Curso completo de Raciocínio Lógico para Concursos Públicos 2019 Aula 17

Summary

The script presents a logical reasoning exercise involving a mystery about who ate the last slice of cake and who broke a vase. Characters named Bruna, Carol, Aline, Walison, Bosco, Kleber, and Daniel are involved, each making statements that either accuse or deny their involvement. The narrative walks through different hypotheses to deduce the truth-teller and the culprit in both scenarios. The exercise is a lesson in critical thinking, using deduction to resolve the conflicts in statements and identify the guilty party.

Takeaways

• 😀 The script is a lesson on logical reasoning involving a case study about who ate the last slice of cake.
• 🔍 Three individuals, Aline, Bruna, and Carol, are suspected of eating the cake, and they make contradictory statements.
• 📝 Aline accuses Bruna of eating the cake, Bruna denies it and accuses Aline of lying, and Carol simply states she didn't do it.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The task is to deduce who is telling the truth and who ate the cake based on their statements.
• 🤔 The script suggests a methodical approach to eliminate possibilities and identify the one who is lying.
• 📉 The first hypothesis is that Aline is lying, which is discarded because it doesn't fit the scenario where only one person is lying.
• 📉 The second hypothesis is that Bruna ate the cake and is lying, but this is also discarded as it leads to a contradiction.
• 📉 The final hypothesis is that Carol ate the cake, which fits the scenario where only one person is lying and the others are telling the truth.
• 🏁 The conclusion is that Carol is the one who ate the cake, as it is the only scenario that doesn't create a contradiction among the statements.
• 📚 The script also introduces a similar problem involving a broken vase and statements from Walison, Bosco, Kleber, and Daniel.
• 👀 The method used in the cake scenario is suggested to be applied to the vase scenario to find out who broke it.

Q & A

What is the main subject of the lesson in the transcript?

The main subject of the lesson is logical reasoning and problem-solving related to a case study involving a cake incident at the Carlos Chagas Foundation.

What is the first case presented in the lesson about?

The first case is about determining who ate the last slice of the grandmother's cake, with three suspects: Bruna, Carol, and Aline, and their respective statements.

What is the logical approach used to solve the cake case?

The logical approach involves formulating hypotheses about who ate the cake and analyzing the truthfulness of each person's statement to deduce who is lying and who is telling the truth.

According to the transcript, who is suspected of eating the last slice of the cake?

Initially, Bruna and Carol are suspected of eating the last slice of the cake.

What statement does Bruna make in response to the accusation?

Bruna states that Aline is lying, implying that Aline is the one who ate the cake.

What is the conclusion of the first case in the transcript?

The conclusion is that Carol is the one who ate the cake, as she is the one lying about not having eaten it.

What is the second case presented in the lesson?

The second case involves determining who broke a vase at home, with four suspects: Bosco, Alves, Kleber, and Daniel.

What statement does Alisson make regarding the vase incident?

Alisson claims that Bosco is the one who broke the vase.

What logical reasoning is applied to solve the vase case?

The logical reasoning involves analyzing each suspect's statement and cross-referencing them to determine who is telling the truth and who is lying.

What is the significance of the approach used in solving these cases?

The approach is significant as it teaches students how to apply logical reasoning to analyze statements and solve problems involving truth and deception.

How does the transcript suggest improving the problem-solving process?

The transcript suggests improving the process by formulating all hypotheses first and then analyzing each statement, which can make the analysis more efficient.