Sony ZV-E10 II vs Sony ZV-E10 - Do You NEED to Upgrade?
Summary
TLDRDans ce script de vidéo, le comparatif entre la caméra Sony ZV-E10 originale et la nouvelle version ZV-E10 Mark II est détaillé. Les améliorations majeures du Mark II, notamment une prise en charge améliorée du bruit, un écran articulaté et tactile de meilleure qualité, et la capacité de filmer en 4K 60fps avec un nouveau capteur de 26 mégapixels, sont soulignées. Malgré les avantages, le prix plus élevé du Mark II par rapport à la version originale, qui conserve son excellente qualité d'image et un obturateur mécanique, suscite des questions sur la valeur de l'investissement. Le script engage le public à réfléchir à ce que la version Mark II apporte de plus et si cela vaut le coût supplémentaire.
Takeaways
- 📷 Le ZV-E10 Mark II est légèrement plus léger que le ZV-E10 original sans batteries, et présente un grip plus confortable pour une meilleure prise en main.
- 🔋 Le ZV-E10 Mark II est équipé d'une batterie plus grande, offrant une meilleure autonomie.
- 🎤 La qualité du microphone a été améliorée sur le ZV-E10 Mark II, offrant le meilleur microphone de la gamme Sony pour les vlogs et enregistrements audio sans microphones externes.
- 📼 L'emplacement de la carte SD a été déplacé vers le côté sur le ZV-E10 Mark II, facilitant le changement de carte, contrairement à l'emplacement dans la chambre de la batterie du ZV-E10 original.
- 🔌 Les ports sont mieux placés sur le ZV-E10 Mark II, évitant que les câbles ne bloquent l'écran et offrant une mise à niveau du port USB-C pour la diffusion 4K 30 via USB-C.
- 🖥️ L'écran articulé du ZV-E10 Mark II a une meilleure résolution et un contraste plus élevé, offrant une meilleure visualisation de l'exposition que sur le ZV-E10 original.
- 📹 L'écran du ZV-E10 Mark II est entièrement compatible tactile, améliorant significativement la navigation et les fonctionnalités par rapport au ZV-E10 original.
- 📚 Le ZV-E10 Mark II est équipé d'un nouveau capteur de 26 mégapixels capable de filmer en 4K 60 avec un léger recadrage de 1.1 fois, tandis que le ZV-E10 original est limité à 4K 30 avec un recadrage plus important.
- 🌈 Le nouveau capteur du ZV-E10 Mark II prend en charge le 10bit 4:2:2, offrant des millions de couleurs par rapport aux centaines de millions du ZV-E10 original, améliorant la qualité de l'image pour le grading de couleurs.
- 🔍 Le ZV-E10 Mark II a amélioré le stabilisateur électronique, avec un recadrage de 1.33 fois, moins important que le recadrage de 1.44 fois du ZV-E10 original.
- 💰 Le ZV-E10 original est un achat plus abordable, offrant une qualité d'image exceptionnelle et un obturateur mécanique, qui est préférable pour les photos de mouvement rapide et la réduction des bandes dans les conditions de faible éclairage.
Q & A
Quel est le principal avantage du ZV E10 Mark II par rapport à l'original ZV E10 en termes de poids et de taille ?
-Le ZV E10 Mark II n'est pas beaucoup plus gros ou plus lourd que l'original ZV E10. Sans les batteries, il est même léger, principalement en raison de la présence d'une batterie plus grande sur le Mark II, qui offre une meilleure autonomie.
Quelle est la différence majeure entre les microphones intégrés des deux caméras ZV E10 ?
-Le ZV E10 Mark II a un microphone amélioré et est considéré comme ayant le meilleur microphone de toute la gamme Sony, offrant une qualité audio supérieure pour le vlogage ou l'utilisation sans microphone externe.
Où se trouvait l'emplacement de la carte SD dans l'original ZV E10 et où a-t-il été déplacé sur le ZV E10 Mark II ?
-Dans l'original ZV E10, la carte SD se trouvait dans le compartiment à batteries, tandis que sur le ZV E10 Mark II, elle a été déplacée vers le côté, ce qui en facilite l'accès, surtout lors de l'utilisation d'un trépied ou d'un gimbal.
Quelle est la différence de résolution et de fonctionnalité entre les écrans des deux caméras ZV E10 ?
-L'écran du ZV E10 Mark II a une meilleure résolution avec 1,04 million de points contre environ 900 000 points sur l'original. De plus, le nouveau modèle a un écran entièrement tactile et compatible avec les menus, tandis que l'écran de l'original n'est pas entièrement fonctionnel en touche.
Quel est le principal avantage du capteur du ZV E10 Mark II par rapport à celui de l'original ?
-Le capteur du ZV E10 Mark II est le même que celui du A6700 et du FX30, offrant une qualité d'image comparable. Il permet également de filmer en 4K 60 avec un léger recadrage de 1.1 fois, tandis que l'original ne peut filmer qu'en 4K 30.
Quelle est la différence en termes de profondeur de champ et de rendu coloré entre les deux caméras ?
-Le ZV E10 Mark II est capable de 10 bits 4:2:2, offrant une information de couleur beaucoup plus riche avec plus d'un milliard de couleurs, tandis que le ZV E10 original enregistre en 8 bits et offre des millions de couleurs.
Quel est le principal inconvénient de la stabilité optique électronique des deux caméras ZV E10 ?
-Les deux caméras n'ont pas de stabilité optique intégrée (IBIS) et la stabilité électronique recadre fortement, avec un recadrage de 1.44 fois pour l'original et de 1.33 fois pour le Mark II, ce qui peut être problématique pour le vlogage.
Quelle est la différence de performance de la bascule de l'obturateur entre les deux caméras ?
-Le ZV E10 Mark II a une meilleure performance de la bascule de l'obturateur, avec une durabilité similaire à celle de l'A7 S3 et de l'A74, tandis que l'original a une performance très inférieure, ce qui peut causer des déformations lors de la prise de vue en mouvement.
Quel est le principal avantage du nouveau kit de lentilles fourni avec le ZV E10 Mark II ?
-Le nouveau kit de lentilles du ZV E10 Mark II est moins bruyant, plus fluide à utiliser, capable de suivre la mise au point même lors du zoom, et dispose d'une nouvelle stabilité optique, offrant une meilleure qualité de stabilisation que l'ancien kit de lentilles.
Quelle est la différence de prix entre le ZV E10 original et le ZV E10 Mark II ?
-Le ZV E10 original est vendu à 698 dollars, parfois en promotion à 598 dollars, tandis que le ZV E10 Mark II est vendu à 998 dollars, représentant une augmentation de prix significative.
Quel est l'avantage du ZV E10 original pour la photographie par rapport au ZV E10 Mark II ?
-Le ZV E10 original a un obturateur mécanique, capable de prendre des photos à 11 images par seconde, ce qui est préférable pour les sujets en mouvement rapide, évitant les courbes et les bandes dues à l'obturateur électronique.
Quelle est la différence de performance en lumière faible entre les deux caméras ?
-Les deux caméras ont une bonne performance en lumière faible, mais le ZV E10 original utilise une réduction de bruit plus agressive, ce qui peut donner des images moins boueuses, tandis que le Mark II offre une meilleure flexibilité avec un double ISO de base pour une utilisation du S-Log3.
Outlines
📷 Comparing ZV-E10 Original and Mark II
Dans le premier paragraphe, la comparaison entre la caméra ZV-E10 originale et la nouvelle version ZV-E10 Mark II est présentée. L'auteur souligne que bien que la Mark II soit légèrement plus lourde en raison d'une batterie plus grande, elle offre une prise en main améliorée et une meilleure autonomie. La nouvelle version a un look plus haut de gamme, un interrupteur de marche/arrêt et un commutateur de mode plus accessible. L'amélioration du microphone intégré est également mentionnée, offrant la meilleure qualité audio dans la gamme Sony pour les vlogs et les enregistrements audio sans microphone externe. L'emplacement du slot de carte SD est amélioré, et les ports sont mieux placés pour une meilleure convivialité. La sortie USB-C est également améliorée pour permettre le streaming 4K à 30 images par seconde. L'écran articulé de la Mark II a une meilleure résolution et une meilleure qualité d'image, et il est entièrement compatible tactile, offrant une navigation de menu améliorée.
🎥 Évaluation de la qualité d'image et de la stabilisation
Le deuxième paragraphe se concentre sur la qualité d'image et la stabilisation des deux caméras. Malgré que la ZV-E10 originale offre des images de qualité, la Mark II propose un avantage avec une résolution 1080p plus nette et une meilleure qualité d'image en 4K 60 images par seconde, bien que avec un léger recadrage. Les deux modèles n'ont pas de stabilisation optique intégrée, mais la Mark II offre une meilleure stabilisation électronique avec moins de recadrage. Des exemples de footage vlog sont présentés pour illustrer les différences. L'auteur mentionne également la possibilité d'utiliser des données gyroscopiques pour une stabilisation améliorée en post-production avec des logiciels gratuits comme Catalyst Browse.
🔧 Accessoires et améliorations du kit de la Mark II
Dans le troisième paragraphe, l'auteur discute des accessoires et des améliorations apportées avec le kit de la ZV-E10 Mark II. Le nouveau objectif fourni avec la Mark II est moins bruyant, maintient le suivi de la mise au point lors du zoom et peut suivre des fréquences d'image plus élevées. L'objectif a également une nouvelle stabilisation optique améliorée. L'amélioration du rolling shutter de la Mark II est également soulignée, offrant une meilleure expérience sans effet 'Jello' lors du mouvement de la caméra. Les améliorations apportées à la Mark II incluent également des fonctionnalités telles que le S-Cinetone, le mode Cine Vlog, et la compensation de la respiration de la mise au point.
💰 Évaluation des coûts et des avantages de chaque modèle
Le quatrième et dernier paragraphe évalue les coûts et les avantages de chaque modèle de caméra. L'original ZV-E10 est présenté comme une excellente option moins chère, offrant une qualité d'image comparable et une meilleure performance pour la photographie en raison du obturateur mécanique. Cependant, la Mark II, bien que plus chère, offre des fonctionnalités avancées comme le 10bit 422, le streaming USB-C 4K 30, un écran tactile pleinement fonctionnel et une meilleure stabilisation. L'auteur conclut en disant que la Mark II est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais le ZV-E10 original reste un excellent choix pour ceux qui cherchent un bon rapport qualité-prix.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡zv E10
💡améliorations
💡microphone intégré
💡écran articulaté
💡stabilisation électronique
💡10bit 422
💡S-cinetone
💡gyro data
💡mechanical shutter
💡prix
💡performance en basse lumière
Highlights
Comparing the original Sony ZV-E10 to the new ZV-E10 Mark II.
ZV-E10 Mark II has substantial upgrades and a few downgrades compared to the original.
ZV-E10 Mark II is lighter without batteries and has a bigger battery for longer life.
New model features an improved grip and premium feel.
Upgraded microphone in ZV-E10 Mark II offers the best in Sony cameras.
SD card slot relocation on ZV-E10 Mark II for convenience.
Improved USB-C port on ZV-E10 Mark II for 4K 30 streaming.
ZV-E10 Mark II has a fully articulating screen with better resolution and touch functionality.
New sensor in ZV-E10 Mark II capable of 4K 60 with a small crop.
ZV-E10 Mark II supports 10bit 4:2:2 color for better color grading.
1080 footage on ZV-E10 Mark II is sharper, beneficial for high frame rate shooting.
No in-body image stabilization, but electronic stabilization is improved in Mark II.
ZV-E10 Mark II has better rolling shutter performance.
New kit lens with ZV-E10 Mark II is less noisy and has improved stabilization.
ZV-E10 Mark II retains autofocus with Clear Image Zoom, unlike the original.
Price difference between the original ZV-E10 and the new Mark II.
Original ZV-E10 has a mechanical shutter, beneficial for fast-moving subjects.
Low light performance is strong in both cameras, with some preference for the original ZV-E10.
Transcripts
oh guys today is the day we're going to
compare the zv E10 original My Little
douge to the brand new zv E10 Mark I
that I so expertly reviewed and rest
assured you can still look gorgeous in
either camera however there are some
substantial upgrades with the zb1 Mark
II and oddly a couple of downgrades so
I'm going to have some test footage I'm
going to have some side by sides some
statistics what else would you expect
from a reviewer of my caliber so let's
get right into it
[Music]
so first let's talk about the
differences in the body and the great
news here is that the zv E10 Mark II is
not much bigger or heavier than the
original zv E10 in fact without the
batteries it's actually lighter than
this camera which is kind of crazy so
the extra weight the extra few grams
that you get on the zv E10 Mark I it's
because it has a bigger battery and that
is much better because you get a bigger
nicer beefier grip to hold on to and you
have much longer battery life the new
body does feel a little more premium and
you also have the onoff switch up by the
zoom rocker and you have a switch mode
for the photos video and snq as opposed
to a button that is on the zv E10
original the microphone is also upgraded
on the zv E10 Mark II and it has the
best microphone in any of the Sony
cameras so if you want to Vlog or just
use the microphone without any actual
external mics then the zv E10 Mark II is
the best you can do in the Sony lineup
now I would always use an external
microphone whether a lavalier or a
shotgun mic something like that but if
you want to use an on camera microphone
that is actually built into the camera
zv E10 Mark II is really good they both
come with that little furry wind muff
that da King wig that goes on top there
and that can really cut down on the wind
noise it's essential in my opinion if
you're going to go out into the world
the SD card slot thankfully is moved to
the side on the new zv E10 whereas the
original one had it in the battery
compartment which is always a chore
especially you're on a tripod something
like that or a gimbal trying to change
out your SD card is a real pain in the
butt you have the same ports on both
cameras but they are more conveniently
located on the zv E10 Mark II so your
wires don't get in the way of your
screen quite as much and also the USBC
Port is much upgraded on the zve 10 Mark
II so you can now do 4K 30 streaming
from that USBC whereas you can only do
720 streaming from the zv E10 I'm glad
there's some kind of streaming on this
camera but really if you want to start
streaming in 4k you are going to have to
use the HDMI port and use a capture card
for the original zv E10 the fully
articulating screen is much better on
the ZB E10 Mark I not only does it have
a better resolution it has $1.04 million
dots versus about 900,000 dots on this
but it's just the actual contrast the
image itself looks so much better on the
new one with the original one you just
kind of had to trust if you were in
sunny weather mode you kind of had to
trust that uh the image was going to be
fine cuz it looked blown out on the
screen no matter what exposure setting
you had it at the new one is much easier
to judge your actual exposure on the
screen itself and I think that was a
very needed upgrade and that screen not
only has better resolution is a much
more useful screen because it is fully
touch enabled you can't actually touch
the menu screen on this one well you can
touch it but it's not going to do
anything you have to use the buttons to
navigate through your menu system if you
can believe that now you can touch to
focus touch to track or touch shutter
with the zv E10 original but you
actually can't scroll through any of the
menus and the new zv E10 Mark 2 that
also has swipe menus it is a very
functional very well-laid out menu
system that is fully touch compatible
that is worth the upgrade for many
people right there and obviously in that
new body is a new sensor the same sensor
that's in the a6700 and the fx30 that
you're looking at right now which is
wonderful for people who want to get
fx30 quality on a budget then you can
get it in the new mark 2 26 megapixel
sensor this one right here in the
original one is a 24 megapixel sensor
and you can only go to 4K 30 with this
guy right here where is with the new
Mark I you can go all the way to 4K 60
there is a small 1.1 times crop but it
is 4K 60 and both cameras will down
sample from 6K except in the 4K 60 mode
that is down sampled from
5.6k but it is 6k in 4k 30 and down same
with this one right here and that new
sensor is capable of 10bit 422 so much
much more color information you can get
millions of colors on the zv E10 in 8bit
but on the new one you get over a
billion colors so when you want to use
slog 3 and get full dynamic range and be
able to color grade to your hearts
content the zv E10 Mark II will let you
do that just like the fx30 now that
being said the image quality on this
camera is still absolutely fantastic so
let me show you some side by-side images
of the zv E10 with the zv E10 Mark I and
you can see for yourself
[Music]
[Music]
now I think in the 4K modes this holds
up extremely well even though though it
is 8bit footage there are many
situations where you won't notice the
difference between 8bit footage and
10bit footage and most of the things I
shoot are those types of situations
you're doing Studio shots you're walking
around vlogging you don't necessarily
need the 10bit and you can still get
wonderful image quality out of this
camera right here at a much cheaper
price but when it comes to the 1080
footage the ZB E10 Mark II definitely
has sharper 1080 footage which also
means the 10812
if you're trying to do 120 frames per
second you have to do 1080 on both
cameras so it's going to look better on
the ZB E10 Mark I and of course that
camera has 4K 60 and this one doesn't
now what about stabilization neither
camera actually has an Ibis system
inbody image stabilization they save
costs by leaving out the Ibis and they
just try to do it electronically and the
ZB E10 the original crops in 1.44 times
in active stabilization a very Hefty
crop and uh the new one still has a
pretty hefty crop it's 1.33 times so
definitely less of a crop however it is
still a substantial crop so if you want
to do something like vlogging I would
recommend the Sony 11mm
f1.8 but even though there's not a giant
gap between the two crop factors it is
the actual stabilization the electronic
stabilization that I think is much
better on the new version of the camera
so let me show you some Vlog footage
right now and you can see for yourself
and now we are on my favorite lens for
vlogging the Sony 11
f1.8 check this out look at this nice
comfortable field of view even if I hold
it by the camera you still have a pretty
good field of view even with that active
stabilization which definitely works
quite well on this new camera check this
out look at this walking around talking
my nonsense film him a gorgeous face
while a bunch of people scream over here
so here we are on the original Sony zv
E10 with the 11 mm from Sony it is still
certainly usable with this camera even
with that active 40% crop for
stabilization because this lens is so
wide once again if I was holding it by
the camera it would be borderline too
close but it's a wide lens so you can
get away with it but with this little
selfie stick out here definitely very
usable still it's nice to have that
wider feel of view on the new mark 2
this is the zv E10 Mark I just on the
kit cleans and I'm using the active
stabilization so if you have a little
selfie stick like this and you extend it
out a little bit then uh I think this is
actually pretty doable for vlogging I
would still prefer the Sony 11 mm 1.8
for this to have a more comfortable
field of view but still this is pretty
nice this here is the zv E10 the
original on the kit lens bit too tight
for vlogging I think and even though I
had the selfie stick extended out
further if I didn't have this selfie
stick it would be right about out here
which is definitely too tight if you
extend it out this far and then push
your arm out further then but now I am
like extending my arm fully here so I
think that that is a little too
difficult and I never use the kit lens
when it comes to vlogging for the Sony
zve E10 because this active
stabilization it crops in too much on
this particular model right here I am
using the internal microphone right here
but uh that's it here you go that is the
comparison to the old versus the
[Music]
new now I certainly thought if you're
going to use active stabilization you're
much better off with the mark 2 version
however you don't have to use active
stabilization at all on either camera
because they both have gyro data you can
record the gyro data right to the SD
card and then smooth it out in post with
Catalyst browse which is free Catalyst
prepare which is a paid program and also
gyro flow which is another free program
I just use Catalyst brows for free even
though you can't do the 10bit footage
with Catalyst brows with the new ZB E10
Mark I I find it's fine for me and my
vlogging situation so often I will use
that gyro data and smooth it out in post
now that does take a long time be warned
that is not an easy process it takes a
lot of computing power and it takes a
fair amount of time but I believe the
results are worth it but you can also
isue all of those things and just simply
use a gimbal a tiny small lightweight
gimbal let me get one I actually got two
this is the xun crane M3s tiny little
lightweight gimbal for mirrorless
cameras and this is the crane m2s which
is even smaller and lighter and this
will take the zv E10 Mark I or Mark 1
with the 11 mm or the kit lens let me
show you that now now of course you
could always go get yourself a little
Gimbal and not have to worry about much
at all this is my smallest lightest
weight and cheapest skimal the xun crane
m2s it can handle the zv E10 and the kit
lens just fine along with little ND
filter that I have on there and a
microphone pack don't have to worry
about your steps being too heavy or too
light and you just get nice smooth
footage as you walk around Society
talking your
[Music]
nonsense so if you don't mind carrying
around and balancing a gimbal then you
can get a very wide feel of view with
the 11 mm and you can also even use the
kit lens to Vlog on the original zv E10
or the Mark I another reason the
handheld footage looks so much smoother
with the Mark I versus is the original
is the improvements to Rolling shutter
has the same rolling shutter on the new
one as the a6700 and fx30 and that is
somewhere in between an A7 S3 and an a74
it is definitely a good enough rolling
shutter something around 16 milliseconds
of rolling shutter of the ZB E10 Mark I
whereas the original one it's atrocious
it's as bad as it gets the rolling
shutter the Jello effect if you're
moving the camera around that's why I
did like to use gimbals or Catalyst
brows with this guy because if you are
using active stabilization you have to
be nice and smooth if you don't want to
see that Jello-O effect now if you're
just putting it up on a tripod doing
Studio shots things like that no worries
or like I said gimbal or Catalyst brows
now let's talk about that new kit lens
for a second that comes with the Mark I
versus the original kit lens and it is
much less noisy it is very smooth to use
whereas the old one rattled around a lot
and the old one as you zoom
you couldn't keep Focus tracking whereas
the new one can the new one can also
keep up with very high frame rates of
Sony cameras whereas the old lens can't
and it has a new Optical stabilization
as well so it's going to be a smoother
lens when it comes to actually
stabilizing your footage now I didn't
see a ton of difference between the two
lenses when it comes to actual Optical
quality and sharpness however the new
kit lens is definitely an upgrade over
the old one another Improvement on the
Mark I is there are no crops at all
except as mentioned the 4K 60 as a 1.1
times crop on the ZB E10 the original
there is a small crop in 4k 30 and also
there's a couple of quirks like you will
lose your ey detect autofocus if you are
connected to an HDMI monitor and you're
using 4K 30 4K 24 is fine on this camera
but 4K 30 you will lose your ey detect
autofocus also if you're connected to
the PC remote function on this camera
once again then you will lose your face
and eye detect autofocus and it will go
to a center based focus and in that same
vein when you use clear image zoom on
the old version you will once again lose
your eye and face detect autofocus and
it will go to a center based autofocus
and that is a big Advantage I think
because clear image Zoom is very useful
on the new camera you can keep your good
autofocus and then extend your lenses
you basically get more reach out of
every single lens that you are using
with almost no downside at all and the
Mark I has many other upgrades to the
original such as s cine tone it also has
the cine Vlog mode so you press one
button and it will make it look a little
more cinematic for your Vlogs switch it
to uh 4K 24 with the S CD tone and you
can have a bunch of other automatic
modes that you can slide around and
adjust these automatic modes with your
finger and you can get just better
footage coming straight out of the
camera you also have that great new
Focus breathing compensation which can
jive with compatible Sony lenses and you
have Focus mapping which I find very
useful when you are trying to obtain
critical Focus but that being said the
original zv E10 is still an excellent
camera and actually has some advantages
over the mark 2 version if you can
believe it well the first one you could
believe and that is the price this one
here is $6.98 when it's not on sale and
sometimes they put it on sale for 598 so
body alone 6.98 for the zve E10 original
and the new camera is coming in at
$998 and that is a big price jump I can
understand it with all of the ability
that the new camera has but you can
definitely get little douge for much
cheaper and as I have shown the image
quality can be absolutely Stellar
indistinguishable at times with this
camera and the new version and the
original zv E10 is probably a better
photo camera when you consider the fact
that this one has a mechanical shutter
they took out the mechanical shutter to
save costs on the zv E10 Mark I this one
can shoot 11 frames per second
mechanical shutter you can only do
electronic shutter with the Mark I which
is also at 11 frames per second so when
it comes to taking photos of things that
are moving fast a lot of times you will
get Curves in your lines like say a golf
club when it's being swung you may see a
big bend in it when you were shooting
shooting with electronic shutter or if
you're taking a photo outside of a
moving car and you see the signpost that
is curved that is the electronic shut
the rolling shutter is trying to read
from top to bottom so you get a curve
you are not going to have that with
mechanical shutter and worse than that I
find is banding so if you are in an
environment where you have different LED
lights flickering at different speeds
then sometimes you can see these
different Shadow lines going through
your photo and that is the landing and
you can eliminate that using mechanical
shutter so if you're trying to take
photos of let's say a wedding and
there's all these lights everywhere
different LEDs there is a variable
shutter and you can try to dial it in on
the zv E10 Mark II and that will help
but you'll have to actually find the
frequency that will get rid of those
lines now when you're shooting outside a
lot of times that won't be a problem but
definitely a mechanical shutter is much
preferred from photographers when it
comes to low light performance both
cameras are
pretty good in fact a lot of people will
prefer the zve E10 original because this
uses more aggressive noise reduction
from what I can tell whereas the a6700
fx30 and now zv1 Mark I it doesn't use
as much noise reduction so you are free
to reduce it yourself in post they give
you that but you'll get a less muddy
image because it's not using such
aggressive noise reduction but the zv
E10 is no slouch it's always been great
in low light the new camera will also
have a dual base ISO at least that's
what I found in my test if you're using
slog 3 and you switch over to 2500 you
will see that noise dropping right there
like the fx30 so that's another good
thing if you want to use S 3 number one
you can use 10 bit number two use that
next ISO of 2500 you can't do anything
like that on the zv E10 but just taking
it out using it in standard picture
profile walking around you are going to
see that this thing competes very
mightily with the new camera when it
comes to low light so I think for a lot
of people the extra cost will be worth
it when you consider all of the things
that you're getting with the Mark I the
10bit 422 the 4K 60 the better rolling
shutter the better stabilization you get
4k 30 USBC streaming it's just a better
screen touch fully touch functional it
is just an excellent camera but you do
have to pay substantially more than the
zve E10 original and as you can see in
this video you can still get excellent
image quality out of this guy and if
you're willing to use cataly browse when
you're doing handheld footage or use a
gimbal or maybe you're just using it as
a studio camera and then you want a
better photo camera with a mechanical
shutter the zv E10 is 698 and like I
said sometimes discounted
2598 so douge is the bargain of the
century here on the Sony lineup and they
are still selling this camera they know
how popular it is and it's a great entry
point for people into the Sony system so
they will continue selling their best
selling camera which makes a lot of
sense but they will add in the zv E10
Mark I for those people who want an
upgrade so tell me down below do you
think the extra cost is worth it of the
zve E10 Mark II or would you stick with
little douge right here and I wouldn't
blame you one bit he is a hell of a
camera and you are a hell of a person
for sitting around and watching me right
to the end I appreciate it with talk to
you again soon okay bye-bye
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
EXCLU Essai nouvelle Tesla Model 3 (2024) : plus douce et plus sage !
SAMSUNG REVENTÓ MIS EXPECTATIVAS!!!!!!!! Llegó el Galaxy S24 ✨
La moisson du blé avec Guillaume, agriculteur | Moisson 2020
Fixed price VS Agile (time material) approach
Le Cautionnement : [Droit des sûretés]
iOS 18 : les nouveautés IA qui vont REVOLUTIONNER l’iPhone !
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)