AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU Review & Benchmarks

Summary

The script reviews AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU, an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a focus on gaming performance. It compares the 7800X 3D with its predecessors and competitors, particularly the Intel 13700K. The review delves into the CPU's efficiency, frame time data, and performance in various games, revealing its strengths and weaknesses. The 7800X 3D shows promise in games that utilize its 3D V-Cache technology but falls short in production workloads and scenarios favoring higher frequencies.

Takeaways

• 😀 The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor that stands out for its gaming performance, particularly when the 3D V-Cache is utilized effectively.
• 💾 The 7800X 3D comes with AMD's 3D V-Cache technology, which is a single CCD design that avoids the core parking issue seen in the 7950X3D and 7900X3D, enhancing gaming performance without needing to disable cores.
• 🆚 The main competitor to the 7800X 3D is Intel's Core i7-13700K, with the 7800X 3D showing promising results in direct comparisons, especially in games that can leverage the 3D V-Cache.
• 📈 The 7800X 3D demonstrates significant power efficiency improvements, with a notable reduction in power consumption compared to its predecessors and the i7-13700K.
• 📊 The review introduces more detailed frame time charts to provide a deeper analysis of the gaming experience, showing both the 7800X 3D and the i7-13700K have minor spikes but maintain a consistent frame-to-frame experience.
• 🔥 In certain games like CS:GO, the 7800X 3D may not outperform the 7700X due to the game's preference for higher frequency over the additional cache.
• 💻 For production workloads, the additional 3D V-Cache does not provide as much benefit as it does in gaming, making other CPUs like the 7950X or 3900K more suitable for tasks like rendering, compiling, and compression.
• 💰 The 7800X 3D offers excellent value for gaming but may not be the best choice for those who require a CPU for both gaming and production workloads due to its mixed performance in non-gaming tasks.
• 📉 The introduction of the 7800X 3D has made the 7900X 3D look less competitive in the gaming market, potentially rendering it a less attractive option for gamers.
• 🔧 The video script also mentions the importance of a clean OS installation when testing CPUs to avoid performance issues caused by driver contamination from previous CPU testing.

Q & A

What is the main feature that differentiates the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU from its predecessors?

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU features an 8-core, 16-thread design with AMD's 3D V-Cache technology on a single CCD, eliminating the need for core parking that was required in previous models like the 7950X3D and 7900X3D to avoid performance hits due to cross CCD communication.

How does the Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU's design compare to the competition, specifically the Intel Core i7-13700K?

The Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor without the need for core parking, which is a significant advantage over the Intel Core i7-13700K in certain gaming scenarios where the 3D V-Cache can be leveraged effectively. However, the i7-13700K may still have advantages in other areas such as production workloads where the 3D V-Cache may not offer as much benefit.

What is the significance of the 3D V-Cache technology in the context of gaming performance?

The 3D V-Cache technology provides additional L3 cache, which can significantly improve gaming performance in titles that can effectively utilize the extra cache. This can result in higher frame rates and more consistent frame times, leading to a smoother gaming experience.

How does the Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU handle power efficiency compared to other CPUs in its class?

The Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU is noted for its efficiency, particularly in all-core workloads. It consumes significantly less power than the Intel Core i7-13700K, making it a more power-efficient choice for gaming systems where power consumption is a concern.

What are the potential issues with upgrading to an AMD Ryzen 7000 series CPU from an older model without a clean OS installation?

Upgrading to an AMD Ryzen 7000 series CPU without a clean OS installation can lead to contamination by previous core parking add-ons, which can negatively affect the performance of the new CPU. This is because the OS may continue to apply settings intended for higher-end x3d CPUs, leading to suboptimal performance.

How does the Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU perform in terms of thermals under load?

The Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU, when tested with a liquid cooler, operates at relatively lower temperatures compared to other Zen 4 CPUs. This is due to its lower thermal design power (TDP) and thermal velocity boost (TVB) settings, which are in place to protect the sensitive 3D V-Cache.

What impact does the 3D V-Cache have on production workloads such as rendering or compiling?

The 3D V-Cache may not provide significant benefits for production workloads like rendering or compiling. These tasks often rely more on core count and frequency rather than cache size, making other CPUs like the Ryzen 9 7900X or Intel Core i9-13900K potentially better choices for such applications.

How does the Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU compare to the Ryzen 5 7600X in terms of gaming performance?

While the Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU has the advantage of additional cache, the Ryzen 5 7600X may still offer competitive gaming performance, especially in titles where frequency is more critical than cache size. The actual performance difference will be game-dependent.

What is the reviewer's recommendation for users who are primarily focused on gaming?

For users primarily focused on gaming, the reviewer suggests considering the Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU, especially for games that can effectively utilize the 3D V-Cache. However, the actual performance gain will vary game by game, and the user should consider the specific titles they play.

How does the Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU stack up against the Ryzen 9 7900X3D in terms of value for gaming?

The Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU offers better gaming performance in certain titles compared to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, making the latter a less attractive option for gamers due to its higher price and diminishing returns in gaming scenarios.

Outlines

00:00

🚀 AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU Overview and Introduction

The script introduces the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU, an 8-core, 16-thread processor with a notable price tag of $450 and AMD's 3D V-Cache technology. It contrasts the 7800X 3D with the 700X 3D, highlighting the latter's limitations due to core parking issues. The 7800X 3D avoids this by using a single CCD, which is crucial for gaming performance. The script also mentions the competitive landscape, including the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD's own 5800X3D. The video promises an in-depth review with additional frame time data to provide a comprehensive gaming experience analysis. A sponsorship note introduces a new solder mat product, emphasizing its utility in various applications from hobbyist projects to professional soldering tasks.

05:00

🔍 Deep Dive into 7800X 3D's Performance and Testing Methodology

This paragraph delves into the testing methodology and potential pitfalls when transitioning between different CPU generations, particularly the AMD X3D series. It discusses the importance of a clean OS installation to avoid performance contamination from previous testing. The script explains how the 7800X 3D's single CCD design avoids the core parking issue seen in other X3D CPUs, leading to better gaming performance. It also touches on the CPU's frequency, which is intentionally lowered to create market segmentation and avoid competition with AMD's high-end CPUs. The power efficiency of the 7800X 3D is highlighted, showing a significant reduction in power consumption compared to the 7700X and the Intel i7-13700K. The paragraph concludes with an introduction to frame time charts, which provide a detailed look at the gaming experience by showing the time taken to render each frame.

10:01

📊 Frame Time Analysis and Gaming Performance Comparison

The script provides a detailed analysis of frame times for the 7800X 3D and compares it with the 13700K across various games. It explains the importance of frame times in assessing the gaming experience and how they can reveal performance issues not apparent in average frame rates. The comparison shows similar performance in CS:GO, with both CPUs having minimal and infrequent frame time spikes. However, in Cyberpunk 2077, the 7800X 3D shows more consistent frame times, despite occasional spikes that align with in-game scene changes. The script also covers performance in Far Cry 6, where both CPUs exhibit excellent frame-to-frame consistency, and in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, where the 7800X 3D leads in average FPS but has a slightly higher frequency of minor frame time spikes.

15:04

🏆 Benchmark Results and CPU Performance Evaluation

This section presents benchmark results for the 7800X 3D and its competitors in various gaming scenarios. The 7800X 3D shows strong performance, particularly in Far Cry 6 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, where it leads in average FPS. However, in games like CS:GO and Final Fantasy 14, the CPU's additional V-Cache doesn't provide a significant advantage, and frequency becomes more critical. The script also notes that the 7800X 3D's performance is highly dependent on the game, with some titles benefiting more from the V-Cache than others. The Intel i7-13700K is highlighted as a strong competitor, often matching or slightly outperforming the 7800X 3D in certain games.

20:07

🛠️ Production Testing and Thermal Performance

The script shifts focus to production workloads, where the 7800X 3D's value proposition is less clear. It underperforms in tasks such as Blender rendering, compiling, and file compression when compared to CPUs with higher frequencies or more cores. The thermal performance of the 7800X 3D is also discussed, noting that while it runs cooler than the 7700X under the same cooling conditions, temperature comparisons between brands or architectures are not meaningful due to differences in thermal management and sensor placement.

25:08

🌡️ Thermal Considerations and Final Verdict

This paragraph reiterates the importance of considering thermals within the same architecture for meaningful comparisons. It emphasizes that the 7800X 3D's thermal performance is good for a Zen 4 CPU, but thermals should not be the sole determinant of a CPU's value. The script concludes by summarizing the 7800X 3D's strengths and weaknesses. It is praised for its efficiency and performance in certain gaming scenarios where the V-Cache is beneficial. However, it falls short in production workloads and is not recommended for users whose primary use is not gaming. The 7900X 3D is deemed as having poor value for gaming, and the 7800X 3D is positioned as the top choice for AMD's gaming-oriented CPUs.

Keywords

💡AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU is the central focus of the video, being a high-performance processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. It is equipped with AMD's 3D V-Cache technology, which enhances the CPU's L3 cache capacity, potentially improving gaming and application performance. The script discusses its comparison with other CPUs, its efficiency, and performance in various benchmarks.

💡3D V-Cache

3D V-Cache is a technology developed by AMD that stacks an additional layer of cache on top of the processor die, increasing the L3 cache size. This technology is highlighted in the script as a key feature of the 7800X 3D CPU, which can help reduce latency and improve performance in gaming and certain applications.

💡Core Parking

Core parking refers to the practice of disabling certain CPU cores to optimize performance in specific tasks, such as gaming. The script mentions that AMD's 7950X3D and 7900X3D CPUs had a core parking conundrum where half the cores were effectively turned off to avoid performance penalties when using the 3D V-Cache. The 7800X 3D resolves this issue with a single CCD design.

💡CCD (Core Complex Die)

A Core Complex Die (CCD) is a part of AMD's CPU architecture that contains multiple processor cores. The script explains that the 7800X 3D uses a single CCD, which helps avoid the performance issues associated with core parking and inter-CCD communication seen in other models.

💡13700K

The 13700K refers to Intel's Core i7-13700K CPU, which is presented in the script as a major competitor to AMD's 7800X 3D. The video compares the performance of these two processors in various gaming and productivity scenarios.

💡Frame Time

Frame time is the duration it takes for a single frame of video to be rendered and displayed. The script discusses the importance of frame time data in evaluating the gaming performance of CPUs, as it provides a more detailed look at the consistency of performance compared to average frame rates.

💡Power Efficiency

Power efficiency in the context of the script refers to the amount of energy a CPU uses to perform a given task, with lower values indicating better efficiency. The 7800X 3D is highlighted for its power efficiency, especially in all-core workloads, which is beneficial for both gaming and overall system performance.

💡Thermals

Thermals relate to the temperature management of a CPU, which is crucial for maintaining performance and reliability. The script provides an educational note on the importance of thermals and how they differ between CPU architectures, using the 7800X 3D and 7700X as examples.

💡Production Workloads

Production workloads refer to tasks typically associated with content creation or workstation applications, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and coding. The script discusses the performance of the 7800X 3D in these scenarios, noting that the additional 3D V-Cache may not always provide a significant benefit.

💡Gaming Performance

Gaming performance is a central theme of the video, with the script detailing how the 7800X 3D CPU performs in various games compared to other CPUs. The discussion includes the impact of the 3D V-Cache on gaming, as well as the importance of frame time consistency for a smooth gaming experience.

💡Value Proposition

The value proposition of a product is its worth or usefulness in relation to its cost. The script evaluates the 7800X 3D CPU's value for gaming and production workloads, comparing it to other CPUs like the 7900X3D and 13700K to determine if the price is justified by the performance gains.

Highlights

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X 3D CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor that stands out in performance compared to the 700X3D.

The 7800X 3D CPU comes with AMD's 3D V-Cache technology, offering a unique advantage in certain gaming scenarios.

The 7800X 3D resolves the core parking issue found in the 7950X3D and 7900X3D, providing a more streamlined gaming experience.

The 7800X 3D's main competition is the Intel Core i7-13700K, with AMD's previous 5800X3D still being a strong contender.

The review includes an in-depth analysis with additional frame time charts for a more empirical look at the gaming experience.

The 7800X 3D's single CCD design avoids the latency issues associated with cross-CCD communication seen in other models.

The 7800X 3D intentionally has a lower frequency to prevent it from competing too hard with AMD's high-end CPUs.

The review highlights the importance of a clean OS installation when testing CPUs to avoid performance contamination from previous settings.

Power efficiency is a significant aspect of the 7800X 3D CPUs, with the 7800X 3D showing impressive results in all-core workloads.

The 7800X 3D demonstrates a substantial power consumption reduction compared to the 7700X and i7-13700K in full load scenarios.

Frame time charts reveal细微 differences in gaming performance between the 7800X 3D and its competitors.

The 7800X 3D shows excellent frame-to-frame consistency in games like CS:GO and Cyberpunk 2077, despite occasional spikes.

In games like Far Cry 6, the 7800X 3D takes advantage of its 3D V-Cache, outperforming other CPUs significantly.

The review points out that the 7800X 3D's value proposition is primarily for gaming, with less benefit in production workloads.

The 7800X 3D's thermal performance is solid, with lower temperatures than expected for Zen 4, due to its lower thermal limit.

The 7800X 3D's introduction may render the 7900X3D obsolete, offering better performance at a similar price point.

The review concludes that the 7800X 3D is a strong contender for gamers, but its value diminishes for those focused on production tasks.

The 7800X 3D's efficiency and performance in games that leverage 3D V-Cache make it a compelling option for gamers seeking high frame rates.

The review suggests that the Intel Core i7-13700K may be a more balanced choice for users needing performance in both gaming and production.

Transcripts

the biggest thing that the 7800x3d does

is make the 700x3d look like trash which

actually should be the opening line for

this video so we'll just

today we're reviewing amd's new ryzen 7

7800x 3D CPU this is an 8 core 16 thread

CPU it's 450 and it comes with the amd's

3db cash but it's a single CCD that's

the core part in all of the specs

because oh it's the core part that

wasn't intentional it's the main part of

importance though for this because the

7950x3d and the 7900 x3d both had a core

parking conundrum where you effectively

turn off half the cores in order to play

games and it works okay but this doesn't

need to do that so the closest

competition here is going to be the

13700k the 5800x3d from AMD previously

that's still a fierce fighter right now

and we'll be looking at both of those

along with the other over a dozen CPUs

on our charts and we're excited for this

review specifically because we're adding

a lot of depth in this so we always

collect frame time data that's how we

build our frame rate chart but this time

we're going to present a couple more

frame time charts to give you a more

empirical look at the gaming experience

frame to frame between the 7800x3d and

the 13700k

and the boxes on the floor didn't have

CPUs in them just so we're clear on that

but let's get started this video is

brought to you by us and our brand new

projects and solder mat on

store.gamersaccess.net we just launched

this mat and the reception has been

amazing our new mat is made of an

extremely high heat resistant silicone

and is perfect for everything from

hobbyist projects like Gundam building

up to soldering components and it can

take direct exposure to soldering irons

flux tinting the materials heat guns all

without issue our mat has carefully

placed a larger sized screw sorters and

small part organizers with the left side

outfitted with larger part trays for

phone screens and heat sinks screwdriver

holders dot the mat in different places

and depths making it easy to organize

paint brushes drivers tweezers and flux

and they're accompanied with spool

organizers to make it simple to keep

track of everything in one place our

brand new mats are in stock and shipping

now on store.amersexus.net and support

our in-depth reviews like this one

directly grab one today all right so for

the data today as stated we're really

excited for it because we've added more

we have 1440p charts more than usual we

typically don't include them but we

collect the numbers and then we also

have in addition to the frame time data

uh individually broken out for the 3700k

comparison we've brought in some really

good Showcases of terrible data that is

easy to run into with the CPU if you're

using a contaminated OS we'll show that

and plenty more like power efficiency

gaming and production so here's the

quick overview for the parts the 7550x3d

and the 7900x3d have already launched

they came out about a month before this

we reviewed both of them separately and

we explained the CCD issue and the core

parking issue in detail in the 7950x3d

review so we'll leave that there for you

if you want to learn about it if you

don't know

the 7000 X 3D CPUs stack the V cash on

only one CCD so AMD composition for

ryzen CPU 7000 series right now is going

to be a maximum of three chip Lids where

you have one is the i o die doesn't

count just ignore it one is the primary

CCD one is the secondary where secondary

isn't always there and primary is the

one that gets the V cash on the previous

x3d CPUs you would have to park half of

the cores or not use them in gaming

because otherwise you end up having to

cross the interconnect or the infinity

fabric to go from the secondary CCD to

the primary CCD if there is a cash hit

on that V cash that's stacked the added

latency was worse for performance than

just restraining all gaming traffic to a

single CCD and that's where the 7800x 3D

comes in it resolves the issue by moving

to a simpler layout and the reason for

that is because the 700x3d when you park

the cores so you're not using that

second CCD and potentially hindering

latency heads you're cutting it down to

a six core CPU effectively for gaming

whereas this is eight and it's still

single CCD so don't be surprised when

the 78x3 app performance 79 only in

scenarios where the frequency is more

beneficial will it really uh be more of

a toss-up or allow the 790 claw backs on

that loss because AMD has segmented the

7800x3d down in frequency enough so that

it doesn't compete too hard with amd's

own high-end CPUs as for those specs the

78x3d drops the frequency hard to just 5

gigahertz has the up to Max Boost number

that's a big fall from the 7950x3d is a

5.7 gigahertz and we suspect that's to

create the segmentation now as with the

750 x3d it's incredibly easy to screw up

the install or testing for the 7800x3d

we installed an entirely new Os from

this because trying to transition

between the x3d CPUs and this generation

causes problems it contaminates the OS

and here's an example of why that

happened as a reminder this chart is for

the 7950x3d and half of the cores are

parked they're doing nothing and that's

during gaming that's a good thing

because it's performance tanks from

Cross CCD V cash hits otherwise we

talked about this in the last one and

here's the 7800x 3D version of that

chart this is bad data though this chart

is on the same OS we used for the

7950x3d but with a full manual wipe of

the chipset drivers and with

installation of new drivers from scratch

even with all of that careful removal

and swapping of the chipset drivers the

OS remained contaminated by Andy's core

parking add-ons that are meant for the

higher end x3d CPUs and so half of the

cores on the 7800 X 3D were parked as

well that's bad because of the single

CCD stuff we talked about earlier this

would ruin results if the tester doesn't

notice it we installed the new OS this

resolves the problem completely and

means that there are no more driver

Gremlins left behind so we're all good

for our data but we wanted to show you

what it'll look like if you end up

upgrading or something like that in the

future let's look at frequency frequency

is important to understand on this part

because AMD is tweaking the frequency so

far down on the 7800x3d it's possible

that it actually underperforms versus a

7700x in scenarios where the V cash

isn't helpful this plot shows a

sustained all core workload the 7800 xvd

ran at about 48 50 megahertz when

averaging all cores this is

significantly lower than we're used to

seeing on Zen 4 parts and explain some

of the upcoming disparities adding the

7700x to the Chart we see an average of

5180 to 5200 megahertz all core it's a

substantial uplift and that'll benefit

it heavily in anything that favors

frequency to cash that's not just single

threat either this is an all thread load

now we're getting into Power testing

which is one of the most interesting

aspects for the xbd CPUs because they're

very efficient so for power testing we

have two primary charts one is power

efficiency one is power consumption and

all core workload for power consumption

we look at the EPS 12 volt rail current

draw and we use that to get an accurate

number for the wattage that the CPU is

using for efficiency what we're looking

at is the amount of energy required to

complete a known amount of work so let's

look at the first chart here we go then

all Core 100 power consumption has the

7800x3d at 86 Watts when measured

directly at the EPS 12 volt cables it's

about the same power consumption as the

efficiency tuned non-x R5 7600 and R9

7900 which is great positioning for

perspective the 7700x pulled 148 watts

in the same test so the 7800x3d has

improved in at least this aspect

compared to the i7 13700k is 280 Watts

under the same full load the 7800 X 3D

maintains a significant Advantage it's a

200 watt reduction it's a lot this

doesn't factor in low load scenarios or

mixed load scenarios but for all core

production style workloads like blender

it's significantly lower power as for

whether it's more efficient for at least

this test that's our next chart here's

the efficiency chart the 7800 x3d is 18

watt hour result has it more efficient

than the 7700x which needed 29 Watt

hours to complete the same work that's a

reduction of nearly 40 percent in what

our cost or energy consumption compared

to the 13700k at 38 Watt hours the

7800x3d benefits from a 52 reduction in

Watt hours and pose significantly

advantaged efficiency in an all-core

full load scenario being the most

efficient doesn't technically mean that

it completes first or anything like that

it just means that it completes a known

amount of work with lower overall energy

consumption for that same fixed work

that's being completed now we're getting

to the frame time charts we're

experimenting with publishing more of

these in our reviews because we it's the

most empirical purest look at the frame

to Frame data that you can get but the

problem is frame time charts are not

clean you can't get a lot of bars on

them you can't get a lot of comparisons

on them once your past two devices it

gets kind of hard to interpret and read

them and the lines obscure each other so

for this we have just two CPUs the 13 7

and the 78 x3d and then we have

everything else in the rate charts as

usual but let us know what you think

about this because we are adding the

extra data if people don't care that's

fine you can always get it in the

average FPS charts but this gives you a

little bit more info so uh first of all

some quick education here frame times

are simply put the metric that is used

to derive the frame rate you turn the

time into a rate it's pretty simple math

but the reason frame times are

interesting is because uh frame rates

and averages even one percent lows and

0.1 percent lows which are averages

those start to blur over any massive

excursions or minor problems in if they

are not sufficient to change the average

itself in a way that triggers the

technician to check that data more

closely now normally that's fine because

for us when we see numbers that look out

of place we check more closely we give

you these charts but now we want to

present them uh more frequently so what

you're going to be looking at is the

y-axis is milliseconds required to

render or present the frame to the

screen and excursions greater than eight

milliseconds tend to become noticeable

but primarily if they are frequent in

occurrence whereas excursions that are

significant let's say 150 milliseconds

or especially 500 milliseconds half a

second one of those is noticeable as

like a hitch or a stutter so that's what

you're gonna be looking at and these

will be just head to head let's get

started here's the Cs go frame time plot

at 1080p the 13700k plots between two to

four milliseconds on average which is

ridiculous with two spikes to around 10

milliseconds and a few other minor

spikes none of these are frequent or

large enough to be noticeable you need

more frequent eight millisecond plus

deviations or much larger excursions the

frames of frame experience is consistent

here the same goes when we add the

7800x3d to the plot this runs almost

exactly the same intervals although with

marginally wider ranges top to bottom

against the average the spikes are

similar in count and the difference

between the Peaks is within reasonable

run to run variation on the two CPUs so

they're about the same with cyberpunk

the 13700k fluctuated below 8

milliseconds on average the load is

easier for the CPU earlier in the test

with difficulty ramping towards the end

only two massive spikes appear and one

breaks the chart bounds the worst of

these two lands at 42 milliseconds which

is enough of a swing to be briefly

noticeable as a stutter maybe depends on

what you're doing in the game when

plotting the 7800x3d we noticed frequent

excursions from the mean the frame times

regularly jumps about four milliseconds

over the prior frame but a four

millisecond Delta itself isn't

particularly bad and this isn't as bad

as micro stutter but the consistency

with which it happens indicates an issue

and not just some one-off spike despite

this the CPU remains more than playable

the x3d spikes at the same spot as the

13700k did at the end with a timing

lining up on further inspection with a

scene change in the game the x3d spikes

to 60 milliseconds here versus 42 on the

other but it happens on both so this

effectively nullifies it in a comparison

because it's just it's a game loading

scene change in Far Cry 6 the overall

frame to frame consistency is excellent

on both CPUs the 13700k is slower and

frame rate and hits a snag of several

spikes around frame 700 the x3d is

technically faster in frame rate but has

its own occasional spikes on frame time

the spikes experienced on both of these

CPUs are a normal part of gaming they

aren't anomalous unplayable or anything

we'd characterize as weird it's just

software and both are fine despite their

unique behaviors the x3d is is

advantaged here over the 13700k that's

something we know about Far Cry with v

cash so now we're moving to the rate

comparison so average FPS one percent

and 0.1 percent loads shadow of the Tomb

Raiders up first this shows greater

response for x3d CPUs the 7800 x3d

positions itself in second just behind

the freshly retested 7950x3d at 386 FPS

average the 7800x3d leads the still good

5800x3d by 16 percent the 3900k by a

mass of 27 percent while being about 100

cheaper and the 13700k by 36 percent

although the 7800 xpd cost five to

fourteen percent more than the 13700k

depending on pricing at the time this

goes up that's far better scaling than

the one percent FPS for one percent more

money scale that we seem to be stuck on

for the GPU market so at least in CPU

land it's still somewhat sane the x3d

CPUs have established their own cluster

at the top of this chart demonstrating

that as we have said before it works

great when games can make use of it we

run 1440p for this one as well you can

see that the GPU has capped the maximum

performance for all CPUs expectedly but

the x3d chip still punch above

everything else on the charge testing

Counter-Strike GO at 1080p the R7 7800

x3d landed at 407 FPS average with lows

paced proportionally at 291 and 220 FPS

this is slightly better than the 7550x3d

that we just retested and the lows are

significantly better than the preferred

frequency test that we ran on the

7950x3d previously the direct 13700k

competitor manages to outperform amd's

7800 X 3D and average FPS marginally 1.6

percent here with one percent lows the

same and 0.1 percent lows worthy of

further inspection but we did that our

frame time chart earlier more

importantly the 7700x outperforms the

7800x3d here that was true of the 7950x

outperforming the 7950x3d as well the

extra for V cash just isn't helping the

7800x3 in this title that's fine they

don't always use every feature and in

this case CS go just cares more about

the frequency and kind of the cores than

it does that extra cash CS go at 1440p

is functionally the same it's CPU bound

so the results don't change we'll Breeze

past this chart Final Fantasy 14 end

Walker is next tested with the built-in

Benchmark to avoid the huge variable

presented by connecting to the network

the 7800xpd ran at 252 FPS average with

a low space as we'd expect for AMD CPUs

at 137 and 106 FPS average for one

percent and 0.1 percent lows the 13600k

maintains better lows and has a tied

average to the 7800 X 3D making the

7800xpd worse value than Intel's 300 I5

CPU this 7950x3d and 7900 xvd offer no

meaningful change from the new 7800 X 3D

maybe that's part of why AMD delayed the

launch on this one 1440p is largely the

same we're C CPU bound so that's good to

confirm and play it at 1440p with a 4090

it would still benefit from the same

CPUs as the 1080p performance we plotted

Far Cry 6 is another game that performs

particularly well with 3D V cash the

7800x3d is our new chart topper at 224

FPS average leading the 7950xpd by 12

percent and with lows about the same the

lead over the 3900k is similar with a 20

lead over the directly competing i7 at

13700k that's a good show in from amd's

newest part here the 13600k remains good

overall value though at a relatively

high end tying the 5800x video in

performance but the 7800x 3D takes away

all the high-end dominance from all the

other parts performance at 1440p is

about the same with some loss off the

very top end of the score the 7800 XD

maintains its leading position here

overall in cyberpunk 2077 the 7800 xpd

ran at 260 FPS average with lows at 118

and 79. that that has it about equal to

the 7900x3d which is not good for the

7900 x3d that is but it's behind the

13700k and frame time consistency the

averages are the same but as we saw in

our earlier frame time plot the 13700k

maintains an advantage in this specific

title the 750 XD pushes slightly higher

with its frequency Advantage F1 2022 is

next tested at 1080p High the 7800x3d

ran at 508 FPS average here allowing the

7950 xpd a lead of one percent it's

massive definitely worth hundreds of

dollars the 7800 actually that was

sarcasm before somebody goes and buys it

the 7800 X 3D leads the 7900x3d once

again thanks to its core Advantage when

gaming compared to the 3900k the 7800

x3d holds an 11 lead in average FPS with

lows also improved the 13700k gives up a

17 lead to the 7800x3d which again leads

in lows as seen in the frame time plots

this is another scenario where the x3d

CPUs actually seem to be doing something

the game can leverage it but it's a

scenario that makes the 7900x3d look

like a total waste in comparison to the

new 78 x3d kind of makes sense why AMD

delayed this one now in Total War

Warhammer 3 the 7800 XD pushed to 311

FPS average and functionally tied the 13

700k competition that's not great

considering the 3700k is cheaper but it

could be enough to hold the line when

considering the full picture of other

games we'll talk about that at the end

the 7800 X 3D app match is the 7900xpd

once again further driving the nail into

that coffin for gaming for the 79 xrd

The 13600k Remains the fiercest fighter

against all these expensive CPUs and

still offers some of the best overall

high-end value so it would be worth

considering giving up 10 FPS for big

savings that can be diverted to gpus or

memory instead now we're getting into

production testing this is workstation

applications content creation

applications things like that this is

where the value will start to degrade

because historically the additional cash

does not benefit these CPUs in the

applications we test for production as

much as say more cores or frequency

would blender Cycles rendering is first

this uses a tile-based renderer where

one tile is spawned For Thread even with

all 16 threads running the 7800 x3d is

heavily disadvantaged here the 7700x

outperforms it benefiting from the

higher frequency more than the cash the

13600k also embarrasses the 7800 xpd for

the price using its 6p cores and the

e-cores total in 12 threads with hyper

threading to land a 10.7 minute render

time that's a reduction of 16 percent

against the 7800 X 3D it's not a good

start for AMD on production value it can

do it but you really need to be buying

it as a gaming first CPU that can handle

this type of work as a secondary when

compiling the chromium code base the

7800 xod required 67 minutes to complete

the compile getting beaten once again by

by the 64-minute results of the 7700x

the 13600k has a 19 lead driving the

dagger in for amd's x3d in this type of

workload in file compression

benchmarking ranked in millions of

instructions per second the 7800x3d once

again falls behind it completes 118 000

mips here allowing the 7700x lead at

technically 122 000 mips and the 13600k

elite at 132 000 mips the comparably

priced 13 700k meanwhile is 35 ahead

with a 159 000 MIP score decompression

has the 7800x3d at 135 000 mips once

again positioning the 7700x ahead of it

in this one it at least ties the 13600k

and gets proportionally closer to the

13700k but the value is still bad Adobe

Premiere is tested in aggregate with a

Puget Suite analyzing scrubbing playback

render Time Warp stabilization and other

effects the 7800x3de scored 1000 57

points putting it behind the 5900x 7700x

13 600k and 13700k it's only

outperforming the R5 7600x and the

5800x3d from the recent Generations the

Photoshop is tested the same way just

with different filters and features the

7800 x3d ranks relatively high on this

charge but it's still behind the 7700x

and 13700k it manages to outperform at

least the 13600k though now we're moving

into thermals first of all thermals

can't be compared cross brand in any

meaningful way so Intel and AMD the

temperature means different things

because for example Intel has a 70

degree threshold for TVB to activate AMD

has pb2 where scaling is affected all

the way up the line and it boosts the TJ

Maxx now so you can't compare them cross

brand and really cross architecture you

shouldn't be either because sensors are

different spots they mean different

things and they report differently and

it just behaves differently but as a

reminder temperature even when we do

compare them within the same

architecture which we're going to do

today isn't some 3D Mark score so it's

not like this this one runs at 70c

that's not how it works it doesn't mean

anything because the cooler the ambient

temperature the cooler fan speed uh the

case all of these things the the load is

it AVX or not all of it impacts the

temperature that comes out the other end

all that matters for our testing here is

that is a pure a b comparison and we are

doing it for educational purposes to

look at how the 78x3d behaves versus the

7700x it's that simple the 7800x3d with

our liquid freezer 2 360 attached ran at

75 degrees Celsius this is relatively

low for Zen four because as another

reminder Zen 4 typically boosts the

clocks until it hits TJ Maxx in this

instance the 7800x3d has both a lower TJ

Maxx to protect the sensitive V cash and

also a lower frequency ceiling to

protect the 750 x3d from getting

cannibalized through hard 75 is

relatively low for this generation and

illustrates that we're hitting other

caps prior to the thermal limiter which

although lower is still higher than 175.

the 7700x however did boost the TJ Maxx

that's how it's designed with the same

cooler it pulled more power and pushed

frequency higher as you saw earlier

until it hit about 92 degrees Celsius

average all core moving on to the main

points then so the 7800x30 is extremely

efficient this follows on the same path

AMD was setting with its other x3d CPUs

not necessarily with the initial 7000

launch but they got there with eco mode

so it is very efficient in at least all

core workloads that's a good thing for

gaming we did see uplift and it was

meaningful when the 3db cache works and

it doesn't work in every game we've

talked about this a lot already not

going to cover when and why it works but

when it works it is actually good and it

does make the CPU strongly worth

considering we'll go over more of that

in a second this is a total waste in

production first use cases so if you are

not gaming as a primary use for your

computer you should buy something else

it's really as simple as a 7950x or

3900k 700k 13th gen seriously worth

considering for something like a desktop

class computer you use for Adobe

software compiling compression

decompression maybe but amd's more

competitive there especially

decompression either way this CPU does

not make sense for those use cases

because you're spending the money on

something that those applications can't

use you could spend that same money on a

more powerful CPU for those applications

but for gaming it's worth talking about

and then the last major point before we

get to the details is this as we said

earlier makes the 7900x3d look

absolutely terrible as any kind of value

for gaming and it's it's for easy

reasons we already explained them so

this basically pretend the 79x3d doesn't

exist this invalidates it and we had a

feeling it was going that direction when

we viewed the southern x3d a month or

whatever ago it was it's been a long

time now uh that that those CPUs have

been out and this one was in the wings

so going over the details uh the reason

it looks terrible is because it's

getting beaten in scenarios where the

eight cores on this are better than the

effect of six cores on the 79 when

you're parking the cores uh all you're

giving up there is between the two CPUs

is maybe a workstation Advantage

definitely and the 79x3d but for other

reasons already mentioned it's

irrelevant secondly uh the 7800x 3D for

gaming occasionally the 7700x Beats it

but that's when frequency matters more

than the additional cache we showed a

chart earlier demonstrating it but the

frequency is higher on the 7700x in our

testing for an awkward workload and that

benefits it in games where that's what

they care about really rapidly recapping

the charts then the biggest competitors

are the 13 7 and the 13-6 in CS go they

make more sense but that class for

performance 13700k at the same price

roughly or cheaper is better assuming no

other options exist than the 7800x3d in

cyberpunk the 13700k and 7800 xvd were

tied with the advantage to the 13700k

for lows in F1 there was a massive

performance boost for x3d as we've seen

before and a big gain versus the 13700k

Far Cry 6 78x3d was a clear leader Final

Fantasy 14 the 13 Seminary kit was a

clear leader so they're going back and

forth here in Shadow of the Tomb Raider

the 78x3d was a clear leader it's not

even closed and in Total War Warhammer

it was about tied so where that leaves

us then is I suppose analyzing how large

is the gap when there is a gap between

the CPU and to whom does the favor go

for the most part when there's a gap it

largely benefits the 7800x3d however

when the 7800 xvd is not leading the

13700k is lead other than Final Fantasy

it's maybe less impressive but overall

they do go back and forth a bit the

13700k to us uh maybe makes more sense

as an all-around CPU being a little bit

cheaper and uh also having advantages in

production workloads if you are only

gaming then the 7800 x3d suddenly

becomes much more worth considering but

unfortunately there's no easy answer for

unless you play one of the games that a

Reviewer is testing how much does it

help you personally because it is very

game to game it's not as clear a cut the

7800 activity is much better value than

the 700x3 the 79 now looks like a

complete another joke the 7950 xvd has

more or less been entirely invalidated

and more so maybe than previously

previously had that sort of but it's

technically the best that it could hold

on to but now it's not even really uh

it's not enough so

from our perspective you're either

looking at a 78x3d from AMD for the top

end gaming CPU just ignore the others

they're not worth the money and

sometimes they're worse or the 13700k

for the same price those are the two to

narrow it down a lot and the 13 6

remains amazing value if you want to get

basically top end CPU performance

for 300 to save money for your GPU or

Ram or something so that's it for this

one thanks for watching as always let us

know what you thought of the additional

depth on the framed lines if you want to

suspend review Air time on that in the

future we can add more of them or do

more interesting analysis If people

really like it uh something we did a

long time ago but we moved away from it

because just can't fit as much stuff on

the charts and uh requires every time a

little bit more audience education

because anytime you get new people in

who haven't seen them before we need to

explain it which is totally cool and I

love doing it but it does mean you get

an extra 20 second explainer every time

okay that's it for this one thanks for

watching as always subscribe for more go

to score.com net to grab one of our

brand new project and solder mats which

are awesome for things uh all the way

from model building and Miniatures up to

component repair soldering highly heat

resistant stuff check it out on the

store thanks for watching subscribe more

we'll see you all next time