Principles of Human Rights
Summary
TLDRThis video script delves into the concept of human rights, defining them as inalienable, fundamental rights inherent to all individuals. It emphasizes the intrinsic value of human dignity and worth, illustrating the interconnectedness of rights through the metaphor of 'Wright's soup' supported by three foundational stones: universality, inalienability, and indivisibility. The script promises a deeper exploration of these principles and their historical development in subsequent videos.
Takeaways
- đ Human rights are defined as inalienable, fundamental rights that every person is inherently entitled to by virtue of being human.
- đ 'Inalienable' means that human rights cannot be taken away from an individual, signifying their inherent nature.
- đ± 'Fundamental' refers to the basic rights that form the foundation for other rights and are essential to human dignity and worth.
- đ 'Inherently' indicates that human rights are a natural part of being human, not granted by any external authority but rather an intrinsic aspect of humanity.
- đ· 'Entitled to' implies that these rights are owed to every individual simply for being human, and are not conditional or discretionary.
- đĄ The concept of human rights is rooted in the ideas of dignity and worth, emphasizing the value of individuals and their right to live a dignified life.
- đ 'Universality' of human rights means that they apply to all people regardless of any differences, suggesting a connection to natural law.
- đ 'Inalienable' nature of human rights is reiterated, emphasizing that no situation can justify the removal of these fundamental rights.
- đ 'Indivisible' highlights the interconnectedness of human rights, indicating that the violation of one right impacts the integrity of all others.
- đ The script introduces the foundational stones of human rights with an analogy of a cooking pot supported by three stones, representing universality, inalienability, and indivisibility.
- đ The video promises a deeper discussion and historical context on human rights in the subsequent video, indicating a continuation of the topic.
Q & A
What does the term 'inalienable' mean in the context of human rights?
-In the context of human rights, 'inalienable' means that the rights cannot be taken away from a person. They are inherent and belong to an individual simply by virtue of being human.
What is the significance of 'fundamental rights' in the definition of human rights?
-Fundamental rights are basic rights that form the basis for other rights and are essential for a person's dignity and existence. They are the foundational stones upon which other rights are built.
What does the term 'inherently entitled' imply about human rights?
-'Inherently entitled' implies that every person has a natural and essential claim to these rights by the mere fact of being human, without the need for any external grant or condition.
How does the concept of 'dignity' relate to human rights?
-Dignity is a foundational idea behind human rights, suggesting that every individual has an inherent worth and should be treated with respect, which is reflected in their rights to live a dignified life.
What is the foundational idea of 'worth' in the context of human rights?
-The foundational idea of 'worth' in human rights refers to the intrinsic value of every individual, which justifies their entitlement to rights and the recognition of their importance in society.
Can you explain the African proverb 'two stones cannot support a cooking pot' in relation to human rights?
-The African proverb 'two stones cannot support a cooking pot' is used to illustrate the concept that human rights are interdependent and interconnected. Just as a pot needs more than two stones to be stable, human rights need all three foundational aspectsâuniversality, inalienability, and indivisibilityâto be upheld effectively.
What does 'universality' of human rights mean?
-Universality of human rights means that these rights apply to every person, regardless of their nationality, ethnicity, religion, or any other status. It emphasizes that human rights are a common standard for all humanity.
What is the concept of 'indivisibility' in the context of human rights?
-Indivisibility in the context of human rights means that all rights are interconnected and interdependent. If one right is violated, it can affect the enjoyment of other rights, emphasizing the need to protect and uphold all rights together.
Why is it said that human rights 'trump other priorities'?
-Human rights are said to 'trump other priorities' because they are considered inherently more valuable and cannot be overridden by other considerations. This highlights the fundamental importance of human rights in all situations.
What is the significance of the 'Wright's soup' illustration in explaining human rights?
-The 'Wright's soup' illustration is used to visually represent the three foundational aspects of human rightsâuniversality, inalienability, and indivisibilityâas the three stones supporting a cooking pot. It shows that like the stones, all three aspects are necessary to maintain the stability and integrity of human rights.
What is the historical context that will be discussed in the next video regarding human rights?
-The next video will delve into the historical development and evolution of the understanding of human rights, exploring how societies and global institutions have come to recognize and define these fundamental rights over time.
Outlines
đ Understanding Human Rights
This paragraph introduces the concept of human rights as inalienable and fundamental rights that every person possesses by virtue of being human. The term 'inalienable' is explained as a right that cannot be taken away, while 'fundamental' refers to basic rights upon which other rights are built. The word 'inherently' is used to describe these rights as essential and natural parts of being human. The paragraph emphasizes the idea that human rights are owed to individuals simply for being human. It also touches on the origins of this concept, linking it to the dignity and worth of individuals, and their right to live a dignified life. The paragraph concludes by hinting at the importance of three aspects of human rights, which are likened to the three legs of a cooking pot, suggesting that all are necessary for stability.
đ The Three Pillars of Human Rights
Paragraph 2 delves into the three key properties of human rights: universality, inalienability, and indivisibility. Universality is described as the application of human rights to every person regardless of their circumstances, emphasizing that these rights are inherent and cannot be taken away. The concept of inalienability is further explored, reinforcing that human rights are more valuable than other priorities and cannot be removed under any circumstances. Indivisibility is introduced as the interconnectedness of all human rights, suggesting that each right is linked to others and that the removal of one would affect the others. The paragraph uses the metaphor of a cooking pot supported by three stones to illustrate the importance of each of these properties in maintaining the stability and integrity of human rights.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄHuman Rights
đĄInalienable
đĄFundamental
đĄInherently
đĄEntitled
đĄDignity
đĄWorth
đĄUniversality
đĄIndivisible
đĄInterconnected
đĄWright's Soup
Highlights
Definition of human rights as inalienable fundamental rights inherent to all individuals simply for being human.
Explanation of 'inalienable' as a right that cannot be taken away from an individual.
Clarification of 'fundamental' as basic rights that other rights are built upon.
Discussion on 'inherently entitled' meaning rights are essential and natural to being human.
Mispronunciation and correction of the word 'entitled'.
The origin of human rights ideas based on dignity and worth, emphasizing the value of individuals and their right to a dignified life.
Introduction of the African proverb 'two stones cannot support a cooking pot' to illustrate the foundational aspects of human rights.
Creation of 'Wright's soup' as a metaphor to explain the three foundational stones of human rights.
First foundational stone: Universality, meaning human rights apply to everyone without exception.
Second foundational stone: Inalienability, emphasizing that human rights cannot be taken away under any circumstances.
Third foundational stone: Indivisibility, highlighting the interconnectedness of all human rights.
The importance of not removing any human right, as it would affect the integrity of all other rights.
Connection between universality and natural law, suggesting a broader philosophical underpinning to human rights.
The concept that human rights are more valuable than other priorities and are considered inherently inalienable.
The upcoming deeper discussion about the history of human rights understanding in the next video.
Promise of an exploration into the historical development of the concept of human rights.
Transcripts
before we get too far in this course we
want to give you a little bit of a
definition of how we understand human
rights today so let's write this down
human rights are
inalienable fundamental rights to which
a person is inherently entitled simply
for being human now there are a lot of
big words in there so let's break this
down a little bit
inalienable just means that it's a right
that can't be taken away from you so it
means it can't be alienated from you
fundamental just means it's a basic
right a right that sort of like you
stand on the ground it's sort of a basic
right that other things stand upon it
and so here rights we've talked about
this in our in our last video so you
should remember that and if you don't
you can go back and look at that video
so enable fundamental rights to which a
person is inherently and here we've got
another strange word inherently means
it's essential it's a part of being a
human it's basically just a part of that
and it's a natural part of it I guess it
may be a good way of describing it and
entitled to and I spelled in title 2
incorrectly we'll take that I out there
entitled means it's owed to you so you
are owed for just being a human you are
owed this fundamental right which is not
to be taken away from you now where does
this idea come from well really in a way
all of this is founded on two sort of
ideas one is dignity
and the other is worth so in a way you
can kind of simplify this to the value
of individuals and their right to live a
dignified life so that is sort of the
way we define and understand human
rights today what is maybe what are some
may be aspects of human rights that are
really important to understand well
there are three and it actually fits
along very well with an African proverb
that says two stones cannot support a
cooking pot and we are going to make an
illustration to describe this entire
thing here to do it we are going to make
something called Wright's soup so here
we going to make a big soup bowl sitting
on some stones and you've got our rites
soup in here it's orange for some reason
there's our soup maybe there's like a
carrot in here or something like that
no it's a right soup and it's sitting on
these three stones right here and
there's some firewood underneath there
I've got a little blaze going which
means our fun soup is warming up now if
we were to pull out one of these stones
the soup would tip over
maybe nothing to eat so what would we
then be basing these the soup bowl on
are these fundamental stones these
foundational stones and the foundational
stones of rites are these three things
first of all we've got universality so
Universal we'll just say that all human
rights are universal they are
inalienable so you'd recognize that One
Laptop their inalienable and they are
indivisible
is it bill there we go so what does that
mean Universal means that human rights
apply to everyone no matter what every
person all humans can't take it away
cross entire spectrum of humanity so in
some ways that's why there are lots of
people out there who try to make a
connection between this universality and
natural law I think you guys might
remember that from our last video
inalienable this means that they can't
be taken away and this is a part of the
discussion what you might which you
might hear quite a lot which means that
you can't take them away just because
there's not there's no really there's no
situation where you really can say well
we can take human rights away because we
have this other thing that's more
important at this moment so a lot of
people will call this trump card Human
Rights trump other sort of priorities
because they are more valuable and they
are inherently inalienable which means
you can't take them away all right and
then we have indivisible which basically
just means that they are interconnected
so we've got maybe these three here
maybe there's more rights that we would
actually be showing but each one of them
is connected to the other individual
means they're completely interrelated
they're completely tied and if you take
one away then all the other ones suffer
so that means this indivisible nature of
Rights makes them essential that makes
it essential that one is always there
with all of its others and if you take
one away then the others will suffer so
there you go we have these three
properties down here we have our
definition and here we have the sort of
the foundation sort of foundational
ideas and that is sort of how we
understand human rights today we're
going to have a much deeper discussion
about these things
and in the next video were actually even
going to talk about the history of how
we came to this understanding in the
first place
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)