70mai A510 vs 70mai A810 | Starvis 2 IMX678 vs Starvis 2 IMX675 | ULTIMATE Comparison & REVIEW |

Summary

This video offers a comprehensive comparison between the 7M A510 and the 7I 810 dash cams, focusing on their ability to capture number plates under challenging conditions like night driving and high-speed motion. The 4K resolution of the 7I 810 provides superior clarity, especially for smaller number plates, while the A510, despite being a 1944p camera, delivers impressive results for its price range. The video also discusses the price points, sensor types, and overall video quality of both models, helping viewers make an informed purchase decision based on their budget and needs.

Takeaways

• 🚗 The video compares two car cameras, the 7M A510 and the 7I 810, focusing on their ability to capture clear images, especially number plates, during high-speed incidents.
• 🎥 The reviewer experienced a close call while driving, where a two-wheeler overtook dangerously, emphasizing the need for reliable dash cams.
• 📸 Both cameras captured the incident, but the 7I 810, with its 4K resolution, provided a clearer image of the number plate despite the challenging conditions.
• 💰 The 7I 810 is priced higher at around 199, while the 7M A510 is more budget-friendly at 129, with a front-only version available for 99.
• 🔎 The 7I 810 uses a Starvis 2 IMX 678 8MP sensor, and the 7M A510 uses a Starvis 2 IMX 675 5MP sensor, which affects their image resolution and clarity.
• 🌌 Nighttime footage from both cameras is impressive, with the 7I 810 showing a slight edge in detail and clarity, especially with smaller number plates.
• 🌅 Daytime video quality from both cameras is excellent, with the 7I 810 having a slight advantage in sharpness due to its higher resolution.
• 🔍 The rear camera quality comparison shows the 7M A510 has better contrast, but the 7I 810 provides more detailed images, which is crucial for evidence purposes.
• 🌙 In low-light conditions, the 7I 810's rear camera performs better, capturing more detail from headlights, whereas the 7M A510's image becomes slightly washed out.
• 🛒 The reviewer recommends the 7I 810 for those with a higher budget seeking the best image quality, and the 7M A510 for those on a tighter budget who still want near 4K quality.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the video script?

The main focus of the video script is a comparison between two car cameras, the 7M A510 and the 7I 810, specifically their ability to capture number plates in various driving scenarios.

What incident is described at the beginning of the script?

The script describes an incident where the narrator was driving on a flyover at 40 km/hour when a two-wheeler overtook them from the wrong side, almost causing an accident.

Why are the cameras mounted on the narrator's car important in the described incident?

The cameras are important because they captured the incident involving the two-wheeler, which happened quickly and at night, providing evidence that could be crucial for understanding what occurred.

How does the script compare the performance of the 7M A510 and the 7I 810 cameras?

The script compares the cameras by examining their ability to capture clear images of number plates, especially in challenging conditions like glare and fast motion, with the 7I 810 showing a higher resolution advantage.

What is the price difference mentioned between the 7M A510 and the 7I 810?

The 7I 810 is priced at approximately 199, while the 7M A510 is priced at 129 for the front-only version and 199 for the dual-channel variant.

What are the key specifications of the 7I 810 and 7M A510 cameras as mentioned in the script?

The 7I 810 has a Starvis 2 IMX 678 8MP sensor, records native 4K resolution, and has a 16:9 aspect ratio. The 7M A510 has a Starvis 2 IMX 675 5MP sensor, records in 2592x1944p resolution, and has a 4:3 aspect ratio.

What is the significance of the 'Starvis 2' sensor mentioned in the script?

The 'Starvis 2' sensor is significant because it allows the cameras to perform well in low-light conditions and when capturing fast-moving objects, as demonstrated by their ability to read number plates under various challenging lighting conditions.

How does the script evaluate the daytime performance of the cameras?

The script evaluates the daytime performance by comparing the clarity and readability of number plates from a distance of 20 feet, noting that both cameras perform well, with the 7I 810 having a slight edge due to its higher resolution.

What is the conclusion the script draws about the rear camera quality of the 7M A510 and the 7I 810?

The script concludes that while the 7M A510's rear camera offers better contrast, the 7I 810's rear camera provides more detailed images, but both are adequate for evidence purposes.

What recommendation does the script provide for potential buyers based on their budget?

The script recommends the 7I 810 for those with a budget of around 20,000 due to its superior image quality, and the 7M A510 for those with a tighter budget of 10,000 to 12,000, as it offers near 4K quality at a lower price.