MPTET Varg-1 latest news today | MP High Court Case Update | part-01

Summary

The transcript captures a legal discussion concerning the appointment process for teachers in 2023, which hinges on a 2018 teacher eligibility test. The speaker pleads for permission to issue appointment orders, emphasizing their provisional nature pending the final judgment of a petition. There's concern over the advertisement for recruitment issued in 2022 and the impact of the 2018 test on current selections. The dialogue also touches on the reservation for economically weaker sections (EWS) and the government's role in the appointment process, with a mention of a departmental delay in granting EWS reservation.

Takeaways

• 📅 The selection process for appointments was conducted in 2023, following an advertisement from 2022, which relates to the 2018 Teacher Eligibility Test.
• 🔄 Two more selection processes have been concluded or started, with claims for benefits from these processes.
• 🚫 There is a concern about issuing appointment orders for the 2023 selections, as per the observations made by the court.
• 📜 An existing order states that any process undertaken will be subject to the final outcome of a court order.
• 🙏 A request is made to permit the issuance of appointment orders, with the understanding that they are provisional and subject to the final court decision.
• 📝 The difficulty arises from the order of the single judge, which was only for EWS (Economically Weaker Section) candidates, while the state has withheld appointment orders for all candidates.
• 🏫 The government's Office Memorandum (DOPT) guidelines are being followed, which affects the handling of EWS vacancies.
• 🔒 Around 2,000 appointment orders have been withheld, not only for EWS but for other categories as well.
• 📆 There is a mention of a timeline, with a focus on the period around 15th October and the subsequent holiday week, indicating a sense of urgency.
• 🏢 The tribal welfare department's non-granting of EWS reservation for 2023 is highlighted as a separate issue that needs attention.

Q & A

What is the primary concern expressed in the transcript?

The primary concern is the urgency of issuing appointment orders for the selection process conducted in 2023, which is subject to the final outcome of a petition related to the advertisement issued in 2022 for a teacher eligibility test conducted in 2018.

What is the significance of the advertisement issued in 2022?

The advertisement issued in 2022 is significant as it pertains to the recruitment process for teachers, which is now under review due to the ongoing legal proceedings.

Why is there a mention of two more selection processes being claimed as a benefit?

The mention of two more selection processes being claimed as a benefit refers to the respondents' argument that there should be additional opportunities for selection beyond the first recruitment process that has already been concluded.

What is the role of the 'single bench' in this context?

The 'single bench' refers to a judge who has issued a directive regarding the appointment process, specifically for candidates from the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS), and the outcome of their decision is crucial to the current proceedings.

Why is there a concern about conducting the appointment process in May?

The concern about conducting the appointment process in May arises from the court's observation that appointment orders should not be issued for the 2023 selections, which could potentially conflict with the final judgment of the court.

What does the term 'provisional' imply in the context of appointment orders?

In the context of appointment orders, 'provisional' implies that the appointments are made on a temporary basis and are subject to confirmation or cancellation based on the final outcome of the legal proceedings.

What is the issue with the EWS vacancies according to the transcript?

The issue with the EWS vacancies is that they cannot be carried forward, and the appointments are being withheld for all candidates, not just for EWS, which is causing complications in the recruitment process.

What is the role of the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) in this matter?

The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) issued an office memorandum that the government is acting upon, which is relevant to the appointment process and the handling of EWS reservations.

Why is there a mention of the tribal welfare department in the transcript?

The tribal welfare department is mentioned because it has not granted EWS reservation for the 2023 trial, which is a separate but related issue that could impact the appointment process.

What is the significance of the date '15th October' mentioned in the transcript?

The date '15th October' is significant as it is the date after which the matter is expected to be revisited in court, and it is also when the court is reminded to address the issue of EWS reservation by the tribal welfare department.