Deno 2 is here… will it actually kill Node.js this time?

Fireship
24 Sept 202404:16

Summary

TLDRThe video script discusses the release of Dino 2, a significant upgrade in the JavaScript world, offering a polished back-end experience. It boasts full compatibility with Node.js and npm, a new logo, and enhanced TypeScript support. Dino 2 can lint and format code, run TypeScript files without configuration, and understands package.json, supporting monorepos. It also includes a package registry, JSR, and reduces dependency on external packages. The script highlights Dino 2's potential to change JavaScript development but notes the risk of relying on a for-profit company for maintenance.

Takeaways

  • 🌟 JavaScript's popularity is polarizing among programmers, with some loving it and others disliking it.
  • 🦕 Dino 2 has been released, significantly improving the JavaScript ecosystem, especially for backend development.
  • 💥 Dino was thought to be extinct after being overshadowed by Bun, but it has made a strong comeback.
  • 🔄 Dino 2 offers full backward compatibility with Node.js and npm, making it a seamless transition for existing projects.
  • 🆕 It introduces a new logo that is claimed to improve code quality, along with a range of new features.
  • 🛠️ Dino 2 provides an integrated development experience with tools like linting and formatting, reducing the need for external packages.
  • 📄 It supports TypeScript out of the box, allowing developers to write and run TS files without additional configuration.
  • 🔒 Dino enforces proper permissions for scripts accessing the network, enhancing security.
  • 📦 Dino understands the package.json file and can work with monorepos using npm workspaces.
  • 🌐 It has its own package registry (jsr) where every package natively supports TypeScript.
  • 🔧 Dino's standard library is stable, reducing the need for additional packages like jest or chalk.
  • 📝 Dino compiles JavaScript into binaries for different operating systems, appealing to compiled language programmers.
  • 📓 Integration of the Jupyter kernel allows for interactive notebooks, a feature new to the JavaScript world.
  • 💼 Dino is free and open source but maintained by a for-profit company that offers hosting services.
  • 🏢 In contrast to Dino, Node.js is part of the OpenJS Foundation and has broad industry support, which is crucial for enterprise adoption.
  • 💡 The video suggests that Dino's main drawback might be its newness and the sustainability of its development, as it's tied to a for-profit company's financial success.

Q & A

  • What significant event happened in the JavaScript world according to the script?

    -The release of Dino 2, which is a major update to the JavaScript runtime environment.

  • What was the initial challenge faced by Dino after its creation?

    -Dino faced the challenge of not being fully compatible with Node.js and npm, which meant that many popular packages wouldn't work with it.

  • What is the new feature of Dino 2 that addresses the previous compatibility issue?

    -Dino 2 now provides full backwards compatibility with Node.js and npm, allowing it to work with every package and meta-framework.

  • What does the script suggest as one of the main advantages of Dino 2?

    -Dino 2's main advantage is its ability to provide a polished back-end JavaScript experience with full compatibility and a new logo that can improve code quality.

  • How does Dino 2 enhance the TypeScript experience for developers?

    -Dino 2 allows developers to write TypeScript code by simply changing the file extension to '.ts', without needing a TS config or compile step.

  • What is the significance of Dino 2's integrated Jupiter kernel?

    -The integrated Jupiter kernel allows developers to create interactive notebooks, a feature that has not been widely adopted in the JavaScript world until now.

  • What is the jsr package registry mentioned in the script, and how does it relate to Dino 2?

    -The jsr package registry is Dino's own package registry where every package natively supports TypeScript.

  • What is the potential drawback of switching to Dino 2 from Node.js mentioned in the script?

    -A potential drawback is that Dino 2 is maintained by a for-profit company that may run out of funding if it doesn't sell hosting and other services.

  • How does the script describe the competition between JavaScript runtimes?

    -The script describes the competition as beneficial, comparing it to other languages with multiple runtimes or compilers, and suggesting that it drives innovation.

  • What is the script's stance on the idea of JavaScript being used only in the browser?

    -The script humorously suggests that some people believe JavaScript should only be used in the browser to trigger popup ads, but it argues that competition among runtimes is good.

  • What does the script suggest about the future of JavaScript development with the release of Dino 2?

    -The script suggests that with the release of Dino 2, JavaScript development could become more efficient and powerful, potentially changing the landscape of back-end development.

Outlines

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Mindmap

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Keywords

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Highlights

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Transcripts

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
JavaScriptDino RuntimeNode.jsTypeScriptnpmBunCompatibilityOpen SourceWeb DevelopmentTech Review
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?