The Problem With TIMEX Watches

Summary

In this video, the reviewer shares their disappointment with Timex watches after owning six different models. Despite Timex's reputation as a leading affordable watch brand, the reviewer highlights issues like poor quality control, lack of attention to detail, and underwhelming movements. They critique each watch, ranging from the mediocre Waterbury chronograph to the disappointing Navi XL, ultimately awarding low ratings across the board, except for the Expedition Camper, which earns an 8 out of 10. The reviewer concludes that, based on their experiences, they will avoid Timex in the future, suggesting viewers explore alternatives.

Takeaways

• 😀 Timex is a major player in the affordable watch market, producing thousands of watches monthly.
• 😕 The reviewer has owned six different Timex watches and feels they all lacked quality and attention to detail.
• 🕒 The Timex Waterbury Chronograph had a decent price but poor overall quality and finishing, earning a 5/10 rating.
• 🧐 The Timex Marlin was appreciated for its design but criticized for its scratch-prone acrylic crystal and tiny movement, receiving a 6/10.
• 💔 The Timex Navi XL featured an appealing color scheme but suffered from a significant quality control error on the dial, resulting in a 3/10 rating.
• 💰 The Timex Expedition Mechanical was a great bargain at £70, with good specs, but the reviewer felt it wasn't worth its retail price of £210, rated at 6/10.
• 🤔 The Timex Standard was heavily criticized for its poor materials and construction, receiving the lowest score of 2/10.
• 🌟 The Timex Expedition Camper stood out as the only model that delivered satisfactory quality and value, achieving an 8/10 rating.
• 🛑 The reviewer expresses frustration with Timex's consistent quality issues and overpriced products compared to competitors like Casio.
• 🔄 Despite some positive features, the reviewer is unlikely to purchase Timex watches again unless significant changes are made.

Q & A

What is the main issue the reviewer has with Timex watches?

The reviewer feels that Timex watches lack quality and attention to detail, leading to a disappointing overall experience.

How many Timex watches has the reviewer owned?

The reviewer has owned six different Timex watches.

Which Timex model received the highest rating from the reviewer, and why?

The Timex Expedition Camper received the highest rating of 8/10 because it offers good quality for its price, is lightweight, and has practical features like the Indiglo function.

What specific quality control issue did the reviewer find with the Timex Navi XL?

The Timex Navi XL had a printing error on the dial, featuring a noticeable black blob next to the Timex name, which the reviewer considered unacceptable.

Why does the reviewer consider the Timex Standard to be a poor investment?

The Timex Standard is viewed as a poor investment due to its use of low-quality materials like chrome-plated brass and a mineral crystal, which do not justify its £80 price tag.

What features of the Timex Expedition Mechanical impressed the reviewer?

The Timex Expedition Mechanical impressed the reviewer with its sapphire crystal, 100m water resistance, and overall value for the price.

What was the reviewer's opinion on the movement used in the Timex Marlin?

The reviewer was disappointed with the movement in the Timex Marlin, describing it as small and difficult to find parts for, which detracted from the watch's perceived quality.

What was the reviewer's experience with the Timex Waterb Chronograph?

The reviewer found the Timex Waterb Chronograph to be a decent watch for the price but noted a lack of detail and poor quality in the chronograph pushes and case finishing.

How does the reviewer compare Timex watches to those from Casio?

The reviewer believes that Casio offers superior watches in a similar price range compared to Timex, citing better value and quality.

What are the reviewer's final thoughts on purchasing Timex watches in the future?

The reviewer is unlikely to purchase Timex watches again unless the brand significantly improves its quality and value offerings.