DPR Blak-blakan ke Jampidsus soal TNI Jaga Kejaksaan, Apa Ada Ancaman?

Summary

In this dialogue, various speakers discuss the challenges and complexities of law enforcement, particularly focusing on the role of the judiciary and prosecutors in addressing corruption. They express concerns about the influence of power and money on justice, especially in high-profile cases like the Sarfikat case. The conversation touches on the risks faced by law enforcement officials, including potential threats that necessitate protection by military forces. The speakers highlight the need for collaboration between the judiciary, police, and military to combat corruption and ensure the integrity of the justice system.

Takeaways

• 😀 The support of Commission T for the actions of the prosecutor's office is strong, emphasizing the importance of law enforcement in fighting corruption.
• 😀 There is a concern that justice is influenced by power and money, highlighting the need for transparency and fairness in the justice system.
• 😀 The speaker agrees that the prosecutor's office must clean up corruption and expose the hidden dynamics behind it.
• 😀 The role of justice should be based on divine fairness, but money and power seem to undermine the fairness of the judicial process.
• 😀 The speaker acknowledges that tackling corruption requires full support from political institutions, such as Commission 3, which continues to push for systemic improvements.
• 😀 Even when facing opposition, the prosecutor's office needs to continue its fight against corruption with determination and full support from relevant authorities.
• 😀 The speaker highlights the significant threats faced by law enforcement officers, particularly during corruption cases like the Marsela case, where even prosecutors are attacked or threatened.
• 😀 The prosecutor's office has no fear of threats but seeks political backing to ensure continued action against corruption and crime.
• 😀 There's a need to address the challenges faced by industries like textiles, where corruption, illegal practices, and unfair competition due to imported goods are taking a toll on local businesses.
• 😀 The collaboration between the prosecutor's office, the police, and the military is vital for ensuring the security of legal proceedings, but it's important to question if the military's involvement is necessary for some cases.

Q & A

What does Pak Suding express concern about regarding the current state of law enforcement?

Pak Suding is concerned that justice in Indonesia is heavily influenced by power and money, as exemplified by the Sarfikat case. He believes that this issue needs to be addressed and urges the prosecutor's office to clean up the system.

How does Pak Suding view the role of the prosecutor's office in dealing with corruption cases?

Pak Suding fully supports the prosecutor's office, particularly in tackling corruption cases. He emphasizes the need for the prosecutor's office to act decisively in exposing and dismantling networks of corruption.

What does Pak Suding think about the role of the military (TNI) in protecting prosecutors?

Pak Suding questions the involvement of the military (TNI) in protecting prosecutors, suggesting that law enforcement, specifically the police, should handle such duties. He expresses concern that the presence of the military could intimidate individuals seeking justice.

What specific example of resistance against law enforcement does Pak Suding mention?

Pak Suding mentions the Marsela case, where one of the suspects paid a bribe of almost 1 billion IDR. He also references incidents of media coverage and public attacks on the Attorney General, which he views as concrete examples of resistance against the legal system.

Has Pak Suding or his colleagues faced direct threats during their work?

Pak Suding states that while there are various forms of resistance in their line of work, there have been no direct threats to him or his colleagues. He emphasizes the importance of political support from Komisi 3 to continue their work.

What role does Komisi 3 play in supporting the prosecutor's office?

Komisi 3 provides strong political support to the prosecutor's office, including maintaining regular communication and pushing for continued efforts in tackling corruption. This support acts as motivation for the legal team.

What does Pak Suding say about the connection between the prosecutor's office and the police?

Pak Suding describes a close working relationship between the prosecutor's office and the police, citing his own experiences where cooperation has been essential in handling cases effectively.

Why does Pak Suding express concern about the textile industry and its relation to law enforcement?

Pak Suding highlights the challenges faced by local textile industries, which struggle to compete with imported goods. He mentions that corruption in the form of unpaid taxes and fees for imported goods further harms local businesses, and stresses the importance of taking action against this issue.

What role does the police play in cases handled by the prosecutor's office?

Pak Suding clarifies that while the prosecutor's office may request the help of the police in handling cases, the cooperation is always professional. He emphasizes that the police are integral to the prosecution's efforts, especially in cases requiring extra security or resources.

What does Pak Suding mention about the involvement of the military in prosecutor protection?

Pak Suding suggests that the military's involvement in protecting prosecutors may be a response to security concerns, but he believes that such protection should typically fall under the police's jurisdiction. He notes that the presence of the military may send the wrong message to the public.