YT14 ARE QURANIC STORIES COPIED FROM THE BIBLE? by Dr. Hany Atchan

Summary

In this video, the speaker explores the Quran's unique depiction of the ruler in the story of Prophet Yusuf (Joseph) as a 'king,' contrasting it with the 'pharaoh' referenced in the Bible. The discovery of the Hyksos, who ruled Egypt during Yusuf's time, supports this distinction. This revelation highlights three critical points: the Quran's historical accuracy, Prophet Muhammad's non-reliance on Biblical stories, and the scribes' unwavering commitment to preserving the Quran. The speaker emphasizes the Quran's distinct narrative and challenges traditional interpretations based on Biblical accounts, urging viewers to reflect on the Quran's truth.

Takeaways

• 🕌 The video discusses the story of Prophet Yusuf in the Quran, emphasizing its uniqueness compared to the biblical version.
• 📜 The Quran refers to the ruler during Yusuf's time as 'the king,' while older versions of the Bible refer to him as 'pharaoh.'
• 🏺 Historical discoveries in the 1850s revealed that the Hyksos, who ruled Egypt during Yusuf's time, used the title 'king,' not 'pharaoh,' supporting the Quran's accuracy.
• 📅 This information about the Hyksos was unknown until the mid-19th century, highlighting the Quran's divine source.
• 🚫 The video argues that Prophet Muhammad (saw) could not have copied this story from the Bible, as the Bible inaccurately refers to the ruler as 'pharaoh.'
• 🖋️ Despite the temptation, scribes copying the Quran for 1400 years did not change the word 'king' to 'pharaoh,' preserving the Quran's original text.
• 📚 Many Tafseer (commentaries on the Quran) mistakenly applied the biblical story of Yusuf to the Quran, despite differences in the Quranic narrative.
• 🔍 The Quranic story of Yusuf is described as more relevant, mature, and insightful than the biblical version, with significant differences.
• 📖 The Quran emphasizes that its stories are the true ones, correcting the corrupted narratives in earlier scriptures.
• 💡 The video encourages viewers to reflect on the truthfulness and uniqueness of the Quranic stories, which differ from those in the Bible and Torah.

Q & A

What is the significance of the speaker's claim about the king in the story of Prophet Yusuf (Joseph) in the Quran?

The speaker emphasizes that the Quran refers to the ruler during the time of Prophet Yusuf as a 'king' rather than a 'pharaoh.' This is significant because historical evidence, discovered in the mid-19th century, supports that the ruler during that period was indeed called a king, as the Hyksos, who ruled Egypt, used the title 'king.' This fact was unknown at the time of Prophet Muhammad, suggesting that the Quran's source of information was not human.

How does the Quran's reference to 'king' instead of 'pharaoh' challenge the theory that Prophet Muhammad copied stories from the Bible?

The Quran's accurate use of the term 'king' rather than 'pharaoh' in the story of Prophet Yusuf contradicts the Bible, which refers to the ruler as a 'pharaoh.' Since this historical detail was unknown until centuries after the Quran was revealed, it challenges the theory held by some Orientalists that Prophet Muhammad copied stories from the Bible.

What does the speaker highlight about the scribes who copied the Quran over the centuries?

The speaker highlights that despite the temptation to align the Quranic story with the Biblical version by changing 'king' to 'pharaoh,' no scribe ever altered the text. This demonstrates the scribes' commitment to preserving the Quran exactly as it was revealed, despite their knowledge of the Bible and the prevalent interpretation in the books of Tafseer.

Why is the consistency of the term 'king' in Surah Yusuf important for understanding the Quran's authenticity?

The consistent use of 'king' in Surah Yusuf, despite the prevailing interpretation that could have justified using 'pharaoh,' underscores the Quran's authenticity. It indicates that the Quran's source was aware of accurate historical details that were not known at the time, reinforcing the belief that the Quran is of divine origin.

What is the significance of the Hyksos' rule in Egypt concerning the Quranic narrative of Prophet Yusuf?

The Hyksos, a Middle Eastern tribe that ruled Egypt during the time of Prophet Yusuf, referred to their ruler as a 'king.' This aligns with the Quranic narrative, which consistently uses 'king' instead of 'pharaoh.' The discovery of the Hyksos and their customs was made long after the Quran was revealed, adding credibility to the Quran's historical accuracy.

How does the speaker suggest the Quranic story of Yusuf differs from the Biblical narrative?

The speaker suggests that the Quranic story of Yusuf is dramatically different from the Biblical narrative, being more relevant, mature, insightful, and educational. Unlike the Biblical story, which is seen as entertainment or consolation, the Quranic account offers deeper meanings and lessons.

What does the speaker imply about the role of Tafseer (Quranic exegesis) in interpreting the story of Yusuf?

The speaker implies that many Tafseer writers forcefully applied the Biblical story of Yusuf to the Quranic narrative, sometimes interpreting the 'king' as 'pharaoh.' This approach, according to the speaker, overlooks the Quran's unique presentation and understanding of the story, which differs significantly from the Bible.

Why does the speaker emphasize the importance of interpreting the Quran based on its own text rather than external sources?

The speaker emphasizes this because relying on external sources, like the Bible, can lead to misinterpretations of the Quran's message. The Quran should be understood on its own terms, as it presents the true stories and clarifies issues that were disputed or corrupted in earlier scriptures.

What lesson does the speaker want the audience to learn about the Quranic stories?

The speaker wants the audience to recognize that the Quranic stories are not mere repetitions of Biblical narratives but are distinct, truthful accounts that provide deeper insights and guidance. The Quran should be appreciated for its originality and divine source.

How does the speaker view the relationship between the Quran and earlier scriptures like the Bible and the Torah?

The speaker views the Quran as correcting and completing the stories found in earlier scriptures, which were corrupted over time. The Quranic accounts are seen as the true versions, revealing what was lost or altered in the Bible and Torah.