Eps 390 | KENAPA NEGARA SEKULER MAJU MAJU? INDONESIA?

Summary

The video script discusses the hypothetical question of whether Indonesia would become more advanced if it were to become a secular nation. It challenges the common assumption that secular countries are more developed by examining the cultural and religious practices of Japan and Norway, and argues against the simplistic dichotomy between religious and secular. The speaker also critiques the application of the term 'secular' to Indonesia, suggesting that the country's issues are not due to religion but rather the misuse of religious labels to mask underlying problems. The script calls for a deeper understanding of secularism and religion's role in societal development.

Takeaways

• 🌍 The video discusses the hypothetical question of whether Indonesia would become more advanced if it became a secular country.
• 📊 It mentions studies from institutions like PW Research and the University of Missouri suggesting a correlation between secularism and advancement in countries.
• 🗣️ The speaker challenges the notion that religious countries are less advanced, arguing that the relationship between religion and progress is more complex.
• 🏮 The video uses Japan as an example of a developed country with a unique approach to religion, combining Shinto traditions with modern ethics.
• 📚 It critiques the idea that secularism is inherently linked to progress, pointing out that the concept of secularism has evolved over time.
• 🏛️ The speaker discusses Max Weber's 'The Protestant Ethic', arguing that the success of Protestant countries was due to their religious ethics, not secularism.
• 🚫 The video criticizes the binary view that one must be either religious or secular, suggesting a more nuanced understanding is needed.
• 📖 It explores the historical origins of secularism, arising from the failures of religious institutions to govern and protect people during Europe's dark ages.
• 🌿 The speaker argues that Indonesia's lack of a clear ideology, rather than its religiosity, may be a barrier to advancement.
• 🏢 The video suggests that even if Indonesia adopted secularism, the practical outcomes might not change significantly if the underlying issues are not addressed.

Q & A

What is the main hypothesis discussed in the script?

The main hypothesis discussed is whether Indonesia would become a more advanced nation if it were to become a secular state.

What is the general perception about the relationship between secularism and advancement in countries?

The general perception is that more advanced countries tend to be more secular, which is supported by statements from scientists and various research findings.

What are the examples of advanced secular countries mentioned in the script?

Examples of advanced secular countries mentioned are Norway, the United States, and Japan.

What is the argument against the hypothesis that secularism leads to advancement?

The argument against the hypothesis is that secularism is not the sole factor for advancement. The script suggests that countries like Japan are advanced due to cultural ethics and mentalities, such as those derived from Shintoism, rather than their level of secularism.

What is the critique of the research that correlates religiousness with lack of advancement?

The critique is that such research starts from a modernist perspective which may not be entirely accurate. It is argued that a postmodern approach should be considered, which challenges the binary view of religious versus secular.

What is the script's stance on the idea that being religious hinders a country's progress?

The script argues against this idea, suggesting that being religious does not necessarily hinder progress and that the concept of secularism should be re-evaluated in a postmodern context.

What is the script's view on the definition of secularism?

The script suggests that the definition of secularism should be reconsidered beyond the modernist perspective. It proposes looking at secularism in the context of postmodernism, where the separation between religious life and worldly life is not as clear-cut.

What is the script's critique of the application of the term 'atheist'?

The script critiques the simplistic application of the term 'atheist' to imply a lack of religious belief. It argues that from a Sufi or certain Islamic theological perspectives, atheism could be seen as the peak of religious belief, indicating a transcendence beyond physical concepts of God.

How does the script analyze the situation in Indonesia regarding religion and advancement?

The script analyzes that Indonesia is portrayed as not being advanced because it is perceived as highly religious. However, it challenges this by pointing out that true religious adherence should lead to ethical behavior and societal progress, which is not always reflected in the country's current state.

What is the script's conclusion about the potential of Indonesia becoming more advanced if it were to adopt secularism?

The script concludes that simply adopting secularism as a label would not necessarily lead to advancement. It suggests that the practical application of ideologies and the true nature of societal behavior would remain the same regardless of the label.

What is the script's view on the implementation of Pancasila in Indonesia?

The script views Pancasila as an ideology that has not been fully implemented in practice. It suggests that Pancasila is used more as a label or a cover for various economic and political systems rather than a truly guiding ideology.