"I F***ING LOVE STEROIDS" - Ryan Garcia ABSOLUTELY Took Ostarine (positive B sample) | My Analysis

More Plates More Dates
25 May 202416:32

Summary

TLDRThe video revisits the controversy surrounding boxer Ryan Garcia, who tested positive for the banned substance Ostarine on the day of his fight with Devon Haney. The script discusses the likelihood of Garcia's innocence or guilt based on B sample test results and urine concentrations. It explores the possibility of contamination, the submission of a hair test, and the implications of the findings. The video delves into the science behind Ostarine, its detectability, and the minimal effective dosage, concluding that Garcia's positive test is likely due to inadvertent contamination rather than intentional doping, but still resulting in significant scrutiny for his career.

Takeaways

  • đŸ„Š Ryan Garcia tested positive for Ostarine, a selective Androgen receptor modulator (SARM), on the day of his fight with Devon Haney.
  • đŸš« Ostarine is a synthetic compound not supposed to be present in an athlete's system and is considered a performance-enhancing substance.
  • 🔬 Both A and B sample tests for Garcia came back positive, indicating the presence of Ostarine and 19-Norandrosterone.
  • 💡 The speaker hypothesizes that Garcia may have been a victim of supplement contamination, as his legal team claims he never intentionally used a banned substance.
  • 🔍 Garcia's hair sample analysis came back negative, suggesting no long-term ingestion of Ostarine, which could indicate contamination.
  • 📉 The negative hair test result, however, cannot overrule the positive urine test and is not considered a gold standard for SARM ingestion assessment.
  • đŸš« The 6 nanograms per milliliter reported for Garcia is 60 times over the allowable limit for Ostarine, which raises questions about his intentions.
  • 🧬 Clinical trials suggest that a dose of around 3 milligrams of Ostarine is the minimum to see increases in power and lean body mass.
  • đŸ€” The speaker questions the likelihood of Ostarine being used intentionally for performance enhancement in boxing, given its high detectability and limited benefits.
  • 🧐 The speaker concludes that while Garcia may have inadvertently ingested a contaminated supplement, the dose was too low to provide significant performance enhancement.
  • 📚 The video script emphasizes the importance of athletes being responsible for what they ingest and the potential consequences of positive drug tests.

Q & A

  • What was the initial reason for Ryan Garcia's positive drug test?

    -Ryan Garcia tested positive for ostarine, a selective Androgen receptor modulator (SARM), and also screened positive for 19-norandrosterone, which is an endogenously produced metabolite that required confirmation via isotope ratio mass spectrometry.

  • What does the B sample test result indicate for Ryan Garcia?

    -The B sample test result also came back positive, indicating the presence of the banned substance ostarine in Ryan Garcia's system.

  • What is the significance of the hair test that Ryan Garcia's legal team mentioned?

    -The hair test was conducted to provide evidence of potential contamination and to show that Ryan Garcia did not ingest ostarine over a period of time, suggesting that any positive test result may not be due to intentional use.

  • What does the negative hair sample result suggest about Ryan Garcia's case?

    -The negative hair sample result is consistent with the claim of contamination and suggests that Ryan Garcia did not have a long-term ingestion of ostarine, which could support the argument that the positive test was not due to intentional use.

  • What is the allowable limit for ostarine in urine tests, and how did Ryan Garcia's test result compare to this limit?

    -The allowable limit for ostarine in urine tests is 0.1 nanogram per milliliter. Ryan Garcia's test result showed six nanograms per milliliter, which is 60 times over the limit.

  • What is the general consensus on the effectiveness of ostarine for performance enhancement?

    -Ostarine is considered a research chemical and is not FDA approved. While it can enhance lean muscle growth and strength to some extent, it is not very effective for performance enhancement, especially in sports like boxing.

  • What is the minimum efficacious dose of ostarine according to the clinical trials mentioned in the script?

    -The minimum efficacious dose of ostarine, where noticeable increases in power and lean body mass begin, is around three milligrams.

  • How does the dosage that Ryan Garcia tested positive for compare to the minimum efficacious dose of ostarine?

    -Ryan Garcia tested positive for six nanograms per milliliter, which is significantly lower than the minimum efficacious dose of three milligrams, suggesting that even if the ostarine was ingested, it would not have provided a significant performance-enhancing benefit.

  • What is the role of Dr. Pascal Kint in Ryan Garcia's case?

    -Dr. Pascal Kint is a foremost expert in toxicology and hair sample analysis. Ryan Garcia's hair sample was sent to him for testing, which returned a negative result for ostarine.

  • What does the script suggest about the likelihood of Ryan Garcia's positive test being due to supplement contamination?

    -The script suggests that it is likely that Ryan Garcia's positive test was due to inadvertent contamination from a supplement, given the ultra-low levels found in his samples and the negative hair test result.

  • What are the implications of Ryan Garcia's positive test result for his boxing career and reputation?

    -The positive test result, even if not intentional, could lead to significant scrutiny and potentially negative consequences for Ryan Garcia's boxing career and reputation, including the possibility of having his win taken away.

Outlines

00:00

đŸ„Š Ryan Garcia's Positive Drug Test Controversy

The paragraph discusses the controversy surrounding Ryan Garcia, who tested positive for the banned substance Ostarine on the day of his fight with Devon Haney. The script details the initial positive test, the confirmation through isotope ratio mass spectrometry, and the subsequent positive B sample test. It also mentions Garcia's claim of innocence, suggesting contamination from a supplement. The paragraph explores the possibility of Garcia cheating, the results of his hair follicle test which came back negative, and the argument that the detected levels of Ostarine could be due to contamination rather than intentional use. It concludes with the high likelihood that Garcia was a victim of supplement contamination, despite the potential for this to be a strategic excuse.

05:03

đŸ§Ș Analyzing Hair Sample Reliability in Doping Cases

This paragraph delves into the reliability of hair sample analysis as a method to refute urine analysis in doping cases. It explains that, as of 2022, hair testing cannot be considered a substitute for urine analysis because a negative hair result does not exclude the use of the detected drug. The paragraph also discusses the limitations of hair testing for sarms and notes that it cannot overrule the results of urine analysis. It suggests that while hair testing might support Garcia's claim of inadvertent contamination, it does not eliminate the positive urine test results. The paragraph also touches on the potential consequences for Garcia's boxing career and gambling winnings.

10:04

🧬 The Science Behind Ostarine Dosage and Detection

The script examines the science behind Ostarine, a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), discussing its clinical trials, efficacy, and detection in drug testing. It explains that Ostarine is not an approved FDA drug and has shown limited effectiveness for performance enhancement. The paragraph explores the minimum efficacious dose of Ostarine and its potential benefits for lean muscle growth and strength. It also discusses the elimination profiles of Ostarine and the likelihood that Garcia's positive test result was due to inadvertent contamination rather than intentional use, given the low levels detected in his system.

15:04

🏆 The Impact of a Positive Drug Test on a Boxer's Career

In this paragraph, the focus is on the potential impact of a positive drug test on a boxer's career, using Ryan Garcia's situation as an example. It emphasizes the importance of being cautious with substances consumed by athletes, especially those at the top of their sport. The paragraph suggests that even if Garcia can prove his positive test was not intentional, the fact that he competed with a banned substance in his system will likely lead to significant scrutiny and could result in the loss of his win. It concludes by highlighting the need for athletes to be more careful with what they ingest to avoid such controversies.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Ryan Garcia

Ryan Garcia is a professional boxer who is the central figure in the video's discussion. He is mentioned in the context of testing positive for a prohibited substance, which has led to controversy and scrutiny. The video explores the implications of this event on his career and the debate surrounding whether his positive test was due to intentional cheating or inadvertent contamination.

💡Ostarine

Ostarine is a selective Androgen receptor modulator (SARM), which is a synthetic compound that is not allowed in sports due to its performance-enhancing capabilities. In the video, it is revealed that Ryan Garcia tested positive for ostarine, leading to the main conflict discussed throughout the script. The video delves into the details of ostarine's effects, detection, and the possible reasons for its presence in Garcia's system.

💡ADR (19-Norandrosterone)

19-Norandrosterone, or ADR, is an endogenously produced metabolite that can be detected in drug testing. While it is naturally occurring, it can also be an indicator of steroid use when present in abnormal levels. The video mentions that Garcia screen positive for ADR, which adds to the complexity of the case and the need for further testing to confirm the presence of prohibited substances.

💡Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry

Isotope ratio mass spectrometry is a technique used to analyze the isotopic composition of elements in a sample. In the context of the video, it is mentioned as a method for confirming the presence of ostarine, which is an endogenously produced metabolite. This technique is crucial for determining whether the presence of ostarine is due to natural production or the use of a prohibited substance.

💡B Sample

In the realm of drug testing, the 'B Sample' refers to a second sample of urine or blood that is collected and stored for testing in the event that the 'A Sample' tests positive. The video discusses how Ryan Garcia's B sample also tested positive for ostarine, which further confirms the initial positive test and intensifies the controversy surrounding the case.

💡Hair Sample Analysis

Hair sample analysis is a method used to detect the presence of drugs over a longer period of time compared to urine tests. In the video, it is mentioned that Ryan Garcia's hair sample tested negative for ostarine, which his team argues supports the claim of contamination rather than intentional use. However, the video also explains the limitations of hair testing in such cases.

💡Contamination

Contamination in the context of the video refers to the accidental presence of a prohibited substance, such as ostarine, due to external factors like supplements or environmental exposure. Garcia's team suggests that contamination from a supplement is the most likely explanation for the positive test, which is a key point in the debate over whether his actions were intentional or accidental.

💡Performance-Enhancing Drugs (PEDs)

Performance-enhancing drugs, or PEDs, are substances that athletes use to improve their physical abilities and performance. The video discusses ostarine as a PED and explores the levels at which it could potentially enhance performance. The script also debates whether the levels found in Garcia's system could have provided any performance benefits.

💡Supplement Contamination

Supplement contamination refers to the unintentional presence of prohibited substances in dietary supplements. The video suggests that one of the natural supplements Ryan Garcia was using could have been contaminated with ostarine, leading to the positive test. This is a common issue in sports, as athletes must be cautious about the supplements they consume to avoid positive drug tests.

💡Nanogram per Milliliter

A nanogram per milliliter is a unit of measurement used to express the concentration of a substance in a solution. In the video, it is mentioned that the allowable limit for ostarine is 0.1 nanogram per milliliter, and Garcia's test result was 60 times over this limit, which is a significant point in the discussion about the severity of the positive test.

💡Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are research studies that help determine the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments, such as drugs. The video refers to clinical trials involving ostarine to establish the minimum effective dose and to understand its potential benefits and drawbacks. This information is relevant to the discussion of whether the detected levels of ostarine in Garcia's system could have had any performance-enhancing effects.

Highlights

Ryan Garcia tested positive for ostarine on the day of his fight with Devon Haney.

The B sample test results also came back positive for ostarine.

Hair test results for Ryan Garcia were negative, suggesting contamination.

Legal team argues for contamination causing a positive test, not intentional use.

Ostarine is a selective Androgen receptor modulator and not naturally produced.

Garcia's urine concentrations were 60 times over the allowable limit for ostarine.

Hair sample analysis cannot overrule urine test results for SARMs.

The negative hair test is consistent with contamination but does not exclude drug use.

Garcia had no previous history of positive tests leading up to the fight.

The minimum effective dose of ostarine for performance enhancement is around 3 milligrams.

Clinical trials show ostarine is not very effective for performance enhancement.

The detected amount of ostarine in Garcia's system is unlikely to provide a significant advantage.

Ostarine is considered a poor choice for performance enhancement in boxing.

Garcia's legal team is working to identify a contaminated supplement as the source.

The incident has led to significant scrutiny and potential consequences for Garcia.

Garcia's case highlights the importance of being cautious with supplements and substances ingested by athletes.

Transcripts

play00:00

sup guys Derek more plates.com today we

play00:02

are revisiting the Ryan Garcia debacle

play00:05

this guy has tested positive for

play00:08

Austrian on the day of his fight with

play00:10

Devon Haney so we got the B sample test

play00:13

results in we also apparently know the

play00:15

urine concentrations and I think I have

play00:18

a pretty good idea if he was indeed

play00:20

trying to cheat or not based on the data

play00:23

we have I can discern a reasonable

play00:25

hypothesis so anyways May 1st VOD sends

play00:30

him the letter that basically says he

play00:32

tested positive for ostering as well as

play00:33

screen positive as well for 19 Nor

play00:36

androsterone but it needed confirmation

play00:38

via isotope ratio Mass Spec analysis

play00:42

because it's an endogenously produced

play00:44

metabolite however ostarine a selective

play00:46

Androgen receptor modulator is not it is

play00:49

something that's not supposed to be

play00:50

there at all so as you would expect when

play00:52

you have a sarm in your system your B

play00:54

sample is probably going to come back

play00:55

positive as well and indeed it has so

play00:57

his test results for the B sample come

play01:00

back positive as well and to make

play01:01

matters worse for him if there was any

play01:04

ambiguity as to if this you know win is

play01:07

going to get turn into a no contest or

play01:09

whatever like it's not good that he was

play01:12

literally in the ring fighting on the

play01:14

day of with drugs in his system

play01:17

regardless if it's a micro do regardless

play01:19

if it was inadvertent regardless if it

play01:21

was contamination at the end of the day

play01:23

he had a amount that exceeded the

play01:25

acceptable threshold for a synthetic

play01:28

compound that is not supposed to be

play01:30

there that has seen his performance

play01:31

enhancing on the day he's punching a guy

play01:33

in the head so not good however he has

play01:37

also gotten his hair tested apparently

play01:40

and his legal team has said you know

play01:41

it's come up Negative they believe

play01:43

there's contamination causing a positive

play01:45

test King Ryan I beat the case like

play01:48

orange juice let's go the glove didn't

play01:50

fit okay unfollow LP Logan is still gay

play01:55

button 29,000 likes Jesus Christ here we

play02:00

go you use ostering to help you retain

play02:02

muscle while cutting weight you had a

play02:03

bad cycle and got caught it's over bro

play02:06

I'm slowly losing respect for Ryan this

play02:08

is a perfect example of people who are

play02:10

just like your be sample came back CL

play02:12

[ __ ] you that's basically the extent of

play02:13

what's going to happen here for a lot of

play02:15

people regardless of how much

play02:18

information comes out that is positively

play02:21

reinforcing his case as a pro athlete

play02:23

you should not especially the top of

play02:26

your sport like this was

play02:28

absolutely un ran at the end of the day

play02:31

regardless if there was inadvertent

play02:32

contamination or whatever like you are

play02:34

responsible for what goes into your body

play02:36

is what people will say regardless so

play02:40

for Ryan he has this hair test

play02:42

supposedly and his lawyers legal team

play02:45

says Ryan Garcia's committed to clean

play02:47

and Fair competition has never

play02:48

intentionally used any bad substance

play02:50

soon after being notified of his

play02:52

positive test Ryan voluntarily had his

play02:54

hair collected and shipped to Dr Pascal

play02:57

kin the foremost expert and toxic iology

play03:00

and hair sample analysis the results of

play03:02

Ryan's hair sample came back negative

play03:04

this is consistent with contamination

play03:06

and demonstrably proves that Ryan had

play03:07

not ingested ostrin over a period of

play03:09

time the only way he would have had any

play03:11

advantage whatsoever in the ring Ryan

play03:14

has voluntarily submitted to tests

play03:15

throughout his career which have always

play03:17

shown negative results he also tested

play03:18

negative multiple times leading up to

play03:20

the fight against Haney all of these

play03:22

factors combined with his ultra low

play03:24

levels it's interesting legal jargon

play03:27

ultra low levels from samples taken on

play03:29

April 19th and 20th in the billionth of

play03:31

a gram range point to Ryan being a

play03:34

victim of supplement contamination and

play03:36

never receiving any performance

play03:37

enhancing benefit from the microscopic

play03:39

amounts in his system we are certain

play03:41

that one of the natural supplements Ryan

play03:43

was using in the lead up to the fight

play03:44

will prove to be contaminated or in the

play03:46

process of testing the supplements to

play03:48

determine the exact source so you know I

play03:52

think it's likely that something he did

play03:54

cause

play03:55

contamination um whether it ends up

play03:58

being one of the supplements that he

play03:59

took or not you know it's probably the

play04:01

most likely source of it however the

play04:04

dose that he got was it performance-

play04:06

enhancing after all and was he you know

play04:08

because even if it wasn't his

play04:10

supplements you could easily argue oh I

play04:12

just so happen to be taking this thing

play04:14

it spiked and that's why it's in my

play04:17

system but this is not a unusual

play04:20

strategy for some people who are looking

play04:23

to use a particular compound having a

play04:26

product that is knowingly contaminated

play04:29

as a cop out to be able to use that

play04:31

compound and then say it was your

play04:32

supplement that said would you do that

play04:35

with austerine

play04:36

intentionally probably not so here we

play04:39

know the amount apparently that was

play04:41

actually in his urine so Garcia's tweet

play04:44

also LED Renown Sports nutritionist

play04:47

Victor Ki to write Austrian has a 0.1

play04:49

nanogram per milliliter allowable limit

play04:51

and Ryan Garcia had six nanograms per

play04:54

milliliter reported for April 19th which

play04:56

is 60 times over the limit history of B

play04:59

sample test is 99% confirmation of a so

play05:02

60 times over the limit it sounds like a

play05:05

lot you know it sounds like oh wow you

play05:07

were clearly trying to like retain

play05:09

muscle while cutting weight or whatever

play05:11

you know like a lot of people jump to

play05:13

these conclusions as you can see here I

play05:15

can see why somebody would think that

play05:17

let talk about the hair sample analysis

play05:19

so he says he got you know hairs on his

play05:22

head an analyze to assess some sort of

play05:26

further back time scale of ostran

play05:28

ingestion and would show that indeed he

play05:31

didn't take any is it a reliable way to

play05:34

actually you know refute a urine

play05:37

analysis not really unfortunately for

play05:40

him so human hair testing for sarms

play05:42

current knowledge and limitations as of

play05:45

2022 in case of an adverse analytical

play05:48

finding hair testing can be a compliment

play05:50

to document the claim of the athlete but

play05:51

of course the result should not be

play05:53

considered as an alternative to urine

play05:55

analysis this is because a negative hair

play05:57

result cannot exclude the use of the

play05:59

detected drug drug and cannot overrule

play06:01

the urine result so at the end of the

play06:03

day like you taking hair out of your

play06:04

head and sending it for analysis to some

play06:06

experts like that's great it could help

play06:09

your case maybe but it's like this isn't

play06:11

a validated method of sarm ingestion

play06:13

assessment really at the end of the day

play06:15

like this is still new and

play06:18

developing uh methodologies around hair

play06:20

testing which may be viable but it is

play06:24

not a gold standard right now and as

play06:26

noted cannot be used to act as an

play06:30

alternative for the actual urine

play06:32

analysis that is um facilitated through

play06:35

the actually governing the actual

play06:36

governing body so despite the fact that

play06:38

he might have done this himself like you

play06:41

know chain of custody on the actual

play06:43

sample who knows like what went into

play06:45

this did he just [ __ ] take it off his

play06:46

head himself and send it in the mail who

play06:47

knows but at the end of the day it's

play06:49

like this isn't going to just eliminate

play06:52

the you know the test results that he's

play06:54

had in his urine it is just something to

play06:57

build a case against how it was not

play07:00

intentional is what he's trying to do

play07:02

which is fair but it's still ultimately

play07:05

not going to get rid of it it just might

play07:08

reduce the scrutiny to some extent but

play07:11

it is certainly not beating you know I

play07:14

beat it like he suggest he says I beat

play07:16

the case like no you're still [ __ ]

play07:18

unfortunately and when I say [ __ ] I

play07:21

mean like he gets the scrutiny and even

play07:23

if he proves that it's inadvertently

play07:25

spiked in his supplements or whatever

play07:27

like you were still responsible and

play07:28

you're likely going to you have your win

play07:31

taken away I would think and I have no

play07:32

idea what this means for all of his

play07:34

gambling winnings and stuff like that

play07:36

must be wild I can't even imagine what

play07:38

that is like right now where you bet on

play07:42

yourself millions of dollars and then it

play07:45

comes to light that you cheated and if

play07:49

that gets held up is there gambling

play07:51

entities chasing him now too you know

play07:53

like I can't even imagine what this

play07:54

guy's dealing with so the actual dosage

play07:57

that he used six per milliliter what

play08:00

does that actually equate to well first

play08:02

what is the minimum efficacious dose for

play08:04

ostarine so we look back at some of the

play08:07

clinical trials I went over the

play08:09

austerine pipeline I believe in my first

play08:11

video by pipeline I mean the clinical

play08:14

pipeline in which it is being assessed

play08:17

for different indications it is a

play08:18

research chemical at the end of the day

play08:20

this is not an approved FDA approved

play08:22

drug yet it is still in clinical trials

play08:26

and has actually failed for lack of

play08:29

efficacy see a few times notably so it's

play08:31

not that effective of a drug for

play08:33

performance enhancement but it does

play08:36

enhance lean muscle growth and strength

play08:38

to some extent but what is the lowest

play08:41

dose you can actually get something out

play08:42

of at least based on the literature

play08:44

available we have studies assessing as

play08:47

low as 0.1 milligrams all the way as

play08:50

high as 100 milligrams in about 1,500

play08:53

subjects and this was back in I don't

play08:56

know when I wrote this article but it

play08:57

was a while ago but it comprises most of

play08:59

the notable austerine literature that

play09:01

actually

play09:02

assesses um dose increments and what

play09:06

actually equates to an outcome worth

play09:08

evaluating so percent change in lean

play09:10

body mass is a metric of assessment of

play09:13

efficacy in many of these studies but

play09:14

also strength and of course these aren't

play09:17

healthy populations but you have to

play09:19

extrapolate what you can as to what is

play09:21

better than like Baseline hormone

play09:24

production and in general what we see

play09:27

when we dig into the literature is that

play09:30

ostarine at a dose of about three

play09:33

milligrams is kind of where you start to

play09:35

get into the territory of increases in

play09:39

power something that could be chocked up

play09:41

to useful in sport anything below that

play09:44

you're not really getting especially as

play09:46

a male highly unlikely to be getting

play09:48

anything worth taking it to begin with

play09:52

and to be honest as mentioned in the

play09:53

first video Even if you were looking at

play09:57

this thing seriously if you're an

play09:58

athlete with even a like room

play10:03

temperature IQ coach on your side would

play10:06

hopefully tell you this is not the

play10:08

compound you want to be using like there

play10:10

is no sane not completely idiotic person

play10:13

who would ever suggest using ostarine

play10:17

for p as a peed in boxing this is a

play10:20

completely absurd choice of a peed with

play10:24

how highly detectable it is and just you

play10:26

know the hordes of anecdotes at this

play10:28

point of people who have been popped by

play10:31

accident inadvertently most of the case

play10:33

cuz it's such a stupid drug to take all

play10:35

the people that want to hate on Ryan

play10:37

will talk about how ostrin is great for

play10:39

retaining muscle and blah blah blah and

play10:41

it it can be helpful for that for sure

play10:44

but at the end of the day like you would

play10:46

pick a way way smarter drug to be taken

play10:49

if you were trying to use an anabolic

play10:51

agent than like one of the most highly

play10:53

detectable

play10:55

synthetic selective not neurologically

play10:59

enhancing non- psychoactive like just

play11:01

shitty [ __ ] anabolic drugs

play11:04

realistically like this thing hasn't

play11:05

even been FDA approved it is not the

play11:07

go-to choice for boxing enhancement that

play11:09

aside it is performance enhancing

play11:11

probably at around 3 milligrams give or

play11:14

take so 6 nanograms per milliliter 60

play11:18

times over the allowable limit what does

play11:20

that mean how much would you have to

play11:22

ingest to actually get six nanog per

play11:24

milliliter is the question cuz if he

play11:26

actually had a contaminated supplement

play11:28

is it possible that it had an enough

play11:29

ostarine in it to actually give him

play11:31

performance enhancing properties at this

play11:33

3 mgram dose or is it possible that he

play11:36

actually just [ __ ] took it at 3 mg

play11:38

and it led to this 6 nanog per

play11:40

milliliter test result well that's where

play11:42

we look at this elimination profiles of

play11:44

micro doed ostrin mimicking contaminated

play11:47

products ingestion study so in here we

play11:49

have individuals being administered

play11:51

orally one and 10 and 50 microgr being

play11:56

assessed and analyzed using liquid

play11:58

chromatography with t mass

play12:00

spectrometry now when you look at these

play12:03

excretion profiles of the parent

play12:06

compound as well as its metabolites

play12:08

you'll note that in general to get to a

play12:11

point where you are even reaching about

play12:15

six nanog per milliliter in the urine

play12:17

because you can see here Austrian

play12:18

nanograms per milliliter you have uh

play12:21

excretion profiles of metabolites as

play12:24

well where are we hitting the 6 nanog

play12:26

per Mill Mark you are in microgram

play12:29

territory so keep keep in mind here

play12:32

micrograms how many micrograms are in a

play12:34

milligram 1,000 so to get to 3 millgram

play12:38

which is probably the minimum

play12:41

efficacious dose you're looking at 3,000

play12:44

micrograms of ingested ostarine over the

play12:47

span of multiple days like this is not

play12:49

just one Administration you get an acute

play12:51

performance outcome that you can use in

play12:53

the ring like again this is not a

play12:55

psychoactive neurologically enhancing

play12:57

compound really it is something that

play12:59

would be a purely tissue selective

play13:02

anabolic with a lack of androgenic

play13:04

activity you would use in a muscle

play13:06

wasting scenario for like women to not

play13:10

have viralized outcomes but have some

play13:12

anabolic action in bone or muscle like

play13:14

that is the typical desired outcome of a

play13:16

compound like this again a reason why

play13:19

it's not very helpful for boxing or the

play13:21

ideal choice for a male but Peak

play13:24

ostering concentrations range from 0.96

play13:26

to 5.77 nanog per Mill L and were

play13:30

observed 4 to 22 22 hours after

play13:32

ingestion and the drug was detectable

play13:34

for even at these low ass concentrations

play13:36

for like multiple days like this is

play13:39

ultimately pretty damn close to what he

play13:41

was tested for at the 6 nanogram per

play13:43

milliliter Mark so you have these

play13:45

dosages being utilized as high as 50

play13:48

micrograms so like 50 micrograms like

play13:51

what is that you're like if you took 50

play13:54

micrograms every day leading up to the

play13:56

fight you would get absolutely nothing

play13:57

out of it like to actually get to the 3

play13:59

milligram dose you are like

play14:02

astronomically higher than this and so

play14:05

like to me that shows that this is very

play14:08

likely inadvertent contamination via

play14:11

something and even if it was

play14:13

contaminated via something it is

play14:15

essentially impossible for him to have

play14:17

gotten a performance enhancing benefit

play14:19

out of it and realistically even if he

play14:21

got like the minimum acious dose how

play14:23

much would it have really helped them at

play14:25

the end of the day not very much like

play14:27

this is not this is a drug that has

play14:29

essentially failed its uh Target end

play14:33

points like it is not an FDA approved

play14:34

drug it is seen as like a primitive sarm

play14:39

that may have some utility in like you

play14:42

know elderly women for anti-catabolic

play14:45

action but it is certainly not going to

play14:47

be like the [ __ ] maker break for a

play14:49

boxer like you would be using a much

play14:52

higher dose as a male boxer to get like

play14:54

a significant Advantage out of it now

play14:56

perhaps that is a bit exaggerating 3 Mig

play14:59

maybe it would do something for a

play15:00

complete natural who's depleted and

play15:02

weight cutting absolutely a case to be

play15:04

made there but at the end of the day

play15:06

like this isn't even close to that what

play15:07

he ingested was an probably accidental

play15:10

micro do to the tune of like double

play15:13

digit micrograms at most and that is not

play15:17

even close to imparting performance

play15:19

enhancing advantages as per the clinical

play15:21

literature as per the extrapolated

play15:23

excretion profiles in these studies no

play15:26

matter which way you spin it with this

play15:27

guy

play15:29

even if he was TR even if he was trying

play15:31

to dope like like his dose was like way

play15:34

too low and even if it was an in

play15:36

inadvertent contamination there's no way

play15:39

the dose he was using inadvertently

play15:41

would have helped him so it's like you

play15:43

know I feel like there's a strong case

play15:45

for him to show that it was not

play15:48

intentional However the fact remains

play15:51

that he walked into the ring with a over

play15:54

the like with a positive test result and

play15:56

fought a guy so that is going to yet

play15:59

unfortunately significant amounts of

play16:01

scrutiny for years to come and that

play16:03

[ __ ] sucks for him cuz it could have

play16:04

been avoided entirely just by being a

play16:06

little bit more careful with what he's

play16:09

putting in his mouth so take from that

play16:11

way you will uh thank you guys for

play16:12

watching like subscribe if you want to

play16:14

see more deep dived into pharmacology

play16:17

human biology and other interesting [ __ ]

play16:19

so um yeah I don't remember how to do my

play16:23

outro I'm still uh getting back in the

play16:25

groove here so check out stuff in the

play16:27

video description if you want to support

play16:28

me so uh yeah I guess I'll talk to you

play16:31

guys soon

Rate This
★
★
★
★
★

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
Ryan GarciaDoping ControversyOstarineSports NutritionDrug TestingPerformance EnhancementSupplement ContaminationLegal DefenseAthlete AccountabilityBoxing Scandal
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?