Asch Conformity Experiment
Summary
TLDRThe script details Solomon Asch's classic conformity experiment, where participants were asked to match a line's length amidst group pressure to conform. It explores how social forces influence perception, with 37% conforming due to informational or normative influences. The experiment also shows that conformity decreases when unanimity is broken or when responses are private, highlighting the power dynamics within group settings.
Takeaways
- 🔍 The script describes an experiment by Solomon Asch that examines conformity under social pressure, specifically regarding the perception of line lengths.
- 🎯 The task in the experiment is to identify which of three lines matches the length of a line presented on the left side of a card.
- 👥 The experiment involves a group setting where only one person is a real subject, and the others are confederates instructed to give incorrect answers.
- 👀 Subjects often conform to the group's incorrect answers, with 37% of them going along with the group on critical trials.
- 🤔 Asch found that subjects' conformity was based on different reasons, such as believing the group must be right or wanting to avoid conflict.
- 👫 Providing a partner to the naive subject who also gives the correct response significantly reduces conformity, dropping to only 5% of critical trials.
- 🔗 The power of the group seems to stem not just from its numbers but also from the unanimity of its opposition, which can be diminished by breaking that unanimity.
- 📉 Conformity can be categorized into informational conformity, where individuals are convinced by the group's correctness, and normative conformity, driven by fear of group disapproval.
- 📝 In a variation of the experiment, subjects were told to write their answers privately, which greatly reduced conformity due to the absence of group criticism.
- 📉 The private response experiment shows that the normative factor of conformity is significantly influenced by the fear of public disapproval.
- 📚 Asch's experiment is a classic in social psychology, demonstrating how people can deny their own perceptions under group pressure and providing insights into the conditions that affect conformity.
Q & A
What is the main purpose of the experiment described in the script?
-The main purpose of the experiment is to examine the influence of social forces on individual perception and behavior, specifically focusing on the conformity of perception under group pressure.
What is the task given to the participants in the experiment?
-The task is to compare the length of a line on the left with three lines on the right and determine which of the three lines is equal in length to the one on the left.
What role do the confederates play in the experiment?
-The confederates are instructed to give wrong answers on some trials to observe how the real subject responds to group influence.
How does the experiment reveal the subject's conformity to the group?
-The experiment reveals conformity when the subject, despite seeing the correct answer, agrees with the group's incorrect answers due to the pressure to conform.
What percentage of critical trials did subjects conform in Solomon Asch's experiment?
-Subjects conformed in 37% of the critical trials, going along with the group's incorrect judgments.
What were the different reasons subjects conformed to the group, as revealed by interviews?
-Subjects conformed either because they genuinely believed the group was correct, or to avoid discomfort by not disagreeing with the group.
What effect did having a partner who also gave the correct response have on conformity?
-Having a partner reduced conformity to only 5% of the critical trials, showing that the unanimity of the group's opposition significantly influences conformity.
What is informational conformity, and how does it differ from normative conformity?
-Informational conformity occurs when individuals conform because they believe the group is right, while normative conformity happens when individuals conform to avoid disapproval from the group for deviating.
How does the experiment demonstrate the power of group unanimity on conformity?
-The experiment shows that when the group's unanimity is disrupted, such as by having a partner who agrees with the subject, the group's power to influence conformity is greatly reduced.
What was the effect of allowing subjects to write their answers privately in another variation of the experiment?
-Allowing subjects to write their answers privately reduced conformity by two-thirds, indicating that the fear of group criticism is a significant factor in conformity.
What broader implications does Asch's experiment have for understanding human behavior?
-Asch's experiment has broader implications for understanding how people may deny their own perceptions and submit to group pressure, and it helps to study the conditions that increase or reduce conformity.
Outlines
🔍 The Solomon Asch Experiment on Conformity
This paragraph introduces the Solomon Asch experiment, which investigates how social pressure influences individual perception and behavior. The experiment involves participants comparing line lengths on cards, with one real subject and several confederates instructed to give incorrect answers. The real subject is expected to conform to the group's incorrect judgments, demonstrating the power of social influence. Asch found that 37% of subjects conformed in critical trials, with various reasons for doing so, including believing the group was right or wanting to avoid conflict. The paragraph also discusses the effects of providing a partner to the naive subject, which significantly reduced conformity due to the group's unanimity being challenged.
🤝 The Impact of Partnership on Conformity
This section delves into the effects of having a partner in the Asch experiment. When a naive subject is given a partner who also gives the correct response, the likelihood of the subject conforming to the group's incorrect answers drops to just 5%. Subjects may feel warmth and connection towards their partner but often deny that this influenced their own responses. The partnership variation highlights that the group's power is not just in its numbers but also in its unanimous opposition, which, when disrupted, lessens the group's influence significantly.
🤔 Types of Conformity: Informational and Normative
This paragraph distinguishes between two types of conformity: informational and normative. Informational conformity occurs when individuals conform because they believe the group's opinion is correct. In contrast, normative conformity is driven by the fear of group disapproval for deviating from the norm. The paragraph also describes an additional variation of Asch's experiment, where subjects are told to write down their answers privately due to arriving late. This private response setting removes the fear of group criticism, leading to a significant reduction in conformity rates, demonstrating the strength of the normative conformity factor.
👀 Observing and Studying Conformity
The final paragraph of the script emphasizes the significance of Asch's experiment as a classic study in social psychology. It allows researchers to observe conformity directly and to examine the conditions that either increase or decrease its occurrence. The experiment not only reveals the extent to which people will deny their own perceptions under group pressure but also provides insights into the dynamics of social influence and the factors that can mitigate it.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Experiment
💡Conformity
💡Social Forces
💡Perception
💡Confederates
💡Critical Trials
💡Informational Conformity
💡Normative Conformity
💡Unanimity
💡Private Response
💡Solomon Asch
Highlights
The experiment examines behavior under the pressure of social forces, as demonstrated by Solomon Asch's study.
Participants were asked to compare the lengths of lines, identifying which of the three lines matched a standard line.
Only one person in the group was a real subject; the others were confederates instructed to give wrong answers on certain trials.
Initially, the subject provides the correct answer, but on the third trial, the subject conforms to the incorrect group response.
Asch found that subjects conformed to the group on 37% of the critical trials.
Subjects conformed for different reasons; some believed the group was correct, while others conformed to avoid conflict.
In some cases, subjects genuinely believed that the group was correct, leading to a distortion of their judgment.
In other cases, subjects knew the group was wrong but conformed to avoid discomfort, indicating a distortion at the level of response.
Introducing a partner who also gave the correct response reduced conformity to 5% of the critical trials.
Despite feeling warmth towards the partner, subjects typically denied that the partner influenced their independent judgment.
The experiment demonstrated that the group's power was significantly reduced when unanimity was broken.
Informational conformity occurs when we are convinced the group is correct, while normative conformity arises from fear of disapproval.
In a variation where subjects wrote their answers privately, conformity dropped by two-thirds, showing the impact of group pressure.
Asch's experiment revealed that people often deny their own perceptions to submit to group pressure.
The study provided insights into the conditions that increase or reduce conformity, making it a classic in social psychology.
Transcripts
but an experiment is not a public
opinion poll
it examines behavior under the pressure
of social forces
as the experiment of solomon ash reveals
the experiment you'll be taking part in
today involves the perception of
lengths of lines as you can see here i
have a number of cards
and on each card there are several lines
your task is a very simple one you're to
look at the
line on the left and determine which of
the three lines on the right
is equal to it in length all right we'll
proceed in this order
you'll give your answer only one of the
people in the group is a real subject
the fifth person with the white t-shirt
the others are confederates of the
experimenter and have been told to give
wrong answers on some of the trials
the experiment begins uneventfully as
subjects give their judgments
two two two
two two
three three
three three three but on the third trial
something happens two
two two
two
two the subject denies the evidence of
his own
eyes and yields to group influence
ash found subjects went along with the
group on 37
of the critical trials but he found
through interviews
that they went along with the group for
different reasons
one one they must be right
there for them and one of me one
this subject's yielding is based on a
distortion of his judgment
he genuinely believes that the group is
correct
one one
one two
one two
two two
i know they're wrong but why should i
make waves two
in this case the subject knows he is
right but goes along to avoid the
discomfort of disagreeing with the group
here the distortion is at the level of
his response
two two
two two
in the previous experiment the naive
subject stood alone against the group
in this variation ash gave the naive
subject a partner
here seated in the third position who
also gives the correct response
one one
two one
two with a partner yielding drops to
only five percent of the critical trials
compared to thirty seven percent without
a partner
although subjects report warmth and good
feeling toward the partner they
typically deny that he played a role in
their own independence
the partnership variation shows that
much of the power of the group
came not merely from its numbers but
from the unanimity of its opposition
when that unanimity is punctured the
group's power is greatly reduced
sometimes we go along with the group
because what they say convinces us they
are right
this is called informational conformity
but sometimes we can form because we are
apprehensive that the group will
disapprove if we are deviant
this is called normative conformity the
strength of the normative factor is
shown in another variation carried out
by ash
in this variation the subject is told
that because he had arrived late
you would have to write his answers
subjects in this private response
experiment are exposed to the same
amount of misleading information as
other subjects but they are immune from
any possible criticism by the group one
one one and this enormously reduces the
pressure to conform
conformity drops by two thirds
ash's experiment is a classic it reveals
how people will deny what they see
and submit to group pressure it allows
us not only to observe conformity
but to study the conditions that
increase or reduce its occurrence
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)