Janji Bangun Disney Land, Pramono: Jadi Bangun Dimana? - [ Debat Pilkada 2024 ]

Summary

In a lively political debate, candidates for Governor and Deputy Governor of Jakarta discuss their plans for economic growth and social welfare. Key topics include tourism development, such as building Disneyland in Cikarang, and the establishment of special economic zones to boost investment. While emphasizing the importance of imagination and bold leadership, the candidates highlight their visions for Jakarta’s future, with one stressing the need for public trust and another focusing on past achievements in improving public services and reducing poverty.

Takeaways

• 😀 The debate revolves around economic development and social welfare issues, with a focus on tourism and investments in Jakarta and surrounding areas.
• 😀 Bapak Pramono Anung and Bapak Rano Karno ask Bapak Ridwan Kamil (Kang Emil) and Bapak Suswono about the feasibility of building a Disneyland in Cikarang, a promise made earlier by Kang Emil in 2018.
• 😀 Kang Emil responds by emphasizing the importance of imagination and visionary leadership, even when some ideas may not come to fruition, like the Disneyland project.
• 😀 The idea of transforming Cikarang into a global-class tourist destination is presented, where Kang Emil envisions upgrading existing sites like Ancol to a global standard, similar to Universal Studios or Dubai's attractions.
• 😀 Kang Emil mentions a proposed special economic zone in the Kepulauan Seribu (Thousand Islands), which could attract significant foreign investment and boost the local economy through tourism and development.
• 😀 The debate also highlights the need for leadership that is willing to take risks, innovate, and make bold decisions, even if those decisions carry some potential for failure.
• 😀 Bapak Pramono Anung stresses the importance of trust in leadership and ensuring that promises made to the public are actionable and backed by practical plans.
• 😀 Bapak Suswono echoes the idea that being a leader means making decisions based on long-term vision, while also addressing the public's needs and concerns.
• 😀 Kang Emil points out his successful governance track record as the Governor of West Java, mentioning the reduction of poverty and the high public approval rating of 90%.
• 😀 The debate touches on the differences between imaginative leadership and more conservative, risk-averse approaches, with a call for balancing bold ideas with pragmatic implementation.

Q & A

What was the question posed by candidate Pramono Anung regarding Kang Emil's plans for tourism in Cikarang?

Pramono Anung asked whether Kang Emil's previous statement about building Disneyland in Cikarang, made in 2018, was still valid. He inquired whether it would be built in Cikarang or on Pulau Seribu, as Kang Emil had indicated both locations at different times.

How did Kang Emil respond to the question about building Disneyland?

Kang Emil responded by emphasizing the importance of imagination in leadership, noting that while the idea of building Disneyland might have been discussed, it could be a business challenge. He suggested the focus should be on building something internationally recognized, such as a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), to boost tourism and revenue.

What was the idea of the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) that Kang Emil proposed?

Kang Emil proposed creating a Special Economic Zone around the Kepulauan Seribu to attract international tourists and investment. This would involve transforming the area into a premium, globally recognized destination, akin to Universal Studios or Disneyland, with an emphasis on improving the tourism infrastructure.

How did Pramono Anung describe leadership during the debate?

Pramono Anung highlighted that a leader must be able to make bold decisions, even if those decisions sometimes fail. He compared good leadership to a creative and imaginative process, stressing that failure is part of progress, and the worst leaders are those who avoid taking risks and just focus on maintaining the status quo.

What is the core difference between Pramono Anung's and Kang Emil's visions for leadership?

Pramono Anung focuses on pragmatic decision-making, emphasizing experience and the willingness to take calculated risks based on long-term political experience. Kang Emil, on the other hand, stresses the importance of visionary thinking and creative solutions, even if those ideas initially appear unfeasible.

What did Kang Emil emphasize about public perception in his response to Pramono Anung?

Kang Emil emphasized that public trust is essential and that his past actions, such as his work as the Governor of West Java, should demonstrate his ability to execute his vision effectively. He also pointed out that his high approval ratings from the public reflect the success of his policies.

What was Kang Emil’s track record in his previous role as Governor of West Java?

Kang Emil highlighted his achievements in West Java, such as reducing poverty in 1,000 villages, attracting the highest level of investment in Indonesia, and reforming public services. He noted that these successes had earned him a 90% approval rating from the public.

How did Pramono Anung defend his decision-making ability in response to the debate question?

Pramono Anung defended his decision-making ability by pointing out his extensive experience as a public servant for over 25 years, including serving as the Secretary of the Cabinet. He emphasized that the risks involved in leadership decisions are familiar to him, and he has always been willing to take responsibility for his choices.

What did Pramono Anung mean when he referred to the concept of 'political will' in his response?

Pramono Anung referred to 'political will' as the determination of a leader to follow through on significant decisions, even if those decisions are challenging. He implied that the ability to act on such will, despite obstacles, is a crucial part of effective leadership.

What did Kang Emil propose regarding tourism development in Jakarta and its surroundings?

Kang Emil proposed elevating the tourism potential of Jakarta by transforming Ancol into a world-class destination. He mentioned that the goal was to make Jakarta a global tourism hub, improving its status from a regional destination to one comparable to international attractions like Universal Studios and Dubai's Global Village.