@RohitRajGupta Anarc watch deleted video

Summary

The video review critiques a budget smartwatch from the brand 'Layers,' exposing significant flaws in its design, software, and performance. Despite heavy marketing claims of innovation, the reviewer highlights issues such as inaccurate heart rate and sleep tracking, a cumbersome user interface, and missing essential features like GPS syncing and call management. The smartwatch is revealed to be a rebranded Chinese product, falling short of expectations even at its budget price. Ultimately, the review emphasizes that similar-priced alternatives offer better value in terms of design, functionality, and overall performance.

Takeaways

• 😀 The budget smart watch industry is evolving, but the latest launch raises concerns about authenticity and reliability.
• 😀 The creator of the smart watch has millions of followers and is widely trusted, but issues have surfaced with product claims and functionality.
• 😀 A major problem reported is inaccurate heart rate and sleep tracking, with the watch performing poorly compared to other devices like the Polar H10 chest strap.
• 😀 There are design flaws in the watch, such as heavy weight, large bezels, and the lack of critical sensors like auto-brightness, which affect user comfort and usability.
• 😀 The smart watch has copied design elements from other products and shows signs of being a white-label Chinese product, raising concerns about transparency.
• 😀 Several features promised by the watch, such as music control during workouts and accurate workout tracking, are either missing or faulty.
• 😀 The user interface (UI) of the accompanying app is described as basic and buggy, which affects the overall user experience.
• 😀 Issues with the customer support system include responses in Chinese, which complicates troubleshooting and customer satisfaction.
• 😀 Despite heavy marketing and claims of being a world-class design, the actual product falls short in both hardware quality and software performance.
• 😀 The watch’s heart rate monitoring is highly inaccurate, as shown by the significant differences in the data it produces compared to established devices like the Polar H10.

Q & A

What is the main issue with the new budget smartwatch launched by Tech Burner?

The main issue revolves around the watch's performance and misleading marketing. Despite claims of innovative design and features, the smartwatch falls short in terms of functionality, accuracy, and overall user experience.

Why does the reviewer believe the smartwatch lacks credibility?

The reviewer points out multiple discrepancies, such as misleading marketing claims, poor quality control in the product's software and design, and the fact that the watch is essentially a rebranded Chinese product, which undermines its credibility.

What was the issue with the watch's software and app integration?

The app associated with the watch is described as a poor, basic UI, with many missing features. The watch also uses third-party Chinese SDKs, which raises concerns about data security and the authenticity of the claims made by the brand.

How accurate is the heart rate monitoring on the smartwatch compared to other devices?

The heart rate tracking on the smartwatch is inaccurate. When compared to the Polar H10 chest strap, the smartwatch's data shows significant discrepancies, with spikes in heart rate being recorded inaccurately.

What did the reviewer find problematic about the watch's design?

The smartwatch's design includes overly large bezels, which are considered impractical. Additionally, the watch is heavy, which could make users feel uncomfortable over extended wear, especially during workouts.

What does the reviewer think about the watch's battery life and display?

The reviewer acknowledges that the watch has a decent battery life and a bright, clear display. However, it misses some critical features such as an auto-brightness sensor, which is common in similarly priced smartwatches.

How does the smartwatch perform in terms of fitness tracking?

The fitness tracking capabilities of the smartwatch are inadequate. It lacks GPS synchronization, accurate workout tracking, and the ability to control music during exercise. These shortcomings make it less useful for athletes and fitness enthusiasts.

What did the reviewer say about the watch's call features?

The smartwatch supports Bluetooth calling but lacks essential features like the ability to put calls on hold or respond to notifications directly from the watch, which makes it less practical compared to other devices in the same price range.

What was the criticism regarding the smartwatch's sleep tracking?

The sleep tracking on the smartwatch is highly inaccurate, with significant differences in recorded sleep duration and stages when compared to more reliable devices like the Elvach. The data shows discrepancies in deep sleep and light sleep tracking.

Why is the smartwatch's price considered unjustifiable by the reviewer?

The reviewer argues that for the price of ₹7,000, the smartwatch fails to deliver in key areas like accurate fitness tracking, software functionality, and design. Comparable devices in the ₹3,000-₹4,000 range outperform this smartwatch in nearly every aspect.