Обзор на основание Ma Long! DHS Hurricane Long 5 (w968)

Summary

In this video, the presenter reviews a table tennis blade, comparing it to the Long 5 commercial version and discussing its performance with different rubbers. They share their initial impressions, modifications, and the outcome after playing for over two weeks. The review covers aspects like control, speed, and spin, highlighting the blade's unique characteristics and suitability for both amateur and professional players. The presenter also provides tips for using the blade effectively and invites viewers to predict the winner of an upcoming match.

Takeaways

• 🏓 The video is a review of a table tennis blade, specifically the Long 5 version 968, also referred to as the 'emotional version'.
• 🔗 The base of the blade is from a specific website, with a link to be provided in the description for viewers to check.
• 📝 The blade is compared to the 'original' and 'pale' versions, inviting viewers to comment on which version they think it is.
• 📊 The weight of the blade is stated as 89.5 grams, which is claimed to match the reality of the product.
• 🎨 The structure of the blade includes Limba as the first two layers, Relate Carbon in the middle, and an Ios core layer.
• 🤔 The review is unconventional, as it is based on the reviewer's two and a half weeks of play and experience with the blade, including coffee breaks.
• 🏓 The blade performed well in short play, with good control and no ball popping out, which was noticeable and appreciated.
• 👆 The reviewer noticed a good initial feeling with the blade, which was slightly modernized, and shared the outcomes of this combination.
• 🔄 The blade's performance was discussed in terms of various elements such as passive play, chops, and blocks, all of which were controlled effectively.
• 🚀 The blade's speed and spin were highlighted, especially in topspin play, where the speed of the ball was faster than with a Viscaria blade.
• 🔄 The reviewer experienced discomfort with the blade's topspin play due to a disproportionate speed of the ball's exit compared to the effort put in.
• 🏆 The video concludes with a summary of the blade's performance, emphasizing its suitability for top players and its potential for amateurs and newcomers due to its forgiving nature and the ability to adjust to it over time.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video?

The main topic of the video is a review of a specific table tennis blade, referred to as 'Long 5 version 968', which the speaker also calls the 'emotional version'.

What are the key features of the 'Long 5 version 968' blade mentioned in the script?

The key features mentioned include its weight of 89.5 grams, a structure with two layers of limba, a layer of 'relate carbon', and an 'ios' central layer.

What type of table tennis rubbers are used in the review?

The speaker uses Denix 09 C and Tenergy 05 as the rubbers for the review.

How does the speaker describe the initial feeling of using the blade with the mentioned rubbers?

The speaker describes the initial feeling as very good, noting that the ball does not pop out excessively and has a controlled short game.

What adjustments did the speaker make to the blade's performance over time?

The speaker mentions that they played with the blade for about two and a half weeks and made some adjustments to the movement and amplitude of their strokes to adapt to the blade's performance.

What was the speaker's experience with the blade's topspin play?

The speaker initially felt discomfort with the topspin play due to a lack of arc, but after adjusting their technique, they found that the blade provided a strong topspin with good control.

How did the speaker find the blade's performance in terms of speed?

The speaker found that the blade had a very good speed, especially in the attack phase, and that the speed of the ball's exit was proportional to the effort put into the stroke.

What issues did the speaker encounter with the blade's loop drive?

The speaker encountered issues with the loop drive, particularly with a lack of arc and the ball tending to catch the net or the table, requiring adjustments in their stroke technique.

How does the speaker feel about the blade's suitability for different types of players?

The speaker believes that the blade could be suitable for top players due to its strong performance features, but it might be challenging for intermediate players without a strong training base or game practice.

What is the speaker's final verdict on the 'Long 5 version 968' blade?

The speaker concludes that the blade has a combination of characteristics from the best of LC and DHS blades, offering a lively and controlled play with a strong topspin and loop drive, but it may require adaptation and practice to master.

What additional service does the speaker mention regarding the authenticity of the blade?

The speaker mentions a hologram and a set of numbers on the blade's packaging that can be entered on the official Butterfly website to verify its authenticity and check the date of its first activation.