GJ 117 | DPR, MK,MA MILIK KELUARGA MANA?

Summary

The video discusses the growing trend of Indonesians migrating abroad, especially to Singapore, due to perceived better living conditions and healthcare. The speaker criticizes Indonesia's systemic issues, including corruption, elitism, and inefficiency in public services, which lead to high medical costs and slow legal processes. The video highlights the dissatisfaction with the current state of governance in Indonesia and questions the effectiveness of the political system, suggesting that the country's leaders prioritize their interests over those of the general population.

Takeaways

• 🇮🇩 Many Indonesians are moving abroad, particularly to Singapore, with around 1,000 people moving annually.
• 😌 The reason for this migration is that living abroad, especially in Singapore, is perceived as more pleasant and accommodating.
• 🧑‍⚕️ There is a trend of Indonesians seeking medical treatment abroad due to lower costs and less invasive procedures compared to Indonesia.
• 💊 The high cost of medical care in Indonesia is attributed to corruption and unethical practices between doctors and pharmaceutical companies.
• 🛑 The script criticizes the Indonesian government for neglecting its citizens and only catering to the elite class.
• 🚔 Issues such as land disputes, crimes, and zoning problems are reportedly ignored by the authorities, leading to a lack of justice for the common people.
• 💼 The speaker argues that laws in Indonesia are primarily designed to serve the interests of the elite, not the general population.
• 👨‍⚖️ Attempts to challenge environmental damage or other major issues through legal channels are often futile and slow.
• 📱 Efforts to expose injustices through viral campaigns are met with harsh penalties under various restrictive laws.
• 🤷 The script questions the legitimacy of political representation, claiming that the political system is controlled by the elite, making it difficult for ordinary people to bring about change.

Q & A

Why do many Indonesian citizens choose to move abroad, especially to Singapore?

According to the script, many Indonesians move abroad, particularly to Singapore, because they find it more enjoyable and less restrictive compared to Indonesia. They feel they can maintain their Indonesian identity without facing discrimination.

What are some specific examples of discrimination faced by Indonesians within their own country?

The script mentions that in Indonesia, individuals might be questioned about their religion if they have slightly Chinese features or about their cosmetics if they have darker skin, indicating a form of racial or social discrimination.

What trend among Indonesians is mentioned as a precursor to the trend of moving abroad?

The script mentions that there has been a trend of Indonesians seeking medical treatment abroad, as it is often cheaper and comes with fewer unnecessary procedures compared to treatment in Indonesia.

What is the reason given for the high cost of medical treatment in Indonesia?

The high cost of medical treatment in Indonesia is attributed to a hidden phenomenon of corruption, where doctors and pharmacists are involved in unethical practices, leading to inflated medical expenses.

What criticism does the speaker have about the way the Indonesian government handles the country's problems?

The speaker criticizes the Indonesian government for neglecting the needs of the general population and only focusing on the interests of the elite. Problems like crime and land disputes are often ignored or unresolved.

What does the speaker imply about the Indonesian legal and political system?

The speaker implies that the Indonesian legal and political systems are biased towards the elite. Legal processes for the elite's benefit are expedited, while issues concerning ordinary citizens are delayed or ignored.

How does the speaker describe the government's response to public grievances or protests?

The government, according to the speaker, responds to public grievances or protests with legislation that suppresses freedom of speech and public expression, such as internet access restrictions and the criminalization of viral content.

What is the role of the DPR (Indonesian House of Representatives) according to the speaker, and how does it relate to public interest?

The speaker argues that the DPR, which claims to represent the people, actually serves the interests of the elite, not the general public. Laws are made to protect the elite from criticism and maintain their power.

What alternatives does the speaker suggest for those disillusioned with the current state of Indonesia?

While the speaker contemplates the idea of moving abroad, they also suggest that instead of changing nationality, it might be more impactful to strive for significant political change from within the country, possibly even aiming to become the president.

What is the speaker's final stance on changing nationality versus staying and fighting for change in Indonesia?

The speaker expresses a preference for staying in Indonesia and attempting to make a difference, rather than changing nationality. They believe in the potential to enact change through political involvement and leadership.

Outlines

00:00

🇸🇬 **Indonesians Moving Abroad**

This paragraph discusses the increasing trend of Indonesians migrating abroad, particularly to Singapore. The main reasons for this trend include better opportunities and a more inclusive environment abroad compared to Indonesia, where discrimination based on appearance or religion is common. The author highlights that while Indonesia is vast, it feels restrictive, whereas Singapore, despite its small size, offers greater freedom. This migration trend is likened to the earlier trend of Indonesians seeking medical treatment abroad due to lower costs and better services in countries like Singapore and Malaysia. The paragraph concludes by criticizing the high cost of healthcare in Indonesia, attributed to corruption and unethical practices among doctors and pharmaceutical companies.

05:02

⚖️ **Systemic Injustices in Indonesia**

The second paragraph delves into the systemic failures and corruption in Indonesia, arguing that the country is not truly serving its people but rather its elite. The author criticizes the inefficiency and indifference of the government, citing examples of how reports of crimes or injustices often go unaddressed for years. The author asserts that laws and government actions primarily serve the interests of the elite, with rapid responses to their needs while the public’s concerns are neglected. This is highlighted by the quick legal changes that benefit the elite, contrasted with the long delays for issues affecting ordinary citizens. The paragraph also touches on the perpetuation of power within elite families, where multiple members hold significant political roles.

Keywords

💡Migration

Migration refers to the movement of people from one place to another. In the video, it specifically addresses the trend of Indonesian citizens relocating to other countries like Singapore. The speaker highlights this migration as a response to perceived limitations and discrimination within Indonesia, contrasted with the more welcoming and less discriminatory environment abroad.

💡Identity

Identity in this context refers to the cultural and national identity of Indonesian citizens. The video discusses how Indonesians can maintain their cultural identity even after moving to another country like Singapore, where they face less discrimination based on race or religion. The speaker contrasts this with the challenges of maintaining identity within Indonesia, where individuals might face racial or religious bias.

💡Discrimination

Discrimination is the unfair treatment of individuals based on certain characteristics such as race, religion, or ethnicity. The speaker in the video points out how Indonesians face discrimination within their own country, where people are judged based on physical traits like skin color or facial features. This discrimination drives many to seek a better life abroad.

💡Healthcare

Healthcare in the video refers to the medical services available in Indonesia compared to those in countries like Singapore and Malaysia. The speaker criticizes the Indonesian healthcare system for being expensive and corrupt, leading many Indonesians to seek more affordable and reliable medical treatment abroad. The speaker also suggests that corruption within the healthcare system inflates costs, making it inaccessible for many.

💡Corruption

Corruption is described as the misuse of power for personal gain, particularly within the healthcare system and government in Indonesia. The speaker argues that corruption is rampant in the Indonesian healthcare system, where doctors and pharmaceutical companies are allegedly involved in unethical practices, making healthcare unaffordable. Corruption is also linked to broader governance issues, where the elite manipulate the system to their advantage.

💡Elite

The term 'Elite' refers to the small, privileged group in power in Indonesia, who are accused of manipulating laws and governance to maintain their status and control. The speaker argues that the government primarily serves the interests of this elite group rather than the general population. This critique extends to the legal system, where the elite can swiftly change laws to benefit themselves, while ordinary citizens' concerns are ignored.

💡Justice

Justice in the video refers to the fair treatment of citizens and the enforcement of laws. The speaker criticizes the Indonesian legal system for being slow and ineffective, particularly for ordinary citizens, while the elite can quickly alter laws to suit their needs. The lack of justice is a central theme, as the speaker highlights the difficulty in achieving legal resolutions for common people, leading to a sense of injustice and frustration.

💡Social Media

Social Media is discussed as a tool for the public to expose and challenge injustices. The speaker notes that when citizens try to use social media to make their voices heard or to expose wrongdoing, they risk being silenced by laws such as the ITE Law in Indonesia, which can be used to punish those who criticize the government. This reflects the tension between freedom of expression and government control.

💡ITE Law

The ITE Law refers to the Information and Electronic Transactions Law in Indonesia, which regulates online behavior and content. The speaker highlights this law as a tool used by the government to suppress dissent and silence those who attempt to expose corruption or criticize the authorities through social media. The law is depicted as a means for the elite to maintain control and prevent the public from holding them accountable.

💡Political Power

Political Power in the video refers to the control and influence exercised by the elite in Indonesia, particularly in shaping laws and governance to their benefit. The speaker emphasizes how political power is concentrated within a small group of elites, who ensure that their families and allies remain in control. This concentration of power is seen as a barrier to genuine democratic governance and justice for ordinary citizens.

Highlights

Thousands of Indonesians are moving abroad each year, with Singapore being a popular destination due to its perceived advantages over Indonesia.

Many Indonesians find life abroad more comfortable and less restrictive compared to their experiences in Indonesia.

In Singapore, Indonesians can maintain their national identity without facing discrimination, a contrast to the experiences of some in Indonesia.

There is a growing trend of Indonesians seeking medical treatment abroad, often due to lower costs and better service compared to domestic healthcare.

The high cost of medical treatment in Indonesia is linked to corruption within the healthcare system, including unethical practices between doctors and pharmaceutical companies.

The Indonesian government is criticized for neglecting the needs of its citizens, focusing instead on serving the interests of the elite.

Reports of crimes or grievances in Indonesia often go unaddressed, leading to widespread frustration among the populace.

The speaker argues that the legal system in Indonesia is biased towards the elite, with laws being quickly adapted to benefit those in power while ignoring the needs of the general population.

The speaker suggests that viral campaigns or public pressure are sometimes the only ways to achieve justice, but these actions are increasingly being criminalized under new laws.

New laws in Indonesia are seen as tools to silence dissent and prevent the public from holding the powerful accountable.

There is a growing disillusionment with the political system in Indonesia, as political parties and coalitions are perceived to be in league with the elite.

The speaker expresses skepticism about the possibility of achieving political change through traditional means, given the current state of the political system.

The speaker criticizes the political process, suggesting that elections are manipulated to ensure the elite maintain control.

Despite the challenges, the speaker concludes by stating a preference for staying in Indonesia and striving for change from within rather than seeking foreign citizenship.

The final statement is a bold declaration of intent to aim for the presidency as a means of making a real difference in Indonesia.

Transcripts

video ini dibuat bersamaan dengan ribuan

warga negara Indonesia yang pindah ke

luar negeri jadi warga negara asing e

rata-ratanya Menurut data yang ada itu

sekitar 1000 orang warga negara

Indonesia pindah ke Singapura Singapura

saja itu sekitar 1000 orang setiap

tahunnya kenapa bisa seperti itu ya

alasan sederhananya adalah karena di

sana lebih menyenangkan sedangkan di

sini lebih menyempitkan kalau misalkan

Baraya pindah ke Singapura Baraya tetap

bisa mempertahankan identitas

keindonesiaan tanpa harus dirasisin

sedangkan kalau di Indonesia Baraya

sipit sedikit aja ditanya Agamanya apa

Baraya hitam sedikit aja ditanyain

kosmetiknya Apa itu kondisi di Indonesia

kan seperti itu maka bisa disimpulkan

bahwa 5 juta km per wilayah nusantara

ini wilayah Indonesia ini ternyata

menyempitkan sedangkan Singapura yang

wilayahnya hanya segede Jakarta itu

ternyata sangat-sangat melapangkan luar

biasa tren kepindahan warga negara

Indonesia ke luar negeri ini adalah

kelanjutan dari tren berobat ke luar

negeri jadi sejak beberapa tahun yang

lalu itu memang ada tren berobat ke luar

negeri karena apa karena jauh lebih

murah Jadi kalau misalkan Baraya

sekarang Baraya ngaku sakit aja sakit

berat kanker misalkan datang ke

dokter-dokter di Indonesia maka ada

potensi Baraya diporotin duit sampai

ratusan juta rupiah tapi dengan keluhan

yang sama silakan Baraya datang ke

Singapura datang ke Malaysia Baraya

tidak akan diapa-apain Baraya mungkin

hanya dicek diajak ngobrol kemudian

kalaupun harus berobat biayanya hanya

puluhan juta atau bahkan lebih murah

daripada itu dan tidak ada prosedur

operasi begini dan begitu biasa aja

bahkan kadang-kadang juga enggak dikasih

obat hanya dikasih konsultasi begini dan

begitu cek kalau tidak percaya kenapa

bisa seperti itu ya karena di Indonesia

ada sebuah fenomena di balik gunung es

yaitu suap jadi dokter-dokter di

Indonesia dengan tukang Farmasi itu

biasanya terlibat pada rangkaian

prostitusi aneh di situ yang menyebabkan

harga berobat di Indonesia menjadi

sangat mahal nah fenomena dari banyaknya

warga negara Indonesia yang pindah ke

luar negeri dan banyak warga negara

Indonesia yang harus berobat ke luar

negeri adalah karena negara ini

sebenarnya tidak diurus jadi setiap ada

penyimpangan setiap ada kejelekan setiap

ada kezaliman setiap ada kejahatan itu

akan diabaikan Kenapa karena negara ini

memang bukan ngurusin hal-hal yang

seperti itu negara ini ngurusin kalangan

elit saja

ngaku enggak jadi Coba silakan Baraya

buktikan apakah pernyataan saya Ini

salah atau tidak Baraya sekarang lapor

kepada polisi misalkan Pak anak saya

dicabuli tunggu 1 tahun Apa yang akan

terjadi saya menduga tidak akan terjadi

apa-apa Baraya coba lapor ke tukang

Pertanahan di Indonesia Pak tanah saya

diserobot sama orang tidak dikenal

Tunggu 10 tahun apakah laporan Baraya

itu akan ditanggapi atau tidak Baraya

sekarang lapor kepada pemerintah Pak

anak saya jadi korban zonasi di

sekolahnya nya Coba tunggu seumur hidup

Baraya Apakah Baraya akan ditanggapi

laporannya Atau tidak Silakan cek

sekarang karena apa negara kita Ternyata

bukan untuk rakyatnya negara kita bukan

untuk

270 juta penduduknya negara ini hanya

untuk kalangan elit elit saja laporan

Baraya yang menumpuk itu hanya akan

terabaikan hanya akan mengendap dan

akhirnya terkubur di dalam genangan

lumpur tangisan Baraya

sendiri bahkan undang-undang yang ada

itu disinyalir bukan untuk mengakomodasi

kepentingan-kepentingan kita tapi

mengakomodasi kepentingan-kepentingan si

elit dan si paling elit dan

keluarga-keluarganya

misal kita menggugat ke MK atau ke ma

atau ke yang gitu-gitulah misalkan

tentang kerusakan lingkungan akibat

pertambangan masalah-masalah di Papua

Baraya silakan ajukan ke ma Baraya

silakan ajukan ke MK Butuh waktu lama

sekali untuk rapat untuk begini dan

begitu Itu pun kalau jadi kemudian

Baraya silakan ajukan masalah-masalah

soal ormas itu juga bakal diabaikan

Baraya membutuhkan masalahmasalah ini

untuk diajukan kepada MK dan Ma dan

sebagainya Itu juga mungkin saja Baraya

akan diabaikan setidaknya dalam beberapa

puluh tahun undang-undang perampasan

aset misalkan itu mengandap sama selama

berapa tahun berapa puluh tahun gitu

Tapi ketika Si paling elit itu ngomong

bahwa anak saya pengin jadi Pejabat itu

dalam 2 hari dalam 3 hari dalam sehari

itu MK dan Ma bisa langsung

mengabulkannya anak saya pengin jadi ini

itu bisa langsung cepat langsung

undang-undangnya langsung berubah gitu

mk-nya langsung berubah apanya langsung

berubah gitu itu di Indonesia itu

kejadiannya seperti itu mau ngebantah ya

kan itu faktanya memang terjadi seperti

itu makanya si elit dan si paling elit

itu

anaknya kakeknya cucunya buyutnya

semuanya jadi pejabat bahkan ada yang si

paling elit itu punya anak tiga

tiga-tiganya jadi pejabat tiga-tiganya

jadi ketua partai politik tiga-tiganya

jadi apa ya semuanya Kayak gitulah

enggak tahu itu di Indonesia apa di

negara yang lain tapi nah gimana kalau

kita melawan misalkan Kok bisa seperti

itu negara ini kenapa kayak gitu terus

Ya udah kalau misalkan negara gini

begitu terus maka kita akan melawan

dengan cara memviralkannya no viral no

Justice misalkan gitu ya Lalu apa yang

terjadi ya muncul undang-undang ite

Siapa yang mau memviralkan bakal masuk

penjara muncul undang-undang penyiaran

Siapa yang melakukan investigasi bakal

masuk penjara Kemudian muncul RUU Polri

Siapa yang bikin onar di memviralkan dan

lain-lain akses internetnya akan dicabut

gitu ya kayak gitu akhirnya jadi rakyat

enggak bisa ngapa-ngapain rakyat mau

ngeluh rakyat mau apa juga ya akhirnya

bisa aja kena undang-undang Ute apa

segala rupa langsung eh ite langsung

dihilangin dan sebagainya pertanyaan

saya adalah itu yang bikin undang-undang

itu kan dan merangkai rancangan

undang-undang itu kan adalah orang-orang

DPR DPR itu ngakunya kan Perwakilan

Rakyat perwakilan kita-kita ini katanya

ya tapi Mana buktinya coba saya misalkan

tanyakan rakyat golongan mana yang minta

agar setiap rakyat Indonesia tidak boleh

melakukan investigasi terhadap hal-hal

yang mencurigakan di Indonesia di mana

rakyat Indonesia golongan mana yang

menghendaki agar kalau misalkan ada

rakyat yang protes yang komplain dan

sebagainya kemudian ee internetnya bisa

dicabut secara sepihak gitu siapa rakyat

yang menghendaki itu ya tidak ada ini

sebenarnya adalah dari kelompok-kelompok

tertentu saja dari elit-elit dari si

paling elit dan keluarga-keluarganya

saja yang tidak mau dikritik yang

penginnya disembah apa segala rupa Jadi

mereka tetap ingin belanggeng berkuasa

ya sedangkan kita-kita Ya hanya

digunakan suaranya saja menjelang

Pilkada nah pilkadanya juga diobok-obok

biar suara-suara kita itu bisa masuk ke

corong mereka dengan sangat

sebaik-baiknya gitu ah kalau misalkan

seperti itu Saya mau berjuang melalui

politik karena dengan jadi partai

politik maka saya bisa ini ya Enggak

bisa juga Baraya karena partai politik

sekarang sudah jadi milik mereka semua

itu kan koalisinya besar ya jadi

partai-partai itu juga pada akhirnya

terlibat aja dalam konspirasi-konspirasi

besar yang kita tidak ketahui

juntrungannya apa ya Semoga aja mereka

punya itikad baik kan kita mah enggak

tahu cuman bisa menduga-duga cuman bisa

berburuk sangka gitu ya lalu Jadi

bagaimana dong Apakah Baraya

mempertimbangkan untuk pindah ke warga

neegaraan kalau saya sih

tidak saya berpikirnya dari daripada

Saya pindah ke warga negaraan Mendingan

jadi presiden