E-Textiles / Wearables Boards Compared: LilyPad vs GEMMA vs Microbit

Core Electronics
13 Jun 201906:21

Summary

TLDRIn this video, Steven from Core Electronics explores various wearable boards for e-textiles, highlighting the LilyPad, Gemma M0, and Micro:bit. The LilyPad, a pioneering board, offers ease of use but limited processing power. The Gemma M0 is praised for its compact size and versatility, featuring touch-sensitive pins and multiple programming options. Meanwhile, the Micro:bit stands out with built-in sensors and Bluetooth capabilities, making it ideal for educational projects. Each board is analyzed for its advantages, disadvantages, and best use cases, providing a comprehensive guide for enthusiasts looking to launch their wearable projects.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The LilyPad is one of the first wearable boards, setting the standard for e-textiles and wearables.
  • 🎉 It features a round profile with large holes for easy sewing with conductive thread.
  • 🔋 The LilyPad has a built-in LiPo battery charging capability but can cause damage if used with standard alkaline batteries.
  • ⚡ The board operates similarly to an Arduino Leonardo, with multiple analog and digital pins for various functions.
  • 💡 The Gemma M0 is a compact board with a powerful microcontroller, offering around 25 times the speed of the LilyPad.
  • 🎨 Gemma M0 includes a built-in DotStar LED that can be programmed to display any color.
  • 🤚 It has three capacitive touch-sensitive pins, enabling touch input for wearable projects.
  • 🛠️ The Gemma M0 can be programmed in multiple languages, including MakeCode, JavaScript, CircuitPython, and Arduino.
  • 📦 The Micro:bit is a powerful board with built-in sensors, including temperature, light, and motion detection.
  • 🔗 While the Micro:bit is less suited for sewing into garments, it provides excellent functionality and documentation for low-cost wearable projects.

Q & A

  • What is the main focus of the video?

    -The video discusses different types of wearable boards and e-textiles, comparing their advantages and disadvantages.

  • What is the LilyPad, and what makes it notable?

    -The LilyPad is one of the first wearable boards, featuring a circular design with large holes for easy sewing with conductive thread. It's an Arduino Leonardo integrated into a lightweight board.

  • What are some advantages of using the LilyPad?

    -The advantages include its lightweight design, built-in LiPo charging capability, and compatibility with a battery pack, making it easy to use for various projects.

  • What precautions should be taken when using the LilyPad with non-rechargeable batteries?

    -Care should be taken not to connect standard alkaline battery packs to the USB while they are powered, as this can damage the batteries or pose fire hazards.

  • How does the Gemma M0 differ from the LilyPad?

    -The Gemma M0 is significantly smaller and faster, with a powerful microcontroller that can handle complex tasks. It also features capacitive touch-sensitive pins and supports multiple programming languages.

  • What programming options are available for the Gemma M0?

    -Users can program the Gemma M0 using MakeCode, JavaScript, CircuitPython, or Arduino, providing flexibility depending on the user's skill level.

  • What features does the micro:bit offer that make it suitable for wearable projects?

    -The micro:bit includes various built-in sensors such as temperature, light, accelerometer, and magnetometer, alongside Bluetooth capabilities, making it versatile for different projects.

  • What is a significant drawback of using the micro:bit for wearables?

    -The micro:bit can be difficult to sew into projects due to its design, requiring careful handling to avoid overlapping on its edge connector pins.

  • Which other wearable boards are mentioned as alternatives to the ones discussed?

    -The Adafruit Flora and the Circuit Playground Express are mentioned as alternatives, with the Flora being similar to the LilyPad and the Circuit Playground Express similar to the micro:bit.

  • What is the key takeaway regarding the recommended boards for e-textiles projects?

    -The key takeaway is that the LilyPad, Gemma M0, and micro:bit are highly recommended for starting e-textiles and wearable projects due to their unique features and ease of use.

Outlines

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Mindmap

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Keywords

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Highlights

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Transcripts

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
Wearable TechnologyE-TextilesArduino BoardsDIY ProjectsMicrocontrollersLilyPadGemma M0Micro:bitElectronics EducationTech Reviews
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?