The Two Faces of Ana: Model Employee/Cuban Spy

AntiPolygraph
17 Jul 201723:23

Summary

TLDRAna Montes, a highly respected Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) analyst, was secretly a Cuban spy. Despite being a model employee with a spotless record, her colleagues and supervisors were unaware of her espionage activities. Over the years, Montes provided critical U.S. intelligence to Cuba, including details of undercover agents and military exercises. Her double life unraveled after a fellow analyst, David, grew suspicious of her involvement in key intelligence anomalies. Following an investigation, Montes was arrested in 2001 and later confessed, exposing the devastating impact of her betrayal.

Takeaways

  • 🕵️‍♀️ Ana Montes, once a respected analyst for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), was a Cuban spy.
  • 🎓 Montes had an impressive academic background, including a master's degree from Johns Hopkins and a bachelor's from the University of Virginia.
  • 💼 She was highly respected by her peers and superiors, earning top performance evaluations and accolades throughout her career.
  • 🤔 Despite her professional success, some colleagues noticed subtle anomalies in her behavior, though nothing initially triggered suspicion.
  • 📡 Montes relayed critical U.S. intelligence to Cuba, including the identities of undercover agents and sensitive military operations.
  • 💻 She used shortwave radio and numeric codes to communicate with her Cuban handlers, and even passed a polygraph test in 1994 using Cuban-taught countermeasures.
  • 👀 One colleague, David, grew suspicious of Montes over time, especially after Cuba's consistent intelligence victories, including the thwarting of U.S. operations.
  • ⚠️ Montes's arrest in 2001 shocked her coworkers, many of whom had never suspected her of espionage, and caused emotional distress among her peers.
  • ⚖️ In 2002, Montes confessed to spying for Cuba, claiming her actions were driven by her opposition to U.S. policy toward Havana. She was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
  • 🔍 The case of Ana Montes serves as a warning to intelligence agencies that even highly trusted individuals can be engaged in espionage and that vigilance is always necessary.

Q & A

  • Who was Ana Montes and what was her role within the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)?

    -Ana Montes was a highly respected and accomplished analyst within the DIA, specializing in Latin American affairs. She was considered a role model by her peers and rose to prominence due to her intelligence and work ethic. However, she was secretly working as a spy for Cuba.

  • How did Ana Montes deceive her colleagues at DIA despite her high-profile role?

    -Ana Montes presented herself as a loyal and hardworking employee, showing no suspicious behavior. Her work was prolific, and she had a spotless security record. She kept her personal life private and displayed none of the typical behaviors associated with espionage, which made it difficult for her colleagues to suspect her.

  • What raised suspicions about Ana Montes's activities, and who first reported these concerns?

    -David, a fellow Cuba analyst, began noticing discrepancies in the intelligence community’s work involving Cuba. He found it odd that Cuban intelligence operations were consistently foiled, leading him to suspect a mole within the U.S. government. Over time, his gut feeling that Ana was involved grew stronger, and he eventually reported his concerns to the DIA's Counter Intelligence and Security Office.

  • What was Ana Montes's role in compromising U.S. intelligence, and what information did she provide to Cuba?

    -Ana Montes revealed crucial intelligence to Cuba, including the identities of undercover U.S. agents, details of U.S. military exercises, and sensitive information on U.S. intelligence operations. Her actions endangered U.S. operatives and potentially led to the deaths of American warfighters.

  • How did Ana Montes manage to pass a polygraph test in 1994, and why did this make her more dangerous?

    -Ana Montes used a countermeasure taught by the Cubans to pass the polygraph test, which deflected suspicion away from her. This allowed her to continue her espionage activities undetected for several more years, making her even more dangerous to U.S. national security.

  • How did Ana Montes communicate with her Cuban handlers, and what methods did she use to send information?

    -Ana Montes communicated with her Cuban handlers using shortwave radio transmissions and deciphered numeric codes on her personal computer to relay U.S. secrets to the Cuban government.

  • What was the impact of Ana Montes's betrayal on her colleagues and the intelligence community?

    -Ana Montes's betrayal devastated her colleagues and undermined the credibility of years of intelligence work on Latin America. Many colleagues experienced emotional turmoil, feeling grief and anger. Her actions also compromised sensitive information, forcing the intelligence community to essentially start over in several areas.

  • What drove Ana Montes to spy for Cuba, and what was her justification for her actions?

    -Ana Montes confessed that she spied for Cuba because she opposed U.S. policy toward Havana, believing it was her moral obligation to protect Cuba from what she perceived as U.S. exploitation and abuse.

  • What was Ana Montes's punishment for her espionage activities, and what deal did she make with the U.S. government?

    -Ana Montes was sentenced to 25 years in prison, followed by 5 years of probation, after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit espionage on behalf of Cuba. In exchange for her full cooperation and disclosure of her espionage activities, she received a reduced sentence.

  • What lesson did the intelligence community learn from Ana Montes's case, and how has it affected their approach to security?

    -Ana Montes’s case highlighted the difficulty of detecting spies who display no outward signs of espionage. The intelligence community learned the importance of vigilance and encouraged employees to report any unusual behavior, even if it seems minor. Her case emphasized the need for continuous internal scrutiny and caution in intelligence work.

Outlines

00:00

🌟 The Rising Star: Ana Montes' Impressive Career

Ana Montes was a highly respected and admired employee in the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). With stellar qualifications and a quick rise in the intelligence community, she gained the admiration of her peers, becoming a role model for many. Her resume and performance were flawless, and her reputation as an outstanding analyst made her seem like the perfect hire. No one suspected her of espionage due to her impeccable security record and modest lifestyle.

05:00

🤐 The Enigma of Ana Montes' Personal Life

Despite her professional success, Ana Montes was known to be highly private about her personal life. She shared little with her colleagues, and they rarely interacted with her outside the office. Even those who worked closely with her, such as fellow Cuba specialist David, noticed that she kept a strict boundary between her work and personal life, making her an enigma to her co-workers.

10:01

😕 Growing Suspicion: David’s Concerns About Ana

David, a fellow Cuba analyst, started noticing subtle discrepancies in the intelligence community's operations against Cuba, which were consistently failing. He began suspecting that Cuba had spies within the U.S. government. Although he never directly suspected Ana, he grew uneasy about her involvement in events of interest to the Cubans. His concerns escalated as intelligence sources dried up after Ana was informed about them.

15:02

✈️ A Tragedy and Mounting Suspicion

The downing of two private aircraft by a Cuban fighter jet in 1996 raised alarm bells for David. Ana Montes was aggressively seeking Cuba-related intelligence that was beyond her job responsibilities, fueling David's suspicions. She avoided him and displayed behaviors that made him uncomfortable, prompting him to finally report her activities to DIA’s Counter Intelligence and Security Office, even though he had no hard evidence.

20:05

👀 The Investigation: Uncovering Ana’s Double Life

David's report led to a discreet investigation by the DIA. Despite the lack of hard evidence, the office conducted a quiet probe into Ana's activities. Over the next few years, Ana's colleagues were shocked when, in 2001, she was arrested for espionage. The revelation devastated those who had admired and worked closely with her. It became clear that Ana had been betraying the U.S. for years, feeding critical intelligence to the Cuban government.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Ana Montes

Ana Montes was a high-ranking intelligence analyst for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) who secretly worked as a Cuban spy. Her double life and betrayal are central to the video's theme, as she deceived the U.S. government for years, compromising sensitive information and causing significant damage to national security.

💡Cuban Spy

A key theme in the video, referring to Ana Montes' role as an espionage agent for Cuba. Despite her respected position in the DIA, Montes provided crucial intelligence to the Cuban government, including military secrets and the identities of U.S. agents, which led to compromised operations.

💡Espionage

Espionage is the act of spying or using spies to gather secret information, especially related to government or military activities. The video highlights how Montes engaged in espionage against the U.S., feeding sensitive information to Cuba for years without being detected.

💡Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)

The DIA is the U.S. agency responsible for providing military intelligence to defense policymakers. Ana Montes worked within this agency as a Latin American analyst, and her role there gave her access to critical information, which she used to betray the U.S. by passing it to Cuba.

💡Counterintelligence

Counterintelligence involves actions taken to prevent espionage or other intelligence activities by foreign powers. In the video, David, a DIA counterintelligence analyst, played a pivotal role in suspecting Ana Montes’ espionage activities and eventually leading to her arrest.

💡Polygraph Test

A polygraph test is used to determine whether someone is being truthful by measuring physiological responses. Ana Montes successfully passed a polygraph in 1994, which deflected suspicion away from her and allowed her to continue her espionage activities undetected.

💡Shortwave Radio Communications

Montes communicated with her Cuban handlers via shortwave radio, using numeric codes. This method is a crucial element of her espionage activities, allowing her to transmit U.S. secrets to Cuba covertly.

💡Gut Instincts

In the video, David's 'gut feeling' played a critical role in his suspicions about Ana Montes. Despite the lack of hard evidence, David’s instincts about her unusual behavior and involvement with Cuba-related intelligence eventually led to a full investigation and her arrest.

💡Deception

Deception is a central theme in the video, with Ana Montes managing to deceive her colleagues, supervisors, and even close friends about her true allegiance. Her ability to mask her double life as both a respected analyst and a Cuban spy underscores the sophistication of her betrayal.

💡National Security

The protection of a nation from external threats, especially espionage. Montes' actions as a Cuban spy severely jeopardized U.S. national security by leaking sensitive military information, intelligence operations, and the identities of American agents to Cuba.

Highlights

Ana Montes was a highly respected analyst at the Defense Intelligence Agency, often regarded as a 'Superstar' by her peers.

Despite her accolades and spotless security record, Ana Montes was secretly working as a spy for the Cuban government.

Her deception went unnoticed for years due to her exceptional professionalism and a lack of the typical behaviors associated with espionage.

Ana Montes passed a polygraph test in 1994, which increased her ability to operate undetected as a spy.

David, a Counterintelligence analyst, became suspicious of Ana due to her involvement in intelligence operations concerning Cuba that seemed beyond her job scope.

Despite David's growing suspicions, he struggled with the decision to report Ana because there was no direct evidence at first.

The suspicions deepened when Cuban intelligence consistently outmaneuvered U.S. operations, leading David to question whether someone within the agency was leaking information.

Ana Montes used shortwave radio communications and coded messages to pass U.S. secrets to the Cuban government.

Her espionage compromised the identities of American operatives, potentially leading to their deaths, and undermined U.S. military operations.

Ana Montes admitted to spying for Cuba out of personal conviction, stating that she disagreed with U.S. policy toward Havana.

Ana was arrested in 2001, and her actions devastated the credibility of the U.S. intelligence community in Latin America.

Her arrest and subsequent confession revealed that she had been sharing U.S. intelligence with not only Cuba but also other foreign governments.

The revelation of her espionage shocked her colleagues, many of whom had admired her as a role model and trusted her deeply.

David's decision to report his suspicions led to Ana Montes' apprehension, marking his most significant achievement as a Counterintelligence analyst.

The investigation into Ana Montes was discreet, with only a handful of individuals aware of it, ensuring her colleagues remained unaware until her arrest.

Transcripts

play00:10

she was a model

play00:11

employee she was kind of considered to

play00:13

be the Superstar of our

play00:16

organization she was a respected

play00:18

colleague she was a role model for me

play00:21

and I I aspired to be like

play00:25

her her name honorin Montes

play00:30

and she was a Cuban spy

play01:08

the defense intelligence agency makes

play01:10

its living learning

play01:16

Secrets good analysts are ever alert for

play01:19

subtle

play01:21

Clues they trust their instincts to send

play01:24

them in the right

play01:26

direction their internal radar always

play01:29

scanning for leads and

play01:35

deceptions Ana Montes was a good analyst

play01:38

and an even better

play01:41

deceiver she almost deceived them

play01:46

all I hired Anam Montes back in the mid

play01:49

1980s she came in she was finishing up

play01:53

her master's degree at John's Hopkins

play01:56

had bachelor's degree from the

play01:57

University of Virginia looked extremely

play01:59

qualified very intelligent Anna Montes

play02:02

seemed like the perfect hire and she

play02:04

lived up to the promise of her

play02:07

resume she quickly won the respect of

play02:09

her peers within the US intelligence

play02:12

Community as a Latin American

play02:15

analyst she was an outstanding analyst

play02:17

she was a phenomenal writer extremely

play02:21

prolific typically producing about two

play02:23

to three times as much as the average

play02:26

analist there was simply nothing about

play02:28

her that raised any red flags her

play02:32

security record was spotless no

play02:34

indications of security infractions or

play02:36

security violations she lived modestly

play02:39

uh within her means and in short she

play02:41

displayed none of the typical behaviors

play02:43

we associate with Espionage activity

play02:46

even those close to Anna found no reason

play02:49

to be

play02:50

suspicious fellow analyst Steve Smith

play02:53

shared a double cubicle with Anna for

play02:55

more than 5 years he never imagined she

play02:59

lived a double life in the time that I

play03:01

knew her I didn't see anything that

play03:05

brought to to my mind a suspicious

play03:09

thought about Anam

play03:11

Mones I really thought she was loyal

play03:14

highly professional and I don't think

play03:17

there was any single incident not even a

play03:19

single incident that I could point to

play03:21

that would have that would have driven

play03:23

me to to to think that maybe there's

play03:26

something something wrong here

play03:30

lordis talber worked with Anna for years

play03:33

and may have known her best I came in as

play03:35

an undergraduate through a program in

play03:37

DIA and I worked my very first summer

play03:39

with her in 1992 and that's when I met

play03:41

her we worked really closely together in

play03:43

determining what I was going to write as

play03:45

a senior analyst she had she gave me

play03:47

guidance and and she taught me how to be

play03:49

an analyst I always was under her team

play03:52

so we were very very close um in terms

play03:54

of our daily work Anna's professional

play03:57

stature grew through the years she

play04:00

continued to rack up honors the highest

play04:02

marks on performance evaluations a

play04:05

meritorious promotion from gs13 to 14

play04:09

selection for the prestigious

play04:11

exceptional analyst program she was the

play04:14

first Dia employee selected for the

play04:17

National Intelligence council's

play04:19

fellowship

play04:20

program she got Kudos from all over she

play04:24

got Kudos throughout the intelligence

play04:25

Community one US ambassador in Latin

play04:27

America commented on her saying that she

play04:29

was was an outstanding an but if her

play04:32

professional accomplishments were well

play04:34

known and well respected her fellow

play04:37

employees knew little about her personal

play04:41

life I would say of the employees who

play04:43

worked for me over the years and the

play04:45

ones who worked for me for a long period

play04:46

of time I probably knew less about Anna

play04:49

than I did about

play04:51

others I would describe Anna Montes is

play04:54

socially reserved and very careful about

play04:58

uh the information that she would share

play05:00

with

play05:05

people she was very protective of her

play05:07

personal life um and very adamant that

play05:09

nobody should ask about her personal

play05:16

life I was definitely curious about what

play05:19

she did after work and you know how she

play05:21

managed to balance work in in her home

play05:23

life but we never interacted outside of

play05:25

the

play05:28

office of all Anna montes's colleagues

play05:31

one had a special professional

play05:33

relationship with Anna because they both

play05:36

were Cuba

play05:38

Specialists David is in silhouette to

play05:40

protect his

play05:42

anonymity I first met Anna in 1987 and

play05:46

uh I was working a project on South

play05:48

America to involve the Cubans and I

play05:51

needed Anna's expertise because she was

play05:53

actually in a different organization and

play05:55

so I need her needed her political

play05:57

military perspective I interacted with

play05:59

with her about every one one to two

play06:02

weeks and it was kind of a requirement

play06:05

at that time because we had to

play06:06

coordinate our work with each other as

play06:08

an experienced analyst David is always

play06:11

sensitive to

play06:12

anomalies he instinctively takes notice

play06:15

when someone seems to have knowledge or

play06:17

information they wouldn't be expected to

play06:19

have or shows unusual interest in areas

play06:22

outside their job

play06:24

responsibilities or seems involved in

play06:27

things that just don't add up

play06:30

by the late

play06:31

1980s he was picking up some

play06:34

discrepancies in the Latin American

play06:36

intelligence

play06:37

Community for one thing us intelligence

play06:40

had been unable to run a successful hum

play06:43

operation against Cuba for decades Cuba

play06:46

consistently foiled all

play06:49

attempts David wondered why Cuba was

play06:52

winning the intelligence game were they

play06:55

that much better than the us or was

play06:57

someone playing for both sides

play07:00

we had a lot of information from Cuban

play07:02

defectors that Cuba had spies working

play07:05

within United States government what

play07:08

what caused you know me concern is that

play07:10

if they had agents within the Department

play07:11

of

play07:12

Defense uh what kind of information we

play07:16

were losing what kind of information

play07:17

they were interested in and uh uh who

play07:21

were those

play07:23

spies then something brought the

play07:25

question closer to home David

play07:28

co-authored and intelligence product

play07:30

that was thought to be compromised to

play07:32

the Cuban government it seemed Cuba

play07:35

learned of it before it was published so

play07:38

only someone in the know could have been

play07:40

responsible someone who knew the Cubans

play07:43

interests I knew

play07:45

Anna and when I saw her involved in a

play07:48

lot of things that the Cubans were

play07:49

interested in it began to make me quite

play07:51

nervous and so I had a g feeling that

play07:54

something wasn't quite right but I never

play07:56

suspected her of being a spy around

play08:00

1992 Anna Montes began work as a Cuba

play08:04

analyst she worked more closely with

play08:07

David and saw the products he was

play08:09

working on dealing with Cuban

play08:11

intelligence against the US and

play08:13

specifically the dod I began to see that

play08:16

she was you know very much involved in

play08:21

uh specific events that I was studying

play08:23

you know as a Counter Intelligence

play08:24

analyst and as a result of that you know

play08:27

my my concerns about her began to grow

play08:30

because prior to that time I never had

play08:32

no suspicions of her at all soon after

play08:35

there was another anomaly in the course

play08:38

of his work David informed one of Ana

play08:41

montes's co-workers about a long-term

play08:43

source that was exploited for Cuba

play08:46

related

play08:49

information a few weeks later the source

play08:51

dried

play08:52

up David now focused more closely on

play08:56

Anna at that time I didn't suspect her

play08:59

of being a spy I just was deeply

play09:01

concerned of the things that she was

play09:02

involved with and I didn't know what

play09:05

they meant weren't anything I needed

play09:06

resolution I needed to know that Anna as

play09:08

a cooworker was safe to work with over

play09:11

the next few years David watched Anna

play09:14

closely huba continued to gain inside

play09:18

information about DOD

play09:20

activities was Anna somehow

play09:23

involved in March of

play09:25

1994 she successfully completed a Dia

play09:28

administered po graph test her

play09:30

background remained spotless and her

play09:33

credentials excellent but David's

play09:36

suspicions continued to

play09:38

grow she was just involved in events

play09:41

okay that were uh very suspicious and I

play09:43

didn't know if she was being targeted I

play09:45

didn't know she was directly involved

play09:47

with these things working with the

play09:49

Cubans uh I was looking at it more from

play09:52

the perspective of of security of the

play09:55

information two more years passed then

play09:58

on febr uary 24th

play10:01

1996 David's internal radar picked up a

play10:04

strong hit and he began zeroing in on a

play10:07

target a Cuban Mig fighter shot down two

play10:10

private aircraft operated by the Cuban

play10:13

igra group Brothers to the rescue in

play10:16

international waters three American

play10:19

citizens and one permanent resident

play10:21

alien were killed it was an

play10:24

international crisis certain to place

play10:26

Cuba in the crosshairs of an American

play10:28

Military strike but the US inexplicably

play10:32

backed down when David looked into the

play10:35

matter Ana Montes seemed to be in the

play10:37

middle of it Anna was aggressively

play10:40

seeking Cuba related counterintelligence

play10:43

information that seemed beyond the scope

play10:46

of her duties David could no longer

play10:48

ignore his

play10:50

suspicions just not the events that she

play10:52

was involved with we have the events

play10:54

plus we have

play10:55

behaviors she knew I was a Counter

play10:57

Intelligence analyst and she couldn't

play10:58

always look me in the eyes she stayed

play10:59

away from me okay immediately that they

play11:02

came to my attention why is she staying

play11:04

away from me and all of these things are

play11:05

coming together 1 plus 2 plus 3 plus 4

play11:08

all of that comes together okay in a

play11:10

sequence of events that causes

play11:12

concern David's gut feeling was now

play11:15

strong enough that he felt someone

play11:17

needed to take a close look at Anna's

play11:19

activities and he knew who to call Dia's

play11:23

Counter Intelligence and Security office

play11:26

but bringing himself to make the call

play11:28

was not so so

play11:30

easy there were no definites at all all

play11:32

I knew was that there was a lot of

play11:33

unusual activity that I couldn't explain

play11:36

so there was initially ambivalence on my

play11:38

part to bring it to Security's attention

play11:41

but after time I kept seeing these

play11:44

events occur you know more often and it

play11:47

got to a certain point where I couldn't

play11:48

ignore it anymore and I had to bring it

play11:50

to Security's

play11:51

attention if Anna Montes was doing what

play11:54

David suspected her actions might have

play11:57

already cost lives and might cost more

play12:01

he had to take

play12:02

action Drew wurger was in charge of

play12:05

Dia's

play12:07

investigation It's Perfectly Natural to

play12:10

feel conflicted about reporting on a

play12:12

coworker that was a very difficult

play12:14

decision but what he did was absolutely

play12:16

the right thing to do he trusted his

play12:18

instincts as an analyst he didn't wait

play12:20

for hard evidence of uh Anna's conduct

play12:23

before he reported it to us and that's

play12:25

what we want people to do if they have a

play12:27

gut feeling about someone they should

play12:29

report it to us and we know how to

play12:31

handle

play12:32

that The Counter Intelligence and

play12:35

Security Office began a discreet

play12:37

investigation standard operating

play12:39

procedure when an employee reports their

play12:42

concerns you know I need my concerns

play12:45

resolved and uh security handled my

play12:48

concerns in a very private way and uh

play12:52

kept me Anonymous in the process and uh

play12:55

to some extent uh even kept me informed

play12:57

and continue to ask me questions about

play12:58

that

play13:00

Dia Personnel should be comfortable with

play13:03

reporting to The Counter Intelligence

play13:05

and Security Office any concerns that

play13:07

they have their identity is protected

play13:10

their name will not come out in part of

play13:12

the as part of the investigation

play13:14

innocent employees will not be harmed by

play13:17

the

play13:18

investigation for David like any other

play13:21

Dia employee making the call was all he

play13:24

had to

play13:26

do it's not the job of an analyist or

play13:28

Dia employ employee to try to determine

play13:30

whether somebody in agency is a spy

play13:32

that's the job of the security people

play13:34

you need to go to them and let them

play13:36

investigate and find out what's going on

play13:39

the counter intelligence and Security

play13:41

Office worked quietly and diligently

play13:44

collecting information about Ana

play13:47

Montes the investigation of Anna

play13:49

involved investigative activity within

play13:51

the daak and I think it's noteworthy

play13:53

that virtually no one became aware of

play13:56

this investigative activity there was

play13:58

literally a hand full of people in this

play13:59

agency that were aware of this active

play14:02

investigation so that should give

play14:03

employees some confidence that we are

play14:05

capable of conducting a very discreet

play14:08

investigation the investigation was so

play14:11

discreet that Ana montes's co-workers

play14:13

never suspected it was in progress on

play14:16

September 21st 2001 they were as shocked

play14:20

as Anna when she was arrested at the

play14:22

deia inspector General's office at

play14:25

bowling Air Force Base Washington DC

play14:30

when it was

play14:32

announced one colleague actually had to

play14:34

ask what name they said because it

play14:36

didn't even register another one broke

play14:39

down

play14:42

emotionally I know I actually broke down

play14:45

it was wasn't even an issue of disbelief

play14:47

it

play14:48

was one of those sort of a I can't

play14:53

imagine what else that would be like but

play14:55

sort of being told someone had died

play14:57

suddenly someone that you hadn't

play14:59

expected to die I was more analytic in

play15:02

my in my thought process when I when it

play15:04

was announced but then as the days went

play15:06

on it it was it definitely turned into

play15:07

more of an emotional response I was

play15:10

definitely

play15:11

sad I did cry I was I was upset and

play15:15

eventually it turned to anger and mostly

play15:17

now it's anger and when I do hear her

play15:20

name I I cringe I because I did work

play15:22

with her so closely and I did admire her

play15:25

Anna's arrest was something that was

play15:27

very devastating to the office office we

play15:30

actually saw the grief counselors the

play15:32

next week to try to understand and

play15:34

accept uh understand better what was

play15:37

going on but it was very tough for us

play15:40

the charge against Anna was conspiracy

play15:43

to commit Espionage on behalf of Cuba

play15:46

and the extraordinary details of Ana

play15:49

montes's treachery began to

play15:52

emerge though her job was to inform the

play15:55

American intelligence community on Cuban

play15:58

operations she was doing just the

play16:00

opposite she was revealing to Cuba all

play16:03

she knew about American operatives and

play16:05

operations from the identity of

play16:07

undercover agents to the details of US

play16:10

military

play16:12

exercises and of course every time we

play16:14

discovered something new I turned around

play16:16

and I said hey

play16:17

Anna guess what we just figured out or

play16:20

guess what we just

play16:21

learned so it was as good as just

play16:24

turning around and sending Fidel Castro

play16:26

a letter I it probably got there faster

play16:28

than a letter was

play16:31

the polygraph test in 1994 made her even

play16:34

more dangerous by deflecting suspicion

play16:37

away from her she was Freer to pursue

play16:39

her Espionage and to pass the polygraph

play16:42

test she had used a countermeasure

play16:45

taught to her by the

play16:46

Cubans Anna Montes engaged in secret

play16:50

shortwave radio communications with her

play16:52

agent Handler she used numeric codes

play16:56

which she deciphered on her personal

play16:58

computer to relay us secrets to the

play17:00

Cuban

play17:01

government she endangered at least four

play17:04

clandestine us Intelligence Officers and

play17:07

may have contributed to the deaths of

play17:09

American war Fighters she jeopardized

play17:12

intelligence collection systems that

play17:14

took many years and millions of dollars

play17:16

to develop her information was shared by

play17:19

the Cubans with other foreign

play17:21

governments whose interests countered

play17:24

Americas she compromised whatever she

play17:27

had access to and she had virtually

play17:29

unrestricted

play17:31

access people trusted you and our

play17:35

government trusted you your colleagues

play17:37

trusted you your friends trusted you and

play17:38

you betrayed us

play17:40

all the damage of Anna's actions to my

play17:44

colleagues and the people who work in

play17:45

Latin America intelligence was

play17:48

devastating uh we we felt like our

play17:50

credibility and all the work we had done

play17:52

for the preceding 16 years I gone for

play17:54

not and you can't undo what's been

play17:57

done in a sense you can try to adjust

play18:00

some things but for the most part you're

play18:03

starting all over again and almost from

play18:06

scratch Anna Montes made a full

play18:09

confession on March 19th

play18:12

2002 she admitted that she spied for the

play18:15

Cuban government because she opposed US

play18:18

policy toward

play18:21

Havana but was that enough to drive Ana

play18:24

Montes to live two parallel lives by day

play18:27

a star performer at DIA and By Night a

play18:31

super spy for

play18:32

Cuba she told the judge at sentencing

play18:35

that she obeyed her conscience rather

play18:37

than the law she felt it was her

play18:40

personal calling to protect Cuba which

play18:43

she believed was victimized by America's

play18:46

abuse in a plea bargain with the

play18:49

Department of Justice Ana Montes was

play18:51

sentenced to 25 years in prison followed

play18:54

by 5 years of probation in exchange for

play18:57

her full cooperation and disclosure of

play19:00

her Espionage

play19:03

activities the investigation yielded

play19:06

critical information on Cuban Counter

play19:09

Intelligence at DIA it brought valuable

play19:12

insights to those she had once deceived

play19:15

and she had almost deceived them

play19:17

all frankly I had no suspicions

play19:20

whatsoever uh I had no suspicions that

play19:22

Anna was involved in spying um I just

play19:25

thought she was a very focused

play19:27

hardworking employee who was uh the

play19:29

center of her life was work Anna said

play19:31

things that perhaps I should have

play19:33

questioned as an analyst but I didn't I

play19:35

mean I I I defer to her as a senior

play19:38

analyst and because I didn't think of

play19:40

her as a spy I never suspected and you

play19:42

don't think of people as spies you don't

play19:44

want to question certain information

play19:46

sometimes Anna was my worst fear my

play19:50

worst fear was somebody involved in

play19:52

Espionage activity that was not

play19:53

displaying any of those indicators those

play19:56

were going to be the individuals that

play19:57

would be very hard to detect and there's

play20:00

where we rely on the workforce to step

play20:02

up and and Report concerns to us and

play20:04

that was the case with Ana would I have

play20:07

known it was Anam Mones no uh but that's

play20:10

not the point the point is something

play20:11

wasn't quite right uh and it and it

play20:14

happened more than once and all I really

play20:16

probably needed to do was to go to my CI

play20:19

analyst certainly one of the things that

play20:21

uh has resulted is that I'm more

play20:24

skeptical about people uh that I work

play20:26

with I don't automatically accept

play20:27

everything at Faceook value uh try to

play20:30

look Beyond uh just the personality that

play20:33

I'm dealing with and uh occasionally say

play20:35

to myself why are they doing a certain

play20:38

thing that they're

play20:39

doing it's definitely affected the lens

play20:41

through which I I read information and I

play20:44

process it for my own products but it

play20:46

also has affected the way I I look at

play20:49

other people and their questions towards

play20:51

me about certain pieces of information

play20:54

although Anna Montes was brought to

play20:55

Justice her story is a cautionary t

play20:58

about a problem inevitable in

play21:00

intelligence

play21:02

work we would be foolish to assume that

play21:05

Anna was the one and only Espionage

play21:07

agent directed at DIA uh we have to be

play21:11

vigilant at all times that's the message

play21:13

for the employees uh that there's a

play21:16

strong likelihood that there are others

play21:17

engaged in such conduct and the only way

play21:20

we're going to catch people like this is

play21:23

if employees step forward and Report

play21:25

their concerns if employees here at DIA

play21:28

uh see anything that's unusual with

play21:30

regard to their their their

play21:33

co-workers and those activities upset

play21:37

them cause them

play21:39

concern then they should take that

play21:41

information and bring it to security and

play21:43

have security resolv the issue we owe a

play21:46

significant debt of gratitude were it

play21:48

not for him stepping forward it's

play21:49

entirely possible that Anna would be

play21:51

continuing her Espionage activities

play21:54

today for David it is a Bittersweet

play21:57

Victory his role in Anna's apprehension

play22:00

is a proud accomplishment that saved

play22:02

Priceless information and perhaps

play22:04

countless lives and yet Honor's

play22:07

treachery compromised many years of hard

play22:11

work the greatest success that I have as

play22:14

a Counter Intelligence analyst and

play22:16

denial deception analyst is the arrest

play22:19

and incarceration of Honor that's my

play22:22

sole success because all the other

play22:24

things that I did in those areas she

play22:26

compromised

play22:34

[Music]

play22:57

get

play23:04

care

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
EspionageAna MontesCuban SpyIntelligenceDouble LifeCIACounterintelligenceNational SecurityDeception1980s-2000s
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?