The Frankfurt School: From a Failed Revolution to Critical Theory | Tom Nicholas
Summary
TLDRThe video script explores the Frankfurt School, a group of scholars influential in sociology and culture, known for their critical theory. It traces the school's origins from the aftermath of WWI, through the rise of fascism, into exile and eventual return to Germany. The script delves into the school's evolution from Marxist roots to a broader social science perspective, examining how societal structures, including the 'culture industry,' foster conformity and stifle individuality. The summary also touches on the school's impact on academic thought and its controversial reception by critics, particularly from the political right.
Takeaways
- đ« The Frankfurt School, officially the Institute for Social Research, had a profound impact on the study of society and culture, with scholars like Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse influencing various academic disciplines.
- đ The Frankfurt School is often criticized by political conservatives for allegedly undermining Western culture, with figures like Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, and Melanie Phillips criticizing their work.
- đ The School's narrative is remarkable, starting with the failure of a revolution, involving global conflict, exile, collaboration with the CIA, and meetings with the Pope.
- đ§ Initially, the Frankfurt School focused on Marxist theory and the economic aspects of society, but under Max Horkheimer's directorship, it shifted towards a more holistic approach, incorporating social and cultural studies.
- đ Horkheimer introduced the concept of 'critical theory,' which aimed to analyze society from diverse academic perspectives, focusing on how capitalism encourages conformity and suppresses individuality.
- đ The Frankfurt School's early optimism about the inevitable overthrow of capitalism faded over time, replaced by a more pessimistic view of society's ability to resist authoritarianism and conformity.
- đ The School's work was influenced by the rise of fascism and the authoritarianism of the USSR, leading to a focus on understanding why people embraced totalitarian ideologies.
- đ Key texts like 'Dialectic of Enlightenment' and 'The Authoritarian Personality' explored the roots of totalitarianism and the psychological traits that predispose individuals to support fascist regimes.
- đ The School's later years saw the publication of influential works like 'One-Dimensional Man,' which critiqued advanced industrial societies for stifling critical thought and promoting conformity.
- đ Jurgen Habermas, who joined the School later, introduced the concept of the 'public sphere' and became a prominent public intellectual, engaging in debates about the role of religion in society.
- đ The Frankfurt School's legacy is its diverse and wide-ranging influence across fields like sociology, philosophy, and political science, emphasizing the importance of critical analysis of societal forces that shape individuality and conformity.
Q & A
What is the Frankfurt School known for?
-The Frankfurt School is known for its influential study of society and culture, with scholars like Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse having a significant impact on various academic disciplines.
Why has the Frankfurt School been criticized by figures on the political right?
-The Frankfurt School has been criticized by political right figures such as Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, and Melanie Phillips, who often portray the school as a group aiming to undermine Western culture.
What was the historical context for the establishment of the Institute for Social Research?
-The Institute for Social Research was established in the context of post-World War I Germany, marked by defeat, economic hardship, and social tension, which set the stage for intellectual exploration of societal issues.
What was the initial focus of the Institute for Social Research?
-Initially, the Institute focused on Marxist theory and economic analysis, aiming to understand why the German Revolution of 1918-19 did not lead to significant economic reform or the establishment of socialism.
How did Max Horkheimer's leadership influence the direction of the Frankfurt School?
-Max Horkheimer's leadership led to a shift in the Frankfurt School's focus from economics to social sciences, emphasizing the study of society, culture, and the ways in which capitalism shapes and is shaped by these forces.
What is 'critical theory' and how does it relate to the Frankfurt School?
-Critical theory, introduced by Max Horkheimer, is a mode of societal analysis that draws on diverse academic fields to understand how capitalism encourages conformity and shapes social and cultural forces, which in turn shape individuals.
What impact did the rise of fascism and the authoritarian shift in the USSR have on the Frankfurt School's work?
-The rise of fascism and the authoritarian shift in the USSR led the Frankfurt School to explore not only why people might fail to embrace socialism but also why they embraced totalitarian ideologies, as examined in 'Dialectic of Enlightenment' by Horkheimer and Adorno.
What is the 'authoritarian personality' as studied by Theodor Adorno and others?
-The 'authoritarian personality' refers to a set of traits that predispose individuals to support fascist political programs, as identified through the F scale in the book 'The Authoritarian Personality', which aimed to understand the psychological underpinnings of authoritarianism.
How did the Frankfurt School's perspective evolve after World War II?
-After World War II, the Frankfurt School continued to develop its critical theory, focusing on how advanced industrial societies could feature totalitarian aspects and how mass culture could lead to conformity and a loss of individuality.
What role did Herbert Marcuse play in the student protests of May 1968?
-Herbert Marcuse's writings, particularly 'One-Dimensional Man' and 'Repressive Tolerance', influenced the student protesters of May 1968 by providing a critique of capitalist society and highlighting the potential for totalitarian aspects within it.
How did Jurgen Habermas contribute to the Frankfurt School's legacy?
-Jurgen Habermas contributed significantly to the Frankfurt School's legacy by introducing concepts like the public sphere and continuing to be an influential public intellectual, engaging in debates on the role of religion in society, for example.
Outlines
đ The Frankfurt School's Influence and Misconceptions
The Frankfurt School, officially known as the Institute for Social Research, has had a significant impact on the study of society and culture, with scholars like Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse shaping academic discourse. Despite their academic contributions, they have also been criticized by political right figures, who accuse the School of undermining Western culture. This video aims to provide an accurate overview of the Frankfurt School, its origins, evolution, and the remarkable true story that includes revolution, global conflict, and unlikely alliances.
đ The Frankfurt School's Beginnings and Shift in Focus
The Frankfurt School was established in 1924 by Felix Weil as a response to the failed German Revolution, with the initial goal of promoting Marxist theory. The Institute's early work focused on economic studies, but under Max Horkheimer's direction, it shifted towards a more interdisciplinary approach, integrating social sciences to understand societal structures. Horkheimer's skepticism of the inevitable socialist revolution led to the development of 'critical theory,' which analyzed how capitalism fosters conformity and discourages individuality and dissent.
đ Exile and the Frankfurt School's Productive Period
The rise of Hitler forced the Frankfurt School into exile, where they continued their work, significantly influenced by the rise of fascism and the authoritarian shift in the USSR. In the United States, they explored the roots of totalitarianism in the Enlightenment, critiquing the 'culture industry' for promoting uniformity and stifling individual thought. Their work during this period, including the seminal 'Dialectic of Enlightenment,' examined the dark potential of reason and rationality when applied to society.
đ The Authoritarian Personality and Post-Waræłć °ć çŠ School
Post-World War II, the Frankfurt School returned to Germany, with their critical theory becoming influential in various academic fields. The 'Authoritarian Personality' research, conducted by Theodor Adorno and others, developed an F scale to measure individuals' susceptibility to fascist ideologies. The School's work increasingly focused on the decline of critical thinking in advanced industrial societies, with Herbert Marcuse's 'One-Dimensional Man' critiquing both capitalist and Soviet systems for suppressing dissent.
đź Divisions and the Future of the Frankfurt School
Internal divisions within the Frankfurt School emerged, particularly between the pessimistic views of Horkheimer and Adorno and the more hopeful perspective of Jurgen Habermas. The School's early radicalism waned, and its members were more criticized for pessimism than for being revolutionary. The May 1968 student protests, influenced by Marcuse's ideas, revealed a generational gap in the School's approach to social change, with Horkheimer and Adorno expressing skepticism about the potential for meaningful revolution.
đ The Legacy and Impact of the Frankfurt School
The Frankfurt School's work has had a profound impact on critical analysis of society, moving beyond economic determinism to consider the role of social and cultural forces in maintaining capitalism. Despite its radical origins, the School's revolutionary spirit faded, with its members more noted for pessimism than for insurgence. The School's diverse and interdisciplinary approach has allowed it to influence various fields, with a key theme being the potential of society to foster conformity and suppress individuality.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄFrankfurt School
đĄCritical Theory
đĄMax Horkheimer
đĄTheodor Adorno
đĄHerbert Marcuse
Highlights
The Frankfurt School, including scholars like Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse, has had a profound influence on the study of society and culture.
Critics on the political right, such as Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson, have portrayed the Frankfurt School as a group undermining Western culture.
The Frankfurt School's actual history is remarkable, involving a failed revolution, global conflict, and collaboration with the CIA.
Initially, the School was grounded in Marxist theory, focusing on the inevitable transition from capitalism to communism.
The failure of the German Revolution led to the establishment of the Institute for Social Research with an endowment from Felix Weil.
Max Horkheimer introduced a shift in the School's focus from economics to social sciences and the study of people, society, and culture.
Horkheimer's critical theory aimed to combine methods from various disciplines to understand how capitalism encourages conformity.
The Frankfurt School's work in exile, particularly in the United States, was highly productive and influenced by the rise of fascism and the authoritarianism of the USSR.
The 'Dialectic of Enlightenment' by Horkheimer and Adorno linked the rise of totalitarianism to the Enlightenment's extreme application of reason and rationality.
The School criticized the 'culture industry' for creating a mass culture that stifles individuality and imagination.
The 'Authoritarian Personality' study aimed to identify individuals likely to support fascist political programs through an F scale.
Jurgen Habermas, a later member of the School, introduced the concept of the public sphere and has been a prominent public intellectual.
The Frankfurt School's critical analysis has had a wide-ranging influence across sociology, philosophy, political science, and more.
The School's work is characterized by a focus on the potential of contemporary society to foster conformity and erode individuality.
Despite radical origins, the Frankfurt School's revolutionary zeal faded over time, with many members becoming known for their pessimism.
The School's embrace of diverse ideas from different academic subjects has allowed it to have a significant impact on various fields.
The Frankfurt School's critical theory asks us to be vigilant against societal tendencies that discourage individuality and empathy.
Transcripts
the Frankfurt School has something of a
reputation many of the scholars who
worked for what was and still is
officially called the Institute for
Social Research such as Max Horkheimer
Theodor Adorno and Herbert Marcuse er
have had a huge influence on the study
of society and culture and secured their
places on undergraduate reading lists
across numerous subjects it's necessary
to note at the top of this video however
that some of the frankfurt schools nota
riot see outside of academia in the
contemporary moment at least is due to
the vitriol that has been leveled at
them by their detractors figures on the
political right from ben shapiro to
jordan peterson to the times journalist
melanie phillips regularly invoked the
frankfurt school as a kind of
intellectual group of supervillains
hell-bent on undermining Western culture
in today's video my goal is to shed a
bit of light on what the Frankfurt
School was and is I'm not gonna be
directly tackling any of the conspiracy
theory stuff yet it's worthwhile saying
that unlike when one usually unpick so
fanciful tale but usually concludes with
finding a somewhat boring reality
underneath the real story of the
frankfurt school is quite remarkable it
begins with a failed revolution moves
through a global conflict involves
exiled collaboration with the CIA and
meetings with the Pope and it is very
much the story of the Frankfurt School
which I'll be focusing on today well
we'll touch on a number of different
aspects of the school's work and get a
sense of how their interests changed
over time my hope is that this overview
might serve as an introduction to some
more in-depth videos on individual
scholars and texts of course if that's
something you would like to see me cover
then do let me know down in the comments
below and if you'd like to see those
future videos then subscribing and
hitting that notification bell will mean
you'll get a little buzz when they're
released finally if you like what to do
here and would like to support me to
make more videos like this then I would
be super grateful if you would check out
my patreon page at patreon.com forward
slash Tom Nicholas with that out of the
way however let's crack on with the
frankfurt school what the theory
[Applause]
[Music]
before we come on to discussing the
Frankfurt School itself it's worth
grounding ourselves in little bits of
historical context our scene then is
Germany and by October 1918 it was
evident that for Germany the first world
war was going to end in defeat having
already suffered through four hard years
of conflict the German people now not
only had to contend with the
demoralizing feeling of having lost the
war but also with the likelihood of
financial hardship in order to pay
reparations to the countries they had
been defeated by these economic concerns
along with a broader social tension
between the nobility who had led the war
effort and the working class who had
done the actual fighting meant that
things were tense now if you were a
Marxist intellectual at the time and one
thing the Frankfurt schools detractors
do get right is that they were initially
at least Marxists you would have been on
the edge of your seats for most Marxist
at the time signed up to what sometimes
called the stage theory of history which
argued that human society pads developed
and would develop through a series of
stages feudalism had given way to
something called mercantilism which had
given way to capitalism which would in
turn give way to communism it was
considered inevitable the capitalism
would sow the seeds of its own
destruction and that as soon as it's
exploitative nature became clear to the
working class they would rise up to
overthrow it and many felt that the
conditions in Germany in 1918 were ripe
for such a revolution indeed in Russia
the year prior exactly that had happened
the February and October revolutions had
led to the overthrowing of the Tsar and
the establishment of Soviet rule in its
place there was thus a sense among
left-wing academics that all they had to
do was sit back and wait for Germany the
birthplace of Karl Marx himself to do
the same and Germany did experience a
revolution days before the end of the
first world war a sailors revolt led to
uprisings in cities across the country
ultimately however the communist faction
of the revolution led by Rosa Luxemburg
and Karl Liebknecht
were outmaneuvered by the less radical
social democratic party while the
revolution did lead to the abdication of
the Kaiser and the introduction of a new
constitution then after the dust had
settled Germany remained a fundamentally
capitalist nation it was with this
supposed failure of the German people to
throw off the yoke of capitalism in mind
that in May 1923
Felix vile the son of a wealthy grain
merchant with a keen interest in Marxism
organized the erster Marxist assure our
bites Fokker or first Marxist workweek
one of the key goals of the week was to
consider why it was the Germany's
revolution had not yielded great
economic reform certainly the perfidious
nosov the Social Democratic Party had
played a role but on being cheated in
this way why didn't the people who had
risen up in great number in support of a
socialist revolution rise up again the
initial plan was for this to be the
first in a number of similar conferences
for left-wing German intellectuals those
gathered however felt that something
more permanent was needed Felix vile
dust turned to his wealthy father Herman
and convinced him to provide an
endowment to establish and maintain a
permanent Institute for Marxist inform
study on the 22nd of June 1924 then the
Institute for Social Research opened its
doors in Frankfurt and main located at
17:00 Victoria Ali vial appointed as the
Institute's first director Karl
Gruenberg an economic and social
historian in his opening address at the
Institute Gruenberg described himself as
a proponent of scientific socialism
stressing that when I speak here of
Marxism I do not understand it in terms
of party politics but rather in a purely
scientific sense that is as an integral
system of economics of a scientific
worldview and a clearly circumscribed
method of research what is clear from
this is the Greenberg did not see the
role of the Institute as being to write
a new version of the
Communist Manifesto but to instead
engage in a more detached form of study
informed by the theoretical economic
approach of Marx's capital although
initially seeing the failure of the
German Revolution as a wake-up call to
reconsider their analysis of society
however the work produced by the
Institute during this period was pretty
similar to that which had gone on before
studies published by scholars working at
the Institute for Social Research during
its first few years boasted such
tantalizing titles as economy and
society in China the law of accumulation
and collapse in the capitalist system
and experiments in economic planning in
the Soviet Union 1917 to 1927 throughout
the stage theory of history remained
very much intact
Robin in questioning the notion that a
socialist revolution was inevitable the
Institute seemed merely to have come to
the conclusion that the time hadn't
quite been right all of this was to
change in 1930 however when grĂŒnberg
fell ill and resigned his post as
director the position was soon filled by
Max Horkheimer who's not an economist
nor a historian but instead had trained
in psychology and philosophy this
evidently gave Horkheimer a somewhat
different perspective on society and his
tenure as director saw the introduction
of a new set of theoretical influences
to the Institute in particular it led to
a shift away from economics and an
embrace of the social sciences instead
or in other words it led to a shift away
from the study of the economy and
towards the study of people society and
culture
see Horkheimer was highly skeptical of
the notion that capitalism would
inevitably lead to a socialist
revolution he saw the kind of empirical
study which Gruenberg had encouraged to
the Institute to be somewhat naive such
an approach he argued assumed that
people engage with the economy and
society more broadly entirely logical it
assumed that as soon as people
recognized that they were being
exploited they would instantly cast off
the system that was exploiting them the
Horkheimer however
nice that the reality was somewhat more
complex three years earlier for instance
he'd written an essay titled the
impotence of the German working class
which argued that capitalism rather than
inspiring insurrection had fairly
successfully integrated the working
class into its structure in particular
he noted that a wedge had successfully
been driven between those who were in
long-term employment and those who are
more sporadically or entirely unemployed
which led to the form a group of them
voting and acting to sustain capitalism
and thus protects their jobs robbing the
risk them in the turmoil have either
violent or democratic revolution who
climb his approach and that's the other
scholars who he brought to work at the
Institute such as Theodor Adorno Erich
Fromm and Herbert mark who's a was thus
far more holistic it encompassed the
study of social and cultural forces as
well as simply economic ones and rogdon
theorizing the manner in which the
working class would overthrow capitalism
it primarily sought to shed light on the
various ways in which they were
discouraged from doing so in a 1936
paper Horkheimer would christen this
mode of societal analysis critical
theory the goal of critical theory was
and is to draw upon diverse fields from
economics to sociology to political
science to psychology and geography say
to foreground the ways in which
capitalism encourages conformity as
Steven Erich Branagh has written then
the Frankfurt School were concerned less
with what Marx called the economic base
than the political and cultural
superstructure of society they
recognized the understanding how
capitalism works required more than just
an understanding of its economic aspects
but also how it shapes social and
cultural forces to and in turn how
society and culture shape us and is
perhaps already evident the Horkheimer
and coast view of the world was somewhat
bleak the optimism of the early
institute for
Social Research have been replaced with
a view of the world or at least Germany
the saw the overthrow of capitalism is
becoming increasingly unlikely yet in
1933 matters became even worse when
adult Hitler was made Chancellor of
Germany as left-wing intellectuals those
working at and associated with the
Frankfurt School would have already been
under threat on top of this however the
majority of its number were also Jewish
but the swastika flag raised over
Frankfurt Town Hall then Horkheimer made
the decision to close the Institute
premises on Victoria alley and to lead
the Frankfurt School into exile it would
be sixteen years before the Frankfurt
School would return to Germany yet in
spite of the circumstances the years in
exile were highly productive the
Institute first moved to Geneva before
in 1935 Erich Fromm on a visit to the
United States persuaded Columbia
University in New York to provide the
group with a new home
the Franklin school set up base at 428
West 117 Street in Morningside Heights
but in truth they spent little time in
New York in 1940 Horkheimer moved to
California with Theodor Adorno following
not far behind Herbert Marcuse er
instead moved to Washington where he
worked for the Office of Strategic
Services the forerunner to the CIA both
the rise of fascism in Europe and the
slide of the USSR into authoritarianism
would have a huge impact on the work of
the Frankfurt School far from simply
studying why people might fail to
embrace socialism an ideology which many
of the frankfurt school thinkers had an
increasingly testing relationship with
the schools work now also had to take
into account why people had come to
embrace various forms of totalitarianism
this is the central concern of one of
the Frankfurt schools key texts a book
written collaboratively by Max
Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno called
dialectic of enlightenment in dialectic
of enlightenment Horkheimer and Adorno
locate the origin of the rise
totalitarianism in the Enlightenment and
this at first might seem strange the
Enlightenment an intellectual movement
which took place mostly during the 18th
century argued for the supremacy of
human reason above all else and what
could be less reasonable than fascism
well Horkheimer and Adorno did not see
totalitarianism as irrational instead
they saw it as reason and rationality
taken to its ultimate extreme see
enlightenment thinking saw to understand
the world empirically it sought to do
away with mysticism and mere belief in
favor of quantification and the
discovery of universal laws which
explained how the world works and this
is well and good when applied to physics
and chemistry yet when we apply this
same way of thinking to people it has a
somewhat darker potential Horkheimer and
Adorno saw totalitarianism as the
application of an extreme conception of
Objectivism uniformity and
standardization to the whole of society
with the consequence of the reduction of
individuals to mere numbers solely parts
of a machine Horkheimer and Adorno did
not only see these traits as being
present in Nazi Germany and Soviet
Russia however they argued that the same
kind of thinking had also come to
permeate the capitalist nations perhaps
inspired by their surroundings in Los
Angeles they wrote acerbic Lee of what
they called the culture industry they
wrote that culture today is infecting
everything with sameness film radio and
magazines form a system each branch of
culture is unanimous with itself and all
are unanimous together Horkheimer and
Adorno argued that the sole goal of the
culture industry was to make money and
thus that it come to rely on creating
films music books and whatever else
which pleased as many people as possible
as much of the time as possible after
creating a culture permeated by
stainless
they argued that what they referred to
as mass culture robbed people of their
imagination and their potential for
individuality dialectic of enlightenment
is a somewhat dense philosophical text
earlier however I stated the Frankfort
schools desire to combine methods from
multiple academic disciplines in their
studies later then Adorno along with a
number of other scholars at the
University of California Berkeley set
about studying authoritarianism from a
more clearly sociological and
psychological standpoint the results of
their studies were published in a 1950
book called the authoritarian
personality which most famously derived
an F scale which sought to identify how
liable an individual might be to
supporting a fascist political program
through asking a set of questions to an
individual it claimed to be able to
place them on a spectrum from democratic
personality to authoritarian personality
though his findings would later come to
be challenged the authoritarian
personality came to be highly
influential it is interesting to note
here however the use of the term
democratic in Adorno a tailed spectrum
for the research carried out at Berkeley
was heavily informed by similar research
that the Frankfurt School had undertaken
before leaving Germany in those earlier
studies the spectrum had referred to an
authoritarian personality and a
revolutionary personality it was not as
if much have been changed around the
definition of the latter personality
either the term revolutionary had mainly
been swapped out for democratic there
are a number of ways of reading this
change firstly the Frankfurt School had
never been afraid of altering their
language for reasons of political
expediency they had often avoided using
recognizably Marxist terminology in
describing their work in order not to
put off less radically minded readers
funders or other stakeholders many on
the Left however increasingly began to
wonder whether the Frankfurt School had
lost its radical
a year before the publication of the
authoritarian personality in 1950 with
the Second World War having ended in the
defeat and dissolution of Nazi Germany
Horkheimer made the decision to move the
Frankfurt School back to its original
home now part of the newly established
Federal Republic of Germany or
colloquially West Germany the Frankfurt
School now found themselves at the
forefront of German sociological
thinking the critical theory that
Horkheimer had envisaged in 1936 and
developed along with Adorno and
dialectic of enlightenment was now an
established body of work which have
begun to have a real influence on how
scholars in multiple fields approached
the study of human society politics and
culture the following years saw the
publication of a number of further works
by Frankfurt School scholars in 1951
Theodor Adorno published minimum moralia
reflections from a damaged life which
argued that human life was now
irrevocably damaged and that however
hard one tried the inhumanity of
contemporary society made living a good
honest life as centuries of philosophers
had sought to define EDS was now
impossible
in 1964 Herbert Marcuse er published a
book called one dimensional man studies
in the ideology of advanced industrial
society which came to some not
dissimilar conclusions a critique of
both capitalist society and that of the
Soviet Union the book argued that under
both systems critical thinking was
becoming a dying art in the capitalist
nations mark heussner argued people have
become so assimilated into the
capitalist mode of production and the
bureaucracy needed to maintain it that
they failed to be able to thinking
anything but a one-dimensional manner
uncritical of the system around them the
pessimism which had begun with
Horkheimer declaration of the impotence
of the German working class have been
exacerbated by the Frankfurt schools
wartime experience had thus seemingly
come to permeate its work the only voice
resistant
this pessimism within the Frankfurt
School was that of Jurgen Haber maps who
had joined the school to study under
Horkheimer and Adorno in 1956 but who
increasingly was at odds with his
mentors though he would later return to
become the director of the Institute for
Social Research he in fact transferred
his PhD away from it to the University
of Marburg in order to escape what he
saw as the frankfurt schools unbearable
defeatism the divisions within the
frankfurt school over whether any hope
remained for socialist revolution would
come to a head in May 1968 when as I've
discussed in my video on key de Bourgh's
society of the spectacle civil unrest
broke out in France students and workers
took to the streets in a defiantly
anti-capitalist uprising it's worth
stressing these protests had a huge
impact Frances economy was brought to a
complete standstill the president
Charles de Gaulle was evacuated to
Germany and the government genuinely
feared the outbreak of full-scale
revolution though less pronounced than
in France students in other nations also
went out onto the streets in support of
various causes what United all of them
was in opposition to the authoritarian
form of capitalism which had come to
dominate the advanced capitalist Nations
indeed their critique of contemporary
society shed much with that of
Horkheimer and Adorno in dialectic of
enlightenment nevertheless it was
Herbert Marcuse II who had the clearest
influence on the striking students of
may 1968 his essay repressive tolerance
published in 1965 and a belief or
grounded the manner in which capitalist
society could feature totalitarian
aspects and they spoke fairly directly
to the protesters grievances more than
this however where Horkheimer and Adorno
remains skeptical of the likelihood that
any meaningful change would come out of
the so-called inventor
mark user was quite glad that some of
his more pessimistic pronouncements in
one dimensional man seemed to have been
proven wrong and the critical thinking
and action were alive and well
Horkheimer and Adorno refusal to find
any hope in the strikes and protests did
not go unnoticed either activists began
to disrupt Adorno's lectures with the
one-time Marxist shift in ideological
position perhaps being exemplified by
his decision to call the police this
only made matters worse and later a
group of students invaded his lecture
theatre once again writing on the
blackboard if a door no is left in peace
capitalism will never cease Adorno was
eventually forced to cancel the rest of
his lectures which were to be some of
his last before his death in 1969
Horkheimer who died just a few years
later in 1973 with mark Uzi passing away
in 1978 in 1983 Jurgen Habermas became
director of the Institute for Social
Research and his own work has been
almost as influential of that as his
forebears given his early work in which
he introduced the concept of the public
sphere to the world it is no surprise
that he's been a truly public
intellectual perhaps most notable given
the fact that many of the Frankfurt
School conspiracy theories revolve
around some form of plot to undermine
Western values in 2004 Haber mass took
part in a debate with pope benedict xvi
and the Catholic Academy of Bavaria in
which he argued for the positive role
that religion can play in holding
society together though I would very
much like to discuss the work of Haber
Mass in a future video however it is
very much the period between Horkheimer
x' installation as director of the
institute of social research and his an
Adorno's death that most people are
referring to when they speak of the
Frankfurt School as such I'll take the
opportunity to draw this video to a bit
of a close the impacts that the
Frankfurt School had
on how we critically analysed the world
around us is undeniable
with regard to left-wing thought in the
broadly Marxist tradition they were a
key factor in discouraging a purely
economic analysis which sure
capitalism's collapse as inevitable and
the development of a more holistic study
of capitalism cognizant of the influence
of social and cultural forces in its
maintenance though the school may have
had radical origins however in truth
this revolutionary zeal faded over time
towards the ends of their lives many of
its most prominent members were more
likely to be chided for their deeply
ingrained pessimism than they were to be
held up as examples of dangerous
insurgents indeed far from presenting us
with a unified doctrine of thought the
work of the Frankfurt School is PI a
diverse both in the aspects of society
that it focuses on and the methods that
it uses in its analysis it is partly
this diversity and embrace of ideas from
an array of different academic subjects
that has allowed it to have such a
wide-ranging influence across fields
including sociology philosophy political
science and many more if we were to pick
out one key theme from the work of the
Frankfurt School however it would be the
potential that contemporary society has
to foster conformity and to a road
individuality the critical theory that
Horkheimer Adorno maku czar and others
developed asked us to be watchful for
these tendencies and work to find ways
of engaging with the world which enable
individuality and empathy to flourish
thank you very much for watching this
video if you have a friend you think
might be interested in the life and
ideas of the Frankfurt School and then
please do send it on to the fan that'd
be great I thank you as always - ash -
Jai frisée Cartwright - Michael B Brown
- army of me and - syndra Nielsen all
for being signed up to the top tier of
my patreon if you would like to join
them in supporting what I do here then
you can check out how to do so and all
the perks and stuff at patreon.com
forward slash Tom
Nicholas with that out of the way
however thanks so much for watching once
again and have a great week
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
Mazhab Frankfurt dan Teori Kritis Part 1 - Ali Kartawinata
The Rise of STEM Education: A Short History of Education
Critical Theory, The Frankfurt School, Adorno and Horkheimer, and the Culture Industries Explained
What is Critical Theory? | Definition, History, and Examples from Pedagogy of the Oppressed
How Family Structure Drives Ideology
Teoria da Comunicação - Conceitos de Ideologia
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)