Humanity's Land-Grab Disaster
Summary
TLDRThis video script narrates the tragic tale of a wild pregnant elephant in India, killed by a pineapple filled with explosives, to highlight the broader crisis of wildlife due to human encroachment on natural habitats. It emphasizes the drastic increase in agricultural land at the expense of forests, the unsustainable growth of the human population, and the consequential mass extinction of species. The script calls for collective responsibility and action, advocating for plant-based diets and considering family planning to reduce our environmental footprint.
Takeaways
- đ The tragic story of a wild pregnant elephant in India who died after consuming a pineapple filled with explosives highlights the dangers wild animals face due to human activities.
- đ„ 'Pig crackers' and similar devices used by farmers to protect crops are causing daily tragedies for various wild animals, illustrating the violent consequences of encroaching on their habitats.
- đł Human land use for agriculture has dramatically increased, with 50% of the world's habitable land now used for farming, up from less than 4% a thousand years ago, leading to significant habitat loss for wildlife.
- đ The rapid deforestation rate, equating to one football field every two seconds, is a stark indicator of the environmental impact of agricultural expansion.
- đ± The growing human population, increasing by over 80 million people per year, is the driving force behind the conversion of forests into farmlands to meet the demand for food.
- đ A shift in the balance of mammalian biomass has occurred, with humans and livestock now making up 96%, leaving only 4% for wild animals, a stark contrast to the past.
- đ The current mass extinction event, the sixth in Earth's history, is largely attributed to human-induced habitat destruction.
- đŠ The destruction of natural habitats and increased contact with wildlife can lead to the spread of infectious diseases, as seen with COVID-19 and other pandemics.
- đ„Š The environmental impact of our food choices, particularly the resources required for animal agriculture, is a significant contributor to deforestation and ecological imbalance.
- đ Adopting plant-based diets could potentially reduce global farmland use by over 75%, according to a study from Oxford University, alleviating pressure on the environment.
- đż A shift towards veganism is not only beneficial for the environment but also promotes better health outcomes, as supported by various health and nutrition organizations.
- đ¶ Addressing overpopulation through improved women's rights, education, and healthcare, as well as considering smaller families and adoption, is crucial for environmental sustainability.
- đ The interconnectedness of environmental issues, including deforestation, biodiversity loss, and disease spread, underscores the urgency for collective action and awareness.
Q & A
What tragic event involving a wild pregnant elephant in India was mentioned in the script?
-The script recounts the story of a wild pregnant elephant in India that died after consuming a pineapple filled with firecracker explosives. The explosion damaged her mouth and tongue, causing her to be unable to eat and eventually die after four days.
Why do local farmers in India use 'pig crackers' in fruits?
-Local farmers in India use 'pig crackers', a type of explosive device, in fruits to scare wild boars and other animals away from their crops. This practice unfortunately leads to tragic incidents like the one involving the wild elephant.
What percentage of the world's habitable land is currently used for agriculture, according to the script?
-The script states that currently, 50% of the world's habitable land is used for agriculture, up from less than 4% a thousand years ago.
How does the human population growth contribute to the destruction of wild habitats?
-The human population growth contributes to the destruction of wild habitats by increasing the demand for agricultural land to produce food for the growing number of people, leading to deforestation and loss of wildlife habitats.
What is the rate at which we are losing forests according to the WWF, as mentioned in the script?
-According to the WWF, as mentioned in the script, we are losing forests at a rate of about one football field every two seconds.
What impact does the livestock sector have on land use and deforestation, as per the United Nations?
-The United Nations states that the livestock sector is the single largest anthropogenic user of land on the planet and is the major driver of deforestation.
How much of a reduction in global farmlands could be achieved by adopting a plant-based diet, according to a study from Oxford University?
-The study from Oxford University suggests that adopting a plant-based diet could reduce global farmlands by more than 75%, an area equivalent to the combined size of the U.S., China, the European Union, and Australia.
What are some of the health benefits of a vegan diet, as recognized by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics?
-The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics recognizes that vegan diets are nutritionally adequate and appropriate for all stages of life, and vegans are 62% less likely to develop diabetes and have greater protection against overall cancer incidence.
How does the script suggest that improving women's rights can help slow down population growth?
-The script suggests that improving women's rights, including access to education and healthcare, and abolishing practices like child marriages, can greatly slow down population growth by empowering women to make informed decisions about family planning.
What is the environmental documentary mentioned in the script, and where can it be watched?
-The environmental documentary mentioned in the script is called 'Endgame 2050.' It can be watched for free on YouTube and is also available on Amazon Prime.
Why is the script emphasizing the importance of considering the environmental impact when planning a family?
-The script emphasizes the importance of considering the environmental impact when planning a family due to the current environmental overshoot and the severe consequences of unsustainable human population growth, such as habitat destruction and mass extinction.
Outlines
đ The Tragic Tale of a Pregnant Elephant
The script begins with a heart-wrenching story of a pregnant wild elephant in India who tragically dies after consuming a pineapple filled with firecracker explosives. This incident, which was reported globally, highlights the broader issue of human activities impacting wildlife. The elephant's death is used as a metaphor to introduce the audience to the crisis affecting wild animals worldwide due to human encroachment on their habitats. The script also touches on the societal response to such incidents and the common misconception that they are isolated events unrelated to our daily actions.
đł The Human Footprint on Wildlife and Habitats
This paragraph delves into the reasons behind the conversion of natural habitats into agricultural land, driven by the need to feed a rapidly growing human population. It discusses the historical context of land use for farming and the current alarming statistics, such as 50% of the world's habitable land being used for agriculture. The paragraph also addresses the consequences of deforestation, including the loss of biodiversity and the impact on the ecological balance, leading to what biologists have termed the 'sixth mass extinction.'
đŠ The Link Between Deforestation and Disease Outbreaks
The script explains the connection between deforestation, biodiversity loss, and the increased likelihood of infectious diseases and pandemics. It points out that land use change, such as converting forests into agricultural areas, brings humans into closer contact with wildlife and their viruses. The paragraph cites scientific findings that a significant percentage of emerging diseases originate from such land use changes, and it raises concerns about the potential for new viruses to emerge as a result of ongoing deforestation.
đ„Š The Environmental Impact of Our Food Choices
This paragraph focuses on the environmental impact of our dietary choices, particularly the consumption of animal products. It emphasizes the inefficiency of using land for livestock farming compared to plant-based agriculture and the significant contribution of the livestock sector to deforestation. The script suggests that adopting a plant-based diet could drastically reduce the amount of land required for farming, thereby alleviating pressure on natural habitats and reducing our ecological footprint.
đ± Addressing Overpopulation and Its Environmental Impact
The final paragraph discusses the role of population growth in exacerbating environmental issues and the need for sustainable population management. It suggests that improving women's rights, education, and healthcare can help slow population growth. The script also encourages individuals to consider the environmental implications of family planning, including the benefits of smaller families and adoption. It concludes by inviting viewers to watch the documentary 'Endgame 2050' for a deeper understanding of these issues and to take personal actions to reduce their environmental impact.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄWildlife Crisis
đĄHabitat Destruction
đĄDeforestation
đĄAgricultural Expansion
đĄPopulation Growth
đĄMass Extinction
đĄLand Use Change
đĄEcosystem Services
đĄSustainable Consumption
đĄPlant-Based Diet
đĄEnvironmental Overshoot
Highlights
A major crisis is affecting wild animals worldwide, exemplified by the tragic story of a pregnant wild elephant in India that died after consuming a pineapple filled with explosives.
Local farmers in India use 'pig crackers' in fruits to deter wild boars from crops, causing daily tragedies for various animals, whether reported or not.
In the U.S., millions of wild animals are killed through trapping, shooting, or poisoning to protect agricultural areas.
Human encroachment into habitats and violence against displaced wild animals is a global issue, not just confined to India.
Agricultural land has increased from less than 4% to 50% of the world's habitable land in the last few centuries, leading to habitat destruction.
We are losing forests at an alarming rate, equivalent to one football field every two seconds.
The global human population increase contributes to the need for more agricultural land, with a net growth of over 80 million people per year.
Wild animals now make up only 4% of the planet's mammal biomass, with humans and livestock accounting for 96%.
Our collective human footprint is causing the sixth mass extinction in Earth's history, with habitats being the primary loss.
In the last 50 years, we have lost 68% of wildlife, a significant update from previous estimates.
Deforestation and habitat destruction increase the likelihood of infectious diseases and pandemics like COVID-19.
More than 30% of emergent diseases originate from land use change, exposing humans to new viruses.
Adopting plant-based diets could reduce global farmlands by more than 75%, alleviating pressure on land use.
A plant-based diet is not only environmentally beneficial but also promotes better health, according to health organizations.
Sustainable population growth can be achieved by improving women's rights, education, and healthcare, which also stabilizes environmental impact.
Considering small families, not having children, or adoption are impactful personal choices to reduce environmental footprints.
The environmental and animal costs of unsustainable human activities are severe and require immediate attention and action.
The documentary 'Endgame 2050' provides a deeper exploration of these issues and is available for free on YouTube and Amazon Prime.
Transcripts
- There is a major crisis thatâs affecting all of the wild animals around the world, but Iâm Â
going to introduce it by first sharing with you the story of just one individual wild elephant.
A few months ago, a lot of networks around the world reported about an event that took place Â
in India. A wild pregnant elephant was looking for food to eat, as wild pregnant elephants do, Â
but this elephant ended up eating a pineapple that was filled with firecracker explosives.
The pineapple exploded in the elephantâs mouth and damaged it. So this poor elephant Â
apparently paced around and stood in a river for four days until she eventually died.
A forestry officer there reported that, âWith her mouth and tongue destroyed in the explosion, Â
she paced around hungry without being able to eat. She must have been more worried about the health Â
of [her] child inside her than about her own hunger.â An incredibly tragic and sad, sad story.
When I shared this news on social media, my beloved mother, who lives in Mexico, Â
called me up because she was kind of upset at me for posting the article. She said, âSofia, Â
itâs very negative thing to share and there is so much negative news already. I donât know a single Â
person in world who would ever put explosives in fruits and them leave them out for elephants Â
to eat. So, whatâs the point of posting something so sad that has nothing to do with most people?â
I can understand my beloved motherâs sentiment. But despite my mother and most people Â
thinking that these events are isolated and, most importantly, that they are unrelated to Â
us and our activities, these events are not isolated and they are actually not unrelated Â
to us. It turns out we do share responsibility for this, and Iâm going to explain why that is.
First, Iâd like to point out that even though the event sparked petitions signed by millions of Â
outraged people calling on authorities to find and punish that one person who placed the explosives Â
in that one pineapple, local farmers there actually use firecrackers and Â
explosives in fruits to protect their land from wild animals all the time.
The explosives that were thought to be used in this case are called "pig crackers", intended to Â
scare wild boars away from crops. And I guess by âscareâ they mean explode in their mouths.
So, these tragedies happen every day to all kinds of different animals, whether itâs reported or not Â
and whether it causes outrage or not. And itâs not just in India that wild animals Â
pay the ultimate price for farmlands to be created and protected. Itâs everywhere.
Here in the U.S. for example, millions of wolves, coyotes, cougars, Â
bears, mountain lions, otters, birds and other wild animals are ruthlessly killed Â
by trapping, shooting or poisoning to protect agricultural areas.
The real problem is we humans are simply using far too much land. So, Â
we encroach into habitats â every day more and more â and then we resort to Â
violence against the wild animals who weâve displaced.
A thousand years ago, less than 4% of the worldâs habitable land was used for farming. So, most of Â
the worldâs land was wilderness like forests. But over the last few centuries, and over the last few Â
decades in especially, we transformed an enormous amount of wild habitats into agricultural land.
Today, instead of using 4% of the worldâs habitable land for agriculture, weâre using 50% of Â
it. So now, we are now using up at least half of the planet's habitable land for agriculture. And Â
we continue to destroy more and more forests every single day to turn them into even more farmlands.
According to the WWF, weâre losing forests at a rate of around one football field Â
every two seconds. Imagine that! One football field of forest destroyed every two seconds. Â
Just take a deep breath, and there goes a few seconds. Think of how much forest has been leveled Â
just in the time that you have been watching this video.
So, why do we keep turning forests into farmlands? Well because we have a bit of a human feeding Â
frenzy going on. After subtracting deaths, our global human population is increasing by Â
a net growth of over 80 million people per year, which is the size of the population of Germany. Â
That means that we are adding another Germany-load of people to the planet every year.
And while the demand for infrastructure and services and other things that populations Â
need as they grow may be variable, the one thing that we all have in common is that we all need to Â
eat. Every single one of us has to eat. So, given the growth we are having in our population size, Â
itâs not surprising that weâre turning forests into farmlands so relentlessly. Itâs also not Â
surprising that our growth has had a devastating impact on the other species we are displacing.
If we go back in time to when we started using agriculture about 11,000 years ago, Â
you may be surprised to know that there was a grand total of about one million people on Â
the planet. Thatâs it. Just one million humans, scattered all over the world.
Today, we actually grow our population by a million people every five days. Weâre almost at Â
8 billion humans now, and we keep growing by more than a million people every five days.
Before we had our massive growth, most of the biomass of mammals on the planet consisted of Â
wild animals, and humans were less than 1% of it. But today, those percentages have flipped around, Â
because today wild animals are estimated to be only 4% of the biomass with the other 96% of it Â
now being humans plus the billions of livestock animals that humans breed into existence.
Thatâs pretty shocking, isnât it? And you may think, well Iâm not going around cutting down Â
any forests or killing any wild animals. All I do is get my groceries every week. I just go to Â
HEB, or Kroger, or a local farmerâs market, or Walmart, or wherever. No, we donât have to Â
personally burn or cut any forests ourselves, or kill any wild animals ourselves, for that Â
to take place. All we have to do, and all we have done for that to take place, is collectively grow Â
our population very happily, like we have in the last few decades, and exist and eat.
It seems very benign doesnât it? It feels very benign. But even if it feels very harmless, Â
there is no question about it. Our collective human footprint is wreaking Â
havoc on other animals. In fact, right now so many wild animals are dying and going extinct, Â
that biologists have classified our time as the sixth mass extinction Â
in Earthâs history. And the main reason why they are going extinct is because we Â
are taking their land and they lose their habitats â so they lose their homes and die.
- Right now, weâre undergoing whatâs called a mass extinction. And that means that the rates Â
of extinction are much faster, much higher than they normally would be.
- In the past, there have been five episodes of mass extinctions. The last one was 65 million Â
years ago when we lost the dinosaurs and a lot of other things. Since then weâve built up a Â
huge amount of biodiversity, and then in the last 200 years, weâve started destroying it.
- That was a clip from my film âEndgame 2050â that was released earlier this year, Â
and I want to bring your attention to something else that was said in the film.
- We have a catastrophic situation thatâs basically Â
unrecognized. In about the last 40 years, weâve lost more than half the wildlife on the planet.
- Fifty percent of wildlife lost in 40 years sounds very alarming to me. But guess what? Â
Since the film was released, the WWF issued a new updated report that says that we have now lost Â
68% of wildlife in 50 years. Remember weâre talking about 68% Â
of the already diminished number of wild animals that existed in 1970.
- If you donât have a functioning ecological system that produces oxygen, Â
that produces food, people will not survive.
- Speaking of survival, itâs very timely to note that infectious diseases and pandemics Â
like COVID-19 are much more likely to occur when we obliterate forests and biodiversity.
With the current pandemic, a lot of the focus has been about wet markets â and the extensive contact Â
with wild animals that occurs there is definitely an easy way for viruses to jump from animals Â
to humans. But these wet markets are not at all necessary for viruses to jump over Â
to humans. All we have to do is intrude into wildlife habitats.
According to scientists, more than 30% of all emergent diseases Â
have originated through the process of land use change. And what does âland use changeâ mean? Â
Well exactly what you think it means. It means Â
natural landscapes are removed and replaced with agriculture, plantations, livestock, etc.
See, different animals have lots of different viruses circulating inside their bodies. And Â
forests filled with biodiversity all around the world have thousands of viruses that humans have Â
never come into contact with. But the moment we start going in there by building roads, Â
or railroad tracks, or anything else, we start getting exposed. And the people who are there, Â
logging and taking the trees down or hunting animals there, Â
they pick up the viruses â so the virus then jumps from wildlife to humans. Or we put Â
livestock in that area that used to be a forest, and the livestock picks up the viruses, Â
and so the virus jumps from wildlife to livestock and then to humans.
Deforestation always involves bringing people into closer contact to wildlife and their viruses. And Â
you have to wonder, what kind of new viruses await us as we continue to intrude in nature?
As a disease ecologist from the University of California pointed out, âItâs a numbers game: Â
The more we degrade and clear forest habitats, the more likely it is that weâre going to Â
find ourselves in these situations where epidemics of infectious diseases occur.â
So, if itâs a numbers game, I wonder how are our numbers looking? Â
Iâm thinking probably not too good, because how can anyone think that we can destroy Â
a football field worth of forest every two seconds and that our species is going to be just fine? Â
How can anyone think that that will have no consequences for us as a species?
Just from the infectious disease perspective alone, epidemics and pandemics have not Â
surprisingly been on the rise. And, as bad as the pandemics are, they might be the least of Â
our worries when it comes to the consequences of deforestation. Because, the fact is, we require Â
the ecosystem services that other species provide in order to have a habitable planet.
Back to the pregnant elephant. The fact is, as uncomfortable as this may be, we are indeed Â
*all* responsible for the death of this poor elephant â and for the countless other victims Â
perishing for humans to take up ever more land for ourselves. Her blood is on all of our hands. It is Â
our huge collective footprint that it is wreaking havoc for wild animals all over the world.
From the terrible deforestation happening in my home country of Mexico due to the Â
worldwide demand for avocados, to the water depletion that is happening in Peru Â
due to the worldwide demand for asparagus, the scale of the resources we are using Â
and consuming is simply too large and therefore very destructive.
But the reason Iâm bringing all of this up is not to berate ourselves. Â
The reason Iâm bringing all of this up is because there is a lot you and I can actually do about it. Â
And itâs not just that we âcanâ do these things â itâs that we âmustâ. Â
We all have the responsibility of doing what we can to reduce our collective Â
human footprint. It is our responsibility to not destroy the only planet we call home.
At the most basic level, the impact we have on the planet depends on two Â
things - our consumption patterns and how many people there are consuming.
When it comes to our consumption patterns, our food choices make a surprisingly huge impact, Â
which, in a way, is kind of a good thing because our diet is something that we can change easily, Â
without the need for expensive infrastructure or new technology or laws or things like that.
All foods require resources to make and grow. All of them. But it happens to be the case that Â
producing animal foods uses a disproportionately larger amount of land, water and energy. Â
Of all the land thatâs being used for farming, 77% it of is used for livestock and their feed, Â
even though livestock only contributes a small amount of the global calories.
According to the United Nations, âthe livestock sector is by far the single largest anthropogenic Â
user of landâ on the planet, and âit is the major driver of deforestationâ in the world.
So, including animal foods in our diet is a very inefficient way of feeding the human population. Â
And itâs very clear that weâre not in a position to feed ourselves in a way that is inefficient.
One of the most comprehensive studies from Oxford University found that if we collectively stopped Â
eating meat and dairy and fed ourselves with plant foods instead, we could reduce the total Â
global farmlands by more than 75% â an area of land equivalent to the U.S., China, the European Â
Union and Australia combined. Can you imagine that? We could relieve that much pressure from Â
our current land use! An area of land the size of the U.S., China, the European Union and Australia Â
combined â all that land no longer being needed for agriculture, simply by changing our diets.
I think thatâs a very empowering and positive thing. Because fortunately ditching animal foods Â
is something that we can all do right now in our very next meal. Â
Even the largest organization of food and nutrition professionals in the U.S., Â
the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, says that sensible vegan diets are healthful, nutritionally Â
adequate, and appropriate for individuals during all stages of life, including pregnancy, Â
lactation, infancy, older adulthood and for athletes. And they found that vegans are 62% less Â
likely to develop diabetes and that a âvegan diet appeared to confer a greater protection against Â
overall cancer incidence than any other dietary pattern.â Even Harvardâs School of Public Health Â
acknowledges that âa plant-based diet is the optimal diet for living a long and healthy life.â
So, in addition to the very compelling and existential environmental benefits, ditching Â
animal foods and feeding ourselves with plant foods instead also happens to be very healthy.
When it comes to the number of people on the planet, Â
well you can just look at a graph of our population and ask yourself if there can Â
possibly be anything sustainable about it. How can there be anything sustainable Â
about growing our population of human consumers by more than a million people per week?
Already, at our current numbers, we are in a severe environmental overshoot, and the resources Â
we are using for everything from our food to our cell phones is already decimating wildlife and the Â
environment. In other words, we are already in the red. If the environmental resources we take from Â
the planet was money then we would be currently in a huge debt. And we canât just keep borrowing more Â
and more money forever, right? Eventually, we have to pay back the loan or else we get into trouble.
We donât even know what all of the potential ramifications and consequences of the damage Â
we have already caused on the planet will be, but theyâre likely to be very long lasting. Â
So, if we owe money to a lender that is uncertain and dangerous, instead of going Â
deeper and deeper into debt with them, wouldnât it be wiser to balance our books first?
Population growth would be greatly slowed down by improving womenâs rights around the world, Â
abolishing horrid practices like child marriages, and making sure women have access to education Â
and healthcare. These are very important human rights that we should all be Â
advocating for anyway, but they also just happen to be some of the most Â
impactful actions we can take to help stabilize our population growth.
I think any action to slow our population growth has to take an approach that respects and promotes Â
human rights. Also, I would encourage everyone to please keep the planet in mind when planning your Â
family. Please consider the planetary benefits of having small families instead of large ones, Â
and please consider adoption as well. Not having a child or adopting Â
is actually one of the most impactful ways to reduce your carbon, water and plastic footprint Â
as well as your carbon, water and plastic legacy. And, I know that itâs not for everyone, Â
but I do think itâs abundantly reasonable for more couples around the world to consider Â
not having children right now for the sake of the planet while we are in an environmental Â
overshoot â especially in wealthier countries like the U.S., where every child has such a Â
huge per capita environmental footprint, but also in the rest of the world as well.
Of course, this is a topic that can be uncomfortable, and Â
a lot of environmental organizations donât like to talk about it, despite its undeniable impact.
Remember Al Gore? Al Gore says talking about our greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuels Â
is inconvenient, and you know he made his film called an âInconvenient Truth.â And, well, Â
Iâve heard people say that animal agriculture is even more inconvenient than fossil fuels, and that Â
animal agriculture is too inconvenient for even Al Gore to talk about. And if thatâs the case, Â
then talking about our overpopulation is probably the king of inconvenient. Â
Maybe we need a new word for inconvenient.
It is not a popular topic. But this is not a popularity contest, is it? The environment and the Â
animals surely do not care how unpopular the topic is, because they are paying the ultimate price. Â
From the beautiful pregnant elephant who died eating the pineapple with explosives, to the Â
elephants and other animals who die crossing our ever-growing web of train tracks and roads cutting Â
through their lands, to the orangutans who are burned when we torch their forests to make room Â
for more palm oil plantations, to the animals who die with their stomachs filled with our plastic Â
waste, to the ones who die in increasingly severe forest fires because our CO2 emissions Â
have skyrocketed and show no sign of abating â the environment and the animals do not care Â
about our sensitivities or our discomfort talking about our unsustainable human population growth.
Itâs about time that we understand that itâs not just about us. Itâs Â
about not destroying the planet and the inhabitants with whom we share it.
I invite you to learn more about these issues, help raise awareness, Â
and take whatever actions you can in your personal lives to reduce your environmental footprint. Â
And if you havenât already, I invite you to watch the environmental documentary I produced called Â
âEndgame 2050.â Iâve shown you a few excerpts from the movie in this video, but the full film goes Â
into these topics into a little more depth, and it also covers other important topics.
It is completely free to watch on YouTube and itâs also on Amazon Prime in case you prefer to watch Â
it on that platform. If you think this information is important, please like and share this video, Â
and I invite you to subscribe to the channel to stay in the loop with upcoming videos. Â
And let me know what you think about these issues. I look forward to reading your thoughts and your Â
feedback in the comment section below. Until next time, thank you for watching.
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
Biodiversity loss and conservation
Ancaman Terhadap Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia- Biologi X Fase E
A biodiversidade Ă© importante?
Endangered Species | Environment & Ecology | Biology | FuseSchool
Doit-on protéger la biodiversité? La réponse d'un explorateur | Animaux | Rad
Climate Change: Why are thousands of species facing extinction? - BBC News
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)