Discussion Text

Summary

This video tutorial introduces the concept of discussion texts, focusing on their structure and key features. A discussion text presents two opposing viewpoints on a particular issue, typically structured into an introduction, supporting points (pro arguments), contrasting points (contra arguments), and a conclusion or recommendation. The video also highlights the linguistic features of discussion texts, primarily using the simple present tense and conjunctions like 'however' to contrast ideas. An example discussing the necessity of the National Examination in Indonesia's education system is provided to illustrate these points clearly.

Takeaways

• 😀 Discussion text is a type of writing that presents both pro and contra opinions on a particular topic or issue.
• 😀 A discussion text typically includes an introduction to the issue, supporting points for both sides, and a conclusion or recommendation for solving the problem.
• 😀 The structure of a discussion text includes an introduction, supporting points (pro), contrastive points (contra), and a recommendation or conclusion.
• 😀 Supporting points (pro) explain the positive aspects or benefits of the discussed issue.
• 😀 Contrastive points (contra) present the opposing arguments or criticisms regarding the issue.
• 😀 The conclusion or recommendation section suggests a solution by weighing both pro and contra arguments.
• 😀 Common linguistic features of a discussion text include the use of present tense, conjunctions like 'however' and 'on the other hand,' to create a clear, logical flow between ideas.
• 😀 In a discussion text, the present tense is typically used to discuss facts or current issues, but past tenses can also be used for historical context.
• 😀 Conjunctions like 'however,' 'on the other hand,' and 'in addition' are used to contrast ideas and create coherence in the text.
• 😀 The example provided in the transcript discusses the pros and cons of the national examination system in Indonesia, highlighting arguments for and against its relevance and effectiveness.

Q & A

What is a discussion text?

A discussion text is a type of text that presents both pro and contra opinions on a specific issue or topic. It discusses different viewpoints, offering arguments both in support of and against the issue.

What are the typical components of a discussion text?

The typical components of a discussion text are: 1) Introduction (which presents the issue), 2) Supporting points (arguments in favor of the issue), 3) Contrasting points (arguments against the issue), and 4) Conclusion or recommendation (which suggests a solution or final stance on the issue).

How does a discussion text structure work?

A discussion text starts with an introduction that outlines the issue. It is followed by supporting points (pro arguments), then contrasting points (contra arguments), and concludes with a recommendation or resolution.

What are 'conjunctions' in the context of a discussion text?

Conjunctions in a discussion text are used to link ideas and improve coherence. They can also express contrast, such as 'however' or 'on the other hand,' which help to show opposing viewpoints.

Why is present tense commonly used in discussion texts?

Present tense is commonly used in discussion texts because they typically address current, factual issues or ongoing debates. It helps convey the immediacy of the topic being discussed.

Can past tense be used in a discussion text?

Yes, past tense can be used in a discussion text, particularly when referencing historical events or situations. However, the majority of the text is often written in present tense to maintain focus on current issues.

What is the role of 'supporting points' in a discussion text?

Supporting points provide the arguments or reasons in favor of the issue being discussed. They help to present the positive side or justification for a particular stance on the issue.

What is the purpose of 'contrasting points' in a discussion text?

Contrasting points present the arguments against the issue being discussed. They offer a counterpoint to the supporting points, showing the opposition's views or reasons for disagreement.

What kind of issue is discussed in the example about national exams in Indonesia?

The example discusses the ongoing debate about whether national exams (UN) are still necessary in Indonesia. It presents both sides: those who believe the exams are important for evaluating educational quality and those who argue they don't accurately assess students' abilities.

What is the conclusion or recommendation made in the discussion text about national exams?

The conclusion suggests that national exams can still be useful as a tool for evaluating students' cognitive competencies in specific subjects, though improvements may be needed.