NEW Goodyear DuraTrac RT vs NEW BF Goodrich KO3

Summary

This video compares the next-generation off-road tires, the Goodyear Duratrac RT and the BF Goodrich K3. It highlights their design improvements, such as the Duratrac's aggressive wave-like pattern and the K3's refined, streamlined pattern. The script delves into performance tests on dry and wet roads, snow, and off-road conditions, revealing each tire's strengths and weaknesses. The Goodyear Duratrac RT excels in wet and snow conditions with its 3D interlocking sipes and softer rubber, while the BF Goodrich K3 stands out on rocky terrain with its durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking blocks.

Takeaways

• 🚀 The video compares the new Goodyear Duratrac RT and BF Goodrich K3 tires, successors to the popular Duratrac and KO2 models.
• 🔍 The Duratrac RT features improved design elements like larger central blocks with more biting edges and an aggressive wave-like pattern.
• 🌪 The BF Goodrich K3 has a refreshed design with a more refined and streamlined pattern, offering better grip and handling on various terrains.
• 🏎 On dry roads, the K3 shows superior performance in longitudinal grip and lateral traction due to its optimized contact patch and shoulder lug design.
• 💡 Steering responsiveness is better in the K3 due to its balanced understeer on entry and solid on-center feel during turns.
• 🌊 In wet conditions, the Duratrac RT excels with its efficient water evacuation through 3D interlocking sipes and a softer rubber composition.
• ❄️ Both tires have three Peak Mountain Snowflake ratings, indicating excellent snow performance, but the Duratrac RT stands out with its Tractive Groove technology.
• 🏞 Off-road, the Duratrac RT provides superior performance on soft terrains like sand and mud, while the K3 excels on rocky surfaces.
• 🏔 The K3's durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking blocks offer better multi-directional grip on rocks.
• 🛠 The Duratrac RT's extractive groove technology effectively breaks down and evacuates mud, improving traction on muddy terrains.
• 📊 The overall verdict is that the Goodyear Duratrac RT has an edge in off-road performance compared to the BF Goodrich K3.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video script?

The main topic of the video script is a comparison between the Goodyear Duratrac RT and the BF Goodrich K3, two successor models of popular off-road tires.

What are the new design improvements in the Goodyear Duratrac RT compared to its predecessor?

The Goodyear Duratrac RT has larger central block lugs with more biting edges, a more aggressive wave-like pattern, aerodynamically aligned shoulder lugs with squared-off angles, and middle-facing notches for improved sideways grip.

What are the key features of the BF Goodrich K3's design?

The BF Goodrich K3 has a refined and streamlined pattern, with more packed central interlocking lugs for better grip, sharp chamfered edges, increased angled notches, and siping for enhanced traction in both wet and dry conditions.

How does the BF Goodrich K3 perform in terms of longitudinal grip?

The BF Goodrich K3 excels in longitudinal grip due to an optimized contact patch and central lugs that enhance rubber-to-road contact, resulting in smoother motion and improved traction.

What factors contribute to the lateral grip and steering responsiveness of the tires?

Lateral grip is influenced by the shoulder lug design, with the BF Goodrich K3 showing superior performance due to compact shoulder lugs with fewer voids and optimized biting elements. Steering responsiveness is affected by the tire's ability to maintain a consistent arc and balance power and steering, with the K3 providing more satisfactory mid-corner resistance and feedback.

How do the tires perform in wet conditions?

Performance in wet conditions relies on the efficient evacuation of water, facilitated by sipes and grooves on the tire. The Goodyear Duratrac RT shines in wet performance due to its more efficient 3D interlocking sipes and a softer rubber composition that allows for better water expulsion.

What is the significance of the 'Goodyear Tractive Groove Technology' mentioned in the script?

Goodyear Tractive Groove Technology refers to the secondary thread pattern or place biters at the base of the tire grooves, which enhances snow traction by picking up snow particles to create snow-to-snow contact, improving grip in snowy conditions.

How do the tires perform in off-road conditions, specifically on different terrains?

The Goodyear Duratrac RT delivers superior performance on softer sandy and muddy terrains, while the BF Goodrich K3 excels on rocky terrains due to its durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking hook-shaped blocks that provide multi-directional grip.

What is the role of the 'extractive Groove technology' in the Duratrac RT's performance?

Extractive Groove technology in the Duratrac RT helps break down mud particles, allowing them to be evacuated more effectively, improving mud traction and clearing properties.

How does the script suggest the overall off-road performance of the two tires?

The script suggests that the Goodyear Duratrac RT has the overall upper hand in off-road performance compared to the BF Goodrich K3, particularly on softer terrains and in snow.

What is the final call to action for viewers in the video script?

The final call to action for viewers is to share their thoughts in the comments, like the video, and subscribe for more content.

Outlines

00:00

🏎 Tire Comparison: DuraTrack RT vs. K3

This paragraph introduces a comparison between the Goodyear DuraTrack RT and the BF Goodrich K3 tires, successors to the popular Wrangler DuraTrac and BF Goodrich KO2. The script discusses design improvements, such as increased biting edges and wave-like patterns on the DuraTrack RT, and the aerodynamic and squared-off lugs on the shoulders. The BF Goodrich K3 is highlighted for its refined and streamlined pattern with more packed central lugs for better grip. The paragraph sets the stage for an exploration of these tires' performance in various conditions.

05:02

🏁 Performance Analysis: Dry, Wet, and Snowy Conditions

The second paragraph delves into the performance of the two tires in different driving conditions. It starts with dry performance, emphasizing longitudinal grip, where the BF Goodrich K3 excels due to optimized contact patch and central lugs. Lateral grip and steering responsiveness are attributed to the shoulder lug design, with the K3 showing superior performance. The paragraph then discusses wet performance, where the Goodyear DuraTrack RT stands out due to its 3D interlocking sipes and softer rubber composition, providing better water evacuation and grip. In snowy conditions, both tires perform well, but the DuraTrack RT is highlighted for its Tractive Groove technology and effective thread edge design, which enhance snow traction and performance in deep snow.

10:02

🚗 Off-Road Performance and Conclusion

The final paragraph wraps up the comparison by discussing off-road performance. The Goodyear DuraTrack RT is noted for its superior performance on soft terrains like sand and mud, while the BF Goodrich K3 is favored on rocky terrains due to its durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking blocks. The paragraph also mentions the DuraTrack RT's Extractive Groove technology for effective mud evacuation and its optimized sidewall for better control on sandy dunes. The script concludes by summarizing the overall off-road performance advantage of the DuraTrack RT and invites viewers to share their thoughts in the comments.

Keywords

💡Tire Comparison

Tire comparison is the central theme of the video, focusing on evaluating the performance of two types of tires: the Goodyear Duratrac RT and the BF Goodrich K3. The script discusses various aspects of these tires, such as design improvements, traction, and handling capabilities, to determine which is better suited for different driving needs.

💡Circumferential Grooves

Circumferential grooves are the longitudinal grooves on the tire's tread pattern that play a crucial role in water evacuation and traction. In the script, it is mentioned that both the Duratrac and its successor feature these grooves with Tractive Groove technology, which is an important aspect of their design for improved performance.

💡Tire Lugs

Tire lugs refer to the individual blocks of rubber on a tire's tread pattern that provide grip and traction. The script details how the lugs on the newer Duratrac model are larger with more biting edges and an aggressive wave-like pattern, which enhances their ability to handle rough terrains.

💡Shoulder Blocks

Shoulder blocks are the portions of the tire's tread pattern that are located on the sides of the tire. The script explains that these blocks on the BF Goodrich K3 have been redesigned to be more aerodynamically aligned with laterally oriented angles, contributing to improved sideways grip.

💡Siping

Siping is the process of cutting thin slits into the rubber of a tire's tread to improve traction on soft or slippery surfaces. The script mentions that the shoulder lugs on the BF Goodrich K3 have more pronounced siping for better grip, which is a key feature for off-road performance.

💡Longitudinal Grip

Longitudinal grip refers to the tire's traction on straight roads, which is primarily measured by braking distance and acceleration time. The script discusses how the BF Goodrich K3 excels in this area due to its optimized contact patch and central lugs, which provide better rubber-to-road contact.

💡Lateral Grip

Lateral grip is the tire's ability to maintain grip and control during cornering. The script explains that the BF Goodrich K3 demonstrates superior performance in lateral grip due to its compact shoulder lugs with fewer voids and an optimized array of biting elements.

💡Steering Responsiveness

Steering responsiveness is the tire's ability to respond quickly and accurately to steering inputs. The script indicates that the BF Goodrich K3 has better steering responsiveness compared to the Duratrac RT, which is important for handling and cornering performance.

💡Snow Traction

Snow traction is the tire's ability to maintain grip and control on snowy surfaces. The script highlights that both tires have three Peak Mountain Snowflake ratings, but the Goodyear Duratrac RT stands out due to its Tractive Groove technology and effective thread edge design, which enhances snow traction.

💡Off-Road Performance

Off-road performance is the tire's ability to perform well on various off-road surfaces such as sand, mud, and rocks. The script discusses how the Goodyear Duratrac RT delivers superior performance on softer terrains like sand and mud, while the BF Goodrich K3 excels on rocky terrains due to its durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking hook-shaped blocks.

💡Mud Traction

Mud traction is the tire's ability to maintain grip and move effectively through muddy conditions. The script explains that the Duratrac RT offers superior mud traction with its wider circumferential rings and extractive groove technology, which helps to break down and evacuate mud particles more effectively.

Highlights

Introduction of the Goodyear Duratrac RT and BF Goodrich K3 as successors to the Duratrac and KO2 tires.

Noteworthy design improvements in the Duratrac RT, including larger central blocks and more aggressive wave-like patterns.

Introduction of linear sipes in the Duratrac RT for better handling on rough terrains.

Aerodynamic alignment and squared-off shoulders in the Duratrac RT for improved grip.

BF Goodrich K3's refreshed design with a more refined and streamlined pattern.

The K3's central blocks offer more rubber to road contact for greater grip compared to the K2.

Enhanced grip in both wet and dry conditions for the K3 due to sharp chamfered edges and angled notches.

Dry performance analysis focusing on longitudinal grip, lateral traction, and steering response.

BF Goodrich K3's superior performance in dry handling due to compact shoulder lugs and optimized biting elements.

K3's steering responsiveness is better due to its under-steer tendency and solid on-center feel.

Efficient water evacuation in wet conditions facilitated by sipes and grooves on the tire.

Goodyear Duratrac RT's superior wet performance due to 3D interlocking sipes and softer rubber composition.

Performance in snow relying on maintaining forward momentum and responding to braking across surfaces.

Duratrac RT's superior performance in snow due to Tractive Groove technology and effective thread edge design.

Off-road performance comparison, with Duratrac RT excelling on softer terrains and K3 on rocky terrains.

Duratrac RT's extractive groove technology for better mud evacuation and wider circumferential rings for mud traction.

Optimized sidewall LS in Duratrac RT for better control and stability on sandy dunes.

Conclusion stating the Goodyear Duratrac RT's overall upper hand in off-road performance compared to the BF Goodrich K3.

Transcripts

welcome to compare the tire where our

most watched video to date the goodier

dura track versus the BF gridge ko2

provided some remarkable insights so I'm

naturally excited to introduce their

nextg successors the goodier dur track

RT and the newly launched BF Goodridge

K3 stay tuned guys as we explore these

updated tires testing their limits and

of course uncovering which is a better

pick for you driving

needs so what's changed with these

updated tires sure both the Wrangler dur

track and its successor the goodier dur

track R feature prominent

circumferential grooves with Tractive

Groove technology but the newer model

introduces some very noteworthy design

improvements for instance the sental

logs maintain their three pair block

configuration but are now slightly

larger and offer an increased number of

biting edges the most significant ific

an update to these Central blocks is of

course the sing design these lugs now

feature a more aggressive wave likee

pattern further enhanced by addition of

linear SES which make the tire more

adapt at handling rough terrains moving

towards the shoulders the lugs are now

more aerodynamically aligned have

laterally oriented angles and are more

squared off overall additionally these

lugs include middle facing notches and

more pronounced siping for improved

sideways grip and regarding the outer

edges the stagged shoulder design now

incorporates inblock notches along the

edges which extend to form robust

sidewall looks however there remains

some potential for further Improvement

in this area on the other hand the BF

Goodridge K3 offers a completely

refreshed design with a more refined and

stream line pattern the tire although

offers similar hook shaped Central

interlocking looks they are now

relatively more packed up together so

they offer more rubber to Road contact

providing greater grip compared to the

K2 plus with sharp chamfered edges and

increased angled notches and siping that

grip gets further enhanced in both wet

and dry conditions same is the case with

the shoulder blocks they although have

less aggressive ing Grove notches this

still offer sharp Cham fo edges and

updated siping providing Superior Car

and with similar staggered shoulder

edges and updated sidewall lugs they

provide great off-road performance as

well speaking of which let's see how

these tires performed on dry

roads now dry performance in tires is

analyzed through handling abilities

which include lateral traction and

steering response and of course the

effectiveness in maintaining directional

grip let's break down these elements one

by one starting with longitudal grip so

so the longitudinal grip pertains to the

tire's traction on straight roads

primarily measured by breaking distance

and acceleration time a critical Factor

here is the optimization of the central

thread area which Bears the most burned

of the tire's weight during straight

line motion the BF Goodridge K3 excels

here thanks to a more optimized contact

batch and sental lugs that enhance

rubber to Road contact and ensure IM

more even weight distribution compared

to the durat TR RT this results in a

smoother motion and improved traction

particularly due to the s-shaped looks

with Cham foot edges and more pronounced

offset sides when it comes to dry

handling there are two things to

consider the lateral grip and steering

responsiveness speaking of lateral grip

first it's influenced by shoulder lug

design for the most part and here the BF

Goodridge K3 demonstrates Superior

performance evidenced by lateral G

forces in comparison tests so why is

that well because the K3 features

compact shoulder looks with fewer voids

and an optimized array of biting

elements improving shoulder to Road

contact and enhancing lateral grip with

it plus the features like sharp jamet

edges and interlocking in Grove notches

further boost this traction but what

about the steering responsiveness why is

that better on the K3 compared to the

dur track RT well to understand that you

need to consider the three phases of

cornering so there's this initial entry

phase which involves downshifting

possibly and slowing down as the vehicle

approaches the turn so needless to say

it really depends on the tires breaking

abilities then comes the mid cornering

and here the focus is on maintaining a

consistent Arc balancing power and

steering so tires need to have a great

Under and Over steering balance here

then comes the exiting phase here as the

vehicle goes out of the corner its

ability to straighten back up is checked

and this is also called the on center

field of the tire now the BF Goodridge

K3 exhibits a tendency to under steer on

Entry but it still provides a more

satisfactory mid Corner resistance and

feedback plus it also maintains a more

solid on center field like I just talked

about where the steering remains firm

and responsive as the tire straightens

from the turn uring efficient handling

without any kind of weakness like

observed in the dura track ATI Tire when

comparing the performance in wet

conditions relies on the efficient

evacuation of water primarily

facilitated by SES and grooves on the

threat now grooves play a pivotal role

in displacing the the majority of the

water while Sipes which are small slits

in the thread help absorb any residual

moisture as they press against the wet

Road surface and this is where the

goodear dur track ATI shines although

this tire May slightly lag in terms of

steering responsiveness compared to the

K3 mainly because of its slightly

heavier weight it still ends up getting

more scores in overall vet performance

meaning it showcase less slippage and

offers greater vet breaking grip so why

is that well this is due to its more

efficient 3D interlocking SES and a

relatively softer rubber composition for

the most part both of these features

combined with wider thread voids allow

the dur TR RT to expel more water out in

all directions compared to the

K3 the performance of a tire in snow

hinges on its capacity to maintain

forward momentum navigate cor nerses and

respond on to braking across various

surfaces now here both tires with three

Peak Mountain snowflake ratings provide

superb performance and have much better

traction values over their predecessors

yet testing both these tires side by

side puts goodier dur track RT in a kind

of a better spot so the tire stands out

primarily due to the goodier Tractive

Groove technology this technology is

refered to the secondary thread pattern

or place biters at the base of the tire

grooves and it enhances snow traction by

actually picking up snow particles to

create snow to snow contact and of

course since snow sticks better on snow

this kind of contact is highly needed

furthermore the durat track ATI comes

with a more effective thread Edge design

featuring aggressive scooping lugs that

excel in deeper snow especially in terms

of acceleration basically the shoulder

and sidewall lugs act like shovels

pushing snow backwards and propelling

the vehicle forward the dur track RT

also incorporates a more sophisticated

siping structure that merges linear and

wave like cyes in the center with

aggressive interlocking structures on

the shoulders so you get better

performance on packed up snow with this

tire as well compared to the BF gridge

K3 off-road things get very interesting

where the goodar durat TR R delivers

Superior performance on softer Sandy and

muddy trains while the K3 excels on

rocks basically Rocky trains demand a

tire with great multi-directional grip

and robust side walls and the BF

Goodridge K3 stands out here offering

better traction with durable angled

sidewall lugs and Central interlocking

hook shaped blocks both of them together

enhance grip from all directions meaning

you get a better combination of lateral

and circumferential traction with K3 but

yes the tire lacks a little behind on

softer trains I mean unlike the ko3 the

durat track RTI offers wider

circumferential Rings separating Central

blocks from the shoulders which provide

Superior mud traction with better mud

clearing properties Additionally the

tire with extractive Groove technology

break down the mud particles so they are

evacuated more effec effectively in

comparison plus the Wrangler durat track

a features a more optimized sidewall LS

that spread out more efficiently under

reduced air pressure providing better

control and stability on Sandy Dunes so

overall it's safe to say that when it

comes to off-road performance the

Goodyear durat track RT has the overall

upper hand compared to the BF gridge

K3 so there you have it what do you guys

think do let me know in the comments

below and please don't forget to hit

that like button and subscribe see you

next time