Ssuuna Golooba-Mutebi - Britain Does Owe Reparations
Summary
TLDRThe speaker argues for reparations as a means of making amends for historical colonial injustices, focusing on the British Empire's impact on Africa. They refute the notion that colonialism was a civilizing mission, highlighting the exploitation and cultural damage it caused. The talk addresses common defenses against reparations, such as the irrelevance of past actions, and emphasizes the ongoing legacy of colonialism in wealth disparities and cultural erasure. The speaker advocates for recognition of historical privilege and the need for Britain to acknowledge and address its colonial past.
Takeaways
- 📚 The script discusses the concept of reparations as a means of making amends for historical wrongs, focusing on Britain's colonial past and its impact on former colonies.
- 🌍 It emphasizes the vast reach of the British Empire, which at its peak ruled over a significant portion of the world's population and land area.
- 🏛 The speaker refutes the notion that colonialism was purely about civilizing 'savages', highlighting the rich cultures and civilizations that existed in Africa before colonial intrusion.
- 🤝 The argument challenges the idea that descendants should not be held accountable for the actions of their ancestors, pointing out the ongoing legacy of wealth and inequality stemming from colonial exploitation.
- 💰 The script acknowledges the complexity and difficulty of quantifying reparations, suggesting that it's not just about financial compensation but also about recognizing historical harm.
- 🏛️ The destruction of cultural heritage and the theft of artifacts, such as the Benin bronzes, are cited as examples of the cultural damage caused by colonialism.
- 🗣️ The speaker argues against the notion of 'white guilt', stating that reparations are about acknowledging the suffering and exploitation of colonized peoples.
- 👥 The script mentions specific instances of colonial violence, such as the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya, to illustrate the severity of the oppression faced by colonized peoples.
- 💬 It critiques the idea that Britain should stop apologizing for its colonial history and instead take responsibility for the impact of its actions.
- 🌐 The speaker calls for a broader understanding of reparations that goes beyond financial compensation, including the repatriation of stolen cultural artifacts and a recognition of historical injustices.
- 📢 The conclusion urges the audience to support the motion for reparations as a means of addressing the legacy of colonialism, rather than dismissing it as a thing of the past.
Q & A
What is the central argument of the speaker in the transcript?
-The speaker argues that Britain should make amends for its colonial past, emphasizing that reparations are not just about financial compensation but also about acknowledging the historical harm and division caused by colonialism.
What does the speaker mean by 'reparations' in the context of the debate?
-The speaker defines 'reparations' as the action of making amends for past wrongs by providing payment or other forms of assistance to those who have been wronged, extending beyond mere financial handouts to include recognition of cultural and historical damages.
Why does the speaker choose to focus mainly on the African experience of British colonialism?
-The speaker, being of African descent, chooses to focus on the African experience to provide specificity to the argument, while leaving the case for other territories to be made by colleagues.
How does the speaker address the counter-argument that Britain should not pay reparations because the colonial era is in the past?
-The speaker argues that the advantages and disadvantages of colonialism continue to affect subsequent generations, and that the wealth and infrastructure built in Britain were financed through the exploitation of colonized lands and peoples.
What is the speaker's response to the idea that descendants should not be blamed for the actions of their ancestors?
-The speaker acknowledges the principle but points out that the wealth and cultural advantages gained by the colonizers continue to impact the present, and thus the descendants of colonizers still benefit from these historical injustices.
What historical example does the speaker provide to illustrate the destructive impact of colonialism on African societies?
-The speaker cites the example of the Benin Empire, where British forces destroyed the city, killed thousands, and looted precious artifacts, which were then sold around the world, erasing centuries of history and culture.
What is the speaker's stance on the argument that reparations should be a financial transaction for the return of stolen artifacts?
-The speaker finds it absurd and unjust that the colonized should have to pay for the return of their own stolen artifacts, comparing it to a burglar demanding payment to return stolen goods.
How does the speaker address the issue of determining the amount of reparations?
-The speaker acknowledges the difficulty in quantifying reparations, stating that it would require a revolution in power structures and that no amount of money can truly atone for the cultural and historical damage done.
What is the significance of the Mau Mau rebellion compensation mentioned by the speaker?
-The compensation to survivors of the Mau Mau rebellion serves as an example of the British government admitting wrongdoing and providing some form of reparation, although the speaker argues that this is not enough.
What is the speaker's final appeal to the audience regarding the motion for reparations?
-The speaker urges the audience to support the motion for reparations as a means of acknowledging historical harm, recognizing the ongoing legacy of colonialism, and rejecting the notion that Britain need not make amends for its past.
How does the speaker refute the idea that advocating for reparations is about 'money grabbing'?
-The speaker emphasizes that the call for reparations is not about financial gain but about accepting the legacy of harm caused by colonialism and recognizing the suffering of colonized peoples.
Outlines
🏛️ Colonialism and the Call for Reparations
The speaker begins by defining reparations as a means to make amends for past wrongs, and sets the stage for a debate on whether Britain should make amends to its former colonies. The speaker challenges the notion that reparations are simply about financial handouts, emphasizing the broader scope of cultural and historical amends. The British Empire's vast reach and influence are highlighted, with a focus on the African experience. The speaker refutes the idea that colonialism brought only benefits, citing the disrespect and exploitation that characterized the colonial era. Examples of cultural denial and the destruction of African civilizations are provided, such as the case of the kingdom of Buganda and the denial of the construction of Great Zimbabwe by black Africans. The speaker argues against the argument that reparations are unnecessary because colonialism is a thing of the past, stating that the effects of colonialism continue to impact the present.
💰 The Legacy of Colonial Wealth and Inequality
This paragraph delves into the argument that descendants should not be held accountable for the sins of their ancestors, countering that the wealth and disadvantages of colonialism continue to affect subsequent generations. The speaker points out the inherited wealth of certain British families and the government's compensation to slave-owning families as separate issues. The focus is on the ongoing inequality rooted in colonial history, questioning the extent of Britain's wealth gained from colonial resources and exploitation. The speaker also addresses the cultural damage caused by colonialism, including the destruction of cultural heritage and the narrative that colonized people had no culture before the arrival of colonialists. The paragraph includes the example of the Benin Empire and the looting of its artifacts, highlighting the ongoing issue of repatriation and the absurdity of having to buy back stolen cultural property.
🕊️ Accepting Historical Responsibility and Moving Forward
The final paragraph addresses the misconception that reparations are about blaming current British people for past actions or seeking to bankrupt the country. The speaker argues that the demand for reparations is about acknowledging the legacy of harm caused by colonialism and recognizing the suffering and exploitation of colonized peoples. The speaker criticizes those who deny the need for Britain to make amends, suggesting that to side with the opposition is to deny the negative impacts of imperialism and to disregard the historical abuse of non-white peoples. The paragraph concludes with a call to admit the privilege gained at the expense of others and to support the motion for reparations, emphasizing the importance of respect for history and the experiences of those affected by colonialism.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Reparations
💡Colonialism
💡African Experience
💡Cultural Damage
💡Exploitation
💡Historical Inequality
💡Cultural Patrimony
💡Dehumanization
💡Imperialism
💡Legacy of Harm
💡Privilege
Highlights
The definition of reparation as the action of making amends for wrongs done by providing payment or other assistance to those wronged.
The broader scope of the motion to make amends beyond financial compensation, focusing on Britain's historical colonial actions.
The vast reach of the British Empire, ruling over one fifth of the world's population and a quarter of the Earth's land area.
The argument against the colonial narrative of 'civilizing savages', highlighting the existence of complex African civilizations before colonialism.
The critique of the 'white man's burden' as an insulting and naive justification for colonial exploitation.
The historical denial of African civilizations and the pressure on archaeologists to conform to colonial narratives.
The critique of King Leopold II's exploitation
Transcripts
[Music]
reparation the action of making amends
for a wrong one has done by providing
payment or other assistance to those who
have been wronged that is the definition
of the word under which I shall be
arguing tonight ladies and gentlemen but
first I would like to ask something of
you reparations for many people like the
first speak on the opposition carry
connotations of money grabbing or
financial handouts but this motion is
abouts more than that
thus I'd like you to think of its like
this as this house believes that Britain
must make amends to her former colonies
which clarifies the much wider scope of
this motion now the British Empire at
its height was the largest in history
ruling over about one fifth of the
world's population at the time and
covering almost a quarter of the Earth's
total land area given its vast breadth
the experiences of British colonialism
in Africa versus India versus the
Caribbean versus elsewhere in the world
are greatly different and so for the
purpose of providing some specificity I
intend to focus mainly on the African
experience being a began the descent to
myself and leave it to my steam
colleagues on the proposition to make
the case as for as other territories
before I move on to why Britain actively
owes reparations to our former colonies
I shall first in anticipation respond to
those who would say that Britain does
not and should not our reparations at
all I was made aware of a conversation
about this motion by a friend of mine a
short while ago in which the following
comment was made well I suppose then
that we should take back the roads the
education and the language as well at
the same time
this sort of argument this so-called
white man's burden to travel the ends of
the world enlightening and Christian
izing simple natives who would otherwise
have nothing is if I may be frank
insulting and quite naive Africa was the
home of ancient kingdoms long before the
arrival of colonialists with our own
cultures our own cities our own
religions and indeed our very own
languages where complex civilizations
were encountered they were denied John
Hanning Speke upon discovering the
kingdom of Buganda and its highly
developed society and constitutional
monarchy expounded the theory that these
people must be descended from a small
residue of the original European stock
even as late as the 1960s and 70s the
wise minority government of Rhodesia
denied that the ruin remains of a huge
ancient stone city in what is now
Zimbabwe had been built by black
Africans and pressured archaeologists
into doing the same the Scramble for
Africa by its own wording alone shows
what's little respect
these colonias had for the people within
these lands which they were rapaciously
partitioning amongst themselves so do
not let yourselves be deceived into
believing that British colonialism
despite the small amount of good which
had brought about in the form of
modernization was an altruistic endeavor
of civilizing savages when that was
simply a ruse for European powers to
take more land and mass greater wealth
and gain higher prestige and internal
power struggles over global dominance
king leopold ii of belgium put it well
when he said that he didn't want to miss
a chance of grabbing a slice of this
fine african cake for himself his
intentions were also declared as
humanitarian and philanthropist although
this somehow translated into forcing all
the natives into rubber latex extraction
chopping off their hands they did not
meet the impossible quotas causing the
deaths of 10 million people around 20 to
50 percent of the population at the time
and using the revenue from the rubber
sales to erect in Belgium many beautiful
arches parks and buildings including
ironically the Royal Museum for central
Africa but this motion is about Britain
and not Belgium so let's me not digress
the other defense often used against
calls for reparations is that this was
all done in the past and that's one
should not blame the descendants of
colonialists for their ancestors crimes
and that we should all move on this is
somewhat of a fair point as the adage
goes the son should not inherit the sins
of the father or indeed the daughter of
the mother but that is not what the
demand for reparations implies I won't
to mention the wealth inherited by
people like Benedict Cumberbatch and
David Cameron from the slave trade
including the hundreds of millions of
pounds paid us as compensation to slave
owning families by the British
government as that is a separate issue
the call for reparations recognizes that
all the advantages and disadvantages
gained by the colonizer and the
colonized continue to trickle down the
generations leaving a huge inequality
that is rooted in the past how much
wealth exactly do you think Britain
received from the oil the minerals ivory
precious metals and stones etc which it
let's be frank stole from other people
and the human capital which is exploited
in India in Africa and all over the
world Rome was not built in a day and
neither was Britain nor any other
colonial power
infrastructure cities and beautiful
buildings were financed with the
proceeds of colonial rule from resources
which were forcibly claimed as their own
thus to present the current states of
former colonies and colonial powers and
the people therein as totally
disconnected from their shared past is a
gross misrepresentation of the
historical reality indeed the son shall
not inherit the sins of the father but
is this shame that these sins cannot be
used as financial capital as well
otherwise I'm sure that the Sun would be
clamoring for such a request but let's
not ignore the cultural damage
colonialism brought on the world the
destruction and theft of one's patrimony
has an extremely pernicious effect on a
people's psyche denying their heritage
and upholding this narrative that's
there was no culture and no art and
nothing of worth before the colonialists
after failing to trick the ruler of
Benin of the Empire of Benin sorry inter
lobbing its annexation and despite
warnings that no foreigners could enter
the city during religious rituals the
British government sent a small
contingent of men in anyway what
happened
they were killed nine British soldiers
were killed in response Britain led a
punitive expedition
that's literally raised the Benin Empire
to the ground killed thousands and
utterly eradicated centuries of history
and looted innumerable innumerable
precious ancient artifacts that's were
then sold all over the world since we
are talking about making amends
how about Britain respond to modern-day
Nigeria's demands for these Benin
bronzes repatriation shockingly enough
the British Museum actually sold some of
these objects back to Nigeria in the 50s
and 70s now imagine the burglar who
destroyed your house telling you that in
order for you to get your stuff back you
have to buy it off him it's hard to
believe
no thank you how many more artifacts in
the British Museum and others across the
globe were pillaged from their countries
of origin
I suppose the concept of money given for
things taken only works one way
however to be fair in 2013 the British
government paid out 220 million pounds
in compensation to five thousand two
hundred and twenty eight survivors of
the Mau Mau rebellion against colonial
rule in Kenya from 1952 to 1960 and
mounting to around three thousand pounds
each the following are the words of one
participant in an interrogation at a
British detention camp in Kenya at the
time things got a little out of hand by
the time I cut his balls off
he had no ears and his eyeball the right
one I think was hanging out of its
socket too bad he died before we got too
much out of him some others were flogged
to death
others were roasted alive with estimates
of the death toll ranging from eleven
thousand to one hundred thousand now I
think that this demonstrates the extent
of colonial oppression and I say that's
this isolated incident of the British
government admitting wrongdoing is quite
honestly not enough nevertheless I am
not about to stand here and advocate for
the bankrupting of the Bank of England
some physical some figures estimates the
cost of reparations being in the
trillions now not only is that
unfeasible but it would also be
extremely difficult to implement why
well because firstly I believe it would
take a revolution in power structures
that I just cannot see ever happening
but there are also other issues at hand
to whom with the money be paid out and
how how would we avoid corrupt Patil
politicians embezzling this money these
points all valid however as I have
stated before this motion is not about
how much reparations should be or how
they should be given truthfully this
motion for me is not really even about
the money at all because I do not
believe that's one can put a price on
human suffering I do not believe that
any amount of money can atone for the
damage done to people's cultures their
histories mentalities and their dignity
but when people like Gordon Brown in
2005 can say that Britain must stop a
apologizing for its colonial history and
be proud of the great British values of
tolerance Liberty and civic duty which
the Empire spread across the globe then
I think there's CLE much more to be said
and done to close i reiterate that's the
demand for reparations is not about
money grabbing despots seeking to line
their pockets or embittered people of
color blaming any one of the British
people in this room right now for things
that's happened decades ago this is
about accepting the legacy of harm and
division
that's colonialism and divide and rule
brought this is about not perpetuating
white guilt but recognizing black and
brown suffering this is about admitting
the privilege which history brought on
one group of people via the
dehumanization exploitation and
oppression of others and announcing it
because ladies and gentlemen if you side
with the opposition tonight you shall
not be sparing Britain an eternity of
inherited debt and shame but saying that
you do not believe that Britain needs to
make any amends for the colonial era
that you do not think that imperialism
was a bad thing and that's racism
you're a centrism economic inequality
the whitewashing of history and the
simple lack of respect for non-white
people and the historical abuse is fine
and that is why I urge the house
proposed the motion
[Music]
Ver Más Videos Relacionados
Dr Shashi Tharoor MP - Britain Does Owe Reparations
Alpha Lee - Britain Does Not Owe Reparations
British empire killed 165 million Indians in 40 years: How colonialism inspired fascism
ENGLISH SPEECH | SHASHI THAROOR: Britain owes reparations to India (English Subtitles)
Dr. Shashi Tharoor - Britain Does Owe Reparations (Over 4 million views)
Colonialism
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)