Gw Beli Concord Yang Katanya Game Terjelek 2024

Eno Bening

2 Sept 202409:02

Summary

TLDRThe video script reviews the game 'Concord,' criticized as one of the biggest flops of 2024 due to its low player count compared to its viewership. Despite a high development cost, the game is likened to 'Overwatch' and 'Valorant,' lacking innovation. The reviewer, after purchasing the game for 600,000, faces issues finding matches due to a lack of players, suggesting the game's high price and unoriginality as its downfall. The script also touches on the game's detailed character expressions and design, which, while visually appealing, are uninspired and unoriginal, further contributing to the game's failure to attract and retain players.

Takeaways

😀 The game 'Concord' is considered a major flop in 2024 as it has significantly fewer players compared to the number of live stream viewers.
😲 The game's player base is so small that the reviewer couldn't find a match, despite trying multiple times.
💸 Concord was developed with a significant investment of hundreds of millions of US dollars and years of development, yet it failed to attract players.
🎮 The game is compared to 'Overwatch', but with no significant innovation or breakthroughs to differentiate it.
😐 The reviewer criticizes the game's character design as unoriginal and lacking inspiration, with some characters resembling those from other games.
😕 The game's price point of 600,000 (currency not specified) is seen as too high for the experience it offers, especially when compared to free alternatives.
🤔 The lack of player base is a critical issue, and the reviewer suggests that the game could have benefited from introducing bots to populate matches.
😅 The game's features are described as 'nobody asked for it', indicating that they might not align with what the gaming community desires.
🚫 The reviewer points out that despite the high price, the game lacks innovation and feels like a rehash of existing games like 'Valorant' and 'Overwatch'.
😞 The game's maps and overall design are described as boring and uninteresting, which contributes to the lack of player engagement.
💡 The reviewer suggests that if the game were offered for free, it might have had a better chance of attracting and retaining players.

Q & A

What is the main issue the reviewer faced with the game 'Concord'?
-The main issue the reviewer faced was the lack of players, making it difficult to find matches, which is a significant problem for the game's player base.
How does the reviewer compare 'Concord' to other games in terms of player numbers?
-The reviewer compares 'Concord' unfavorably to other games, stating that even games that have failed, like 'Game Golum', have more players than 'Concord'.
What was the reviewer's expectation for 'Concord' given its development cost?
-The reviewer expected 'Concord' to offer a new experience and innovation in the shooting game genre, considering the game's development cost of hundreds of millions of US dollars.
Why does the reviewer believe 'Concord' is similar to 'Overwatch'?
-The reviewer thinks 'Concord' is similar to 'Overwatch' because of its gameplay mechanics and the fact that it lacks significant innovation to differentiate itself.
What is the reviewer's opinion on the game's facial expressions and character design?
-The reviewer praises the facial expressions in the game for being detailed and clear but criticizes the character design for being unoriginal and uninspiring.
What solution does the reviewer suggest to improve the matchmaking experience in 'Concord'?
-The reviewer suggests introducing bots or creating matches against bots to improve the matchmaking experience for players who have purchased the game.
How does the reviewer feel about the game's pricing and perceived value?
-The reviewer questions the value of the game at its price point of 600,000, given the lack of players and innovation, suggesting it's overpriced for the experience it offers.
What other games does the reviewer compare 'Concord' to in terms of gameplay and design?
-The reviewer compares 'Concord' to 'Overwatch' and 'Valorant', noting similarities in skills and gameplay, but criticizes 'Concord' for lacking the innovation that those games have.
What is the reviewer's stance on the game's features that seem unnecessary?
-The reviewer finds some features of the game unnecessary and questions their inclusion, suggesting they do not add value to the game experience.
What does the reviewer think is the critical factor leading to the game's failure?
-The reviewer believes the critical factor leading to the game's failure is the lack of innovation, boring maps, and the high price for a game that doesn't offer a significantly different experience from its competitors.
What advice does the reviewer have for potential buyers of 'Concord'?
-The reviewer advises potential buyers to try the game first, considering its high price and the lack of a distinguishing factor that would make it stand out from free alternatives like 'Overwatch' and 'Valorant'.

Outlines

00:00

🎮 'Concord' Game Flops in 2024

The script discusses the failure of a game called 'Concord' in 2024, highlighting that despite its high development cost, it has fewer players than the number of live stream viewers. The game is compared to 'Golum', which is considered a complete failure. The speaker, jgwip, mentions buying the game but not being able to play it due to lack of players, making it unplayable. The game is said to be similar to 'Overwatch' but with no significant innovation. The speaker criticizes the game's high price of 600,000 and the absence of bots in matchmaking to make the game playable for those who have purchased it. The facial expressions of the characters are praised for their detail and clarity, but the character designs are criticized for being unoriginal and uninspiring. The script ends with the speaker expressing disappointment in the game's lack of uniqueness and innovation.

05:02

📉 Reasons Behind 'Concord's' Failure

In this paragraph, the speaker delves into the reasons why 'Concord' failed, focusing on the game's high price and lack of innovation as the main culprits. They compare 'Concord' to 'Overwatch' and 'Valorant', noting that while the latter games are free, 'Concord' requires a significant payment without offering anything groundbreaking. The speaker also criticizes the game's map design for being uninteresting and similar to other games. They argue that 'Concord' lacks the innovative features that other paid games like 'Rainbow Six' offer, which sets them apart in the market. The paragraph concludes with the speaker's belief that if 'Concord' were offered for free, it might have had a chance to compete, but as it stands, its high price and lack of unique features make it an unattractive option for gamers.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Concord Game

The 'Concord Game' refers to a specific video game that is criticized in the video for its lack of players and high price point. It is described as a 'flop' in 2024, indicating it did not meet expectations or achieve commercial success. The game is said to have cost millions of dollars to develop, yet it failed to attract a player base, which is a central theme of the video. The script mentions the game's price as a significant barrier to entry, with the reviewer questioning its value at 600,000 (presumably currency units).

💡Nge-flop

'Nge-flop' is an informal term used to describe something that has failed or not lived up to expectations, often used in gaming to describe a game that did not succeed. In the context of the video, it is applied to the Concord Game, suggesting that despite high development costs, the game did not gain popularity or meet the sales or player engagement targets.

💡Live Streaming

Live streaming is a form of broadcasting content in real-time over the internet. In the video, the reviewer compares the number of live stream viewers to the number of players of the Concord Game, highlighting the game's lack of player engagement. The term is used to emphasize the game's failure to attract an audience, even when compared to the viewership of a live stream.

💡Matchmaking

Matchmaking in gaming refers to the process of connecting players with others of similar skill levels for competitive play. The script mentions that the game suffers from poor matchmaking, as the reviewer was unable to find other players to compete against, which is a significant issue for a multiplayer game. This lack of matchmaking success contributes to the game's failure, as it prevents players from enjoying the game's multiplayer aspect.

💡Training Mode

Training mode is a feature in many games that allows players to practice and hone their skills in a controlled environment without the pressure of competition. The reviewer mentions that they could only play the game's training mode due to the lack of other players, indicating that the game's appeal is limited and that its core gameplay loop is not engaging enough to sustain player interest.

💡Facial Expression

Facial expression refers to the way emotions are conveyed through the movements of the face. In the video, the reviewer praises the detailed facial expressions of the game's characters, suggesting that the game has high-quality graphics and animation. However, this praise is contrasted with criticism of the character designs, which are described as unoriginal and uninspiring.

💡Innovation

Innovation in the context of the video refers to new ideas or features that differentiate a product from others in the market. The reviewer criticizes the Concord Game for lacking innovation, stating that it is too similar to other games like Overwatch and Valorant. This lack of innovation is presented as a reason why the game failed to attract and retain players, as it does not offer a unique experience.

💡Diversity, Equality, and Inclusivity

These terms are used to discuss the representation and treatment of diverse groups within a game's design and community. The reviewer touches on these concepts when discussing the game's potential shortcomings, suggesting that the game may have failed to appeal to a wide audience due to issues related to diversity, equality, and inclusivity. However, the reviewer does not elaborate on specific examples from the game.

💡Free-to-Play

Free-to-play (F2P) refers to a business model where the game is provided without an upfront cost, but may offer in-game purchases. The reviewer contrasts the Concord Game's paid model with the F2P models of successful games like Valorant and Overwatch, suggesting that a free model might have made the game more accessible and appealing to a larger audience.

💡Tactical Shooter

A tactical shooter is a genre of shooter games that emphasizes strategy and teamwork over reflexes and reaction times. The reviewer mentions Rainbow Six as an example of a tactical shooter that has found success, suggesting that the Concord Game could have benefited from a similar approach to differentiate itself from other shooters on the market.

💡Esports

Esports refers to competitive video gaming, often involving organized, multiplayer video game competitions. The script mentions esports in the context of the game's potential, suggesting that if the game had been free and offered innovative gameplay, it might have attracted an esports following. This could have provided additional exposure and player engagement.

Highlights

Concord game is considered the biggest flop of 2024 due to its low player count compared to live streaming viewers.

The game has failed despite a high development cost, with player numbers not even close to those of other games like 'game golum'.

Reviewer purchased the game but was unable to play it due to lack of players, highlighting the main issue of matchmaking.

The game is compared to Overwatch in terms of gameplay but is criticized for lacking innovation.

Facial expressions and character details in the game are praised for their quality and clarity.

The character designs are criticized for being unoriginal and uninspiring, with some resembling characters from other games.

The game's price of 600,000 is questioned given the lack of innovation and the absence of bots to fill matches.

The reviewer suggests that the game could have been improved with the addition of bots or special matches against bots.

The game is compared to PUBG Mobile and other games that use 'match packing' with bots pretending to be players.

The reviewer only managed to play the game's training mode due to the inability to find real matches.

The game's failure is attributed to high price, lack of innovation, and boring maps that are too similar to other games.

The game is criticized for not offering a unique experience compared to free alternatives like Overwatch and Valorant.

The reviewer points out that the game's characters and skills are too similar to those in Overwatch and Valorant.

The game's lack of tactical innovation is highlighted, with the reviewer preferring the unique gameplay of Rainbow Six.

The reviewer speculates that if the game were free, it might have had a better reception and player base.

The game's high price and lack of differentiation from other titles are seen as the main reasons for its failure.

The reviewer concludes that the game's future is uncertain and it may become free or 'buyable' to attract players.