LBC caller insists Brits deserve social housing more than immigrants | LBC
Summary
TLDRThe conversation revolves around the contentious issue of social housing allocation in Britain amidst a backdrop of migration and housing crisis. The speaker clarifies misconceptions about the eligibility of British citizens and migrants for social housing, emphasizing that legal status, not nationality, dictates eligibility. The discussion heats up over the caller's assertion that British citizenship should confer priority in housing allocation, leading to accusations of bias and racism. The exchange touches on the complex interplay of migration, legal rights, and social policy, ultimately questioning the fairness and criteria of housing allocation in a diverse society.
Takeaways
- 😕 The callers disagree over whether being a British citizen should give priority access to social housing
- 😟 There are concerns over high levels of legal migration and its impact on services like housing
- 😞 The host challenges the original caller's assumptions about migrants' housing status
- 😔 The original caller believes the housing shortage justifies prioritizing British citizens
- 😣 Accusations of racism and anti-British sentiment are exchanged
- 😖 Both question if the other truly considers themselves British
- 😫 The original caller demands to know why the host 'hates' British people
- 😡 The conversation becomes heated and personal attacks begin
- 😤 The original caller implies the host's ethnicity means they can't understand
- 😓 The call ends abruptly without resolution
Q & A
What was the main topic of discussion between the two speakers?
-The main topic was around social housing allocation in the UK, specifically whether being a British citizen should give priority access to social housing.
What was the caller's viewpoint on social housing allocation?
-The caller felt that being a British citizen should be a consideration or qualification that gives priority access to social housing.
What was the host's response to the caller's opinion?
-The host disagreed and said that priority is given based on housing need, not citizenship. She stated that most immigrants are not entitled to social housing benefits.
Why does the caller think immigrants are getting social housing priority?
-The caller believes that due to high levels of immigration, some immigrants end up on benefits or meet conditions that allow them access to social housing waitlists on an equal level as British citizens.
How does the host counter the caller's claims about immigrants accessing social housing?
-The host argues that most immigrants who come to work likely do not qualify for social housing waitlists, as they earn above the threshold. She asks for evidence that immigrants manipulate waitlists.
How does the conversation take a turn near the end?
-The caller accuses the host of being anti-British. The host points out the caller's assumption that she is not British due to her ethnicity.
What does the host imply about the caller's motivations during the call?
-The host implies the caller holds racist views or makes assumptions based on her ethnicity that she is not British.
Does the caller provide evidence to support his claim that immigrants take priority for social housing?
-No, the caller does not provide any statistical evidence or examples to demonstrate his claim.
How does the host respond to the caller's accusations of her being anti-British?
-She directly challenges his assumptions, asks him to explain his reasoning, and points out that he would likely not accuse a white host of being anti-British.
What tone is set between the speakers as the conversation progresses?
-The tone becomes increasingly tense and adversarial, with the host pointing out the caller's problematic assumptions and the caller becoming defensive.
Outlines
🏠 Housing and Citizenship Debate
The discussion begins with a caller questioning the absence of British people in housing qualifications as highlighted by expert Russell Conway. The speaker clarifies that British citizens, those with the right to remain, work visa holders, and key workers, all have equal opportunities to access social housing without priority over others. The conversation delves into concerns about unlimited migration, healthcare, and the impact on housing needs, emphasizing that being British doesn't grant special treatment in housing allocation. The caller expresses confusion and frustration over perceived injustices in the system, with the speaker rebutting misconceptions about migration and eligibility for social housing, highlighting legal qualifications and the need-based nature of housing allocation.
🤔 Debating National Identity and Racism
The discussion escalates as the caller accuses the speaker of being anti-British and potentially racist, questioning the speaker's stance on national identity. The speaker challenges these accusations by highlighting the assumptions made based on race and nationality, particularly pointing out the caller's assumptions about the speaker's and another individual's (Matthew Wright's) ethnic backgrounds. The heated exchange touches on deep-seated issues of racism, national identity, and the implications of these on public policy debates, such as housing allocation. The speaker defends their position, questioning the caller's logic and intentions, and the conversation ends on a tense note, with unresolved tensions about identity, belonging, and discrimination.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡housing crisis
💡social housing
💡migration
💡citizenship
💡eligibility
💡waiting list
💡evidence
💡homeless
💡overcrowding
💡refugees
Highlights
Caller claims British people are not prioritized for social housing.
Assistant explains eligibility criteria for social housing does not favor nationality.
Caller alleges migrants manipulate the housing waiting list over British people.
Assistant clarifies migrants on work visas are unlikely to qualify for social housing.
Caller insists British nationality should be a factor in allocating social housing.
Assistant questions why nationality should override housing need.
Caller attributes housing shortage to high immigration.
Assistant points out housing crisis has multiple causes, including government policies.
Caller accuses assistant of being anti-British.
Assistant challenges caller's racist assumptions about her nationality.
Caller admits he assumed assistant's nationality based on her ethnicity.
Assistant asserts nationality should not determine access to social services like housing.
Caller continues to argue British people deserve priority housing access.
Assistant points out housing eligibility is based on need, not nationality.
Caller resorts to personal attacks when unable to counter assistant's arguments.
Transcripts
uh so your your expert um is it Russell
Conway I mean he's a great expert as
well uh but the thing is he didn't
mention British people in those
qualifications for
housing so does that not count for
anything in all this no the point he
made was if you are a British citizen or
you have the right to remain or you on a
work visa or you are one of the key
workers that my previous caller just
pointed out if you were in housing need
you will have an equal opportunity to
get on the ladder of social housing as
anyone else you won't be given priority
but you're entitled to it that was his
point so obviously we've got an
unlimited migration going on no we
haven't who've got medical health issues
children there are various other issues
going on so they're always a lot of them
are always going to Trump get ahead of
any British people on that house in NE
need thing so again being British
doesn't count for anything in all this
yes you're quite happy with that are you
sorry who are the who are the people
with kids godamn them that are coming in
um and taking your homes so just explain
to who these people are families right
so those would be would these be the
500,000 these are the 500,000 600,000
people that came in last year that's
what yes yeah how did they get here
Peter yeah yes legal it's legal
migration m i mean I'm not I'm not
saying that obviously we are in a
housing crisis direct you know created
by a lot of it created by this stupid
government but that doesn't excuse that
British people it should be considered
when they're allocated housing that
they're British people but I'm
completely confused where have you got
the impression that people that don't
have a right to be here that don't have
a right to be on social housing waiting
list where have you got got the
impression where is the evidence that
they are somehow manipulating the social
housing waiting list yeah but they're
being considered on the same completely
the same level as British people because
they have British people it should be
considered a a qualification that
they're British people and that should
be considered why in allocating housing
why why not this is Brit because if you
live here
legally let me answer the question Peter
let me answer the question question
because under the current system that we
have you will only qualify for to be put
on the housing waiting list not even
necessarily getting uh a
housing if number one you in need of
it Priority will be given to homeless
people all those living in overcrowded
or squalled
conditions refugees may be allowed to
claim social housing but anyone who is
not entitled to
benefits meaning most foreigners in the
UK are
excluded so what is the problem still
obviously with mass massive migration
some of them will end up on benefits or
and they'll have the various issues that
allow them to uh access how to be
considered for housing what are you that
will be considered on the same level as
British people I'm saying should be
consider I know I understand what you're
saying you're saying it should be a
factor when considering who gets housing
in this country I'm asking you upon what
evidence do you think your citizenship
should be an issue over and above
housing need given half a million people
over half a million people arrived here
legally to do the jobs that British
people either can't do or won't do the
likelihood is hang on the likelihood is
the majority of those people are not
going into social housing because for
example if you have a work visa to come
here and you're a professional for
example you are likely to be earning
£30,000 or more so the chances of you
being on a social housing waiting list
are minimal I'm not considering all I'm
say is we're in a housing crisis at
total housing said that so it should be
considered in in allocation why because
that's that's the way it is we're in a
complete that's the way you say it is if
things need changing in the law then
they have to be changed it why why not
why not why what have you got against
British people
Sita say that again what have you got
against British people why are you
asking me that question I'm just asking
you why are you asking me that question
I'm just asking you what you keep in a
lot of your discussions on you keep
slagging off against British people
really what do you think
I what do you think I am I know I know
you're Asian yes I know you I think
you're British born or you raised in
Britain I don't know if you think you're
listen see now you're trying to T some
you're the argument and you're frankly
being a bit of a racist British a lot of
the time I'm anti-british
really would you be saying this to a
white
person yeah if if they yeah i' say I
don't believe you Peter I think you're
lying no not Matthew right he has a go
at Britain have you wrong him up have
you wrong up Matthew right up and said
why do you keep attack British people uh
probably not no not it's not it's not
how do you know Matthew WR is British
how do you know how do you know Matthew
is British how do you know Matthew rght
is British answer the question how do
you know Matthew rght is
British you have assumed Matthew R is
British how do you know he's British I
don't know I just assume he is from he
ACC him no you don't you assume he is
because he's white you've assumed I'm
not because I'm not white no I haven't I
haven't assumed anything about you I'm
just saying just hang hang you're the
one that started all this you're the one
that started all this you want to go
there Peter we're going there right so
you have rung me up and you have said
why are you anti-british I've asked you
why you're asking me that
question not what's that explain why are
you anti why what have you got against
British people being allocated housing
so you think I hate my own country men
and women or do you really think that
they're not my country men and women
Because deep down you don't think I'm
British no no so you're trying to twist
this into something else I'm not I'm
asking a question why shouldn't being
British being consider you started mate
I'm GNA I'm GNA blowing well end it yeah
answer the question oh oh I've hurt
Pet's feelings oh God
awful anyway
関連動画をさらに表示
FILM PENDEK DOKUMENTER: Tetap Berdiri di Tengah Alienasi | Kesenjangan sosial
País sin techo: La generación que nunca tendrá casa | Carla Escoffié (Por qué crees lo que crees)
2000 Kadamay Nagdulot Ng Kaguluhan Sa Pwersahang Pang-aagaw Ng Mga Bahay Sa Pandi Bulacan
The Evil Decline of Britain’s Dystopian Estates
John T. Dunlop Lecture: Angela Glover Blackwell
All Govt. Schemes of Himachal Pradesh | Sarkari Yojnaayen | HPPSC
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)