STRUCTURALISM (Literary Criticism - History, Proponents, Basic Tenets, Application) || Kheneth Avila
Summary
TLDRThis script delves into the structuralist movement, highlighting its origins in the work of Ferdinand de Saussure and its development in 1950s France. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying structures and patterns in language, culture, and literature to interpret surface meanings. Key concepts like the arbitrariness of language, binary opposition, and the relational nature of concepts are explored. The script also discusses how structuralism views language as constitutive, shaping our perception of the world, and provides examples of applying structuralist analysis to literary works and myths.
Takeaways
- đ Structuralism originated in the 1950s in France, with key figures like Claude LĂ©vi-Strauss and Roland Barthes, and its roots trace back to Ferdinand de Saussure's work on linguistics.
- đ Structuralism is a theory that emphasizes the underlying structures and patterns in culture, literature, and language, rather than just the surface meaning of a text or idea.
- đ± The theory suggests that to fully understand something, one must examine its deeper structure and the common system of patterns involved.
- đ± To understand a concept, one must look at the bigger structure it is part of, much like understanding a leaf requires studying the whole tree.
- đŁïž Language is central to structuralism, with Saussure's idea that language is a system of signs, composed of a signifier (the word or sound) and a signified (the mental concept).
- đ Structuralism posits that language is arbitrary, meaning there is no inherent reason why a word has a specific meaning; it's a product of human agreement and labeling.
- đ Structuralism views language as relational, where concepts are understood in relation to others, such as binary oppositions (good/evil, night/day) and paradigmatic chains (hut/house/mansion/palace).
- đïž The theory is applied to literary criticism by analyzing the underlying structures of texts, such as the rhyme scheme in a sonnet or the common patterns in fairy tales.
- đ Structuralism also considers the role of culture, where different cultural codes and conventions can lead to different perceptions and understandings of the same concept.
- đ The theory provides a method for analyzing and interpreting texts by looking at their larger systems, genres, and the underlying patterns that govern them.
Q & A
What is structuralism and when did it begin?
-Structuralism is a movement that began in the 1950s in France, focusing on the underlying structures and patterns in culture, literature, and language to interpret surface meanings.
Who are the major proponents of structuralism?
-Claude LĂ©vi-Strauss, known for his structural study of myth, and Roland Barthes are among the major proponents of structuralism.
What is the relationship between structuralism and the work of Ferdinand de Saussure?
-Ferdinand de Saussure is considered the father of structuralism, particularly in linguistics, and his theories laid the groundwork for the development of structuralism.
How does structuralism view language?
-Structuralism views language as a complex system of signs, where words (signifiers) are related to concepts (signifieds), and meaning is constructed through this relationship.
What is the concept of the signifier and signified in structuralism?
-In structuralism, the signifier is the physical word or sound, while the signified is the mental concept it represents. The connection between them is arbitrary and culturally defined.
Why does structuralism emphasize understanding concepts through their larger structures?
-Structuralism emphasizes understanding concepts through their larger structures because it believes that the true meaning of something lies in its underlying patterns and systems, not just its surface appearance.
What is the role of binary opposition in structuralism?
-Binary opposition in structuralism is a system where concepts are defined in relation to their opposites, such as good and evil or night and day. It suggests that concepts cannot exist in isolation but are understood in relation to each other.
How does the concept of 'paradigmatic chain' contribute to structuralism?
-The paradigmatic chain in structuralism is a way of organizing thoughts and concepts in relation to each other, allowing for the understanding of one concept through its relation to others within a system.
What does it mean for language to be 'constitutive' in the context of structuralism?
-In structuralism, language being 'constitutive' means that it shapes and defines our perception of the world. It is not just a reflection of reality but actively constructs our understanding of it.
How can structuralism be applied to analyze literary pieces?
-Structuralism can be applied to literary analysis by examining the underlying structures, patterns, and systems within a text, rather than focusing solely on the surface narrative or theme.
What is the significance of the concepts of 'langue' and 'parole' in structuralism?
-In structuralism, 'langue' refers to the overarching system of language, while 'parole' refers to individual utterances or expressions. Understanding 'langue' is essential for interpreting 'parole' within a cultural or linguistic context.
Outlines
đ Introduction to Structuralism
The paragraph introduces the concept of structuralism, which posits that the meaning of things is not inherent but is a result of human labeling and communication. It discusses how humans use language to give meaning to objects and ideas, and how this process is not natural but a human construct. The paragraph also introduces the historical roots of structuralism, particularly in the work of Ferdinand de Saussure, who is considered the father of structuralism. It emphasizes the importance of looking beyond surface meanings to understand the deeper structures that underlie concepts and ideas.
đ€ Language as a System of Signs
This section delves into the arbitrary nature of language, explaining that there is no inherent connection between words (signifiers) and their meanings (signified). It uses examples like 'tree' and 'cat' to illustrate how language allows us to conceptualize objects. The paragraph also discusses how language is relational, with concepts being understood in relation to others, and how binary opposition and paradigmatic chains are systems within language that help us understand and organize our thoughts.
đ The Role of Culture in Structuralism
The third paragraph expands on the idea that language and culture are intertwined, with cultural codes and conventions influencing our perception of the world. It uses the example of the Alaskan people's perception of colors to illustrate how language can shape our understanding of reality. The paragraph also introduces the concepts of 'langue' and 'parole', which represent the overall system of language and individual expressions, respectively. It emphasizes that to understand a concept fully, one must consider its place within the larger system of language and culture.
đ Structuralism in Literary Criticism
This paragraph applies the principles of structuralism to the analysis of literature. It discusses the importance of looking at the underlying structure of a text, rather than just its surface meaning, and how this approach can reveal patterns and systems within the work. Examples such as the structure of a sonnet and the common themes in fairy tales are used to illustrate how structuralism can provide deeper insights into literary works. The paragraph also touches on the idea that language is constitutive, shaping our view and understanding of the world.
đ Structuralism as a Method of Analysis
The final paragraph summarizes the key tenets of structuralism and provides examples of how it can be applied to analyze various phenomena, including myths and everyday occurrences like boiling water. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying structures that drive these phenomena, rather than just their surface appearances. The paragraph also highlights the challenge and intellectual rigor required to apply structuralism effectively, suggesting that it is a method of analysis rather than a static theory.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄStructuralism
đĄClaude LĂ©vi-Strauss
đĄFerdinand de Saussure
đĄSignifier and Signified
đĄArbitrariness of Language
đĄBinary Opposition
đĄParadigmatic Chain
đĄLinguistics
đĄMyth
đĄCultural Codes and Conventions
đĄGenre
Highlights
Structuralism began in the 1950s in France with pioneers like Claude LĂ©vi-Strauss and Roland Barthes.
Structuralism's roots trace back to Ferdinand de Saussure's work in the early 20th century.
Structuralism opposes the perception of reality to a representational and structural one.
Structuralists believe in examining the deeper structure to understand something fully.
Understanding a concept requires studying the bigger structure it belongs to.
Language is the basis of structuralism, focusing on underlying structures and patterns.
Saussure introduced the concept of the signifier and signified in language.
Language is arbitrary, with no inherent connection between words and their meanings.
Structuralism views language as a system that labels the world.
Concepts are relational; understanding one requires comparing it to others.
Binary opposition is a system where concepts are opposite in meaning.
Paradigmatic chain is a way of organizing thoughts in relation to complex objects or situations.
Language is constitutive, directing our view and understanding of the world.
Structuralism sees language as having a structure, with signifier and signified as its components.
Structuralism analyzes literary pieces by looking at their underlying structure and systems.
The concept of 'langue' and 'parole' in structuralism represents the system and individual expressions of language.
Structuralism's three major tenets include the structured nature of language, its relational aspect, and its constitutive role.
Structuralism is a method for analyzing literary pieces by focusing on their patterns and structures.
Examples of applying structuralism include analyzing the rhyme scheme of a sonnet or the common structure in myths.
Structuralism challenges us to look beyond the surface and find the true meaning in underlying structures.
Transcripts
[Music]
have you ever wondered why things are
named the way they are
like trees
plants
or even a cow
or sometimes when we look around a
flower
why a flower
is called the flower
or sometimes when we look
on a c
y c
is called a c why couldn't be sun or a
tree
maybe sometimes we are asking yeah
how and why
look around you
do you think names come naturally or did
someone name them and later this name
was passed through a generation to come
and voila
that's why a sea is called a sea and not
a tree
in that sense if that name is not
natural
meaning it was just being generated and
by whom
of course science tells us that only
human is the ability to communicate
effectively
that's the only creature who can do such
thing in this regard we humans are the
ones responsible for labeling the world
and the things around us
and we use language as medium to turn
the concept into object without further
ado that will be our topic for today
hi there let's begin
structuralism began its movement in
1950s in france among many pioneers in
structuralism the major proponents that
largely contributed to this movement
were claude levstrasse with his
structural study of myth and roland
bart's however the origin of
structuralism is rooted to the work of
sushi linguist ferdinand de saussure
in the early 20th century in regard as
father of structuralism commonly in
linguistics
this theory was developed in opposed to
perception of reality to a
representational and structural
defendant one
in addition this theory emerged from
theories of language and linguistics
where it looks at the underlying
elements and structures in culture and
literature that can be used as a channel
to further interpret the surface meaning
of the text or idea
structuralists believe that there is
more than just the surface
that to fully understand something
one must look at its deeper structure
and see the common system of patterns
involved
[Music]
for structuralism in order to understand
a concept or idea one must look on the
bigger structure that underlies it and
see how it relates to the other things
that is found in the same structure
for instance
in order to understand a single leaf you
must also study the tree where that
specific leaf came from
it only denotes that we cannot
understand a concept if we just look on
the surface area of the word or concept
but one must examine the bigger
underlying structures of it
imagine that the relationship of the egg
and chicken
one cannot fully understand the concept
of the egg without also studying the
chicken which is the bigger structure
in order to fully understand why waves
occur in the first place one should
study the physical oceanography which in
turn is just because of the wind
gravity and earthquake that commonly
cause different waves
or we can fully comprehend the sun
without studying
the solar system
for just
sun
is part of the bigger structure which is
the solar system the galaxies and the
universe as simple as it is since
language is basis of structuralism in
addition to the atmosphenite mentioned
earlier that structuralism composed of
underlying structures and patterns
further studying language can guide us
towards analyzing and understanding
literary pieces
according to susur language is just a
complex system of science
all words will say
all human activities even our perception
and thoughts are constructed and is not
natural because structuralists believe
that there is no such thing as innate or
natural it is all a product of human
mind in the through language we give and
provide meaning to the object around us
these meanings were specified
through science
sine is the smallest unit of meaning and
is composed of a signifier and is
signified
signifier is the word itself or the
sound we offer
while signified is the mental concept we
produced out of the word or sounds we
hear
for instance when we hear or see the
word tree
[Music]
we then visualize something with leaves
branches and so on the same with the
word cat we conceptualize something with
four legs and so on
however there is no inherent or innate
reason and connection between a word and
its meaning that is why language
according to the sewer is arbitrary
arbitrary meaning
there is no definite reason why a man is
called a man
or why egg is called egg and not tree
blue or sun or any words but just egg
that is because we define such words
like egg in relation to others
meaning we understand that it is called
egg because we also rely on other
objects characteristics that we already
conceptualized that an egg is something
round in a triangle or rectangle or
square
another great example for the
arbitrariness of language is that every
country has their own languages and that
we called dagat in filipino as c in
english or
mer in french
if there is a common reason for the
occurrence of language or words then
all countries will have the same
language then it is not arbitrary at all
[Music]
with that language is not a reflection
or a product of the world but instead
language stands apart from the world
language is a system that labels the
world
simple understanding
imagine you are doing the things that
you are doing right now
whatever it is
now
imagine that you are just doing it with
no idea at all what the thing is called
just actions without labels
what you should call it
that comes the language the language
helps the world to label things to label
everything
even the perception and the thoughts we
have
that is why
the world and the language stands apart
from each other they are like two
different agents that were separated but
have a common goal of making the world a
better world
and also that is why a language is a
system that helps people to understand
things commonly in the same context
and a perfect reason why it is arbitrary
because there is no inherent or innate
connection between the word and the
concept or between the signifier and the
signified
[Music]
going back to idea of the egg being
compared to others in order to fully
understand it it means that a concept or
language cannot be understood in
isolation
thus it is relational
[Music]
[Music]
for instance
imagine you are standing alone in a vast
blank space
structuralism believes that you cannot
understand yourself without the
existence of other things because you
have nothing to compare to but imagine
that you are now standing together with
the monkey
chicken and other things in animals you
can easily spot right on what makes you
different from them
the language then through human minds
will conceptualize the idea and produce
names in order to label that object
though as it was being said it is
arbitrary and that there's no such
reason why things named the way they are
meanings can also relate to others
through binary opposition and
paradigmatic chain
binary opposition is a system of pair
which concepts are opposite in meaning
for example
good and evil night and day
and the likes
structuralism believes that if we take
away one of them the other would also
not exist it's like when we take away
the idea of the day
there wouldn't be night
the presence of another is also the
birth of opposing concept
so they are connected and cannot be
separated
[Music]
so how can we possibly know the concept
of happiness without the existence of
sadness
right
[Music]
paradigmatic chain on the other hand is
a particular way of perceiving and
organizing our thoughts in relationship
to complex objects or situation being
compared for instance the paradigmatic
chain of a hut house mansion and palace
in paradigmatic chain we can easily spot
the idea being referred to an object
with the help of others in the same
system we can then infer that a hat is
smaller than a house
mansion being larger than a hat and a
house but smaller than a palace
and so on
[Music]
another general characteristic or a
planet of language that can be used in
literary criticism is that it is
constitutive
it means that language constitutes or
set the world we live in or in simpler
terms it directs our view and
understanding of the world take the idea
of freedom fighters and terrorists for
example
if we look on their actions in reality
somehow their actions are the same it's
just that the way the names are being
constructed the people in the world
terrorists are someone who are more
ruthless than just those people who are
being freedom fighters but when we look
on what they are doing it's just somehow
the same
let's take the alaskan callers compared
to the seven colors of the rainbow as
example
alaska has only five colors but it
doesn't mean that they can see what we
can see upon looking on a rainbow it is
that they are being limited by the
vocabularies of the language that they
have though they can still see but
perceive it differently
that is why
[Music]
culture is also a big factor in
structuralism
different cultures have their own codes
and conventions
take beauty for instance
different cultures have different
perception of what is beautiful
there still some ethnic groups out there
who perform different battle ritual for
instance
the lotus feet of chinese way back
history
culture is a part of structuralism in a
way that a single text or concept
may represent the system of codes and
conventions of the culture just like how
alaskan perceived colors
the point is
the surface or the structure is still
the same but people just have their own
way of calling it alaskan having five
colors doesn't lessen the value of the
colors
they can still see it the way we are
seeing it
it's just that the language constitutes
or creates the perception of them or in
other sense that's how their language
labels their world remember the
signifier and is signified it is
understood then that a single word may
be signified differently because one
group may conceptualize something
differently compared to others just like
how alaskan people perceive colors
because as we say
language constitutes the world
that is why one way in viewing literary
type is by looking on its larger system
or by looking on its genre for instance
a plot of tragedy is different to the
plot of romans or
horror
with this concept
language has what we call lung and parol
wherein the lung is the larger structure
or the system of the language or the
language itself while the parole is the
individual expressions of the language
or the words we other let's put it in a
context of a house
the house represents the lung while the
door and the things that will fan inside
the door is the parole
imagine there are two doors in a house
if you enter the first one
inside
a korean is there
while on the other door a french isn't
there
upon entering a door you may or may not
understand what that person will say
without understanding the bigger's
structure or its rules and systems of
language which is korean language or the
french one in simple terms
one cannot understand that hada
is the sea for korean and mer for french
without even studying the overall
structure of their language in general
we have three major tenets in
structuralism first that language has
structure or in literary criticism it
views as the underlying system found
within the text under this standard
there is the sign where it composes of
signifier and signify
secondly the language is relational but
a concept cannot be analyzed without
being compared to others illiterary
structuralism tends to compare one piece
to others in order to look on varying
systems or structure that underlies them
understand it is a concept of binary
opposition and a paradigmatic chain
third
language as constitutive
that language constitutes or creates the
world we live in
under this idea are the codes and
conventions that can be found in the
culture together with the lung and rule
or in literary texts by looking on his
genre one can easily understand why the
occurrence of such events takes place
and above all this there is an idea of
language being arbitrary the occurrences
of these things have no innate or
inherent relationship with each other
for better understanding let's have some
examples on how we can apply
structuralism in analyzing literary
pieces
let's take sonnet for example
in order to understand it a structure
list may look on its pattern of having a
rhyme scheme of a b a b c d c d e f e f
and chichi each letter represents each
line of the poem and it means that the
same letters were rhymed you see
structuralism rather look on the
structure and systems rather than on the
overall concept or meaning a piece
wanted to convey that is why
structuralism is somehow referred to be
a method rather than a thought or theory
let's take this short story as example
again
from which a boy left home after
quarreling with his father
sets out a walk through the forest and
falls down in a deep pit the father look
for his son
even managed to look into the pit but
fails to see in the deep because of the
darkness at the very moment the sun has
risen to a point directly overhead
illuminates the pit's depth with its
rays and allows a father to rescue his
child after a joyous reunion they return
together
looking on view of structuralism the
story can be analyzed or schematized
through the grammatic form
father being the higher significant
character and the sun
being below
when the sun leave
his father and went to the forest this
is the first act of division of the
horizontal axis and their reconciliation
is the last stage of the axis
additionally the representation of sun
being the high and the pit being the low
signified the father and the son you see
the story has its structure but the
challenge is how you are able to spot
these structures or the systems that is
why structuralism is an intelligent
movement and a method rather than just
being a group of thoughts and a theory
one should have background for different
principles before one can analyze a
piece using structuralism the main point
is that the tenets mentioned earlier are
just the guides for your journey in
structuralism another example
in order to understand the concept of a
building or how a certain building was
made
one must not look on the outside feature
of it or it's a static view but the look
on what are the principles being applied
in creating it or it's blueprint
another example in fairy tales sleeping
beauty snow white cinderella and
the likes
we grew on the idea that this princess
will always be rescued by a prince
so this is also a kind of pattern
structuralist we'll also consider by
looking on its genre just like the idea
of the lung and buttroll the fairytale's
plot is somehow conceives a pattern
another great example is found in claude
livestro's the structural study of myth
published in 1955 wherein he studied a
structural model of myth from different
cultures according to him a myth is
somehow like a language with its long
and parol
being myth the lung and mythics the
parole
straw's concern is not just a single
myth but rather the underlying structure
which exists in groups of myths and even
all myths according to him all myths
seem to have a common structure which is
commonly being driven by different
mythics yet some structure for instance
in greek mythology there is what they
call zeus or the king of heaven and
hades being its underworld king
same concept in egyptian mythology where
there is also a king of heaven named ra
and osiris for underworld you see there
are patterns in the myth and that what
straws wanted to emphasize that all
myths seem to have a common problems if
we also look on the ancient mythology or
chinese mythology there are these
entities
at the same time the binary opposition
of these myths are also seen to be
structured like there is always a
presence of good and evil heaven and
earth hatred and love and so on just
like what we have in philippines we have
batala and satan in our mythology so i
think that's the basic concepts that we
should understand in structuralism
all in all structuralism is really a
challenging one
but
it could become an easier task if you
just focus on the idea that a word or
concept underlies its meaning
the surface is not quite important
because true meaning lies in its
underlying structures let me ask you one
more time
how will you explain the phenomena of a
boiling water in the kettle
well looking on the view of
structuralism the water is boiling
because the heat energy is transferred
to the molecules of water and then they
form a gaseous molecules of water vapor
which float the star races bubbles and
travel into thin air
that's how it's boiling another case in
perspective there is a boiling water
there because someone wishes to have a
coffee and since there is no hot water
available the person decided to boil the
water
i think that's all about structuralism
[Music]
do
[Music]
you
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
Structuralism
Structuralism and Semiotics: WTF? Saussure, LeÌvi-Strauss, Barthes and Structuralism Explained
Semantic Change. Metaphor. Metonomy. Hyperbole. Litotes. Simile
Derrida: Structure, Sign and Play in Discourse of Human Sciences | Fully Literary Analysis Explained
Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
UP TALKS | A Poetics of the Literary Work: In Sum
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)