The MOST OFFENSIVE Kid is BACK

Summary

The video script discusses a controversial YouTuber who previously made offensive content, including using racial slurs and mocking sensitive topics. He recently apologized and claimed to change, but viewers are skeptical as his new content seems odd and potentially inappropriate, such as a video titled 'Black Chicken' and another suggesting Michael Jackson is not dead. Despite the change in content, the creator's past actions cast a shadow over his current efforts to become a better YouTuber.

Takeaways

• 🎥 The video discusses a controversial YouTuber who previously made offensive content, including racial slurs and mocking of the deceased.
• 🔄 The YouTuber claimed to have quit making offensive videos and promised to become a better content creator in a previous video.
• 👀 Viewers have been commenting that the YouTuber has returned and is posting 'weird content', prompting the creator to investigate.
• 🤔 The YouTuber made an 'apology' video using a robot voice and did not show his face, raising questions about his sincerity.
• 😷 In a subsequent video, the YouTuber claimed to be sick, which was the reason for not using his own voice or showing his face.
• 🎼 He also posted a video playing 'Five Nights at Freddy's' on the piano, which seemed out of place compared to his previous content.
• 🐔 A video titled 'Black Chicken Re-upload' was mentioned, which was confusing and seemingly unrelated to his previous content.
• 🎭 The YouTuber made a video claiming Michael Jackson is not dead, which was seen as a parody of other YouTubers' content.
• 🤣 The creator of the video script commented on the YouTuber's video, suggesting he was copying other channels, and received a reply from the YouTuber.
• 👍 The YouTuber's channel now seems to be posting more 'normal' content, but the video script's creator remains skeptical of his transformation.
• 😠 The video script's creator expresses disappointment in the YouTuber's past behavior and will not forget it despite his apparent change in content.

Q & A

What was the main topic of the original video the narrator discussed two days ago?

The main topic was about the most offensive kid on YouTube who had quit making offensive videos and was trying to become a better YouTuber.

What offensive behaviors did the kid on YouTube previously engage in?

He used to say the n-word, make fun of people who were dead, and ridicule Jewish people.

What kind of content did the kid post after claiming to quit making offensive videos?

He posted videos such as 'Five reasons why Michael Jackson is not dead' and 'This is the reason why I didn't show my face or use my voice'.

Why did the kid not show his face or use his own voice in his apology video?

He used a robot voice and did not show his face because he said he caught something from his school and was sick.

What was the content of the video titled 'Black Chicken re-upload'?

The content of the video is unclear from the transcript, but it seems to be potentially offensive and involves a black chicken.

What was the narrator's reaction to the kid's new video content?

The narrator found the new content to be somewhat better and more normal, but still expressed skepticism about the kid's intentions.

What was the kid's response to the narrator's comment about copying Cooper and Duber's video style?

The kid replied that it was a parody of Cooper's channel, indicating that he was not copying but rather making a parody.

What is the significance of the 'Five Nights at Freddy's on the piano' video?

The significance is not clear from the transcript, but it seems to be another attempt by the kid to create content that is different from his past offensive videos.

How many subscribers does the kid have according to the transcript?

The kid has 411 subscribers.

What is the narrator's final sentiment towards the kid's transformation as a YouTuber?

The narrator is glad that the kid is becoming a better YouTuber and making better videos, but still remembers the past offensive behavior.

What is the narrator's opinion on the kid's subscriber growth after mentioning him in a video?

The narrator believes that the kid does not deserve the subscriber growth and that it was not expected.