Critical Thinking #3: Types of Arguments

David Pakman Show
2 Mar 201805:25

Summary

TLDRThe video script delves into the concept of arguments, distinguishing between deductive and inductive reasoning. It illustrates how deductive arguments guarantee conclusions based on premises, while inductive arguments suggest probable outcomes that may be influenced by additional premises. The script highlights the importance of both reasoning types in various fields, from hard sciences to creative problem-solving. It concludes with a promotion of 'brilliant.org', an online learning platform that enhances critical thinking and logical reasoning skills.

Takeaways

  • 📌 An argument is a set of reasons intended to support a conclusion, acting as the foundation for a claim or assertion.
  • 🏛️ The script introduces two types of arguments: deductive and inductive, highlighting their differences in the certainty of the conclusion.
  • 📍 In a deductive argument, the premises guarantee the conclusion, providing enough information to deduce it without the need for additional premises.
  • 🔎 The example given for a deductive argument is the location of the David Pakman Show studio, using the premises of Boston's location within Massachusetts.
  • 🌐 In contrast, an inductive argument, like the one about the YouTube channel releasing videos, makes a probable conclusion based on the premise but does not guarantee it.
  • 🚫 The script warns against mistaking an inductive argument for a deductive one if the conclusion is not guaranteed by the premises alone.
  • 🔑 Deductive arguments are based on objectivity and inevitability, making them crucial for testing and confirming hypotheses in fields like math and science.
  • 🛠️ Inductive reasoning and ampliative arguments, on the other hand, allow for more flexibility and creativity, important for open-ended thinking in fields like medicine, economics, and marketing.
  • 💡 The script emphasizes the importance of understanding both types of arguments for effective critical thinking and problem-solving.
  • 🎓 The sponsor, Brilliant, is highlighted for offering lessons on logic, rationality, and identifying fallacies, which can improve one's ability to think and argue clearly.
  • 🌟 The script encourages viewers to sign up for Brilliant to gain a deeper understanding of the world and enhance their critical thinking skills, with a special offer for the first 200 visitors.

Q & A

  • What is an argument in the context of reasoning?

    -An argument is a reason or a set of reasons intended to support a conclusion or claim. It is an explanation of how one arrived at a particular conclusion.

  • What is the difference between a premise and an argument?

    -A premise is a statement within an argument that provides support for the conclusion. An argument, on the other hand, is the entire set of premises that justify a new statement.

  • Can you provide an example of a deductive argument from the script?

    -An example of a deductive argument from the script is: 'The David Pakman Show studio is located in Boston, and Boston is in Massachusetts; therefore, the David Pakman Show studio is in Massachusetts.'

  • What is the key characteristic of a deductive argument?

    -The key characteristic of a deductive argument is that the premises guarantee the conclusion. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

  • What is an inductive argument, and how does it differ from a deductive argument?

    -An inductive argument is one where the premises make the conclusion probable but do not guarantee it. Unlike deductive arguments, inductive arguments allow for the possibility that additional premises could be introduced that might invalidate the argument.

  • Why might someone consider an argument to be bad if it is intended to be deductive but the conclusion is not guaranteed by the premises?

    -An argument is considered bad in this context because it fails to meet the criteria of a deductive argument, which requires the premises to be sufficient to guarantee the conclusion.

  • What are the advantages of deductive arguments in fields like mathematics and science?

    -Deductive arguments provide certainty and objectivity. They allow for the testing and confirmation of hypotheses, which is crucial in establishing universal truths in mathematics and the hard sciences.

  • How do inductive arguments contribute to creative thinking and problem-solving?

    -Inductive arguments contribute to creative thinking by allowing for more flexibility and consideration of outside factors and possibilities. This open-ended thinking is essential for fields that require innovative solutions and adaptability.

  • What is the potential risk associated with inductive reasoning?

    -The potential risk associated with inductive reasoning is the loss of objectivity. Since the premises do not guarantee the conclusion, there is a higher chance of drawing incorrect conclusions.

  • What is the role of inductive reasoning in fields like medicine, economics, or marketing?

    -Inductive reasoning plays a significant role in these fields by allowing professionals to consider a wide range of factors and possibilities, which is crucial for diagnosing diseases, solving economic problems, or developing effective marketing strategies.

  • How does the script suggest improving critical thinking skills related to arguments and reasoning?

    -The script suggests using online learning platforms like Brilliant, which offers lessons on logic, rationality, and identifying fallacies, to improve critical thinking skills related to arguments and reasoning.

Outlines

00:00

📚 Understanding Deductive and Inductive Arguments

This paragraph delves into the concept of arguments in reasoning, distinguishing between deductive and inductive arguments. A deductive argument is presented as one where the premises necessarily lead to the conclusion, as exemplified by the location of the David Pakman Show studio. In contrast, an inductive argument is based on probabilities, where premises make the conclusion likely but do not guarantee it, as illustrated by the channel's history of releasing YouTube videos weekly. The paragraph also discusses the importance of deductive arguments in fields like mathematics and science, while inductive arguments are crucial for creative thinking and problem-solving in areas such as medicine, economics, and marketing. The script promotes the use of 'brilliant' as a learning platform to enhance critical thinking skills.

05:01

🎓 Promoting Critical Thinking with 'Brilliant'

The second paragraph serves as a promotional segment for 'Brilliant,' an online learning platform that offers lessons on logic, rationality, and multi-level thinking. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the world at fundamental levels to be fully equipped in understanding politics and other complex subjects. The paragraph invites viewers to sign up for free through a provided link and mentions a special discount for the first 200 visitors who sign up for an annual Premium Membership, reinforcing the value of continuous learning in developing a comprehensive understanding of various disciplines.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Argument

In the context of the video, an 'argument' refers to a set of statements or reasons intended to support a conclusion or claim. It is the foundation of logical reasoning, where premises are used to justify a new statement. The video uses the example of the David Pakman Show studio's location to illustrate how an argument is structured and how it upholds a conclusion.

💡Conclusion

A 'conclusion' is the final statement or assertion that an argument aims to establish. It is derived from the premises and is the outcome of the reasoning process. The video explains that a conclusion cannot stand alone and requires an argument to support it, as seen in the example where the conclusion is that the studio is in Massachusetts.

💡Premise

A 'premise' is a statement or proposition that forms the basis of an argument. It is used to support the conclusion. The video script mentions that the premises are 'the David Pakman show studio is located in Boston' and 'Boston is in Massachusetts', which together form the argument for the conclusion.

💡Deductive Argument

A 'deductive argument' is a type of argument where the premises guarantee the conclusion. If the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. The video provides the example of the studio's location being in Boston, which is in Massachusetts, thus deducing that the studio must be in Massachusetts.

💡Inductive Argument

An 'inductive argument', also known as an 'ampliative argument', is one where the premises make the conclusion probable but do not guarantee it. The video contrasts this with a deductive argument by using the example of the YouTube channel releasing new videos weekly, suggesting that new episodes will be released this week, but not guaranteeing it.

💡Objectivity

'Objectivity' in the video refers to the quality of being based on facts rather than personal feelings or opinions. Deductive arguments are said to be based on objectivity and inevitability, meaning their conclusions are not influenced by subjective interpretations.

💡Inevitability

'Inevitability' is used in the video to describe the certainty of a conclusion in a deductive argument. It implies that the outcome is unavoidable given the premises, which is a key characteristic of deductive reasoning.

💡Ampliative Argument

An 'ampliative argument' is another term for an inductive argument, which allows for more flexibility but requires proper inference. The video explains that while these arguments suggest that the conclusion is probably true, they do not guarantee it, leaving room for other premises that could change the argument's validity.

💡Hypothesis

A 'hypothesis' is a proposed explanation or assumption made on the basis of limited evidence, which can be tested. The video mentions that deductive arguments are concerned with testing and confirming a hypothesis, which is a fundamental process in fields like mathematics and science.

💡Creativity

'Creativity' in the video is associated with inductive reasoning and ampliative arguments, which allow for open-ended thinking and problem-solving. It is contrasted with the more rigid structure of deductive arguments, highlighting the importance of considering various possibilities and outside factors in fields like medicine, economics, and marketing.

💡Brilliant

'Brilliant' is an online learning portal mentioned in the video that offers lessons on logic, rationality, and critical thinking. It is used as an example of a resource that can help viewers improve their debating skills and understand complex issues more clearly.

Highlights

An argument is a reason or set of reasons meant to uphold a conclusion.

An argument is your explanation of how you arrived at your conclusion.

An argument consists of statements called premises that justify a new statement.

The David Pakman Show studio is used as an example of a deductive argument.

In a deductive argument, the premises guarantee the conclusion.

Deductive arguments are based on objectivity and inevitability.

Ampliative arguments, also known as inductive arguments, make conclusions probable but not guaranteed.

Inductive reasoning allows for creative thinking and consideration for 'what if' scenarios.

Deductive arguments are important in math and hard sciences for testing and confirming hypotheses.

Inductive reasoning is crucial for fields that require open-ended thinking and problem-solving.

The risk of loss of objectivity in inductive reasoning is offset by its flexibility and consideration of outside factors.

The importance of understanding the difference between deductive and inductive arguments for critical thinking.

Brilliant.org is recommended for improving debating skills with hands-on lessons on logic and rationality.

Brilliant.org offers a vibrant community of over five million members for interactive learning.

A link to Brilliant.org is provided for a 20% discount on an annual Premium Membership.

The first 200 visitors to the link will receive the discount.

Transcripts

play00:07

let's talk about arguments it's usually

play00:10

the case that a conclusion a claim an

play00:13

assertion can't stand on its own

play00:15

it needs something to hold it up

play00:17

supporting it and that's what we call an

play00:20

argument an argument is a reason or a

play00:22

set of reasons that are meant to uphold

play00:26

a conclusion an argument is your

play00:28

explanation of how you arrived at your

play00:31

conclusion so an argument can be thought

play00:33

of as a set of statements that justify a

play00:36

new statement the statements of your

play00:38

argument are called premises premise the

play00:42

david pakman show studio is located in

play00:44

Boston premise Boston is in

play00:47

Massachusetts conclusion the david

play00:49

pakman show studio is in Massachusetts

play00:51

this is an argument this is also an

play00:54

example of a deductive argument a

play00:57

deductive argument is an argument

play00:59

wherein the premises guarantee the

play01:02

conclusion if our studio is located in

play01:04

Boston and Boston is located in

play01:07

Massachusetts our studio must be located

play01:11

in Massachusetts it's a deductive

play01:13

argument because the premises expressed

play01:16

in the argument alone give you enough to

play01:19

determine to deduce the conclusion the

play01:22

conclusion that our studio is in Boston

play01:24

must follow the premises that are given

play01:27

no new premises that could be added to

play01:30

this argument could change its validity

play01:32

and given these two premises this will

play01:35

always be the conclusion but what if I

play01:37

said this premise our channel has been

play01:40

releasing new YouTube videos every week

play01:43

for the last X years however many it's

play01:46

been conclusion our channel will have

play01:49

new episodes this week does my premise

play01:52

support my conclusion yeah the premise

play01:56

gives me good reason to think that my

play01:58

conclusion is true that the david pakman

play02:00

show will release new YouTube videos

play02:02

this week but this is no longer a

play02:05

deductive argument we would call this an

play02:07

AmpliTube argument also known as an

play02:11

inductive argument this is because my

play02:13

premise makes my conclusion probable but

play02:17

the premise does not guarantee the

play02:19

conclusion there

play02:20

new potential premises that could

play02:23

invalidate the argument for example

play02:25

YouTube has been hacked by the Russians

play02:28

and the site has been taken offline for

play02:31

a month so no we're not going to be

play02:33

uploading new videos so the premises of

play02:35

a deductive argument guarantee the

play02:38

conclusion no matter what other premises

play02:40

are added and a strong inductive

play02:44

argument has premises that suggest that

play02:46

the conclusion is probably true but

play02:49

other premises could be added that would

play02:52

invalidate the argument if someone is

play02:55

intending their argument to be deductive

play02:57

but their conclusion is not guaranteed

play03:00

by their premises then you know it's a

play03:03

bad argument and not just AmpliTube

play03:06

deductive arguments are based on

play03:08

objectivity and inevitability ampliative

play03:11

arguments allow for more flexibility but

play03:14

require proper inference deductive

play03:17

arguments have the advantage of giving

play03:19

us everything we need to know simply

play03:22

within our premises even if implicitly

play03:24

it's concerned with testing and

play03:26

confirming a hypothesis and this plays

play03:30

an important role in math and science

play03:32

especially the hard sciences but it's

play03:34

inductive reasoning and ampliative

play03:37

arguments that allow for creative

play03:39

thinking and consideration for what if

play03:42

think of practicing medicine and

play03:45

diagnosing a disease or solving economic

play03:48

problems or developing a marketing

play03:50

strategy while inductive reasoning

play03:52

creates a risk for loss of objectivity

play03:55

it pays off by making use of more

play03:58

open-ended thinking and problem-solving

play04:01

and consideration for outside factors

play04:04

and possibilities which are crucial to

play04:06

countless fields do you want to get

play04:10

better at debating people you should

play04:12

check out one of my favorite online

play04:14

learning portals brilliant which

play04:16

sponsors our critical thinking mini

play04:19

series brilliant has fascinating

play04:21

hands-on lessons that allow you to think

play04:24

and argue more clearly about political

play04:27

and philosophical issues check out their

play04:29

lessons on logic rationality multi-level

play04:33

thinking ident

play04:34

find false information and identifying

play04:37

fallacies it's a vibrant community of

play04:39

over five million members it brings

play04:42

together the expert knowledge and

play04:44

experience of students educators and

play04:47

professionals from all over the world to

play04:49

create an immersive interactive online

play04:51

learning environment keeping up with the

play04:54

news is one thing but you're never

play04:56

really fully equipped to understand

play04:58

politics until you've developed a

play05:00

complete understanding about how the

play05:02

world at the most fundamental levels

play05:05

works sign up for free by going to

play05:08

brilliant org slash critical thinking

play05:11

I've put a link in the description under

play05:14

this video and the first 200 people who

play05:16

visit will get 20% off an annual Premium

play05:19

Membership visit brilliant org slash

play05:22

critical thinking

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
ArgumentationCritical ThinkingDeductive ReasoningInductive ReasoningLogicRhetoricPersuasionEducationMedia AnalysisOnline Learning
英語で要約が必要ですか?