Human Nature is Evil | The Philosophy of Xunzi on Human Nature

Summary

This video explores differing views on human nature in philosophy, focusing on Confucian philosopher Xunzi, who argued that human nature is inherently evil, contrasting with Mencius, who believed it to be good. The video delves into Xunzi's ideas that goodness arises from conscious effort, learning, and societal rituals, emphasizing the need for moral guidance and government to maintain order. The discussion connects Xunzi's philosophy with Western thinker Thomas Hobbes, raising questions about the role of government and human nature.

Takeaways

• 🤔 Human nature has been a subject of debate in both Western and Eastern philosophy, with differing views on whether humans are inherently good or evil.
• 📚 The video explores the Confucian philosopher Xunzi's argument that human nature is evil, contrasting it with Mencius's belief that human nature is good.
• 🧠 Xunzi asserts that goodness is not innate but is the result of conscious effort, discipline, and moral education.
• 👶 Xunzi uses the example of children, who act on impulse and emotion rather than reason, to illustrate the inherent evil in human nature.
• 📖 Xunzi argues that without the guidance of teachers and adherence to ritual principles, people would naturally follow their base instincts, leading to chaos and disorder.
• ⚖️ Goodness, according to Xunzi, is defined as being upright, reasonable, and orderly, while evil is associated with prejudice, irresponsibility, and chaos.
• 👑 Xunzi believes that government and laws are necessary to enforce moral behavior and prevent the evil nature of humans from causing societal collapse.
• 💡 The video draws a parallel between Xunzi's views and those of Thomas Hobbes, who also believed that a strong government is necessary to maintain order due to the brutish nature of humans.
• 🧐 The script questions whether a state of nature without government would be harsh due to the inherent evil of humans, inviting viewers to reflect on their views.
• 📜 The video encourages viewers to explore different philosophical perspectives on human nature and share their thoughts on the subject.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video?

The video explores differing views on human nature, focusing on the Confucian philosopher Xunzi, who argued that human nature is inherently evil, and contrasts this with other philosophical perspectives, including those of Confucius and Mencius.

Who is Xunzi, and what is his main argument about human nature?

Xunzi was a Confucian philosopher who argued that human nature is inherently evil. He believed that goodness is achieved through conscious effort and moral education rather than being innate.

How does Xunzi define 'goodness' and 'evil'?

Xunzi defines 'goodness' as that which is upright, reasonable, and orderly, while 'evil' is defined as that which is prejudiced, irresponsible, and chaotic.

What is the significance of childhood in Xunzi's argument?

Xunzi uses childhood as an example to illustrate human nature's inherent evil. He points out that children act impulsively and emotionally without much conscious thought, suggesting that our natural state is one of disorder and impulsiveness.

How does Xunzi believe goodness can be achieved?

Xunzi argues that goodness is achieved through conscious activity, which includes following the instructions of teachers, adhering to ritual principles, and making a personal effort to act morally.

What role do teachers and ritual principles play in Xunzi's philosophy?

In Xunzi's philosophy, teachers provide moral guidance, and ritual principles represent good practices. Together, they help transform individuals' inherently evil nature into goodness through conscious effort.

How does Xunzi's view compare to that of Mencius, another Confucian philosopher?

Xunzi's view contrasts with Mencius, who believed that human nature is inherently good. While Mencius argued that people have an innate tendency towards goodness, Xunzi believed that humans are naturally inclined towards evil and must be taught to be good.

What is the connection between Xunzi's philosophy and Thomas Hobbes' views on human nature?

Xunzi's belief in the evil nature of humans and the need for government and moral principles to maintain order parallels Thomas Hobbes' argument that without government, life in the state of nature would be 'nasty, brutish, and short.' Both philosophers emphasize the need for external control to manage human nature.

What is Xunzi's argument regarding the necessity of government?

Xunzi argues that because human nature is evil, governments and sage kings are necessary to enforce moral principles and maintain order. Without these structures, society would descend into chaos.

What does the video suggest about the relevance of Eastern philosophy in discussions of human nature?

The video suggests that Eastern philosophy, such as Xunzi's views, offers unique perspectives on human nature that are often overlooked in Western discussions. These perspectives can provide valuable insights and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of human nature.

Outlines

00:00

🤔 Exploring the Duality of Human Nature

This paragraph introduces the age-old philosophical debate about human nature, particularly the contrasting views on whether humans are inherently good or evil. It suggests that human behavior can sometimes lead us to lose faith in humanity, while at other times, we are reminded of the goodness in people. The text mentions that both Western and Eastern philosophies have grappled with these questions, with a particular focus on the Confucian philosopher Xunzi, who argued that human nature is inherently evil.

05:01

📚 Confucius and His Disciples: Diverging Views on Human Nature

This section discusses the influence of Confucius and his disciples, focusing on the differing views of Mengzi (Mencius) and Xunzi on human nature. While Mengzi argued that human nature is fundamentally good, Xunzi contended the opposite, believing that human nature is evil. The text highlights the importance of these philosophical debates and notes the recurring pattern of adding 'zi' to the names of Chinese philosophers.

👶 Are Children Evil? Xunzi's View on Human Nature

This paragraph delves deeper into Xunzi's philosophy, particularly his assertion that 'man's nature is evil, and goodness is the result of conscious activity.' It uses the example of children, who act on impulse and emotion rather than reason, to illustrate this point. The text suggests that while childhood may seem simple and innocent, it is also a time of emotional impulsiveness, which Xunzi views as evidence of the inherent evil in human nature.

🧠 The Role of Conscious Effort in Achieving Goodness

This part discusses Xunzi's argument that goodness is not inherent but is achieved through conscious effort, education, and adherence to ritual principles. Xunzi emphasizes the importance of teachers, moral guidance, and self-discipline in transforming human nature. The paragraph also touches on Xunzi's definitions of good and evil, linking them to concepts of order and chaos, and highlights the importance of the teacher-student relationship in this transformation.

🏛 The Necessity of Government in Xunzi's Philosophy

In this final section, Xunzi's argument for the necessity of government and ritual principles is presented. He believes that because human nature is evil, external structures like government are needed to enforce order and morality. The text draws a parallel between Xunzi's views and those of the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes, who also argued for the necessity of government to manage the inherent brutality of human nature. The paragraph ends with a call for viewers to reflect on these ideas and share their thoughts.

Keywords

💡Human Nature

Human nature refers to the inherent characteristics, including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting, that all humans tend to possess. In the video, the discussion centers on different philosophical views about whether human nature is fundamentally good or evil. This theme is explored through the contrasting ideas of Confucian philosophers like Mencius, who argued that human nature is good, and Xunzi, who argued that human nature is evil.

💡Confucianism

Confucianism is a system of philosophical and ethical teachings founded by Confucius, which emphasizes moral values, social harmony, and respect for authority. The video explores how Confucianism led to different interpretations of human nature by philosophers like Mencius and Xunzi. These interpretations shape their views on morality, education, and governance.

💡Xunzi

Xunzi was a Confucian philosopher who argued that human nature is inherently evil and that goodness is achieved through conscious effort and education. The video discusses his work and how he believed that without the guidance of teachers and adherence to ritual principles, humans would naturally act on selfish and impulsive desires. His views contrast sharply with those of Mencius, another Confucian thinker who believed in the inherent goodness of humans.

💡Mencius

Mencius was another prominent Confucian philosopher who argued that human nature is fundamentally good. The video mentions him as a foil to Xunzi, highlighting the internal debates within Confucianism about the nature of humanity. Mencius believed that humans have an innate tendency towards goodness, which can be nurtured through proper education and moral cultivation.

💡Goodness

Goodness in the context of the video refers to morally upright behavior that is achieved through conscious effort and education, according to Xunzi. Xunzi argues that because human nature is evil, goodness is not innate but rather the result of deliberate actions, teachings, and adherence to societal rules and rituals. The video uses this concept to explore how moral behavior is cultivated according to Xunzi’s philosophy.

💡Evil

Evil, as defined by Xunzi in the video, represents the natural, chaotic, and self-serving impulses that humans are born with. He argues that without the guidance of moral teachings and societal rules, humans would naturally act in ways that are prejudiced, irresponsible, and destructive. This view of evil is central to Xunzi’s argument that strong governance and education are necessary to cultivate goodness.

💡Conscious Activity

Conscious activity refers to the deliberate and thoughtful actions that lead to moral behavior and goodness, according to Xunzi. The video emphasizes that Xunzi believed human nature is not naturally good, so achieving goodness requires conscious effort, learning, and the influence of teachers and rituals. This concept contrasts with the idea that goodness is an innate quality.

💡Ritual Principles

Ritual principles are the societal norms and moral rules that guide proper behavior, according to Confucian philosophy. In the video, Xunzi emphasizes the importance of ritual principles in transforming human nature from evil to good. He argues that these principles, along with conscious effort and education, are essential for maintaining social order and moral behavior.

💡Thomas Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher known for his views on the state of nature and the necessity of government. The video draws a parallel between Xunzi’s views on human nature and Hobbes’s belief that life without government would be 'nasty, brutish, and short' due to humanity’s selfish instincts. This comparison highlights the similarity between Xunzi’s emphasis on the need for moral and societal structures to curb human nature and Hobbes’s arguments for strong government.

💡State of Nature

The state of nature is a philosophical concept that describes the condition of humans before the establishment of society or government. In the video, the state of nature is discussed in the context of both Xunzi’s and Hobbes’s views, where it is depicted as a chaotic and dangerous state due to the evil tendencies of human nature. This idea supports the argument that governance and moral education are necessary to maintain order and cultivate goodness.

Highlights

The philosophical debate on human nature has persisted throughout history, with varying views on whether it is inherently good or evil.

Shunza, a Confucian philosopher, is introduced as a key figure arguing that human nature is evil in his self-titled book.

Confucius' influence is highlighted through his disciples who carried on and sometimes disagreed with his ideas, showing the dynamic nature of philosophical thought.

Shunza's central thesis is presented: 'Man's nature is evil, goodness is the result of conscious activity', a phrase he repeatedly emphasizes.

Shunza uses the state of being a child as an indicator of our true nature, characterized by emotional impulsiveness and lack of conscious thought.

The question of whether children are inherently evil is posed, inviting the audience to reflect on the nature of childhood and its emotional aspects.

Shunza argues that goodness arises from conscious effort, consideration, learning, and willpower, which are necessary to overcome our natural inclinations.

The role of teachers and moral guides is emphasized in transforming individuals from their naturally evil state to one of goodness.

Ritual principles and societal norms are identified as essential components in guiding individuals towards good behavior.

Shunza's definition of good and evil is explored, with good being described as upright, reasonable, and orderly, and evil as prejudiced, irresponsible, and chaotic.

The necessity of government and sage kings in enforcing moral principles due to the evil nature of humans is discussed.

A comparison is made between Shunza's views and those of Thomas Hobbes, drawing parallels between their philosophies on the state of nature and the need for governance.

The audience is invited to consider whether the state of nature would be harsh without government, given the perceived evil nature of humans.

Shunza's overall position on human nature is summarized, prompting the audience to reflect on his argument and its implications.

The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to share their thoughts on the argument and their favorite Chinese philosopher, fostering engagement and discussion.

The importance of understanding and debating philosophical concepts of human nature is underscored as a means to explore our true selves.

Transcripts

throughout philosophy or just the

history of human thought in general

there's always been differing views on

human nature after all I mean you're

human at least I hope so therefore won't

you be at least curious about what your

true nature is and then there's other

people sometimes you come across some

interaction between people that lead you

to lose faith in humanity as the saying

goes but then there are other moments

moments that restore your faith in

humanity so what is it exactly take a

history of Western philosophy class and

you'll come across philosophers arguing

about human nature and the state of

nature but Eastern philosophy also

offers some unique perspectives on the

issue perspectives that unfortunately

are often overlooked in this video we're

going to be looking at the Confucian

philosopher shunza in his self-titled

book where he argues that human nature

is evil

foreign

so we all know about Confucius even

non-philosophy people know about this

dude and he was so big that he had a lot

of disciples that carried on his ideas

but also split and disagreed with one

another because really how boring would

it be if you're just a carbon copy of

your teacher you want to make a name for

yourself right well one of these

disciples was named Monza who wrote a

book named after himself and in that

book he argued that human nature was

good basically and in this video we're

dealing with another Confucian disciple

shunza who is responding to Monza

arguing that human nature is evil side

note I'm Chinese American but I'm not a

Chinese historian or anything can

someone tell me why all these dudes and

their name in zuh it's becoming a hell

of a pattern so getting into the shunza

he repeats this one phrase over and over

again which you should memorize man's

nature is evil goodness is the result of

conscious activity he literally repeats

this phrase after every paragraph so

don't lose it but what does it mean

let's start with this first part that

man's nature is evil shunsa makes

reference to being born and being a

child as an indicator of our true nature

it's during this time that we're hyper

emotional and impulsive essentially

there's not much conscious activity we

just do what we feel we should do

without much thought it is the way with

man's nature that as soon as he is born

he begins to depart from his original

naivete and simplicity so one way of

understanding what shunza means by human

nature is not only our emotional side

but kind to the state we were in when we

were kids because that emotional side

was so strong now this begs the question

and I'm sure you've thought about it

when you're on a plane trying to sleep

with a screaming baby are kids evil I

know I know it's a weird question so on

the one hand a kid does ACT off emotions

mainly not really reasoning things out

but acting just on impulse as a kid my

dumbest tried stealing a greeting card

that had a lion on it just because

someone in my class liked lions and I

wanted to give it to them I legit did

not think twice about hiding in my

jacket because was I emotionally wanted

to get that card and just blocked out

any real reasoning behind it on the

other hand there is something nice about

childhood when we reflect back on it

there's this Simplicity to it to just

going outside and playing with your

friends not worrying about all the chaos

in the world so I don't know I'll ask

you guys what do you think are kids evil

or is there some things that kids

actually do better than adults shunza

gives this example about dining and how

it's respectful to let your elders eat

first as a kid since you're impulsive

you might ignore those moral rules

altogether and just dig in it takes

conscious activity to do good and this

is a good segue into the second part of

the quote that goodness is a result of

conscious activity during the whole

human nature debate the person saying

human nature is evil has to explain

instances where humans do good things

here shunza does this by pointing to

things like effort consideration

learning and willpower therefore man

must first be transformed by the

instructions of a teacher and guided by

ritual principles and only then will

will he be able to observe the dictates

of courtesy and humility obey the forms

and rules of society and Achieve order

so I view this as there being three big

things at play to produce goodness first

are the instructions of teachers who I

guess today we might say are moralizers

in our society second are the ritual

principles which we may generally equate

to good acts or practices deemed to be

good and finally there's the conscious

effort of the person to listen to those

teachers and to follow through with

those practices now there is a big

unspoken issue that we've kind of been

ignoring throughout this whole video and

that's what good and evil is for those

curious this is how shunzo defines these

all men in the world past and present

agree in defining goodness as that which

is upright reasonable and orderly and

evil is that which is prejudiced

irresponsible and chaotic this is the

distinction between good and evil so

whether you take shunz's own definition

of good and evil or you take up the

teachings of a moral philosopher of your

preference there is still this

relationship of teacher and student so

we could see that part being satisfied

even today then actually following

through on those teachings could satisfy

those other elements now that's

generally shunza's position on human

nature but he has a very familiar

sounding argument to help support this

essentially he believes that the evil

nature of humans requires not only these

ritual principles and conscious action

but governments to enforce all of this

if the nature of man were good we could

dispense with sage Kings and forget

about ritual principles but if it is

evil then we must go along with the sage

Kings and honor ritual principles now

this could lead into a whole Rabbit Hole

of political philosophy but what I find

interesting are the parallels between

this philosophy and a philosophy held by

someone roughly 1800 years later in

England we're probably all familiar with

Thomas Hobbes in his argument for

government in light of the state of

nature and hobbes's view of this state

of nature is pretty brutal and I'm sure

shunzo would agree with this view just a

cool little connection anyways what do

you think about this argument do you

think the state of nature without

government would be harsh due to the

evil nature of humans and what do you

think about shunz's position overall

comment below your thoughts as well as

your favorite Chinese philosopher who

name probably ends in Zur subscribe for

more philosophy content and I wish you

all a beautiful rest of your day

[Music]