Sara Duterte-led OVP spent P125 million confidential funds in 11 days

Rappler
24 Sept 202302:35

Summary

TLDRIn a legislative session, the discussion revolves around the Office of the Vice President's (OVP) expenditure report. The OVP is required to submit an accomplishment report to the President, Senate President, and Speaker of the House as part of their liquidation report. It is revealed that the OVP spent a staggering 125 million within a short period of 11 to 19 days, raising concerns about the efficiency and necessity of such spending. The speaker expresses surprise at the high daily expenditure and seeks confirmation of the exact duration and details of the spending.

Takeaways

  • 📜 The discussion is about the Office of the Vice President (OVP) providing accomplishment reports to the President, Senate President, and Speaker of the House as part of their liquidation report.
  • đŸ—Łïž The Vice President is requested to submit a copy of their accomplishment report to support their liquidation report.
  • đŸ’Œ There is a mention of a significant amount of 125 million being spent by the OVP, which seems to be a point of concern.
  • 📆 The spending mentioned occurred within a short period of 19 days, which is later corrected to 11 days, raising questions about the efficiency and necessity of such expenditure.
  • đŸ€” The speaker expresses surprise at the high spending within a brief period, suggesting it might be excessive or unusual.
  • 🔍 The speaker has reviewed various reports to verify the spending claims but found discrepancies in the duration of the spending period.
  • đŸ›ïž The issue is being discussed in a formal setting, likely a legislative or parliamentary session, indicating the importance of transparency and accountability in government spending.
  • 💡 The speaker is seeking confirmation of the spending details, emphasizing the need for clarity and accuracy in financial reporting.
  • 📉 The correction from 19 to 11 days of spending suggests there might be inaccuracies in initial reports, which are being questioned and clarified.
  • 💬 The dialogue highlights the importance of scrutinizing government spending, especially when it involves large amounts within short timeframes.

Q & A

  • What is the requirement for the Office of the Vice President (OVP) regarding the accomplishment report?

    -The OVP is required to provide a copy of their accomplishment report to the President, the Senate President, and the Speaker of the House as support for their liquidation report.

  • Has the accomplishment report been provided to the three mentioned officials?

    -Yes, the accomplishment report has been provided to the President, the Senate President, and the Speaker of the House.

  • What was the amount reportedly spent by the OVP within a specific time frame?

    -The OVP reportedly spent 125 million within a time frame of 19 days.

  • Is there a discrepancy in the number of days the OVP spent the funds?

    -Yes, there is a discrepancy. While initially mentioned as 19 days, it was later clarified to be within 11 days.

  • What was the speaker's reaction to the reported spending within the 19 days?

    -The speaker expressed surprise at the amount spent within 19 days and found it hard to believe, comparing it to a high daily expenditure.

  • What was the speaker's inquiry to the OVP regarding the spending?

    -The speaker asked the OVP's representative to confirm the actual number of days the funds were spent.

  • What was the final confirmation regarding the number of days the funds were spent?

    -The final confirmation was that the funds were spent within 11 days.

  • What does the speaker imply about the nature of the expenditures?

    -The speaker implies that the expenditures might be related to surveillance or reward payments, given the high daily amount.

  • What was the speaker's request to the OVP's representative?

    -The speaker requested the OVP's representative to confirm the actual number of days the funds were spent, which was later confirmed as 11 days.

  • What was the speaker's overall tone regarding the OVP's financial report?

    -The speaker's tone was one of surprise and scrutiny, seeking clarification and confirmation of the reported spending.

Outlines

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Mindmap

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Keywords

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Highlights

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant

Transcripts

plate

Cette section est réservée aux utilisateurs payants. Améliorez votre compte pour accéder à cette section.

Améliorer maintenant
Rate This
★
★
★
★
★

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Étiquettes Connexes
OVP ExpenditureFinancial InquiryGovernment SpendingBudget AllocationPolitical AccountabilityPublic FundsLegislative OversightEconomic TransparencyAudit ScrutinyFiscal Responsibility
Besoin d'un résumé en anglais ?