New "Gun Control" Passes And On Governors Desk
Summary
TLDRIn this Copper Jacket TV episode, the host discusses two new gun control bills, SB 53 and AB 2917, recently passed in California. SB 53, introduced by outgoing Senator Anthony Portantino, significantly expands safe storage requirements, mandating safe storage in any location where a firearm is present, including temporary accommodations. It also specifies that safe storage devices must be approved by the state. AB 2917 broadens California's 'red flag' laws, allowing more people to file Extreme Risk Protection Orders against individuals and extending the time frame for confiscation without due process. Both bills are awaiting the governor's signature and are set to take effect from January 1st, 2026.
Takeaways
- đą The video creator had to take a break due to the loss of a family member.
- đą The creator discusses two new gun control bills that have passed in California: SB 53 and AB 2917.
- đ° Despite having over 100 existing gun control laws, California is adding more restrictions.
- đ SB 53, introduced by outgoing Senator Anthony Portantino, aims to expand safe storage laws.
- đïž The bill requires safe storage not just at homes, but also in temporary accommodations like campsites and hotels.
- đ SB 53 also mandates that firearms must be stored in state-approved safety devices, starting January 1st, 2026.
- đ« AB 2917 further expands California's red flag laws, allowing more people to file Extreme Risk Protection Orders against gun owners.
- â±ïž The bill extends the time that individuals can lose their gun rights without prior notice, potentially up to ten years.
- đ The legislation adds numerous reasons that can be used to justify filing an Extreme Risk Protection Order.
- âïž The process for filing these orders is simplified, potentially leading to more people losing their rights without due process.
Q & A
What is the main topic discussed in the Copper Jacket TV video?
-The main topic discussed is two new gun control bills, SB 53 and AB 2917, which have passed in California and are awaiting the governor's approval.
What is the current state of gun control laws in California according to the video?
-California already has over 100 gun control laws, including universal background checks, registration, waiting periods, and bans on certain types of firearms and capacities.
Why does the speaker mention the difficulty for California legislators to come up with new gun control laws?
-The speaker mentions the difficulty because California already has an extensive list of gun control laws, making it challenging to introduce new ones without overlapping or amending existing ones.
What is the purpose of SB 53 according to the video?
-SB 53 aims to expand the existing safe storage laws in California, requiring safe storage of firearms in any location where one resides temporarily, such as campsites, RVs, or motel rooms.
Who is Senator Anthony Panino, and why is he mentioned in the video?
-Senator Anthony Panino is an outgoing Senator who has been responsible for some of the strictest gun control laws in California. He is mentioned because he introduced SB 53, which is one of the bills discussed.
What changes does SB 53 make to the definition of a safe storage device?
-SB 53 changes the definition by requiring that any new safe storage device used must be one listed on the California Department of Justice's roster of approved safety devices, starting from January 1st, 2026.
What does AB 2917 aim to expand in California's gun control laws?
-AB 2917 aims to expand California's red flag laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders, by increasing the number of people who can file them, the reasons for filing, and the duration of time one can lose their rights without prior notice.
What is the potential duration of rights loss under the expanded red flag laws mentioned in the video?
-The potential duration of rights loss under the expanded red flag laws could be 1 to 5 years initially, with the possibility of an additional 5 years extension.
How does the speaker describe the process of someone losing their rights under the red flag laws?
-The speaker describes the process as someone being the last to know about the loss of their rights, as it can happen without their prior knowledge until law enforcement arrives to confiscate firearms based on an approved order.
What is the speaker's opinion on the constitutionality of the bills discussed?
-The speaker believes that the bills are unconstitutional, as they impose additional restrictions and requirements that infringe upon Second Amendment rights without due process.
Outlines
đ California's Expanded Gun Control Laws
The video discusses two new gun control bills, SB 53 and AB 2917, that have passed in California and are awaiting the governor's approval. The host expresses his grief over the loss of his brother and his hiatus from creating content. He then delves into the details of SB 53, which is an expansion of the state's safe storage laws. This bill, introduced by outgoing Senator Anthony Portantino, mandates safe storage of firearms in any location where one resides, including campsites, RVs, and motel rooms. It also requires the use of approved safety devices listed on a state website, effective from January 1, 2026. The host criticizes the bill for being unconstitutional and burdensome to citizens.
đš Expansion of California's Red Flag Laws
The second paragraph focuses on AB 2917, which further expands California's red flag laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs). This bill broadens the criteria for filing an ERPO against an individual, allowing for more reasons to be considered and potentially extending the time an individual can lose their rights without prior notice. The host explains that these laws enable the government to confiscate firearms from citizens based on accusations and evidence that may not be concrete, leading to a loss of rights without due process. The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to stay informed about these bills and the potential impact on their rights, as the governor is likely to sign them into law.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄGun Control Bills
đĄSafe Storage Laws
đĄAnthony Panino
đĄRed Flag Laws
đĄCalifornia DOJ Roster
đĄConstitutional
đĄAffidavit
đĄTrigger Lock
đĄDue Process
đĄLegislative Process
Highlights
Introduction to the video discussing two new gun control bills in California.
Mention of the speaker's personal loss and the impact on his video production.
Description of the current extensive gun control laws in California.
Introduction of SB 53 as an expansion of existing safe storage laws.
Explanation of how SB 53 mandates safe storage in various locations, including campsites and hotels.
Discussion of the initial requirement for manufacturers to provide safes with firearms, which was later amended.
Details on the state's roster of approved safety devices for firearm storage.
The effective date of the new safe storage requirements, January 1st, 2026.
Introduction of AB 2917 and its expansion of California's red flag laws.
Explanation of how AB 2917 increases the number of people who can file red flag orders and the reasons for filing.
Discussion of the potential duration of red flag orders, which can range from one to ten years.
Critique of the red flag law process, emphasizing the lack of due process and the potential for rights to be stripped without notice.
Concerns about the broad criteria that can lead to the filing of a red flag order based on accusations rather than convictions.
The potential for these bills to be signed into law by the governor, given their alignment with his political stance.
Call to action for viewers to research the bills and the legislative process in California.
Conclusion and appreciation for viewers, with an invitation to like, subscribe, and engage with the content.
Transcripts
hey everybody how's it going welcome
back to Copper Jacket TV sorry I haven't
been making too many videos uh if you
guys are aware I recently lost my
brother and I just needed some time to
grieve before I jumped in front of the
camera but I wanted to let you guys know
about two bills two gun control bills
that just passed in the state of
California and are on their way to the
governor's desk right now so let's talk
about
it okay so let's go and talk about
what's going on here so in my mind it's
got to be difficult for California
legislators to come up with anything new
I mean as it stands right now there are
already over 100 laws on the books I
mean it's the liberal Utopia they have
everything from Universal background
checks to registration waiting periods
list of things that are approved for
sale by the state they ban capacity they
uh ban arms I mean you name it it's it's
in existence in California so there's no
excuse for anything bad to happen there
because hey they got everything that
they have been asking for pretty much so
what did they do in that state well they
decided let's just go ahead and expand
on the existing laws that we have we'll
take a couple laws we'll pick those ones
out and we'll just make them so much
worse that it'll be almost like
something new and that's what they did
with SB 53 and ab 2917 again both of
those pass and are on the way to the
governor's desk so let's start off by
talking about s sp53 Okay so so s sp53
this one is by outgoing Senator Anthony
pantino this is like his last little
parting gift to the state of California
he is responsible for some of the worst
gun control that you've ever seen in
that state so I I'm happy to see that
he's not going to be there anymore
doesn't mean that he's getting replaced
by any anybody that's going to do any
better but at least the person who is
responsible for so much will no longer
be in the California state senate
regardless Anthony Panino's bill here uh
is going to expand on so-called safe
storage laws now there's already safe
storage laws in the state of California
but this makes it so much worse I
understand that it's Sunday you guys'
time is valuable to you so we're not
going to read a bunch of the bill and
the legislation I'm just going to give
you kind of a breakdown here basically
what this bill does is it now says that
anywhere that you are there has to be
safe storage so it doesn't matter if
you're at like a campsite or in an RV or
you're in your motel room or anything
like that anywhere that you are B
basically laying your head for the night
there has to be safe storage so that
anybody who's not allowed to access it
isn't allowed to access it now we've
talked about s53 multiple times in the
past on this channel and that's because
it started out so much worse than the
final bill in the very beginning this
thing started out by saying that
manufacturers that imported anything
into the state of California had to
provide a safe with it so if you bought
a pistol it would have to come with a
lock box or a safe or or something like
that it had to come with its own safe
storage well that's since been amended
and now what they've done is they
expanded on safe storage by expanding
the number of places that you're going
to have to keep it stored so you know
campsites hotel rooms uh anywhere
basically where you lay your head at
night where anybody else could get
access to it uh it would have to be in
some type of safe storage type device
now the other thing that it does is it
expands on what California considers to
be a safe storage device so in the you
know you might have to sign in affidavit
when you go in to say that you own a
safe and that's where it's going to be
or just a simple trigger lock coming
with it would be enough but now the
state of California is going to have a
special page on their website where
you're going to be able to look up a
roster of approved safety devices and it
has to be one of those approved safety
devices moving forward from the date of
the start of this new law so it's going
to start January 1st 2026 so if you
owned a safe prior to that and it's not
on the California doj roster and it's in
that safe it's fine but moving forward
if you get anything new it has to go
into one of the approved devices that's
going to be on the roster so again it's
going to cost people a lot of money it's
completely unconstitutional and it
expands on that safe storage type
requirement okay so let's move on to AB
2917 now 2917 yet again expans on
California's already unconstitutional
and outrageous red flag laws from the
number of people who are allowed to file
them against you to the reasons that
they're allowed to use to file them
against you to the amount of time that
you could lose your rights without even
knowing that anything's happening to you
until after the fact you're looking at
one to five years but that can be
expanded so they can additionally add
five more years at a time and so
California already has a terrible laws
when it comes to that but this makes it
even worse now these are also called
Extreme risk protection orders or Heros
and the way that 2917 makes this even
worse is by expanding yet again on the
number of things that could get one of
these filed against you so if you were
to take a look at the list right now of
things that could be used to file one of
these against you it's it's fairly bad I
mean it is a long long list this is
going to add a couple dozen more reasons
that you could have one of these filed
against you and again we're talking
about 1 to five years and then possible
extension maybe another 1 to five years
and so you could be looking at a fairly
significant amount of time for simple
accusations so what they ask for is just
simply evidence of something that you
may have done or that you may possibly
do in the future it's not something that
you have concretely done okay it's not
something that you have a record of
necessarily it's just something where
somebody has evidence and again it
expands on the list of things that could
be used as evidence to get one of these
things filed against you so uh this is
basically their way of being able able
to confiscate things from people uh
without due process because again you're
the last person that knows you have one
of these things filed against you
somebody goes in they fill out an
affidavit they put down whatever reasons
and again this gives them more reasons
to put on that paper they give them all
the information that they know about you
and why they're filing it or whatever it
goes off to a judge and the judge takes
a look at what might be or might not be
and then determines whether or not to
rubber stamp that order right you're
sitting at home you're sitting there
watching your sports next thing you know
you get a knock on the door and you're
right are gone so you're the last person
to know but you can go to court
afterwards and try and prove that that
person who said those things against you
is not true and and and then you know I
mean it's obviously it's a lot more
intricate than that there's a lot more
going on and people really get screwed
over by the system here but I I know I'm
oversimplifying that but I mean the
basic premise is you're the last one to
know that you have lost your rights and
so uh 2917 is just another expansion of
what is essentially what they consider
to be legal government conf conf so I
wanted to let you guys know about that
there's there's plenty more out there I
mean if you go to the California doj
website or the legislator's website
excuse me and and you simply type in a
couple keywords you will see all of the
things right now that are currently
sitting uh at the California state
legislature that they're working on and
the list is long so uh they they're
always coming up with something new and
I wanted to you know let you guys know
about that because the chances of these
getting signed by the governor are very
high to 100% uh this is just right up
his alley so again I wanted to let you
guys know that that's coming down the
road January 1st 2026 for both of them
thank you all very much for watching I
really do appreciate it please like
subscribe have a great day
[Applause]
Voir Plus de Vidéos Connexes
Initiatives and Referendum...In 57 Seconds with Senator Joe Fain
Sansad TV Special: Reforming Indiaâs Criminal Justice System | 02 December, 2023
Bucket options in Cloud Storage
Kamala: "F*** The 4A Too!" | Military Red Flag Laws | Feds Buy 100s Of Switches
The Three Laws of Robotics
98 Percent Cloud Cost Saved By Writing Our Own Database
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)