Why Kavos HATES ImAllexx

Summary

In this candid conversation, the speakers discuss their ongoing conflict with YouTuber Alex, focusing on his lack of accountability and the false accusations he's made. They share their frustration over Alex's refusal to meet or apologize properly, highlighting his tendency to avoid responsibility for his actions. The conversation also touches on cancel culture, the role of online apologies, and how people, particularly influencers like Alex, manage their public personas. Ultimately, they emphasize the importance of growth and change in dealing with past mistakes, especially in the public eye.

Takeaways

• 😀 Alex has made false claims about trying to meet up with the speaker multiple times, but the speaker asserts Alex never reached out to him.
• 😀 The speaker is frustrated by Alex’s refusal to take accountability for his actions, particularly regarding false accusations and mishandling controversies.
• 😀 Apologies play a crucial role in resolving conflicts. The speaker believes a genuine apology from Alex could clear the air, but Alex has been reluctant to make meaningful apologies.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes the importance of taking responsibility for mistakes and correcting them publicly, rather than hiding or ignoring them.
• 😀 The speaker sees Alex's inability to admit wrongdoing as a significant issue and feels that Alex often hides his mistakes from his audience.
• 😀 The speaker doesn't actively seek to 'cancel' people, but he does want them to be held accountable for their actions, especially in the case of Alex.
• 😀 Cancel culture is a complex issue, and the speaker believes it's difficult to truly cancel someone who still has a loyal following or who hasn't fully apologized or shown remorse.
• 😀 Despite the ongoing tension, the speaker would still be open to meeting Alex and having a constructive conversation to resolve the misunderstandings.
• 😀 The speaker acknowledges the importance of entertainment and relevancy when creating content about others, noting that videos don't always have to be deeply serious.
• 😀 The speaker dislikes repeating the same content, especially when it comes to talking about Alex, but feels it’s necessary due to the unresolved issues and constant public interest.
• 😀 The speaker believes that personal growth and genuine change in someone like Alex would shift public opinion if Alex showed empathy and remorse for his past actions.

Q & A

What is the main issue the speaker has with Alex?

The main issue the speaker has with Alex is his lack of accountability for his actions and failure to apologize sincerely for past mistakes, particularly the incident with Slazzo.

Why does the speaker believe Alex has never made an effort to meet him?

The speaker believes Alex has never made an effort to meet him because Alex falsely claimed that the speaker had never shown up for a meeting, when in reality, the speaker had tried to meet Alex multiple times but Alex never reached out.

What would it take for the speaker to forgive Alex?

The speaker would be willing to forgive Alex if Alex took full accountability for his actions, made a sincere apology, and showed genuine change in behavior.

How does the speaker view the apology Alex gave regarding the Slazzo incident?

The speaker views Alex's apology regarding the Slazzo incident as insincere and inadequate, describing it as a 'wall of text' that lacked true emotion and accountability.

What is the speaker's opinion on cancel culture?

The speaker is skeptical about cancel culture, stating that it has become ineffective because people who do problematic things, like Alex, continue to thrive and succeed despite their controversies.

How does the speaker feel about meeting Alex in real life?

The speaker would be open to meeting Alex in real life, especially to have a debate or a conversation about the issues they have with him, but doubts they would connect or get along.

Why does the speaker continue to make videos about Alex?

The speaker continues to make videos about Alex because they feel a sense of responsibility to clear the names of people who have been wronged by Alex, as well as the desire to hold Alex accountable for his actions.

What is the speaker’s perspective on judging people for old actions, like past tweets?

The speaker believes that people should not be judged solely for their past actions or old tweets but should be assessed based on their current behavior and how they have changed over time.

What does the speaker think Alex needs to do to regain public trust?

The speaker thinks Alex needs to show genuine empathy, admit his wrongdoings, and demonstrate significant change in order to regain public trust and have his past mistakes forgiven.

What impact has the internet's view on cancel culture had on the speaker’s views?

The speaker has changed their view on cancel culture due to the realization that the internet is less unforgiving than it once was, with people like Alex and Jeffree Star continuing to prosper despite controversies.