you know on other social

play10:06

Platforms in any way uh this is very

play10:08

different

play10:09

from other apps you could see them being

play10:12

promoted here or there t is different

play10:16

all of our growth is purely organic and

play10:19

uh we got to almost 900 million users uh

play10:25

without uh having to spend anything

play10:29

on ads to promote teleg amazing I'm I'm

play10:32

sorry to interrupt your no it's just

play10:34

it's just interesting because I have

play10:35

heard people say that um but it sounds

play10:37

like the opposite of the truth so you

play10:39

decided to sell the company resign as

play10:41

CEO and leave your

play10:43

country yes that's what I did it was a

play10:46

bit painful because obviously my first

play10:49

company was my baby I created my stuff

play10:51

there was a lot of creativity time and

play10:54

effort invested in that platform but at

play10:58

the same time uh you know I understood

play11:01

that i' would rather be free I would

play11:03

want to take orders from anyone and uh I

play11:07

left behind probably a comfortable life

play11:11

uh but for me it was never about you

play11:14

know becoming rich for me everything in

play11:17

my life was about becoming free yes

play11:20

and to the extent it is possible my

play11:24

mission in life was to allow other

play11:26

people to also become free in a sense

play11:30

and using the platforms that we create

play11:33

or I

play11:34

created uh My Hope was that they could

play11:37

express their

play11:39

freedoms this is the mission of telegram

play11:42

and it was also in part the mission of

play11:45

my previous company BK we wanted to

play11:47

pause this interview just for a minute

play11:49

to point something out when the Russian

play11:51

government asked pav durov to use his

play11:54

social media company to censor its

play11:56

political opponents he refused he said

play11:57

he would rather resign and leave the

play12:00

country where he was born then

play12:02

participate in something like that such

play12:04

was his commitment to free speech now

play12:06

you got to compare that what he did what

play12:09

pav durov did to what Mark Zuckerberg

play12:11

did or Prague agarwall the guy who ran

play12:13

Twitter before Elon Musk bought it both

play12:16

of them have collaborated with

play12:18

governments to censor people and that's

play12:21

shameful so we believe pavle when he

play12:25

says that his his app telegram will be a

play12:27

Bastion of free speech because it has

play12:28

been we believe him cuz he's shown how

play12:31

committed to that he is so we've decided

play12:33

that we're going to launch with pride

play12:35

our own telegram channel to give one

play12:37

more Avenue to reach people with our

play12:39

content free from censorship so if

play12:41

you're on telegram we ask that you would

play12:43

subscribe to our new channel for by

play12:45

searching for a username listed below

play12:48

we're honored uh to be doing this we're

play12:50

going to get back to our conversation

play12:51

with Pablo durov so you start telegram

play12:54

after you leave Russia correct yeah so

play12:57

the idea for telegram came with when we

play12:59

were still based in

play13:01

Russia because at some point we had this

play13:06

uh very stressful situation where armed

play13:10

policemen would come to my house try to

play13:15

break in because I refused to take down

play13:18

this uh opposition groups that I

play13:20

mentioned earlier and I realized there

play13:22

is no secure means of communication I

play13:25

realized I want to tell my brother

play13:27

what's going on to coordinate whatever

play13:29

we want to do and the every tool to

play13:34

communicate I could use was not really

play13:37

secure not encrypted uh it was not safe

play13:40

to use them so I thought hm it could be

play13:43

a good idea to actually come up with a

play13:46

know a decently crypted messaging app uh

play13:50

and my brother being the genius that he

play13:51

is he was able to create this encryption

play13:55

standard that we're using up until this

play13:57

day with minor changes

play14:00

uh but the IDE your brother wrote the

play14:01

encryption yes well my brother like two

play14:04

phds in maths super smart he could you

play14:08

know he's he's an expert in

play14:10

cryptography uh he designed uh the basic

play14:14

principles of the telegram's encryption

play14:17

I was more on the user interface side

play14:21

the way how the app works the features

play14:24

Etc he was responsible for it for the

play14:27

encryption side so where did you go when

play14:30

you left

play14:31

Russia we tried several places we first

play14:34

went to Berlin we tried to set up a

play14:37

company in Berlin we then tried London

play14:41

Singapore San Francisco you name it

play14:43

we've we've been everywhere and uh why

play14:46

didn't you stay in any of those places

play14:49

oh because the bureaucratic hurdles were

play14:51

just uh too difficult to overcome you

play14:55

know I was bringing the best inclass

play14:58

programmers in the world to these places

play15:01

and I was trying to hire them uh from a

play15:06

local company and the response I got in

play15:09

places like Germany for example is that

play15:12

no no no you can't hire people from

play15:14

outside of the European Union because

play15:17

you should first run some newspaper ad

play15:20

in the local uh magazine whatever and

play15:23

then for for six months nobody responds

play15:27

from engineers that are available inside

play15:30

the European Union and Germany then

play15:32

you're allowed kind of to hire Outsiders

play15:35

and I thought it was a crazy idea

play15:37

because why didn't you just say they

play15:39

were illiterate

play15:41

refugees well because we didn't consider

play15:44

ourselves refu we were you know very

play15:47

successful people we could have gone

play15:49

anywhere I know but if you told them you

play15:52

were illiterate refugees they would let

play15:53

you

play15:55

stay yeah so you so you go from Germany

play16:00

to Singapore to London to San Francisco

play16:03

what happened in San Francisco well in

play16:05

San Francisco we really thought that

play16:08

would be the place for us to be in

play16:11

because all the tech companies are there

play16:13

or around San Francisco and uh there

play16:16

were two things that happened that uh

play16:19

made us uh think twice uh well one thing

play16:23

is pretty obvious uh I was in San

play16:25

Francisco I got attacked on the street

play16:28

after visiting

play16:30

uh I think it was Jack dorsy uh in

play16:34

Twitter in the Twitter's office and uh I

play16:37

was walking back at 8:00 p.m. to my

play16:40

hotel and I got attacked in the street

play16:43

uh this is the only country where I got

play16:46

attacked in the streets what what

play16:48

happened just three big guys tried to

play16:51

grab my phone from my hands I was

play16:53

tweeting uh about the fact that I just

play16:56

met uh the founder of Twitter that

play16:58

seemed right like a right idea for me

play17:01

back then uh to do and uh I got attacked

play17:04

uh I didn't want to let them have my

play17:07

phone um they probably didn't expect uh

play17:12

resistance so I snatched my phone back

play17:14

there was a short fight with the guys

play17:16

there was a little bit blood involved

play17:19

but I managed to run away uh and decided

play17:23

I should probably they probably don't

play17:25

mug a lot of Russians they might have

play17:26

been

play17:27

surprised well there were much taller

play17:29

than me I must admit and there are three

play17:31

of them but uh I think I put up a good

play17:35

fight were you surprised did this

play17:37

happened in San Francisco completely

play17:39

yeah it was it was a shock to me because

play17:42

I I traveled a lot that was the first uh

play17:45

place I I got attacked and I thought all

play17:48

right maybe we shouldn't uh look at San

play17:52

Francisco maybe there are other places

play17:53

in America where where you don't get

play17:56

attacked yeah exactly uh

play17:59

but you know there there's this second

play18:02

part which was probably more alarming

play18:04

there in the

play18:06

US we got too much attention from the

play18:10

the FBI the security agencies wherever

play18:13

we came to the US so to give you an

play18:16

example last time I was in the US I

play18:19

brought an engineer that is working for

play18:22

telegram and there was an attempt to

play18:25

secretly hire my engineer behind my back

play18:29

by cyber security off officers or agents

play18:32

whatever they are called the US

play18:34

government should to hire your engineer

play18:36

that's my understanding that's what he

play18:38

told me to write code for them or to

play18:41

break into telegram they were curious to

play18:44

learn which open-source libraries are

play18:47

integrated to the telegram's app you

play18:50

know on the client's side and they were

play18:52

trying to persuade him to use certain

play18:56

open-source tools that he would then

play18:59

integrate into the telegram's code that

play19:02

in my understanding would serve as back

play19:04

doors would allow the US government to

play19:07

spy on people who use telegram the US

play19:10

government or maybe any other government

play19:12

because a back door is a back door

play19:13

regardless of who is using it that's

play19:16

right and and and you're that's a little

play19:19

surprising to hear maybe it's not

play19:20

surprising it's it's

play19:22

offensive you're confident that happened

play19:26

yes there is no reason for my engineer

play19:29

to make up the stories also because I

play19:32

personally experienced

play19:34

similar pressure in the US whenever I

play19:37

would go to the US I would have two FBI

play19:40

agents greeting me at the airport asking

play19:43

questions one time I was uh having my

play19:47

breakfast like 9:00 a.m. and

play19:50

uh the FBI showed up my house that I was

play19:54

renting and uh that was quite surprising

play19:57

and I thought you know we're getting too

play20:00

much attention here uh it's probably not

play20:03

the best environment to run why would

play20:05

the had you committed a crime no they

play20:08

were interested to learn more about

play20:11

telegram they knew I you know left

play20:14

Russia they they knew what we

play20:17

were doing but they wanted details and

play20:20

my understanding is that they wanted to

play20:23

establish a relationship

play20:25

to in a way control telegram better I'm

play20:29

I I understand they were doing their job

play20:31

it's just that for us running a privacy

play20:35

focused social media platform that

play20:37

probably wasn't the best environment to

play20:40

be and we want to be focused on what we

play20:42

do not on uh government relations of

play20:45

that sort the government

play20:47

relations um so then you came to UAE to

play20:51

Dubai yes seven years ago we uh moved

play20:55

here we first wanted just to try it

play20:59

for half a year see if it works out and

play21:02

it turned out to be a great place we

play21:05

never looked back and we never wanted to

play21:09

change thee for any other place after

play21:12

that why well for a number of reasons

play21:15

first the ease of doing business here is

play21:18

uh so high for example you can hire

play21:20

people from anywhere in the world as

play21:22

long as you're paying them a good salary

play21:25

the residence permits they granted

play21:28

automatically it's very different if you

play21:30

try to do that in Europe in some other

play21:32

countries it's very different from them

play21:34

second it's very tax efficient uh third

play21:38

uh the infrastructure is great you get a

play21:40

lot for uh the minimum amount of taxes

play21:44

you're paying the the the the roads the

play21:47

airports the hotels the everything I

play21:50

think you witnessed it yourself yes but

play21:53

I think more importantly is that it's a

play21:55

neutral place it's a neutral country

play21:56

it's a small country that wants to be

play21:58

friends with friend with everybody uh

play22:02

it's not aligned geopolitically with any

play22:06

of the big superpowers and I think it's

play22:09

uh the best place for a neutral platform

play22:13

like ours to be in if we want to make

play22:15

sure we can defend our users privacy and

play22:18

freedom of speech so in the time that

play22:20

you've been here there have been a

play22:21

number of wars and threats of War

play22:25

precursors to war um

play22:29

have you had any pressure from the

play22:30

government here honestly any pressure

play22:32

from the government here um to reveal a

play22:35

back door into tegram or to ban anyone

play22:38

or to make any changes to your business

play22:40

zero that's the best part for all the

play22:44

seven years we've been here there's

play22:47

there's been zero pressure coming from

play22:49

the eue towards telegram they've been

play22:51

very supportive very helpful and it's a

play22:53

big contrast from you know whatever

play22:56

we've experienced before um what about

play22:59

what you've experienced since since you

play23:00

moved here in those seven years have you

play23:02

come under pressure from other

play23:03

governments under whose jurisdiction you

play23:06

don't fall but to to accommodate their

play23:09

demands well of course well telegram is

play23:12

is a large platform we are popular in

play23:16

many many countries and uh we we've uh

play23:21

been uh receiving a lot of requests

play23:24

demands some of them were legit

play23:26

legitimate like if uh

play23:28

there was a group of people who was

play23:31

promoting violence there was some

play23:33

terrorist activity that was uh you know

play23:36

spreading violence in some parts of the

play23:38

world publicly uh posting uh things that

play23:44

any decent human being would disallow or

play23:46

wouldn't want to be posted we would help

play23:49

them but in some other cases where we

play23:52

thought it would be crossing the line it

play23:54

wouldn't be uh you know in line with our

play23:58

values of freedom of speech and and

play24:00

protecting people's private

play24:04

correspondence we would ignore can can

play24:07

you give us an example of a request that

play24:09

you thought crossed into censorship and

play24:12

and spying violating people's

play24:15

privacy well there's a I would say a

play24:18

very funny story related to your home

play24:21

country um after the events of January

play24:24

the 6th uh we received a letter from

play24:29

I I believe uh

play24:31

Congressman of the democratic side um

play24:34

and uh they requested that we would

play24:37

share all the data we had in relation to

play24:41

what they called this you Uprising or um

play24:45

and we checked it with our lawyers and

play24:48

they said you better ignore it but the

play24:51

letter seemed very

play24:52

serious uh and the letter said you know

play24:56

if you're fail to comply with this

play24:59

request you will be in violation with

play25:02

know the US Constitution or

play25:05

something uh so they wanted data on

play25:08

people who voted for the other guy in

play25:09

the

play25:10

election but they wanted the data of

play25:13

people yeah who were demonstrating in

play25:16

Washington or wherever they were doing

play25:19

uh they Pro you're probably right they

play25:21

were I'm not an expert in the

play25:24

politics uh What uh what funny about

play25:28

that is two years exactly two sorry two

play25:30

weeks after that letter we got another

play25:33

letter a new letter from the Republican

play25:37

side of the Congress and there we read

play25:43

that if we give out any

play25:46

data according to the previous request

play25:50

we would be in violation of the US

play25:52

Constitution so we got two letters that

play25:56

said whatever we do

play25:58

would be violating the US Constitution

play26:01

in a way that was my understanding of

play26:04

this letters uh from the same

play26:06

legislative body both from the US

play26:08

Congress yes so how do you respond to

play26:11

that

play26:14

well the same way we respond to most

play26:16

such requests we decided to ignore them

play26:20

because it's such a complicated matter

play26:23

related to internal politics in the US

play26:25

we don't want to take any if you I

play26:28

believe this strongly if you ignore your

play26:30

problems most of them do go away it's

play26:32

very true it is very no it says it but

play26:35

it's true um that's amazing have you

play26:38

ever had demands that you can't

play26:41

ignore well it it depends unreasonable

play26:45

demands so I would say the largest

play26:48

pressure towards telegram is not coming

play26:51

from governments uh it's coming from

play26:54

Apple and Google huh so when it comes to

play26:57

freedom of speech those two platforms

play26:59

they could basically censor whatever is

play27:03

you can read access on your

play27:08

smartphones so I mean do you run the

play27:11

risk of being thrown out of their stores

play27:13

exactly that's what they make very clear

play27:16

that if we fail to comply with the

play27:18

guidelines so they call it uh telr could

play27:22

be removed from the

play27:24

stores well that would be not a small

play27:27

thing for you right well it's not W be a

play27:29

small thing for us because obviously a

play27:31

big chunk of the world population will

play27:34

lose access to available tool that

play27:37

they're using every day but you know it

play27:39

will not also be a small thing for them

play27:42

I mean there

play27:43

should I I believe there there must be

play27:46

find some compromise in such cases but

play27:49

Apple and Google are not very

play27:51

compromising when it comes to the

play27:52

guidelin if they believe some content is

play27:56

against their rules they will see to it

play27:59

that all the apps that are distributed

play28:01

through their uh stores comply with

play28:05

these

play28:05

rules are any of those rules or do you

play28:08

interpret any of those rules do you

play28:10

believe any of them to be

play28:12

political in

play28:15

nature some of them but it's not the

play28:19

rules it's the application of the rules

play28:21

the rules themselves they're pretty

play28:25

General right so

play28:28

there must be no violence discrimination

play28:32

public uh publicly available I don't

play28:35

know child abuse materials it's hard to

play28:37

disagree with that yes uh but then when

play28:40

they start to apply those rules

play28:43

sometimes we are not agreeing with with

play28:47

their interpretations and we try to uh

play28:51

you get back to Apple or Google whoever

play28:53

it is and say look we think you got it

play28:57

wrong we think actually this

play29:00

is legitimate way of people expressing

play29:03

their opinions and sometimes they do

play29:05

agree to their credit sometimes they

play29:07

disagree and we still have to take some

play29:09

content down at least in the version of

play29:11

telegram that it distributed through

play29:14

that

play29:16

platforms so there are a bunch of a

play29:19

number of conflicts going on around the

play29:20

world right now and that may

play29:23

accelerate so would you expect that the

play29:25

number of Demands and the intensity of

play29:28

those demands the Persistence of those

play29:29

demands would increase as the wars

play29:32

become more

play29:35

intense let's see I'm really hopeful

play29:37

that the past is is behind us I want to

play29:40

be

play29:40

optimistic um I think now we reached a

play29:45

point where uh politicians and societies

play29:50

know what to expect from social media

play29:54

platforms and where there uh you know

play29:57

the red lines are yes uh we also learned

play30:02

much more about the requirements coming

play30:05

from both them and Google

play30:08

slapple so and our users get better

play30:11

educated as well what what is allowed it

play30:13

was not allowed so I don't necessarily

play30:17

believe that things are going to get

play30:19

worse it does seem like the red line for

play30:22

for governments is allowing organized

play30:25

opposition to their rule that's what you

play30:27

saw in Russia with nval and and the

play30:29

Ukraine crisis in 2014 that's what you

play30:31

saw from that Democratic member of

play30:34

Congress after January 6th 2020

play30:37

definitely there's a p pattern here

play30:39

telgram has been used by protesters in

play30:42

places like Hong Kong yes barus

play30:46

Kazakhstan even in Barcelona back in the

play30:49

day yes so it's it's it's been a tool

play30:52

for Theos to a large extent but it

play30:56

doesn't really matter whether it's

play30:59

opposition or the ruling party that is

play31:02

using tou for us we apply the rules

play31:05

equally to all sides we don't uh become

play31:09

prejudiced in this way it's not that we

play31:11

are rooting for the opposition or We are

play31:13

rooting for the ruling party of it's not

play31:15

that we don't care but we think it's

play31:18

important to uh have this platform that

play31:21

is neutral to all voices because we

play31:24

believe

play31:25

that the competition of different ideas

play31:29

can result in progress and a better

play31:32

world for everyone that's um in start

play31:36

contrast to say Facebook which has said

play31:38

in public you know we tip the scale in

play31:42

favor of this or that movement and this

play31:43

or that country all far from the west

play31:45

and far from Western media attention but

play31:48

they've said that what do you think of

play31:50

that tech companies choosing

play31:53

governments well I think that's one of

play31:56

the reasons why we ended up here in the

play31:59

UAE out of all places right so you you

play32:02

don't want to be geopolitically aligned

play32:04

you don't want to select the winners in

play32:07

any of this uh political fights and

play32:11

that's why you have to be in a neutral

play32:12

place but I think Facebook in particular

play32:15

has uh a lot of uh reasons apart from

play32:20

being based in the US for doing what

play32:23

they're doing uh I I think every app and

play32:27

platform plays its own role and we

play32:30

believe that Humanity does need a

play32:33

neutral platform like telegram uh that

play32:36

would be respectful to people's privacy

play32:39

and

play32:40

freedoms maybe the mo from a political

play32:43

perspective it seems like the most

play32:45

provocative thing telegram does is offer

play32:47

something called channels which seem

play32:50

sort of readymade for organizing groups

play32:53

of people can you explain to viewers who

play32:55

aren't familiar with them what a

play32:56

telegram channel is

play32:58

yes so telegram channel is a one too

play33:02

many broadcast tool that allows people

play33:06

to uh quickly disseminate any message to

play33:09

millions of people so there's a Channel

play33:13

people subscribe to it it's a one-way

play33:16

communication meaning a channel can be

play33:19

used by say a president or a head of

play33:22

state and uh everybody else will not be

play33:26

able to send a message to the president

play33:29

but the president will be able to send a

play33:30

message to all of the people who

play33:32

subscribe to his channel yes or her

play33:34

channel so the point here is uh channels

play33:39

are so easy to use and they're so deeply

play33:42

integrated in the messaging user

play33:45

interface that they became extremely

play33:47

popular so you receive it like a text

play33:50

exactly so it's it's a very familiar

play33:53

form for a lot of people and since we

play33:55

launched launch channels 8 years ago I

play33:58

believe uh a few other apps popular apps

play34:02

followed in our footsteps and copied

play34:04

that feature as well not nearly as

play34:07

advanced was we have but it shows that

play34:10

it's a really uh high quality and

play34:14

demanded feature that the world

play34:18

needs I think it's and you don't have to

play34:20

answer any of these questions if you

play34:21

don't want if it's too personal but um

play34:23

you're the owner you you own it and it's

play34:26

very unusual in fact I've never seen it

play34:28

um to have a large business like this

play34:31

owned by one person why didn't you take

play34:34

and you could have cashed in on private

play34:35

Equity money along the way but you

play34:37

didn't why didn't

play34:40

you well that's true as of now till was

play34:43

100% owned by myself which is like I

play34:46

said quite uh unusual I've never heard

play34:49

of that before the the reason I tried to

play34:54

you

play34:54

know stay away from Ben Capital money at

play34:58

least the early stages of our

play35:00

development is because we wanted to be

play35:02

independent we knew that our mission and

play35:07

our goals not necessarily consistent

play35:10

with the goals of uh funds that could be

play35:14

investing into us and also for me it was

play35:17

never about money right so I have a few

play35:20

hundred million dollars in my bank

play35:23

account or in Bitcoin since 10 years ago

play35:26

and uh I don't do anything anything with

play35:28

it I don't own any like real estate Jets

play35:33

or Yachts I don't think those uh this

play35:38

lifestyle is for me I like to focus on

play35:40

what we are doing uh with Tel you don't

play35:42

own

play35:44

anything like big assets You Don't Own

play35:47

no big assets an island in Hawaii or no

play35:50

no no no land no real estate nothing why

play35:55

well because for me my number number one

play35:57

priority in life is my freedom and once

play36:00

you start buying things first it will

play36:04

tie you down to a physical location in

play36:07

my view it's my personal view I don't

play36:09

have nothing against people who are

play36:10

buying real estate but in my personal

play36:14

view it would be like this for me and

play36:15

the second reason is I like to stay

play36:18

focused on what we do at telegram so I

play36:21

know that if I buy a house I I buy a jet

play36:25

something like that I would be spending

play36:28

time on trying to make it nice and yeah

play36:32

this will require a lot of time and

play36:34

effort would you go with leather seats

play36:36

or velvet seats exactly and you're not

play36:39

even going to choose yes for me I would

play36:42

rather make decisions that would

play36:44

influence how a billion people

play36:47

communicate rather than choosing the

play36:50

color of seats in the house that only I

play36:52

and my relatives probably bunch of my

play36:54

friends will see

play36:57

interesting and you didn't take cuz I I

play37:00

just want I just have to say it a third

play37:01

time haven't seen this before you

play37:04

obviously were famous as a young man as

play37:07

a company Builder and entrepreneur and

play37:09

so you could have really taken a lot of

play37:10

money and you didn't because you didn't

play37:13

want to be

play37:15

controlled I just didn't see any reason

play37:17

to do that you know I had enough money

play37:19

to get by well to be completely Fair

play37:22

tgram did takes outside money we issued

play37:25

bonds 3 years ago so we rais debt uh and

play37:29

that was

play37:31

uh and and before that we had a

play37:34

cryptocurrency project that also raised

play37:37

some funds so there were instances where

play37:40

we raised outside uh funding but uh when

play37:44

it comes to company's Equity yeah you

play37:47

didn't give up ownership we didn't give

play37:49

anyone ownership or voting control or

play37:51

anything like that because we also

play37:54

believe in efficiency I think that

play37:56

having my myself as the sole owner

play37:59

director and product manager for this uh

play38:04

extensive period of time and the

play38:05

company's development allowed us to move

play38:08

faster and be how could you be the only

play38:10

product manager are you still the only

play38:12

product manager in the company exactly I

play38:15

still come up with all most of the

play38:18

features uh I still work directly with

play38:22

every engineer every designer who is

play38:24

implementing these features um you know

play38:27

I'm running this company because I enjoy

play38:28

it I'm the only product manager because

play38:32

I think this is the way I can

play38:35

contribute how big is your HR

play38:37

department zero well you could say it's

play38:40

me

play38:41

and because the way we are engineer no

play38:44

no you need a big HR department you

play38:45

don't think you don't Suffer Without

play38:48

one we in a way decentralized that we

play38:52

started a platform where we host

play38:55

contests for engine Engineers it's

play38:58

actually contest.com we have the

play39:01

separate uh platform for that and we

play39:03

select the best of the best Engineers as

play39:06

a result of the

play39:08

competitions that we organize we hold

play39:11

them every like month or two months so

play39:15

after a series of these competitions we

play39:17

select the best of the best of the best

play39:20

and they then maybe could join our team

play39:24

which is just about 30 Engineers so it's

play39:27

it's really compact the team super

play39:30

efficient it's like a a Navy sealed team

play39:33

and uh uh this is how we operate we

play39:36

don't need HR department to find uh

play39:40

super talented

play39:42

Engineers why doesn't everyone do this I

play39:45

look at some of these tech companies or

play39:47

Elon Musk famously when he showed up at

play39:49

Twitter I mean there were people doing

play39:50

things that he didn't even know what

play39:51

they were doing and they didn't know

play39:52

what they were doing they were like

play39:54

there was a World Peace Department and a

play39:56

foosball Department

play39:58

and why doesn't

play40:00

everybody run their business like you

play40:03

well it's an interesting question I

play40:05

think it all boils down to the question

play40:08

of uh Independence anyway I asked this

play40:11

question to the predecessors of el Jack

play40:14

dorsy Jack and

play40:17

um um and the his predecessor as well

play40:21

and uh what you say dick cost I his name

play40:24

and uh this Jack he told me that uh if I

play40:29

told him look you can run this company

play40:30

with 20 people you don't need so many

play40:33

people here and the response was I agree

play40:37

with you but if we start firing so many

play40:40

people it will make the Wall Street

play40:43

scared they will think something's very

play40:46

wrong with the company and we don't want

play40:48

to do that and that's why we got to keep

play40:51

all this uh employees around so to keep

play40:54

the stock price high he had to run it

play40:56

inefficiently

play40:59

I mean that's what you're saying if I

play41:01

understood him correctly that's what

play41:03

what but to to his to his credit El has

play41:06

to take Twitter private before he could

play41:11

do all

play41:13

theorization there's I mean there's

play41:15

something sort of profound in what

play41:16

you're saying I mean the whole point of

play41:18

a publicly traded company or one of the

play41:20

points so the public can participate in

play41:21

the ownership of the company but also so

play41:23

Outsiders can assess the operations of

play41:25

the company and so there transparencies

play41:28

we know how the company is run because

play41:29

it's owned by the

play41:31

public and so it would be by definition

play41:33

more efficient you would think but

play41:36

you're saying that it's wildly less

play41:39

efficient that you wind up with a

play41:40

foosball department when it's publicly

play41:41

traded but when it's privately held you

play41:43

don't I mean that's kind of the opposite

play41:44

of what you would think right well I

play41:47

guess most tech Founders would actually

play41:49

agree that running a public

play41:52

company is uh less efficient than

play41:55

running a private company because you

play41:57

have to be accountable to much more

play42:00

people there's a lot of redundancy

play42:02

bureaucracy

play42:03

involved so from a purely like

play42:06

efficiency standpoint I would argue and

play42:09

I think a lot of people would agree with

play42:10

me that we a a public company is

play42:13

suboptimal however there are other

play42:16

advantages of of uh getting listed and

play42:20

of course that is relevant when you want

play42:23

to acquire other companies cash right

play42:26

yes you can have access to cheap Capital

play42:28

you know there's a lot of things you can

play42:31

do but you don't want to do any of those

play42:34

things well not not presently definitely

play42:37

I am enjoying running my company in The

play42:38

Way It Is Well who knows what the future

play42:41

holds but uh as of now I think we are

play42:44

doing a great job with uh with telegram

play42:46

900 million users will probably cross a

play42:51

billion uh monthly active users within a

play42:54

year from now I think we're doing great

play42:57

why would we lose this momentum right

play43:00

now can I just go back to something you

play43:01

said the at the outset you don't have an

play43:04

HR department you only have 30 Engineers

play43:06

working for

play43:08

you you run the products you own the

play43:11

company such a tight organization but

play43:13

how do you get new users if you spend

play43:16

zero money for Acquisitions if you're

play43:19

not advertising if you're not paying to

play43:21

bring people in how do you how do you do

play43:22

that how do you get to a billion for

play43:24

free because people love our product

play43:27

what we realized pretty early on is that

play43:30

people are

play43:32

smart people like to use good things and

play43:36

they don't like to use inferior things

play43:41

that's why whenever you have a person

play43:43

who who started to use Telegram and

play43:46

they're there for a while and they start

play43:49

to discover all the features all their

play43:52

uh you know the speed the security the

play43:53

pro everything that we have uh they

play43:56

don't want want to go back and they

play43:58

start inviting their friends

play44:00

recommending them you should really

play44:02

check this app out because it's so much

play44:04

better than everything else also because

play44:07

people realize that whatever uh

play44:10

messaging apps they're using right now

play44:11

they're like five six years behind

play44:14

They're copying what we did six years

play44:16

ago and that's not a you know very high

play44:19

quality copy that they make of our

play44:22

features so people love quality that's

play44:25

why they move they also love the

play44:26

independent they also love the Privacy

play44:29

they love the freedom there are a lot of

play44:31

reasons why somebody would switch to

play44:33

telegram from other apps so one of the

play44:35

things we learned when Elon Musk bought

play44:37

Twitter is that the Intel agencies not

play44:39

just us but a bunch of other countries

play44:42

The Usual Suspects um were all over the

play44:45

company I mean they were some of them

play44:47

were present working at the company they

play44:48

had access to the direct messages you

play44:50

can just imagine well you know because

play44:52

you run one but the wealth of data

play44:54

flowing through would be of great

play44:57

interest to to governments does that

play45:00

make you paranoid that you'll be

play45:03

penetrated I mean I I assume governments

play45:06

would like to know what's going on sort

play45:08

of privately on telegram well there's

play45:11

definitely a lot of responsibility that

play45:13

we have on our shoulders and we I

play45:16

wouldn't say we are paranoid but I think

play45:18

it makes sense to stay prudent and uh

play45:22

you know not being uh too accessible not

play45:27

traveling to weird places you don't

play45:30

travel to weird places I hope

play45:33

not like I travel to places where I have

play45:36

uh confidence that you know those places

play45:40

are uh consistent with what we do in our

play45:45

values I don't go to any of the big

play45:48

geopolitical powers of the countries

play45:50

like China or Russia or the US so uh you

play45:54

don't go to the US I try not to I can go

play45:57

but you know it's uh too much attention

play46:00

like I described before yeah because at

play46:02

some point if you run something like

play46:03

this you're a player in World politics I

play46:06

mean by Def whether you want to be or

play46:07

not don't you think we definitely don't

play46:10

want to be a player we want to be a

play46:12

neutral platform that is impartial and

play46:16

you know doesn't take any side but

play46:19

you're probably right there's some role

play46:21

we have to play well not taking aside is

play46:24

the one thing you're not allowed to do

play46:26

right right I mean aren't you required

play46:28

to take aide in the modern world I think

play46:31

that's a big problem because I think

play46:33

that kind of

play46:36

um attitude can result in our world

play46:40

becoming a more dangerous place because

play46:42

at the end of the day we all have to try

play46:45

to understand each other and try to get

play46:49

closer to each other in in terms of

play46:52

getting to know the positions of the

play46:55

other people even those they're

play46:57

drastically different from our own

play46:59

positions and that's how we get to some

play47:01

compromise and and move forward if we're

play47:05

strictly divided and everybody is

play47:07

required to take a side and we can't

play47:10

take a side because we are this platform

play47:13

that people should

play47:14

use to collaborate and to find common

play47:18

ground and hopefully to move forward if

play47:22

we lose that we can end up in a much

play47:24

more dangerous place

play47:27

how often do you intersect with the

play47:30

National Security Agency NSA and I asked

play47:33

that as someone whose texts were read by

play47:34

them so I I I know that they're very

play47:36

active in this world um what's your

play47:38

experience

play47:39

been well I think the NSA is not uh an

play47:45

agency that works with you directly

play47:47

right I don't come and C you're so

play47:50

diplomatic I love it the N is not an

play47:53

agency that works with you directly no

play47:54

that is true that is true true so my

play47:59

knowledge of my interactions with the

play48:01

NSA is very limited yes I could read

play48:04

something in the newspapers about you

play48:06

know my phone being penetrated with

play48:10

Pegasus or something like that I no idea

play48:14

whether it's true or not but this is the

play48:17

only source of information I can have

play48:19

about me personally being of interest to

play48:23

any of uh you know the secret agencies

play48:26

but you've got to think even though you

play48:28

haven't done an interview in seven years

play48:31

is uh you know you're it's it's widely

play48:33

known by people who are interested who

play48:35

you are in your role in this I mean

play48:36

you've got to think you're under just

play48:38

crazy amounts of surveillance wouldn't

play48:39

you think that's probably true you know

play48:43

it would sound funny but I assume by

play48:47

default that the devices I use I are

play48:51

compromised yes because you you you will

play48:53

still use an iPhone or an Android phone

play48:55

and uh

play48:57

now After experiencing what I

play48:58

experienced in the US I have very

play49:02

limited faith

play49:04

in platforms developed in the US from a

play49:08

security standpoint yes privacy

play49:10

standpoint exactly yeah because in a lot

play49:13

of countries ours America included

play49:17

spying is described as quote security

play49:19

you're looking at it from the other

play49:21

perspective you're assuming that

play49:23

security is privacy and my right not to

play49:25

be spied upon but big governments

play49:27

describe spying upon you as security

play49:30

thank you for this

play49:32

correction um so last question do you

play49:36

since you've done this since you were in

play49:38

college and you've been at the center of

play49:40

it where do you see it going and by this

play49:43

I mean the free exchange the private

play49:45

exchange of information between

play49:47

Sovereign individuals human beings

play49:49

nonslaved

play49:51

when I was a child that was possible

play49:54

it's increasingly difficult are we

play49:56

moving toward a world where there just

play49:57

is no private

play49:59

communication or do you think that

play50:01

privacy will remain despite say AI or

play50:05

just massive increases in computing

play50:09

power well this depends on the extent of

play50:13

privacy uh when you say privacy will

play50:16

remain do you mean that we have absolute

play50:18

privacy now I don't think that we do and

play50:21

I think the world is becoming less

play50:22

amenable government's becoming less

play50:25

tolerant of privacy it's clearly the

play50:27

trend because they have more

play50:29

technological

play50:31

power but will they win I guess will

play50:34

there ever be a way to preserve privacy

play50:39

you know can is there a place for it I

play50:42

believe in that I an optimist I think

play50:45

some new secure Hardware you know

play50:48

communication devices will be created uh

play50:51

in a similar way that now we have uh

play50:55

Hardware wallets to store your

play50:56

cryptocurrency yes maybe we'll have

play51:02

secure

play51:04

communication devices you know to send

play51:06

messages or do voice calls it's possible

play51:11

uh I do believe that you know the world

play51:14

develops in cycles and uh if things seem

play51:19

to go in one direction today doesn't

play51:22

seem doesn't mean that tomorrow they

play51:25

will go the same direction

play51:27

I also feel that at some point

play51:29

people will get tired of uh what they

play51:34

experienc today and they would decide to

play51:37

you know move to some other direction so

play51:42

it's I I seen it after covid for example

play51:45

so during Co you had a lot of

play51:48

restrictions also on social media

play51:51

platforms you most social media

play51:53

platforms you were not really allowed

play51:57

to express doubt in relation to

play52:00

lockdowns or vaccines or masks and uh at

play52:06

some point I could feel that the

play52:08

sentiment changed people started to feel

play52:11

very very tired and sometimes

play52:14

angry with the fact that they were not

play52:16

allowed to express their opinions

play52:19

particularly after the end of uh the

play52:23

pandemic uh PE a lot of people start

play52:26

started to

play52:29

be even more skeptical about the

play52:33

restrictions in their freedoms that they

play52:35

experienced during the pandemic what was

play52:38

your position as a business owner uh

play52:41

during covid did you must have come

play52:44

under pressure to censor opinions on

play52:46

lockdowns vaccines masking what how did

play52:49

you respond so our position is pretty

play52:52

straightforward we're a neutral platform

play52:54

we were helping governments to spread

play52:56

their message about the lockdowns and

play52:59

masks and accidents we had dozens of

play53:01

governments who we really helped uh you

play53:04

know de simulate their information but

play53:06

we also didn't want to restrict the

play53:09

voices that were critical of all these

play53:12

measures we thought it made sense for

play53:16

this opposing views to collide and

play53:19

hopefully you know see some truth come

play53:23

out of those debates and of course we

play53:25

got critic for that but uh looking back

play53:29

I think it was the right strategy so you

play53:31

allowed people to voice doubts about the

play53:33

so-called science throughout the

play53:35

throughout the

play53:36

experience exactly during the pandemic

play53:39

we I think were one of the few or maybe

play53:41

the only major social media platform

play53:45

that didn't uh take down accounts that

play53:51

were

play53:52

skeptical uh in relation to some of

play53:55

these measures so why why are you not

play53:57

famous and treated as a hero in the

play53:59

United

play54:01

States shouldn't there be a parade in

play54:03

your honor if you're the only social

play54:06

media platform not to take down what

play54:08

turned out to be true or in some to some

play54:10

extent true more certainly more true

play54:12

than the CDC

play54:13

guidance I mean why why why weren't you

play54:16

times Man of the Year why isn't your

play54:19

face on the

play54:24

nickel I'm not an expert in us

play54:28

politics but to to be fair you have now

play54:33

uh Twitter or a yeah that uh seemingly

play54:36

becoming more Pro freedom of speech uh

play54:41

and uh I think it is it's it's it's it's

play54:44

a great development and back to our

play54:46

earlier discussion about how all of this

play54:50

is developing in

play54:52

Cycles things are starting to change it

play54:55

seems

play54:56

so do you I mean but in in some ways

play54:59

Elon buying

play55:02

Twitter sort of ends your

play55:05

Monopoly but you still greet it

play55:08

cheerfully you're still in favor of it

play55:10

definitely we we love the fact that uh

play55:13

Elan bought Twitter we thought it was a

play55:16

great development for a number of

play55:18

reasons first reason is just Innovation

play55:21

you could see ax doing trying a lot of

play55:24

things some of them will turn out to be

play55:27

mistakes some of them will work but at

play55:30

least they're trying to innovate that's

play55:31

something we didn't have outside of

play55:34

telegram and a few other companies in

play55:36

this industry for the last 10 years what

play55:39

you saw from the big players they would

play55:44

rather copy The Proven models the

play55:47

features that apps like

play55:49

telegram

play55:50

launch and just scale them on a larger

play55:54

audience this features would be a pale

play55:57

will be pale pale reflections of what we

play55:59

built but this was the way those

play56:02

companies operate still

play56:03

operate what x is trying to do is uh in

play56:07

line what we're building you know

play56:10

Innovation trying different things uh

play56:13

trying to give power to the

play56:15

creators uh trying to get the ecosystem

play56:18

economy going those are all exciting

play56:21

things and uh I think we need more

play56:24

companies like that I was I don't know

play56:25

if it's good for Humanity that um like Y

play56:30

is spending so much time on Twitter

play56:31

making it better but it's definitely

play56:33

good for the social media

play56:36

industry when you see the other the guys

play56:39

who run these other companies like what

play56:41

do you do know them and do you ever talk

play56:43

about freedom of speech I mean if you're

play56:45

running you're running to Mark not you

play56:46

don't have to answer of course if you

play56:48

don't want but like if you're running to

play56:49

Mark

play56:51

Zuckerberg yeah I we met with Mark more

play56:54

than 10 years ago I was still running VK

play56:57

and I told them I told Mark and his

play57:00

colleagues about

play57:03

our uh app platform we launched an app

play57:06

platform I think it was 2009 at VK they

play57:09

were very interested it was an

play57:11

interesting

play57:12

meeting

play57:14

um they ended up trying to copy not what

play57:18

we did but what I told them we did uh it

play57:22

was funny um I remember him asking

play57:26

whether we were planning

play57:28

to uh start something on a global uh

play57:33

basis on the global Lael level like go

play57:36

uh for international expansion I said no

play57:40

and I asked him whether he was going to

play57:43

try to capture more of my domestic

play57:47

Market where I was working on and he

play57:50

said no and we both ended up doing

play57:53

exactly that in like two or three weeks

play57:57

that was so I'm thinking I shouldn't go

play57:58

into business with Mark

play58:00

Zuckerberg

play58:02

uh no

play58:06

comment pav J that thank you very much

play58:09

it a great conversation I appreciate and

play58:11

we're rooting for you thank you for

play58:13

having me of

play58:17

course free speech is bigger than any

play58:19

one person or any one organization

play58:21

societies are defined by what they will

play58:23

not permit what we're watching is the

play58:25

total inversion of virtue hey it's

play58:28

Tucker Carlson the internet is crowded

play58:30

with interesting things that don't

play58:31

really matter on TCN we attempt to bring

play58:34

you interesting things that actually do

play58:36

matter and a lot of them interviews long

play58:39

form and short videos documentaries you

play58:42

can find all of it on tuckercarlson.com

play58:45

and we hope you will

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
TelegramPavel DurovCensorshipPrivacyFree SpeechEntrepreneurSocial MediaCybersecurityTech InnovationGlobal Politics
Вам нужно краткое изложение на английском?