Post-debate round table talk: Political analysts react to historic presidential showdown
Summary
TLDRこのスクリプトは、CNNの大統領選討論番組の後番組を要約しています。政治分析家パネルと地域の選挙ウォッチパーティーからの報告者、さらに北フロリダ大学の学生が若年層の投票についてコメントしています。選挙討論の熱い瞬間や、トランプ大統領とバイデン氏の激しい言葉の交換が取り上げられました。特に、移民、外交政策、経済、そして選挙討論における個人的な攻撃が注目されました。分析家はバイデン氏の体力と精神的適性、トランプ氏の自己規制の不足について議論しました。
Takeaways
- 📺 このスクリプトは、CNNの大統領選挙デバトの後番組を表しており、政治分析家やリポーター、さらにはノースカロライナ大学の学生が参加しています。
- 🗣 デバトでは、特に邊境巡視や選挙に関する熱烈な議論が行われ、トランプ大統領とバイデン氏の間には強い対立があることがわかります。
- 🎙️ マイクミュートのシステムが導入されており、これによりより秩序正しい議論が行われることが期待されましたが、両者ともに質問への答えが不十分でした。
- 👴 トランプ氏は、自分の息子が犯罪者ではないと主張し、バイデン氏の息子に関連する非難を繰り返しました。
- 👴 バイデン氏は、トランプ氏の過去の政治的行動と、特に移民政策や外国との関係について批判しました。
- 🔍 トランプ氏は、自分の政権下ではテロがなかったと主張し、経済的圧力を通じてテロ組織に資金を提供しないようにとしていたと語りました。
- 🤔 トランプ氏とバイデン氏の両者の精神的、身体的適性について、国民が疑問を持つことが示唆されています。
- 📉 デバトでは、インフレという重要な問題があまり議論されず、選挙にかかわる重要な問題として浮上しなかったことが注目されます。
- 📹 スクリーンを分割することで、両者の反応を同時に観察することができましたが、バイデン氏は特にエネルギーに欠ける様子が目立ちました。
- 🗳️ デバトは、どちらの候補者にも好意を持たない選挙者にとって、特に助けになりませんでした。彼らが両者ともに持つ問題点を再度強調しただけです。
- 🌐 外国政策に関する議論では、特にアフガニスタンからの撤退や中東情勢が取り上げられ、トランプ氏は自らの政権下での外交政策の成果を強調しました。
Q & A
このトークショーは何についての議論をしていますか?
-このトークショーは、CNNの大統領選挙デbateの後番組であり、政治分析家や報道関係者、さらには北フロリダ大学の学生らが参加して、選挙デbateの分析と議論を行っています。
トークショーで取り上げられた主なトピックは何ですか?
-トークショーでは、国境パトロール、移民、選挙権、外国政策、経済、そして個人的な攻撃など、様々なトピックが議論されています。
トークショーのゲストはどのように選ばれましたか?
-ゲストには政治分析家、地元の牧師、政治戦略家、そして元市長のチーフオブスタッフなどが参加しており、彼らはトークショーに多角的な視点を提供しています。
トークショーでディベートが行われた理由は何ですか?
-ディベートは、選挙デbateの後で行われ、選挙デbateで見られた激しい瞬間や、各候補者の主張や政策について分析し、議論するためです。
トークショーでディベートが行われた背景には何がありますか?
-ディベートの背景には、選挙デbateでの両候補者の激しい言い合いや、選挙戦における彼らの戦略やビジョンの違いがあります。
トークショーで特に注目されたのはどの部分ですか?
-特に注目されたのは、候補者の声やエネルギー、そして彼らがどのように質問に答えるか、また、どのように自分たちの物語を伝えるかという部分です。
トークショーで議論された「ダブルヘッダー」とは何を指しますか?
-「ダブルヘッダー」とは、どちらの候補者とも支持したくないという立場の有権者を指しており、彼らがどちらの候補者からも納得のいく答えを得られるかどうかが議論の焦点です。
トークショーで言及された「ナレッジ」とは何を意味していますか?
-「ナレッジ」とは、候補者が持つ物語やイメージ、そして彼らが国民に対してどのように印象を与えるかを指しており、これは選挙戦で重要な要素とされています。
トークショーでディベートの形式について何が言及されましたか?
-ディベートの形式については、マイクのミュート機能の試験的な導入が話題となり、これは将来のディベートに向けての可能性があるとされています。
トークショーでディベートの主な問題点は何だと指摘されましたか?
-ディベートの主な問題点としては、候補者の質問への答えの質、特に質問に直接答えなかったり、関係ない話題に飛び迂んだりすることが指摘されました。
トークショーでディベートの結果についてどのように評価されていますか?
-ディベートの結果は、両候補者のエネルギーやコマンド、そして彼らがどのように議論に臨んだかに基づいて評価されており、特にジョー・バイデンのエネルギーとコマンドについて疑問が投げかけられています。
Outlines
🗣️ 政治分析家の見解: 熾烈な議論の分析
この段落では、CNNの政治分析家たちが大統領選挙討論の後で、熾烈な議論の瞬間を振り返っています。彼らは特に、トランプ大統領とバイデン氏の間の激しい言葉の交換に焦点を当てています。トランプ氏は、より多くの国境警備隊員と署名を増やすことで何ができるかという議論を主張しています。バイデン氏は、トランプ氏の過去のコメントを引用し、彼が自分の言葉を理解していないと非難しています。さらに、トランプ氏の息子についても議論が行われ、彼が既に有罪判決を受けているか、または将来有罪判決を受ける可能性があると述べています。
📊 選挙の7つの主要な問題: 政治戦略とメディアの役割
この段落では、2024年の選挙において重要な7つの問題がNBCニュースによって紹介されています。それらは、中絶と女性権利、移民と南部国境、医療保障と医薬品の価格、税金、最高裁判所の裁判官、外国との貿易、そしてNATOと外国政策、ロシアとウクライナの戦争、そして中東の戦争に関する懸念です。さらに、トランプ氏とバイデン氏が外交政策に関する議論を行っている様子が語られており、トランプ氏は自らの政権下でテロがなかったことを主張しています。分析家たちは、トランプ氏とバイデン氏のメディアでの表現と、それが選挙に与える影響について議論しています。
🤔 選挙戦の戦略と候補者のイメージ
最後の段落では、トランプ氏とバイデン氏の選挙戦戦略が分析されています。トランプ氏はエネルギー的な姿勢を示し、バイデン氏は議論に集中しようとしていますが、その姿勢が常に伝わったわけではないと指摘されています。分析家は、バイデン氏が特にエネルギー的な姿勢を示さなければならず、選挙戦においてはそれが求められると述べています。また、トランプ氏は議論の中で自分の意見をはっきりと主張する必要があるとしています。彼らは、どちらの候補者にも選挙戦においては改善点があると結論付けています。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡大統領選挙
💡政策
💡論戦
💡メディア
💡選挙戦略
💡公衆の意見
💡個人的な攻撃
💡モデレート
💡メディアの役割
💡選挙戦術
💡公衆の関心
Highlights
Post-debate analysis from CNN at Channel 4 Studios with a roundtable of political analysts and reporters.
Discussion on the impact of the debate on undecided voters and the candidates' strategies.
President Trump's comments on border patrol and immigration policy.
President Biden's response to Trump's comments, including references to his son and the term 'suckers'.
Analysis of Biden's energy levels and how they may affect voter perception.
Debate on the narrative surrounding immigrants and crime rates.
Trump's claims about his administration's impact on Iran and terrorism.
Biden's strategy to contrast his vision with Trump's on various issues.
The role of body language and non-verbal cues in the debate.
Concerns about Biden's mental and physical fitness for another term.
Trump's discipline and focus on the debate's key issues.
The experimental use of microphone muting during the debate.
Analysis of the moderators' performance and their role in the debate.
Foreign policy discussion, including Trump's comments on Afghanistan and Iran.
The split-screen effect on viewers' perception of the candidates.
Final thoughts on the debate's outcome and its potential impact on voters.
Transcripts
>>KENT JUSTICE: AND WELCOME
BACK. THIS IS A POST OF A SHOW
HERE POST FROM THE CNN
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. YOU'VE
BEEN WATCHING JOIN I ALONG
WITH OUR GUEST. WE WATCHED THE
DEBATE HERE AT THE CHANNEL 4
STUDIOS. JOINING US FOR OUR
POST SHOWS OUR ROUNDTABLE OF
POLITICAL ANALYSTS.
>> ALONG WITH OUR REPORTERS
WHO ARE AT DEBATE WATCH
PARTIES ALL AROUND TOWN
TONIGHT. AND 2 STUDENTS FROM
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH
FLORIDA WHO HAVE A HOT TAKE ON
THE YOUNGER VOTE. SO FOR NOW,
LET'S LISTEN TO SOME OF THOSE
HEATED MOMENTS WE HEARD
TONIGHT.
>> THE TOTAL INITIATIVE
RELATIVE TO WHAT WE CAN DO
WITH MORE BORDER PATROL AND
MORE SIGNING OFF. PRESIDENT
TRUMP.
>> I REALLY DIDN'T KNOW WHAT
HE SAYS. THE END OF THIS SAID
DON'T THINK HE KNOWS WHAT HE
SAID. HE THAT I WENT TO THE
WAR TO CEMETERY. WE WANT
CHOOSE TO GO TO HOUSTON NEWS.
4 STAR GENERAL AND HE TOLD ME
SHOULD I DO WANT TO GO IN
THERE BECAUSE A BUNCH LOSERS
AND SUCKERS.
>> MY SON WAS NOT ONLY IS IT
WAS NOT A SUCKER YOU SOCCER,
YOU'RE THE LOSING ONLY SHUN
THE STAGES OF CONVICTED FELONS
LOOKING AT RIGHT BUT WHEN HE
TALKS ABOUT A CONVICTED FELON,
HIS SON IS A CONVICTED FELON
AND A VERY HIGH LEVEL. HIS SON
IS CONVICTED, GOING TO BE
CONVICTED, PROBABLY NUMEROUS
OTHER TIMES SHOULD HAVE BEEN
CONVICTED BEFORE, BUT HIS
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LET THE
STATUTE LIMITATIONS LAPS AND
THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS. BUT
HE COULD BE A CONVICTED FELON
SOON AS HE GETS OUT OF OFFICE.
JOE COULD BE A CONVICTED FELON
WITH ALL OF THE THINGS THAT
HE'S DONE HAVING AND THE ON
THE NIGHT WAY PREGNANT. WOULD
HE TALK ABOUT.
>> UNION, THE MORALS AN ALLEY
CAT.
>> AND JOINING US AGAIN, OUR
PANEL OF POLITICAL ANALYST
RICK MULLANEY FROM THE PUBLIC
POLICY STITE. JOHN NEWMAN,
LOCAL PASTOR FOR 40 YEARS AND
A POLITICAL STRATEGISTS AND
GOVERNMENT LAW ATTORNEY,
FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF OR ALVIN
BROWN, CHRIS HAND IS WITH US.
ALL RIGHT. WHO WANTS TO GO
FIRST?
>>KENT JUSTICE: THERE WAS A
LOT OF WHAT WE SAW. CHRIS,
YOUR SO WE'RE GOING WITH BY
HUGHES, 2 CANDIDATES. THEY
DON'T LIKE EACH I MEAN, IT WAS
A PERSONAL DEBATE 2 CANDIDATES
WHO DON'T LIKE EACH OTHER, WE
HAVE VERY KIND OF DIFFERENT.
>> VISIONS FOR THE COUNTRY AND
STRONGLY OPPOSE THE OTHER
CANDIDATES VISION AS WELL. YOU
KNOW, BEFORE THE DEBATE, WE
TALKED ABOUT A COUPLE OF
THINGS. ONE WAS WHAT WAS GOING
TO BE THE IMPACT ON THOSE
VOTERS. THE SO-CALLED DOUBLE
HEADER VOTERS WHO DON'T WANT
EITHER OF THOSE CANDIDATES.
I'M NOT SURE WE SAW ANYTHING
TONIGHT THAT MADE THOSE VOTERS
FEEL BETTER ABOUT EITHER OF
THE CANDIDATES IN THE RACE. WE
ALSO TALKED ABOUT SOME OF THE
CANDIDATES STRATEGIC
IMPERATIVES FOR PRESIDENT
BIDEN. I LISTED 3, 1, WAS TO
BE TO CHANNEL THAT MARCH STATE
OF THE UNION ADDRESS BE
ENERGETIC, BE GIVE AS GOOD AS
HE GOT. AND THERE WERE SOME
MOMENTS OF THAT. BUT IT DID
NOT MATCH THE SAME 10 OR AS
THE MARCH STATE OF THE UNION
ADDRESS. NUMBER 2 IS TO DRAW
KIND OF AN EFFECT OF CONTRAST
BETWEEN HIMSELF AND PRESIDENT
TRUMP SOME ISSUES. HE DID THAT
LIKE FOREIGN POLICY LIKE THIS
SCHOOL POLICY AT TIMES. BUT
OTHERS HE SORT OF LET THE
FORMER PRESIDENT OUTFLANK HIM
ON ISSUES LIKE REPRODUCTIVE
CHOICE AND ABORTION. AND, YOU
KNOW, THE 3RD ISSUE WE TALKED
ABOUT WAS PROVIDED COMPELLING
ANSWER ON INFLATION. ONE THING
THAT WAS SURPRISING TONIGHT
WAS THAT INFLATION WASN'T MORE
OF A SUBJECT THE DEBATE. THERE
WASOMESCUSON BETWEEN
THE CANDIDATES ON THAT. BUT IT
REALLY WAS SORT OF DOMINATED
BY OTHER ISSUES, SOME OF WHICH
WEREN'T POLICY RELATED, SOME
OF WHICH WERE MORE PERSONAL IN
AND RICK POINT, I KNOW YOU
WANT TO POLICY JOHN NEWMAN,
YOU REFERENCE IN OUR PRE SHOW,
HEY, SOME OF THESE MAY BE BODY
LANGUAGE. THINGS COULD BE OF.
>> I WANT TO TALK ABOUT ONE
THING THAT STOOD OUT TO ME.
THE FIRST MOMENT I HEARD
PRESIDENT BIDEN SPEAK HIS
VOICE SEEMED WEEK. THERE ARE
THERE ARE SOME OF THESE
INTANGIBLE THINGS THAT ALSO
IMPACT HOW A VIEWER RECEIVES
SPEAKERS IN THE DEBATE. YES,
SO MUCH OF THIS IS FOR. AND I
THINK IN MANY INSTANCES HE
DIDN'T PROJECT WELL AND THAT
FITS NARRATIVE THAT'S BEEN
ALREADY PUT OUT THERE ABOUT
HIM. AND AT THIS POINT REALLY
IS ABOUT THE NARRATIVES.
PEOPLE KIND OF HAVE BIG IN
WHAT THEY ALREADY ARE
PREDISPOSED TO THINK ABOUT THE
CANDIDATES ON BOTH SIDES IN
FOR PRESIDENT BIDEN HAS CHRIS
SAID IT HAD TO BE MORE ENERGY.
AND HE DIDN'T ALWAYS PROJECT
THAT. SOMETIMES DID. SOMETIMES
DIDN'T CLEARLY TRUMP WAS
BASICALLY DOING HIS GREATEST
HITS, BUT HE WAS ALWAYS
TALKING ABOUT D ARND KD
FOU A WAY TO DO TONIGHT.
BUT ALWAYS NO MATTER WHAT IT
WAS OUT TALKING ABOUT CHILD
CARE. BUT IT'S IMMIGRATION
TALKING ABOUT WHATEVER
IMMIGRATION. BUT THERE'S SO
MUCH BAKED IN ALREADY TO HAVE
TO BE SOME KIND OF DEMARCATION
TO SEPARATE WHAT'S ALREADY
BAKED IN. FACTS ARE NOT NEARLY
AS IMPORTANT AS WHAT THE
NARRATIVE IS. TALKING ABOUT
THIS EARLIER. OUR ECONOMY IS
FUNDAMENTALLY STRONG, BUT THE
NARRATIVE IS THAT IT'S GOING
TO HELP. IMMIGRANTS BY AND
LARGE WHO COME IN ILLEGALLY DO
NOT COME AT A HIGH LEVEL OF
IME.BUT THE NARRATIVE IS
ALL THE CRIME GOING UP RIGHT
NOW IS BECAUSE OF IMMIGRATION.
SO IT'S REALLY ABOUT THE
NARRATIVE THAT PRESIDENT BIDEN
HAS HAS A LOT TO BREAK. FACTS,
BUT THE STORYTELLING IS NOT AS
STRONG AS NEEDS TO BE. AND
TONIGHT THE NEED TO BE
SOMETHING STRENGTHEN THE
STORY. AND IN MANY WAYS DIDN'T
QUITE HEAR RICK. I KNOW THAT
YOU'VE GOT A REACTION TO THIS
DEBATE THAT WE WATCHED HERE
FOR AN HOUR AND A HALF AS OVER
DISAPPOINTING DEBATE ON A
POSITIVE NOTE. LET ME SAY THIS
WAS AN EXPERIMENT WITH THE
MICROPHONES BE MUTED AND
EXPERIMENT.
>> WITH NO DIEN ANDI
THINK THERE'S SOME THINGS TO
WORK OUT. BUT THAT HAS SOME
POTENTIAL FOR THE FUTURE. IT
ACTUALLY IT ACTUALLY CAN WORK.
AND IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE
RECENT DEBATES, THE 5 IN THE
REPUBLICAN PRIMARY, THEY WERE
WORST BRAWLS. YOU CAN'T STOP
PEOPLE FROM BEING DISPARAGING
WHICH HAPPENED TONIGHT. BUT
THOSE WERE WORSE. I THINK THAT
IT DOES PUT A LITTLE BIT
GREATER BURDEN ON THE
MODERATORS. AND I THOUGHT THEY
DID A GOOD JOB, BUT THEY WERE
RELUCTANT TO ENTER THE FRAY. I
THOUGHT THEY'RE TRYING TO BE
OBJECTIVE IN THAT KIND OF
SITUATION. YOU NEED FOLLOW UP
QUESTIONS BECAUSE ONE OF THE
DEFINING PARTS OF THIS DEBATE
WAS THE FAILURE TO ANSWER TO
BE REONVE QUEIONS
AND THAT PUTS A BURDEN ON THE
MODERATE. SO PROCEDURALLY ON
THAT NOTE ON THE ON THE
MICROPHONES AND AND AS FAR AS
AUDIENCE, I THINK THERE'S
POTENTIAL FOR THE FUTURE. THAT
WAS AN IMPROVEMENT. BUT ON THE
DEBATE ITSELF, I SAID COMING
IN TONIGHT, THE BIG QUESTION
THE NATION WAS ASKING WAS,
DOES JOE BIDEN HAVE THE MENTAL
AND PHYSICAL FITNESS? THE
STAMINA ENERGY TO SERVE FOR
ANOTHER 4 YEARS? I'M NOT SO
SURE HE ANSWERED THAT TONIGHT
WITH A RESOUNDING YES, IT WAS
A LITTLE BIT PROBLEMATIC IN
FOR JEN AND FOR DONALD TRUMP.
COULD HE HAVE THE DISCIPLINE
TO NOT LOOK TO THE PAST, TO
NOT BE A PERSONAL GRIEVANCE
AND TO LOOK FORWARD. I'M NOT
SO SURE HE WAS DISCIPLINED
EITHER. HE WAS RAMBLING AND THE
WAS NOT RESPONSIVE TO
QUESTIONS. I THOUGHT IT WAS A
CHALLENGING NIGHT FOR BOTH. I
REALLY DO.
>>JOY PURDY: VERY INTERESTING.
WE JUST POPPED UP A GRAPHIC
SHOWING ACCORDING TO NBC NEWS,
7 BIG ISSUES AT STAKE IN THE
2024 ELECTION. YOU SEE IT NOW
ABORTION AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS,
IMMIGRATION AND THE SOUTHERN
BORDER, HEALTH CARE AND
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, TAXES,
JUDGES IN THE SUPREME COURT
TRADE WITH FOREIGN NATIONS AND
FOREIGN POLICY AND NATO WITH
CONCERNS TO 2 MAJOR WARS GOING
ON THE WAR BETWEEN RUSSIA AND
UKRAINE AND THE WAR IN THE
MIDDLE EAST. THAT'S
INCREASINGLY BECOMING A
REGIONAL WAR. ALSO, YOU KNOW,
GOING BACK TO BEING TOLD THAT
WE HAVE SOME SOUND FROM THE
DEBATE TALKING ABOUT FOREIGN
POLICY. LET'S LISTEN.
>> AND AS FAR AS HIS STATE IS
CONCERNED, I WAS GETTING OUT
OF AFGHANISTAN, BUT WE ARE
GETTING OUT WITH DIGNITY WITH
STRENGTH, WITH POWER. HE GOT
OUT. IT WAS THE MOST
EMBARRASSING DAY. ISRAEL WOULD
HAVE NEVER BEEN INVADED. IN A
MILLION YEARS BY HAMAS. YOU
KNOW WHY? BECAUSE IRAN WAS
BROKE WITH ME. I WOULD LET ANYB
THEY RAN OUT OF MONEY. THEY
WERE BROKE THAT NO MONEY FOR
HAMAS. THEY HAD NO MONEY FOR
ANYTHING, NO MONEY FOR TERROR.
THAT'S WHY YOU HAD NO TERROR
AT ALL DURING MY
ADMINISTRATION. THIS PLACE THE
WHOLE WORLD IS BLOWING UP
UNDER HIM. VERY INTERESTING.
>>JOY PURDY: 2 THINGS THAT I
NOTICED. NUMBER ONE, YOU
CALLED IT, JOHN. TAKE A LOOK
AT SEE HOW SEE IT AND WAS
GOING TO BE PRESENTING THIS.
THEY DID DO THE SPLIT SCREEN.
SO EVEN THOUGH MIKES WERE
MUTED, WE COULD SEE REACTIONS
BECAUSE THEY PUT THEM BOTH UP.
BUT COND, I OUGHIT WAS
A GREAT IDEA TO KEEP THE
QUESTIONS UP THERE THAT THEY
HAD ASKED BECAUSE YOU DON'T
REALIZE HOW MUCH OFF TOPIC
BOTH OF THEM WENT. TELL YOU,
YOU KNOW, THE QUESTIONS RIGHT
WAITING FOR THE TO THE PLACE
THAT MADE US IT MADE IT EASY
FOR VIEWERS TO THAT WAS THE
QUESTION. BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. ONE POINT
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GOLF.
>> THERE WAS NEVER A QUESTION
ABOUT TOURNAMENT ON THE SPLIT
SCREEN. I ACTUALLY THINK THE
SPLIT SCREEN HURT JOE BIDEN
TONIGHT THIS WAS NOT THE JOE
BIDEN OF THE STATE OF THE
UNION ADDRESS IN THAT ADDRESS.
HE WAS AN ER JET, A VERY
ENERGETIC, RY HIGH HE WAS
SOMEWHAT IN COMMAND AND GOT
HIGH MARKS FOR IT. TONIGHT WAS
NOT THAT JOE BIDEN AND THE
SPLIT SCREEN HURT. DONALD
TRUMP MAY HAVE BEEN RAMBLING A
NON RESPONSIVE, BUT HE LOOKED
ENERGETIC AND HE LOOKED IN
COMMAND. JOE BIDEN DID NOT
LOOK IN COMMAND AND DID NOT
QUITE HAVE THE ENERGY. I
THOUGHT IT WAS A CHALLENGING
DEBATE TO WATCH, BUT I THINK
IT WAS A PARTICULARLY
CHALLENGING NIGHT FOR JOE
BIDEN. DONALD TRUMP WITH DID
NOT MEET THE STANDARD OF THE
DISCIPLINE. I THOUGHT HE
NEEDED TO HAVE A GREAT NIGHT,
BUT HE HAD ENOUGH TO SHOW
ENERGY ON THE AGE ISSUE AND
ENOUGH TO SHOW COMMAND. AND I T
THEM AN IN CHRISTMAS. THIS THE
VOTERS WHO DON'T LIKE EITHER
CANDIDATE.
>> WHERE THEY HELPED AT ALL
TONIGHT, I DON'T THINK THEY
WERE BECAUSE I THINK SOME OF
THE TRAITS THEY DON'T LIKE
ABOUT BOTH OF THESE
CANDIDATES. WE'RE VERY PRESENT
SORT OF THROUGHOUT THE DEBATE.
IF YOU'RE AN UNDECIDED VOTER
WHO'S CONCERNED ABOUT DONALD
TRUMP'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE
TRUTH AND HE'S KIND OF THE WAY
HE ADDRESSED HIS POLITICAL
ENEMIES AND THOSE SORTS OF
ISSUES. PROBABLY YOU DIDN'T
SEE A LOT DIFFERENT. RICK IS
TOTALLY RIGHT. HE WAS MORE
INCOME AND MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE,
MORENERGIC. I'M NOT SURE
HE WAS MORE PRESIDENTIAL THAN
HE OFTEN IS. AND I THINK THAT
IS A TRAIT THAT SOME OF THOSE
KIND OF DOUBLE HEADER VOTERS
ARE BONE DIDN'T LIKE BOTH
CANDIDATES ARE LOOKING FOR FOR
JOE BIDEN. AND I SAY THIS
RESPECTFULLY, HIS STRATEGIC
IMPERATIVE COMING IN,
PARTICULARLY WITH THOSE SWING
VOTERS AND THOSE VOTERS WHO
DON'T LIKE OTHER CANDIDATES
WAS TO SHOW HIMSELF AS
ENERGETIC INCOME AND A UP TO
THE JOB. AND I'M NOT SURE THAT
HE ACCOMPLISHED THAT STRATEGIC
IMPERATIVE THIS EVENING. SO
I'M NOT SURE THOSE VOTERS CAMP
OR IN ANY DIFFERENT PLACE
AFTER THIS DEBA TH THEY
WERE BEFOREHAND. THANK YOU,
CHRIS. ALL RIGHT. STICK WITH
US. WE'RE GOING TO BE RIGHT
BACK AFTER THIS BREAK.
関連動画をさらに表示
CBS News poll: Trump leads Biden in Arizona, Florida
働いたら負け ニート大国フランス完成? / バイデン氏の暴走は止まらない やめろと言う声と縋りつく支流派 でもトランプ氏が優勢【渡邉哲也Show】一般公開ライブ 20240712-570 Vol.2
SNSでバズらないような、「まっとうな」生き方の価値
【超重要】大統領はこうして決まる。入り組んだ選挙のシナリオを解説します。
【米大統領戦・最新分析】日本メディアの左派バイアス/ハリスのアキレス腱/現職副大統領の勝利は一度だけ/バイデン撤退の決め手/スピーチ型のハリス、アドリブ型のトランプ/バンスの矛盾【ジョセフ・クラフト】
日本にも影響きます…トランプが再選した場合世界がどう変わっていくのかポイント別で紹介
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)