Conflict Management | Part 1
Summary
TLDRThe transcript discusses the evolving perspectives on conflict within organizations. Initially viewed negatively, conflict was considered a disruptive force, but contemporary management theories suggest it can have positive outcomes when managed properly. Conflict is now seen as a necessary aspect of organizational growth, fostering change and development. While excessive conflict can harm the organization, a certain level, when effectively managed, is recognized as functional. Ultimately, the management and resolution of conflict depend on individual and team approaches, highlighting its dual nature—either functional or dysfunctional—depending on how it is addressed.
Takeaways
- 😀 Conflict is a concept that lacks a clear and unanimous definition, with different experts offering various interpretations.
- 😀 Some view conflict as a situation, others as a type of behavior, while some see it as a result of mismatched or opposing goals and interactions.
- 😀 Traditional perspectives on conflict in organizations often focus on its negative impacts rather than its potential benefits.
- 😀 Conflict theory evolved from the 1970s to 2000s, where it began to be seen as effective at an optimal level within organizations.
- 😀 Organizations tend to be less effective when experiencing a high level of conflict, but a certain degree of conflict can be beneficial.
- 😀 Contemporary management theories suggest that conflict can bring positive consequences, helping organizations grow and adapt.
- 😀 Conflict is viewed as something necessary for organizational development, fostering dynamic change and growth.
- 😀 According to contemporary management theory, conflict is inevitable and must be managed effectively to prevent disintegration within an organization.
- 😀 Too much conflict can harm organizations, but it can also be functional if handled properly by individuals and teams.
- 😀 Conflict can be functional or dysfunctional depending on how it is managed, resolved, and perceived by those involved.
Q & A
What are the different perspectives on conflict according to the script?
-The script highlights multiple perspectives on conflict. Some experts view conflict as a situation, others as a type of behavior, and some see it as the result of mismatches or opposition in goals, activities, or interactions between social entities.
How is conflict viewed in traditional perspectives within organizations?
-In traditional perspectives, conflict is largely seen as a negative force within organizations, bringing more harm than benefits.
What change in perspective occurred regarding conflict in the 1970s?
-In the 1970s, theories of conflict evolved, with a shift in view that conflict can be beneficial if managed correctly, with a focus on achieving optimal effectiveness when conflicts occur at an appropriate level.
What is the relationship between conflict and organizational effectiveness?
-The script explains that an appropriate level of conflict can lead to optimal organizational effectiveness, while excessive conflict can reduce overall effectiveness and lead to organizational dysfunction.
How does contemporary management theory view conflict in organizations?
-Contemporary management theories consider conflict to have positive consequences for organizations, suggesting that it is necessary for organizational growth and dynamic change.
What role does conflict play in organizational growth according to modern theories?
-Modern theories argue that conflict is essential for organizational growth, as it allows organizations to develop and change dynamically through the challenges it creates.
What is the importance of managing conflict in organizations?
-Managing conflict effectively is crucial because, while conflict cannot be avoided, unaddressed or poorly managed conflict can lead to disintegration within an organization.
What do organizational behavior scientists agree on regarding conflict?
-Organizational behavior scientists agree that a certain level of conflict is important, but only if it is handled properly. Mismanagement can lead to dysfunction, but proper handling can keep the organization functional and effective.
What are the possible outcomes of conflict depending on how it is managed?
-Conflict can either be functional or dysfunctional, depending on how individuals or teams perceive it, manage it, and resolve it.
What does the script suggest about the inevitability of conflict in organizations?
-The script emphasizes that conflict is inevitable in organizations, but it can be managed and resolved effectively to avoid negative outcomes.
Outlines
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードMindmap
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードKeywords
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードHighlights
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレードTranscripts
このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。
今すぐアップグレード関連動画をさらに表示
Why Conflict is a Good Thing | Dale Feinauer | TEDxOshkosh
Lewis Coser: Analisa Fungsional tentang Konflik
MODULE 09: How to Resolve Conflict in the Workplace
Module 4, Segment 1: Conflict in the Health Care Setting
Conflict Resolution | Mediation | Conflict Resolution Techniques | Mediation Process | Negotiation
Common Causes of Conflict
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)