Marlee Matlin on Cochlear Implants and Deaf Culture

Summary

This video discusses the perspectives of the deaf community on cochlear implants and the importance of American Sign Language (ASL). The speaker highlights the need for individuals to have the freedom to choose their own path, whether it involves cochlear implants or signing, without external pressure. Emphasizing the cultural significance of ASL, the speaker advocates for recognizing deaf culture, which includes language, education, and community. The message challenges the notion that cochlear implants are always the better option and stresses the pride and value found in deaf culture and its language, American Sign Language.

Takeaways

• 😀 Cochlear implants are often presented as the primary option for deaf children, but there are other alternatives that are not always fully explored.
• 😀 Many individuals in the deaf community feel pressured to opt for cochlear implants, which is seen by some as a better option than sign language.
• 😀 The deaf community advocates for the right to self-define and make decisions about their identity and communication methods without outside interference.
• 😀 Deaf culture, which is closely tied to American Sign Language (ASL), includes language, art, education, and a strong sense of community.
• 😀 ASL is not just a communication tool but a key component of deaf culture, offering visual connection rather than relying on auditory experiences.
• 😀 Not all deaf individuals are opposed to cochlear implants, particularly those who have had prior hearing experiences and may benefit from them.
• 😀 Cochlear implants are not effective for everyone, and their success varies depending on the individual’s specific circumstances and background.
• 😀 Deaf culture is diverse, and different regions and countries have their own sign languages, which means deaf individuals worldwide may not always understand each other.
• 😀 The speaker advocates for the importance of ASL as an essential part of deaf identity, stating that it connects individuals through visual communication.
• 😀 The deaf community continues to fight for recognition and autonomy, often facing pressure from those who may not fully understand their experiences or needs.

Q & A

What are some of the options provided to parents of deaf children according to the speaker?

The speaker mentions cochlear implants as one option, but notes that there are other options available, such as American Sign Language. However, these alternatives are often not discussed in depth.

What is the issue with the current approach to educating parents of deaf children?

The issue is that many educational professionals only view deafness in terms of a 'black and white' approach, focusing primarily on cochlear implants, and not providing enough information about other viable options like sign language.

How does the speaker feel about cochlear implants?

The speaker is not opposed to cochlear implants but emphasizes that it’s not the right choice for everyone, particularly for those who have never heard. They advocate for the use of American Sign Language instead.

What does the speaker say about those who argue against the use of sign language?

The speaker challenges those who discourage the use of sign language, asking 'Who are you to decide for us?' and stresses that deaf people should have a voice in defining how they wish to communicate.

What factors should be considered when choosing between cochlear implants and sign language?

The decision should depend on individual circumstances, such as whether the person has progressive hearing loss or was born deaf. Cochlear implants may be more suitable for those with a background of hearing, while sign language is often preferred by those in the deaf community.

What is the speaker's stance on the eligibility for cochlear implants?

The speaker acknowledges that cochlear implants are not suitable for everyone and do not work for everyone. They emphasize that it is important for individuals to make their own decisions regarding their hearing or communication methods.

Why does the speaker advocate for American Sign Language for children?

The speaker advocates for American Sign Language because it is a visual language, which aligns with the visual nature of the deaf community. They also highlight the cultural significance and community of deaf individuals who use sign language.

How does the speaker define modern deaf culture?

Modern deaf culture is defined by the use of American Sign Language, the community's art, education, and strong cultural identity. It is also emphasized that deaf culture is not universal, as different sign languages exist across the world.

What is the significance of deaf culture to the speaker?

Deaf culture is extremely important to the speaker, as they describe it as something precious. They express pride in being part of it and stress the ongoing struggle against those who try to control the lives of deaf people.

What is the relationship between deaf culture and the use of sign language?

Sign language is central to deaf culture. It is the primary means of communication within the community and is deeply intertwined with the community's identity, art, and education.