Dituding Terima Suap Rp400 Juta Kasus AKBP Bintoro, Kapolres Jaksel: Itu Tidak Benar! | News Flash
Summary
TLDRThe transcript details the controversy surrounding Komjen Ad Rahmat Nal, the head of South Jakarta Police, who is accused of accepting bribes amounting to IDR 400 million from suspects in a murder case. His lawyer, Pahala Manurung, denies the allegations and asserts that the legal process is being followed. The case also involves accusations of bribery involving other police officials, with some conflicting figures about the sum involved. The lawyer stresses the importance of clarification, transparency, and legal justice, providing evidence and documents to back up their claims, while emphasizing a firm stance on accountability.
Takeaways
- đ Ade Rahmat Nal, the Head of South Jakarta Police, is accused of receiving a Rp400 million bribe in connection with a murder case.
- đ The defense, led by Pahala Manurung, denies the corruption allegations and asserts that Ade Rahmat has provided testimony to the internal police investigation body.
- đ WRC (the defense team) is committed to ensuring justice for their client, An and MBH, and will take legal steps to clear their names.
- đ The defense clarifies that the reported bribe figures vary, with some media outlets stating Rp20 million and others citing Rp17 million.
- đ According to the defense, An and MBH were approached for legal protection regarding the demands for money by an officer named Kanit Z.
- đ The defense team highlights the importance of verifying all claims and ensuring that no false accusations are made without proper evidence.
- đ WRC emphasizes that they have visual evidence from their clients and others involved, including a written statement detailing the financial losses attributed to the alleged bribe.
- đ The defense insists that they are not making any accusations without verifying the facts, and they are committed to transparency and truth during the investigation.
- đ There are claims that the money requested by Kanit Z was meant to handle matters related to the South Jakarta Police, including the processing of cases.
- đ The WRC defense team is prepared to take further legal action if necessary to protect their clients and ensure the truth is revealed in the court of law.
Q & A
What is the main allegation against Kombes Ade Rahmat Nal?
-The main allegation against Kombes Ade Rahmat Nal is that he allegedly received a bribe of 400 million Indonesian Rupiah from suspects involved in a murder case, specifically Arif Nugroho.
Who is defending the suspects, and what is their stance?
-The suspects are being defended by their lawyer, Romisi Hombing, and Pahala Manurung. They have denied the allegations, asserting that there is no evidence of bribery and that the legal process should proceed fairly.
How did Kombes Ade Rahmat Nal respond to the bribery allegations?
-Kombes Ade Rahmat Nal denied the bribery allegations, claiming that he did not receive any money from the suspects and has already provided a statement to the Propam Polda Metro Jaya regarding the accusation.
What action is being taken by WRC in response to the allegations?
-WRC (the legal team) has announced that they will take legal action to ensure justice for their client, An and B, by overseeing the legal process and ensuring fair treatment.
What did WRC emphasize regarding their involvement in the case?
-WRC emphasized that they are committed to supporting their client through legal actions, ensuring that the law is enforced and that their client receives fair treatment in the ongoing legal process.
What was the initial reason for the legal teamâs involvement in the case?
-The legal team became involved after two witnesses, Mr. B and Mr. G, approached WRC seeking legal protection. They claimed that an official from the South Jakarta Police Station had demanded a sum of money to influence a case involving the suspects.
How much money is being discussed in connection with the alleged bribery?
-The total amount mentioned in the case is reported to be 17 million Rupiah, according to the testimonies from the witnesses. This is the sum allegedly requested by the officer from the suspects.
What steps did WRC take to verify the bribery claim?
-WRC conducted interviews with the witnesses and asked for written statements to verify the claims. They also collected written evidence, including a declaration from the suspects and witnesses, to ensure the allegations were legitimate.
What is the significance of the amount 17 million Rupiah in the case?
-The 17 million Rupiah represents the amount that the suspects claim was requested by the officer in exchange for handling the case. This is a critical part of the allegations and is supported by the written statements from the involved parties.
What further actions will be taken by the WRC in the coming legal process?
-WRC will continue to monitor the legal process, ensure transparency, and take appropriate actions to ensure that their clientâs rights are protected. They are prepared to present the collected evidence in court to support their claims.
Outlines
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantMindmap
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantKeywords
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantHighlights
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantTranscripts
Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.
Améliorer maintenantVoir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
Ada Bukti Pelanggaran HAM Kasus Vina? | Telusur tvOne
ETIKA ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK "KOLUSI" | KELOMPOK 2
Misteri Uang Damai Rp50 Juta Guru Supriyani - [Top News]
Kasus Anak Nikita Mirzani, Begini Hasil Pemeriksaan Vadel Badjideh dan Pemanggilan Saksi Lain
Ada Bukti Pelanggaran HAM Kasus Vina? | Telusur tvOne
L'Appel Trop Con - ProcĂšs du candidat Martin âïž #rireetchansons
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)